cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Zaenal Arifin
Contact Email
zaenal@usm.ac.id
Phone
+6282242226898
Journal Mail Official
usmlawreview@usm.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Soekarno - Hatta
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW
Published by Universitas Semarang
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26214105     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v2i2.2266
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
Journal USM LAW REVIEW (JULR) is an academic journal for Legal Studies published by Master of Law, Semarang University. It aims primarily to facilitate scholarly and professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. The focus and scope of this journal are legal problems in the fields of Criminal Law; Civil Law; Constitutional Law; International Law; Administrative Law; Islamic Law; Business Law; Medical Law; Environmental Law; Adat Law; Agrarian Law; Legal Philosophy.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 35 Documents
 1   2   3   4 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): APRIL" : 35 Documents clear
Criminal Disparity in Judges' Decisions on The Crime of Sexual Intercourse Against Minors Himawan, Yuniar Yudha; Muhibbin, Moh; Parmono, Budi
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i1.11281

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to compare judges' decisions that give different sentences for the same criminal offense. Judges' decisions often provide different sentences for the same criminal offense because the positive criminal system in Indonesia uses an alternative system. This research raises the issue of why there is criminal disparity in the Supreme Court's decision related to the crime of sexual intercourse with a minor and how to reduce criminal disparity related to this crime. The urgency of this research is to find out and explain the imposition of criminal law, compare judges' decisions on the imposition of criminal law, and the impact of criminal disparity in cases of child sexual intercourse which has a serious impact on public confidence in the criminal justice system and the protection of children as a vulnerable group. This research is a normative juridical research using primary and secondary materials. The result of the research shows that: 1) There is a criminal disparity between Supreme Court Decision No. 2184K/Pid.Sus/2022 where the defendant was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and a fine of Rp. 30,000,000.00 with Supreme Court Decision No. 2199K/Pid.Sus/2022 where the defendant was sentenced to 2 years imprisonment and a fine of Rp. 20,000,000.00. 2) The cause of criminal disparity is a legal factor that does not contain guidelines for the imposition of punishment for the defendant.
Etika Bisnis dalam Hukum Islam: Implikasi terhadap Praktik Bisnis Modern Mufarrochah, Sylvia; Putri, Febri Falisa; Murtadho, Achmad; Assari, Elsa
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i1.11365

Abstract

This research aims to analyze modern business practices within Islamic business ethics and the challenges and opportunities in implementing modern business practices from the perspective of business ethics in Islamic law. The implications of the application of Islamic business ethics in modern business practices can be seen in efforts to create a balance between profit and morality, as well as addressing socio-economic problems that often arise in today's business world, such as unfair distribution of wealth, exploitation of labor, and environmental damage. The urgency of this problem is increasingly relevant when today's business world prioritizes the principle of profitability which sometimes conflicts with ethical values. Phenomena such as market manipulation, monopolistic practices, and exploitation carried out by large companies show the importance of implementing business ethics in Islam that emphasizes balance and sustainability. Therefore, it is important to conduct a more in-depth study of how the principles of Islamic business ethics can be adapted and integrated into modern business practices so that they not only provide economic benefits but also provide broad social benefits to society. The implementation of these ethics can also help increase public trust in the business world and create a more equitable and sustainable business environment. This type of research will use a qualitative approach and literature analysis to analyze Islamic economic values and business ethics. The qualitative approach involves a thorough examination of primary and secondary sources related to Islamic economic principles and ethics. This process will include an analysis of texts related to the topic. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk analisis terhadap praktik bisnis modern dalam etika bisnis Islam dan tantangan dan peluang dalam menerapkan praktik bisnis modern dalam perspektif etika bisnis dalam hukum Islam. Implikasi dari penerapan etika bisnis Islam dalam praktik bisnis modern dapat dilihat dalam upaya menciptakan keseimbangan antara profit dan moralitas, serta menanggulangi masalah sosial-ekonomi yang sering muncul dalam dunia bisnis saat ini, seperti ketidakadilan distribusi kekayaan, eksploitasi tenaga kerja, dan kerusakan lingkungan. Urgensi permasalahan ini semakin relevan ketika dunia bisnis masa kini mengedepankan prinsip profitabilitas yang kadang bertentangan dengan nilai-nilai etika. Fenomena seperti manipulasi pasar, praktik monopoli, serta eksploitasi yang dilakukan oleh perusahaan besar menunjukkan pentingnya penerapan etika bisnis dalam Islam yang menekankan pada keseimbangan dan keberlanjutan. Penting untuk melakukan kajian lebih mendalam tentang bagaimana prinsip-prinsip etika bisnis Islam dapat diadaptasi dan diintegrasikan dalam praktik bisnis modern, agar tidak hanya memberikan keuntungan ekonomi, tetapi juga memberikan manfaat sosial yang luas bagi masyarakat. Implementasi etika ini juga dapat membantu meningkatkan kepercayaan publik terhadap dunia bisnis dan menciptakan lingkungan usaha yang lebih adil dan berkelanjutan. Jenis penelitian ini akan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dan analisis pustaka untuk menganalisis nilai-nilai ekonomi dan etika bisnis Islam. Pendekatan kualitatif melibatkan pemeriksaan menyeluruh terhadap sumber-sumber primer dan sekunder yang terkait dengan prinsip-prinsip ekonomi dan etika Islam. Proses ini akan mencakup analisis teks-teks yang terkait dengan topik tersebut.
Legal Protection of Minors Whose Land Certificates are Used as Collateral for Debts Hidayat, Maxe; Rokhim, Abdul; Sunardi, Sunardi
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i1.11282

