cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Marthsian Y. Anakotta
Contact Email
marthsiananakotta@ukdc.ac.id
Phone
+6231-5946482
Journal Mail Official
jurnalsev@ukdc.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Darma Cendika Lantai 4 Gedung Vidya Loka, Ruang VL 4K Jl. Dr. Ir. H. Soekarno 201, Surabaya 60117
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Sapientia Et Virtus
Published by Universitas Katolik Darma Cendika
ISSN : 2355343X     EISSN : 27162273     DOI : 10.37477
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Tujuan jurnal ini adalah menyediakan tempat bagi akademisi, peneliti dan praktisi untuk menerbitkan artikel penelitian asli atau artikel ulasan. Ruang lingkup artikel yang diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini membahas berbagai topik, termasuk berbagai pendekatan untuk studi hukum seperti perbandingan hukum, hukum dan ekonomi, sosiologi hukum, dan antropologi hukum. Artikel juga dapat membahas bidang hukum yang spesifik, misalnya: hukum pidana, hukum perdata, hukum komersial dan bisnis, hukum internasional, hukum konstitusional, hukum administrasi, hukum adat, dan hukum sumber daya alam.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 126 Documents
 9   10   11   12   13 
Urgensi Pembentukan Undang-Undang Restorative Justice dalam Rangka Reformasi Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum di Indonesia Muhammad Alvin Nashir; Nabila Maharani; Aisyah Zafira
SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS Vol 9 No 1 (2024): March
Publisher : Darma Cendika Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37477/sev.v9i1.501

Abstract

Abstrak Keadilan restoratif merupakan proses penyelesaian perkara pidana dengan menggunakan pendekatan keadilan dan kesempatan memperoleh pemulihan kepada korban akibat perbuatan pidana yang dilakukan oleh pelaku. Sering kali, sistem peradilan pidana mengesampingkan hak-hak korban yang menderita dan dirugikan. Oleh sebab itu, hadirlah konsep baru sebagai teori kritis akan filosofis pemidanaan yang dikenal dengan restorative justice. Penelitian ini mempergunakan jenis penelitian hukum atas dasar pendekatan penelitian yuridis-normatif dimana diperoleh dengan studi kepustakaan. Di Indonesia, keadilan berbasis restoratif bermula dari sistem peradilan pidana anak yang dimanifestasikan dalam konsep diversi. Namun, peradilan pidana umum belum memuat pelaksanaan dari paham baru pemidanaan tersebut. Meskipun telah ditemukan pelbagai peraturan yang merujuk pada realisasi keadilan restoratif. Justru memicu kendala-kendala dalam proses penegakan hukum pidana yang kian memuncak. Peraturan tersebut juga tidak memberikan implikasi yang signifikan guna memperlancar proses legalitas dengan membentuk undang-undang mengenai restorative justice. Dimana bertujuan untuk membentuk legitimasi hukum bagi masyarakat luas dalam mereformasi sistem peradilan pidana yang tidak relevan di jaman sekarang. Oleh sebab itu, diperlukan urgensi perumusan undang-undang induk sebagai payung hukum pelaksanaan restorative justice secara konkrit dengan mengedepankan keadilan dan kepastian hukum. Kata Kunci: Keadilan restoratif, Urgensi, Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum. Abstract Restorative justice is the process of solving criminal cases using a justice approach and the opportunity to obtain recovery for victims due to criminal acts committed by perpetrators. Many times, the criminal justice system overrides the rights of both suffering and aggrieved victims. Therefore, there is a new concept as a critical theory of the philosophy of punishment known as restorative justice. This research uses a type of legal research on the basis of a juridical-normative research approach which is obtained by literature study. In Indonesia, restorative-based justice starts from the juvenile criminal justice system which is manifested in the concept of diversion. However, the general criminal court has not yet contained the implementation of the new definition of punishment. Although various regulations have been found that refer to the realisation of restorative justice. It actually triggers obstacles in the criminal law enforcement process that are increasingly mounting. The regulation also does not have significant implications to expedite the legality process by forming a law on restorative justice. Where it aims to form legal legitimacy for the wider community in reforming the criminal justice system that is irrelevant today. Therefore, the urgency of formulating the master law as a legal umbrella for the implementation of restorative justice is needed concretely by prioritising justice and legal certainty. Keyword: Restorative Justice, Urgency, Justice and Legal Certainty.
Marriage Between Religions Based on Human Rights Perspectives Nerisma Eka Putri; Khaidir Ali Junid; Muhammad Azkia Fahmi
SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS Vol 9 No 1 (2024): March
Publisher : Darma Cendika Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37477/sev.v9i1.540

Abstract

The controversy over religious marriages is still a matter of legitimate recognition by the state. The provisions of this regulation have not been explicitly regulated in the Act No. 16 of 2019 on the Amendment of the Regulation of the Law No. 1 of 1974. So researchers are interested to know the establishment of marriages of different religions based on the human rights perspective in the decision of the Supreme Court No. 1400K/Pdt/1986. This research is analytically descriptive, with an empirical jurisprudential approach and using the type of library research, to describe in depth about the topic of marriage from a different religious perspective through the understanding of concepts, understanding marriage rules, analyzing and concluding the results of research. So it is concluded that this problem does not have a point of legal clarity and creates a legal vacuum, so that this practice does not get a place in the eyes of the law. This practice of marriage is considered difficult to implement, so not a few people submit to the trust of their partners to carry out the marriage. According to the International DUHAM instrument, marriages of different religions are deemed to violate the right of every human being to enter into marriage. So the practice of marriage of different religions in the country of Indonesia is established on the basis of the decision of the Supreme Court No. 1400K/Pdt/1986. It's supposed to have got the attention of the government by issuing a new legal regulation
Perlindungan Hukum Indonesia Bagi Pemegang Hak Atas Pencantuman Merek Terkenal Pada Parfum Lokal Stefani Adelia Widyani; Febri Noor Hediati
SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS Vol 9 No 1 (2024): March
Publisher : Darma Cendika Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37477/sev.v9i1.544