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal consequences of minors' land certificates used as debt collateral by their biological mothers and legal protection for minors whose land rights are used as debt collateral by their biological mothers. The research method used is normative juridical using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Minors (minderjarig) according to the law are not capable of performing legal acts independently, including in terms of making their land rights as forest collateral. Legal actions of minors whose fathers die can be represented by their biological mothers who act as guardians based on court decisions. The urgency of this research is to provide a description and analysis of guardians who replace their parents to replace minors to carry out legal processes by analyzing the cases raised. The case raised is the novelty of the results of this research analysis. The results of this study indicate that the legal consequences of a minor's land certificate used as debt collateral by his biological mother without going through the determination of the guardian and the power of attorney to make the minor's land rights from the court are null and void (nietig van rechtswege). The law (Article 393 of the Civil Code) has provided preventive legal protection against minors whose land titles are used as debt collateral by their biological mothers if this is done without the appointment of a guardian and power of attorney from the court. The minor's biological mother in her position as guardian is only authorized to make the certificate of land title on the basis of absolute necessity or clearly beneficial to the minor after hearing or legally summoning the child's immediate family or blood relatives and the supervisory guardian.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Sengketa Warisan Siraso-Raso Sumatera Utara Rahman, Rezi Alfarizi; Winanti, Atik
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i1.9473

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the judge's considerations and the protection of buyers of disputed land in case Number 75/Pdt.G/2017/PN Blg jo Case Number 1815K/Pdt/2020. Legal protection for buyers of land rights in inheritance disputes is very important in Indonesia, especially in North Sumatra. Inheritance disputes, such as the Siraso-Raso case, involve conflicts between heirs over the division of inherited land. The high number of land disputes in Indonesia indicates a land management problem that can threaten state security. This research method is juridical-normative. In this process, legal principles, rules, and theories are used to find solutions to specific problems. This research can offer a new way to interpret moral ethics by looking at the broader social, cultural, and economic context. In addition, it can provide practical recommendations that have not been made before. The Siraso-Raso case research can help the development of legal theory and practice in Indonesia, as well as discover the source of land dispute problems and create innovative and efficient solutions through in-depth and systematic analysis. This inheritance dispute involves a conflict between customary law and positive law regarding land ownership, which is an important issue in Indonesian agrarian law. Legal protection for disadvantaged parties, especially women, in inheritance disputes is still weak. The research is expected to help build a more equitable and inclusive legal system to resolve inheritance disputes and recommend legal education for the public regarding land sale and purchase transactions involving inheritance disputes. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hakim dan perlindungan terhadap pembeli tanah sengketa dalam perkara Nomor 75/Pdt.G/2017/PN Blg jo Perkara Nomor 1815K/Pdt/2020. Perlindungan hukum bagi pembeli hak atas tanah dalam sengketa waris sangat penting di Indonesia, khususnya di Sumatera Utara. Sengketa waris, seperti kasus Siraso-Raso, melibatkan konflik antara ahli waris atas pembagian tanah warisan. Tingginya angka sengketa tanah di Indonesia mengindikasikan adanya masalah pengelolaan tanah yang dapat mengancam keamanan negara. Metode penelitian ini bersifat yuridis-normatif. Dalam proses ini, asas-asas hukum, aturan-aturan, dan teori-teori hukum digunakan untuk menemukan solusi atas permasalahan tertentu. Penelitian ini dapat menawarkan cara baru untuk menginterpretasikan etika moral dengan melihat konteks sosial, budaya, dan ekonomi yang lebih luas. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga dapat memberikan rekomendasi praktis yang belum pernah dilakukan sebelumnya. Penelitian kasus Siraso-Raso dapat membantu pengembangan teori dan praktik hukum di Indonesia, serta menemukan sumber masalah sengketa tanah dan menciptakan solusi yang inovatif dan efisien melalui analisis yang mendalam dan sistematis. Sengketa warisan ini melibatkan konflik antara hukum adat dan hukum positif mengenai kepemilikan tanah, yang merupakan isu penting dalam hukum agraria di Indonesia. Perlindungan hukum bagi pihak yang dirugikan, terutama perempuan, dalam sengketa waris masih lemah. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat membantu membangun sistem hukum yang lebih adil dan inklusif dalam menyelesaikan sengketa waris dan merekomendasikan pendidikan hukum bagi masyarakat terkait transaksi jual beli tanah yang melibatkan sengketa waris.
Hubungan Hukum Terhadap Kepemilikan Hak Cipta Yang Dijadikan Merek Bagi Pencipta Dan Pemegang Merek Pratama, Revie Rachmansyah; Roisah, Kholis
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i1.10363

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the characteristics, legal protection, application of principles between copyright and trademarks, and the potential disputes that arise. The urgency of this research lies in the need for harmonization between the declarative principle in copyright and the first-to-file principle in trademarks to address the potential legal conflicts that often arise due to the overlapping protection of these two intellectual property rights. This research method uses a normative juridical type of research with secondary data as the main data. The research results indicate that differences in protection principles can trigger legal disputes, especially when elements of copyrighted works are used as trademarks without permission. The novelty of this research is the recommendation for the implementation of cross-database mechanisms and policies for the cancellation of trademark registrations that violate copyright to prevent conflicts. The novelty of this research is to examine the legal relationship between copyright and trademark more holistically, providing an approach based on the Economic Analysis of Law (EAL) to assess the effectiveness of legal protection. The recommendation of this research is that cross-database mechanisms and policies for the cancellation of trademark registrations that violate copyright should be implemented to prevent disputes. In conclusion, the harmonization of the declarative principle and the first-to-file principle can be achieved through enhanced synergy among relevant institutions, education for creators and entrepreneurs, and strengthened regulations to ensure fairness, legal certainty, and balanced protection of economic rights. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis menganalisis karakterisitik, perlindungan hukum, penerapan prinsip antara hak cipta dan merek serta potensi sengketa yang terjadi. Urgensi penelitian terletak pada perlunya harmonisasi antara prinsip deklaratif dalam hak cipta dan asas first to file dalam hak merek untuk mengatasi potensi konflik hukum yang sering terjadi akibat tumpang tindih perlindungan kedua hak kekayaan intelektual ini. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatf dengan menggunakan data sekunder sebagai data utama. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbedaan prinsip perlindungan dapat memicu sengketa hukum, terutama ketika elemen karya cipta digunakan sebagai merek tanpa izin. Kebaruan penelitian ini adalah mengkaji hubungan hukum antara hak cipta dan hak merek secara lebih holistik, memberikan pendekatan berbasis Economic Analysis of Law (EAL) untuk menilai efektivitas perlindungan hukum. Rekomendasi penelitian ini bahwa implementasi mekanisme lintas basis data dan kebijakan pembatalan pendaftaran merek yang melanggar hak cipta untuk mencegah sengketa. Kesimpulannya, harmonisasi prinsip deklaratif dan asas first to file dapat dicapai melalui peningkatan sinergi antara lembaga terkait, edukasi kepada para pencipta dan pelaku usaha, serta penguatan regulasi untuk memastikan keadilan, kepastian hukum, dan perlindungan hak ekonomi yang seimbang.
Keabsahan Akta Hibah Yang Digunakan Wajib Pajak Untuk Penghindaran Pajak Maharani, Mentari Rizkika; Wijaya, Vira; Sinawan, Carolina Isabela; Salsabila, Aurynanda; Alvina, Zenza Ayu
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i1.10714