Abstract

A form of preventive protection against the inclusion of well-known perfume brands on local perfumes is the existence of regulations in the form of provisions in Articles in Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Brands and Geographical Indications. Apart from that, the regulations include registration and licensing which also includes forms of preventive protection. A form of repressive protection for the owner of a famous perfume is in the form of a claim for compensation or termination of all actions related to the use of the brand or based on criminal prosecution through law enforcement officials. Owners of well-known foreign perfume brands are required to register their brands in Indonesia using the International Registration method according toMadrid Protocol as previously explained. After that, we will enter into a licensing agreement with a local perfume owner who wants to list a famous perfume brand in Indonesia.
Urgensi Penguatan Kewenangan KPPU Untuk Menegakkan Hukum Pada Tindak Pidana Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Muh. Syah Quddus; Atqo Darmawn Aji
SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): March
Publisher : Darma Cendika Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37477/sev.v10i1.726

Abstract

Persaingan usaha yang sehat merupakan faktor penting dalam mendorong perekonomian nasional yang adil dan kompetitif, yang diatur melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Meskipun KPPU berwenang untuk menegakkan hukum persaingan usaha, namun aturan mengenai acara pidana yang belum jelas menyebabkan kelemahan dalam penanganan perkara pelanggaran, sehingga memerlukan perubahan undang-undang untuk membuat kewenangan KPPU lebih tegas dan efektif. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis perlunya perubahan Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999 untuk memperkuat kewenangan KPPU dan meningkatkan efektivitas penegakan hukum persaingan usaha. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis-normatif, dengan menganalisis data sekunder dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa KPPU membutuhkan kewenangan yang lebih kuat untuk berfungsi secara efektif dalam menjaga persaingan usaha yang sehat di Indonesia. Penguatan kewenangan KPPU tidak hanya akan meningkatkan mekanisme penegakan hukum yang terkait dengan persaingan usaha, tetapi juga akan berkontribusi pada penciptaan lingkungan bisnis yang sehat, kompetitif, dan berkelanjutan .
Intelligence Oversight in Indonesia: The Dilemma of Human Rights and National Security Putra, Satria Rangga
SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): March
Publisher : Darma Cendika Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37477/sev.v10i1.633

Abstract

Democratic oversight of intelligence is an instrument to ensure that intelligence activities uphold the principles of human rights and protect liberties of civil society. Based on Law Number 17 of 2011 concerning State Intelligence, oversight is divided into two, internal and external. Internally it is carried out by each state intelligence administrator and externally through the Intelligence Oversight Team of House of Representative. Intelligence oversight has several problems, ranging from regulatory factors, conflicts of interest (political factors) to the weak capacity of oversight actors in assessing alleged violations and considerations of political stability and national security. This paper attempts to constructively analyze the regulation of intelligence oversight in Indonesia and various contemporary problems that surround it. This paper uses a normative juridical research method, with a concept and legislation approach. This research found that the attachment of oversight actors to the limits of intelligence secrets makes it all in a dilemma so that it is impossible to open up allegations of human rights violations of state intelligence to the public holistically. The existence of conflict of interest, void and unclear regulations, until threats to the members of State Intelligence Oversight Team is also a separate inhibiting factor in conducting oversight.
Perlindungan Hukum Ojek Online dalam Perspektif Hukum Pengangkutan di Indonesia Priska Evelyn; Utiyafina Mardhati Hazhin
SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): March
Publisher : Darma Cendika Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Technological advancements have transformed various aspects of life, including transportation. One of the innovations in this field is online motorcycle taxis, which offer convenience to the public through app-based services. However, despite their benefits, online motorcycle taxis face several challenges, particularly in legal and regulatory aspects. Some regions have even temporarily banned their operations due to the lack of recognition as public transportation under Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation. This study aims to analyze the legal position and protection of online motorcycle taxis from the perspective of transportation law in Indonesia. The research employs a normative juridical approach and literature study. The findings indicate that online motorcycle taxis fulfill the concept of transportation, which involves the movement of passengers or goods using a means of transport. However, since motorcycles are not categorized as public transport under existing regulations, online motorcycle taxis lack a strong legal foundation. The issuance of Minister of Transportation Regulation Number 12 of 2019 provides a legal basis for their operation and offers legal protection for drivers and passengers. Nonetheless, more comprehensive regulations are still needed to ensure legal certainty and better protection for all parties involved in online motorcycle taxi services

Page 13 of 13 | Total Record : 126

 9   10   11   12   13 

Filter by Year

2014 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): March Vol 9 No 1 (2024): March Vol 8 No 2 (2023): September Vol 8 No 1 (2023): March Vol 7 No 2 (2022): September Vol 7 No 1 (2022): March Vol 6 No 2 (2021): September Vol 6 No 1 (2021): March Vol 5 No 2 (2020): September Vol 5 No 1 (2020): March Vol 4 No 2 (2019): September Vol 4 No 2 (2019) Vol 4 No 1 (2019) Vol 4 No 1 (2019): March Vol 3 No 2 (2018) Vol 3 No 2 (2018): September Vol 3 No 1 (2018) Vol 3 No 1 (2018): March Vol 2 No 2 (2015) Vol 2 No 2 (2015): September Vol 2 No 1 (2015): March Vol 2 No 1 (2015) Vol 1 No 2 (2014): September Vol 1 No 2 (2014) Vol 1 No 1 (2014) Vol 1 No 1 (2014): March More Issue