Abstract

The aim of this research is to analyze the validity of gift deeds made by taxpayers with the aim of avoiding tax, by reviewing the role of Notaries in ensuring the legality of gift deeds as well as the relevance of tax provisions related to gifts of property which are part of the Notary's duties and responsibilities. The background of this research is based on several cases that occurred, namely related to the transfer of assets through gifts which are often used to avoid tax obligations. One of the prominent cases is the manipulation of gifts by a taxpayer with the initials TY, a Supreme Court judge, who during the investigation found that the addition of assets was not reasonable and many were made through gifts. The urgency of this writing lies in the importance of ensuring that the gift deed made by the Notary does not violate the law, considering that the Notary is a public official who is responsible for compiling and making authentic deeds. The research method used is normative juridical, with an analytical approach to applicable legal regulations. The research results show that gifts from equal family members who are not related to business are not subject to tax, considering that the practice of giving is often used for tax avoidance, the Notary needs to understand the tax rules related to gifts and sanctions for violations so that the gift deed prepared can be legally accounted for. The novelty of this research is that it identifies notary’s role and analyzes loopholes in regulations that allow taxpayers to take advantage of gift deeds to avoid tax obligations considering that familial grant transactions are often difficult to verify, thereby allowing for misuse by taxpayers. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis keabsahan akta hibah yang dibuat oleh wajib pajak dengan tujuan menghindari pajak, dengan meninjau peran Notaris dalam memastikan legalitas akta hibah serta relevansi ketentuan perpajakan terkait hibah harta yang menjadi bagian dari tugas dan tanggung jawab Notaris.  Latar belakang penelitian ini didasarkan pada beberapa kasus yang terjadi yaitu terkait pengalihan harta melalui hibah yang kerap digunakan untuk menghindari kewajiban pajak. Salah satu kasus yang menonjol adalah manipulasi hibah oleh wajib pajak berinisial TY seorang hakim agung yang dalam pemeriksaan ditemukan penambahan harta yang tidak wajar dan banyak dilakukan melalui hibah. Urgensi penulisan ini terletak pada pentingnya memastikan akta hibah yang dibuat oleh Notaris tidak melanggar hukum, mengingat Notaris adalah pejabat umum yang bertanggung jawab untuk menyusun dan membuat akta autentik. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, dengan pendekatan analisis peraturan hukum yang berlaku. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hibah dari anggota keluarga yang setara dan tidak terkait bisnis bukan merupakan subjek pajak, mengingat praktik hibah sering kali dimanfaatkan untuk penghindaran pajak maka Notaris perlu memahami aturan perpajakan terkait hibah dan sanksi atas pelanggaran agar akta hibah yang disusun dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara hukum. Kebaruan dalam penelitian ini adalah mengidentifikasi peran Notaris dan menganalisis celah-celah dalam regulasi yang memungkinkan wajib pajak memanfaatkan akta hibah untuk menghindari kewajiban perpajakan mengingat transaksi hibah yang bersifat familial sering kali sulit diverifikasi sehingga memungkinkan penyalahgunaan oleh wajib pajak.
Penegakan Hukum Pidana Balap Liar Oleh Pihak Kepolisian Terhadap Terciptanya Ketertiban Umum Sarifah, Nurhidah; Wati, Briliyan Erna; Afifah, Hasna
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i1.11401

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the criminal law enforcement of illegal racing by Semarang Police Satlantas in Jalan Diponegoro Ungaran, its causal factors, and obstacles to public order. This research is important because it is material for a law enforcement approach that focuses on public order and evaluation of the effectiveness of the role of the Police so that illegal racing can be overcome. This research uses qualitative research methods with a juridical sociological approach with the findings that cases of illegal racing in three years, namely 2022-2024, have only decreased slightly with the highest case in 2022 totaling 282 cases. This is motivated by law enforcement constraints, especially the lack of police personnel and the habit of illegal racing which is a contributing factor to the existence of illegal racing. various police efforts have been made, but the unresolved cases of illegal racing cause instability in law enforcement and have a negative impact on society. This research concludes that better law enforcement is needed by improving the quality of police performance, and community participation with a humanistic action approach to discuss together the dangers and violations of illegal racing and the application of CCTV to find out illegal racing violations. A comprehensive approach by combining legal, educational, and socio-cultural paradigms as an innovation in overcoming illegal racing and creating public order. This research is important and different from previous studies because it discusses the use of a more integrated approach from the police, which involves technology and community cooperation and provides practical solutions to overcome the problem of illegal racing. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis penegakan hukum pidana balap liar oleh Kepolisian Satlantas Polres Semarang di Jalan Diponegoro Ungaran, faktor penyebab dan kendalanya terhadap ketertiban umum.  Penelitian ini menjadi penting karena menjadi bahan untuk pendekatan penegakan hukum yang berfokus pada ketertiban umum dan evaluasi efektivitas peran kepolisian sehingga balap liar dapat diatasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis sosiologis dengan hasil temuan bahwa kasus balap liar dalam tiga tahun yaitu 2022-2024 hanya mengalami penurunan sedikit dengan kasus tertinggi pada tahun 2022 berjumlah 282 kasus. Hal tersebut dilatarbelakangi karena kendala penegakan hukum terutama kurangnya personil kepolisian dan kebiasaan balap liar yang menjadi faktor penyebab adanya balap liar. berbagai upaya polisi sudah dilakukan, tetapi kasus balap liar yang belum teratasi menimbulkan ketidakstabilan penegakan hukum dan berdampak negatif bagi masyarakat. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan, diperlukan penegakan hukum yang lebih baik dengan meningkatkan kualitas kinerja kepolisian, keikutsertaan masyarakat dengan pendekatan tindakan humanitis untuk berdiskusi bersama bahaya dan pelanggaran balap liar serta penerapan CCTV  untuk mengetahui pelanggaran balap liar. Pendekatan secara komprehensif dengan memadukan paradigma hukum, pendidikan, dan sosial-budaya sebagai inovasi dalam mengatasi balapan liar dan terciptanya ketertiban umum. Penelitian ini menjadi penting dan berbeda dari penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya karena membahas penggunaan pendekatan dari kepolisian yang lebih terintegrasi, yang melibatkan teknologi dan kerjasama masyarakat, serta memberikan solusi praktis untuk mengatasi masalah balap liar.  
Analisis Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Nomor 18 Tahun 2024 Perspektif Jean Jacques Rousseau tentang Legitimasi Kekuasaan Riyadi, Muhammad; Mu’alim, Moh.; Buldani, Muhammad Nahidh; Fadli, Muhammad Nur; Wahab, Abdul
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i1.11408

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legitimacy of authority in determining the elected candidate pairs in the Pilkada, as regulated in Articles 58 and 76 of the General Election Commission Regulation (PKPU) Number 18 of 2024, using Jean Jacques Rousseau's theory of legitimacy of authority. The difference in the mechanism for determining the winner between DKI Jakarta by obtaining more than 50% of the valid votes and other provinces based only on the most votes, gives rise to anomalies that have the potential to damage the legitimacy of authority. The impact is that the determination of elected candidates who do not obtain more than 50% of the votes will create skepticism about being trusted by the public. This is contrary to Rousseau's principle of the general will, that legitimate power must come from the collective will of the community. Normative juridical is used as a method in this study with a statutory and conceptual approach. The novelty of the study lies in the analysis of PKPU Number 18 of 2024, which was only ratified in November 2024. The use of Rousseau's theory applied in studies related to election regulations in Indonesia is unique in this study.  The results of the study show that Article 58 of PKPU Number 18 of 2024 is contrary to the principle of general will, so the KPU needs to revise the regulation to guarantee the legitimacy of leadership. Where the provisions that must be changed are in Paragraph (1). In addition, implementing a run-off election mechanism and elected leaders need to involve the community in policy-making as compensation for the lack of legitimacy. Concrete steps that can be taken are through public hearings from the community. This study makes a significant contribution by offering a new perspective in the analysis of Pilkada regulations, which focuses more on the general will as the foundation of the legitimacy of authority. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis legitimasi kekuasaan dalam penetapan pasangan calon terpilih pada Pilkada, sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 58 dan 76 Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum (PKPU) Nomor 18 Tahun 2024, dengan menggunakan teori legitimasi kekuasaan Jean Jacques Rousseau. Perbedaan mekanisme penetapan pemenang antara DKI Jakarta dengan memperoleh suara 50% lebih dari jumlah suara sah dan Provinsi lain hanya berdasarkan suara terbanyak, memunculkan anomali yang berpotensi merusak legitimasi kekuasaan. Dampaknya, penetapan calon terpilih yang tidak memperoleh jumlah suara 50% lebih akan menimbulkan rasa skeptis untuk dipercaya oleh masyarakat. Hal ini bertentangan dengan prinsip kehendak umum Rousseau, bahwa kekuasaan sah harus berasal dari keinginan kolektif masyarakat. Yuridis normatif digunakan sebagai metode dalam penelitian ini dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan konseptual. Kebaruan penelitian terletak pada analisis terhadap PKPU Nomor 18 Tahun 2024, yang baru disahkan pada November 2024. Penggunaan teori Rousseau yang diterapkan dalam studi terkait regulasi pemilu di Indonesia menjadi keunikan dalam penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 58 PKPU Nomor 18 Tahun 2024 bertentangan dengan prinsip kehendak umum, sehingga KPU perlu merevisi aturan tersebut untuk menjamin legitimasi kepemimpinan. Di mana ketentuan yang harus dirubah terletak pada Ayat (1). Selain itu, melakukan mekanisme run off election dan pemimpin terpilih perlu melibatkan masyarakat dalam pengambilan kebijakan sebagai kompensasi atas kurangnya legitimasi. Langkah konkret yang bisa dilakukan dengan cara rapat dengar pendapat umum dari masyarakat. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi signifikan dengan menawarkan perspektif baru dalam analisis regulasi Pilkada, yang lebih berfokus pada kehendak umum sebagai fondasi legitimasi kekuasaan.
Kekuasaan Presiden Dalam Pembentukan Kabinet Menurut Sistem Presidensial Kelmaskosu, Krisyando; Rauta, Umbu
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i1.11739

Abstract

This study aims to discuss the president's power in forming a cabinet in connection with the amendment to Law No. 39 of 2008 concerning State Ministries (Ministry Law). One of the main changes to the law is Article 15 concerning the total number of ministries, which was originally limited to a maximum of 34 ministries, changed according to the needs of the administration of government by the President. The norm does not explicitly regulate the total number of ministries. This is indeed compatible or in line with the presidential system of government firmly adopted by Indonesia after the constitutional amendment in 2002. The problems arising from the change in the norm are related to the implications of increasing the number of ministries which are related to governance. The change in this article refers to legalistic, not prerogatives because if it is prerogative, the number of ministries does not need to be regulated in the law. The formation of the cabinet is one of the powers held by the President in a presidential system of government. The research method uses normative legal research with a conceptual approach, a comparative approach, and a statutory approach. The results of the study indicate that the changes in the norms in the Ministry Law are in accordance with the presidential system of government. However, the president's discretion in forming a cabinet must take into account the professionalism, integrity, and track record of ministerial candidates so as not to merely accommodate short-term political interests. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membahas tentang kekuasaan presiden dalam pembentukan kabinet. sehubungan dengan adanya perubahan Undang-Undang No. 39 Tahun 2008 tentang Kementerian Negara (UU Kementerian). Salah satu pokok perubahan pada undang-undang tersebut yaitu Pasal 15 terkait jumlah keseluruhan kementerian, yang semula dibatasi paling banyak 34 kementerian berubah menjadi sesuai kebutuhan penyelenggaraan pemerintahan oleh Presiden. Dalam norma tersebut tidak diatur secara eksplisit  mengenai jumlah keseluruhan kementerian. Hal itu memang kompatibel atau sejalan dengan sistem pemerintahan presidensial yang dianut secara tegas oleh Indonesia pasca amandemen konstitusi tahun 2002. Permasalahan yang timbul dari perubahan norma tersebut terkait implikasi pada penambahan jumlah kementerian yang mana berhubungan dengan tata kelola pemerintahan. Perubahan pasal ini mengacu pada legalistik bukan prerogatif sebab jika prerogatif jumlah kementerian tidak perlu diatur dalam UU. Pembentukan kabinet tersebut merupakan salah satu kekuasaan yang dimiliki oleh Presiden dalam sistem pemerintahan presidensial. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan perbandingan dan pendekatan undang-undang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perubahan norma pada UU Kementerian sudah sesuai dengan sistem pemerintahan presidensial. Namun, keleluasaan presiden dalam pembentukan kabinet harus mempertimbangkan profesionalisme, integritas dan track record  calon menteri sehingga tidak sekedar mengakomodasi kepentingan politik jangka pendek.    
Paradigma Surat Tanda Bukti Akta Keterangan Waris Sebagai Asas Kepastian Hukum Gulianti, Lia
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i1.11338

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of Permen ATR / BPN Number 16 of 2021 concerning the third amendment to Land Registration in Article 111 paragraph (1) letter C concerning the making of a certificate of evidence of the Deed of Inheritance and Article 111 paragraph (5) the transfer of rights falls to 1 (one) person who receives the inheritance based on the Deed of Inheritance, which deed raises inconsistencies in legal norms related to Article 111 paragraph (1). This research focuses on normative juridical law as formulated by legislation. The inheritance certificate is made before a notary for all groups and the inheritance deed is made the same as the Deed of Distribution of Inheritance Rights which has a different form and content, The fact in the field is that there are many Notaries who cannot distinguish the making of the deed which results in a discrepancy between the evidence letter of the Deed of Inheritance and the Deed of Distribution of Inheritance, the deed is recorded at the Land Agency Office in various regions such as Bandung City, Bandung Regency and West Bandung, resulting in legal uncertainty and resulting in confusion or obscuration of rules and having an impact on heirs and sole recipients or recipients of inheritance rights that can be cancelled. As there is an abolition of groups but cannot be abolished, the pluralism inheritance law, so it is necessary to have regulations governing the Deed of Inheritance Certificate and Deed of Division of Inheritance Rights due to different functions. As with legislation, there is a legal principle that regulations that have a lower level in the hierarchy of regulations do not differ from each other.   Penelitian ini yang bertujuan mengkaji mengenai pengaruh Permen ATR/BPN Nomor 16 Tahun 2021 tentang perubahan ketiga Pendaftaran Tanah pada Pasal 111 ayat (1) huruf C tentang pembuatan surat tanda bukti akta keterangan waris dan Pasal 111 ayat (5) peralihan haknya jatuh kepada 1 (satu) orang penerima warisan berdasarkan Akta Waris, akta mana menimbulkan inkonsistensi norma hukum terkait pasal 111 ayat (1). Penelitian ini fokus pada hukum yuridis normatif sebagaimana dirumuskan oleh perundang-undang (law in books). Keterangan waris dibuat dihadapan Notaris untuk semua golongan dan akta waris dibuat sama seharusnya akta pembagian hak waris yang substansi bentuk dan isi yang berbeda, dan tidak membedakan golongan yang diatur dalam KUHPerdata, fakta dilapangan banyak sekali Notaris tidak dapat membedakan pembuatan akta tersebut dan membuat untuk semua warga Negara Indonesia asli  yang mengakibatkan ketidaksesuaian antara surat tanda bukti akta keterangan waris dan akta pembagian waris, yang mana akta tersebut telah di catat pada Kantor Badan Pertanahan diberbagai wilayah seperti Kota Bandung, Kabupaten Bandung dan Bandung Barat, sehingga terdapat ketidakpastian hukum dan mengakibatkan konprontasi atau pengaburan aturan serta berdampak terhadap ahli waris dan penerima tunggal atau penerima hak waris yang dapat dibatalkan. Sebagaimana adanya penghapusan golongan namun tidak dapat dihapuskan hukum waris yang pluralisme sehingga perlu adanya peraturan yang mengatur atas akta keterangan waris dan akta pembagian hak waris dikarenakan fungsi yang berbeda. Sebagaimana perundang-undangan adanya asas hukum peraturan yang memiliki tingkat rendah secara hirarki peraturan tidak berbenturan lebih tinggi.

Page 1 of 4 | Total Record : 35

 1   2   3   4 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): - Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): AUGUST Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): APRIL Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): AUGUST Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): APRIL Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): DECEMBER Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): AUGUST Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): APRIL Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): NOVEMBER Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): MAY Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): NOVEMBER Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): MAY Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): NOVEMBER Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): MAY Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): NOVEMBER Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): MAY Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): NOVEMBER Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): MAY More Issue