cover
Contact Name
Muhammad Yusqi
Contact Email
jurnalmaqashid@gmail.com
Phone
+6285646452588
Journal Mail Official
yuski@alqolam.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl Raya, Dusun Baron, Putat Lor, Kec. Gondanglegi, Kabupaten Malang, Jawa Timur 65174
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
MAQASHID : Jurnal Hukum Islam
Published by Universitas Al-Qolam
ISSN : 26139758     EISSN : 26854619     DOI : 10.35897
Jurnal MAQASHID merupakan jurnal ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh program studi Ahwal al-Syakhsiyah Institut Agama Islam Al-Qolam, terbit dua kali dalam satu tahun. Sebagai sarana pengembangan intelektual dosen dan civitas akademik pegiat hukum Islam. Redaksi menerima artikel ilmiah maupun hasil laporan penelitian yang relevan dengan tema dalam jurnal ini, yaitu hukum Islam. Naskah yang dikirim adalah naskah yang sesuai dengan pedoman penulisan artikel jurnal MAQASHID
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 136 Documents
INTERSEKSI ANTARA PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA, SELIBAT, DAN CHILDFREE : PERSPEKTIF USHUL FIQH IMAM AR-RAZI Khoirul Muhtadin
MAQASHID Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Mei 2025
Publisher : Malang Prodi. Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah, IAI Al-Qolam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35897/maqashid.v8i1.1927

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the laws surrounding interfaith marriage and its position amidst the growing trends of celibacy and being childfree in modern society. In the context of increasing religious pluralism, the phenomena of interfaith marriage, celibacy, and being childfree have become complex issues that require in-depth study. The research method employed is qualitative, utilizing a literature review approach, where the data sources include the Qur'an, Hadith, and social facts found in articles, journals, and news reports. Data collection was conducted through documentation studies, while analysis was based on the thoughts of Imam Ar-Razi in his work Al-Mahshul, which provides a Usul Fiqh perspective on these issues. This research is expected to offer a better understanding of the legal status of interfaith marriage, as well as the social and religious implications of the choices of celibacy and being childfree. The results indicate that the laws regarding interfaith marriage can be divided into two categories: permissible and forbidden. Meanwhile, the laws concerning celibacy and being childfree also depend on the intentions and circumstances of the individuals involved, which can either be permissible or forbidden.
KAJIAN LIVING LAW TERHADAP MAHAR BHOKA DALAM PERNIKAHAN BEDA STRATA SOSIAL SUKU BUTON : Prespektif Hukum Islam Rismayani; Muhammad Andi Akmal; St. Halimang, , St. Halimang,; Pabbabari, Musafir; Said, Irwanti
MAQASHID Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Mei 2025
Publisher : Malang Prodi. Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah, IAI Al-Qolam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35897/maqashid.v8i1.1968

Abstract

This study examines the tradition of determining the bhoka dowry in inter-social strata marriages within the Buton Tribe in Baubau City. In Buton’s customary law, society is divided into three social classes: Kaomu (nobility), Walaka (middle class), and Papara (commoners), each with different dowry values regulated by the Sultanate. Traditionally, marriages between Kaomu women and Papara men are prohibited and subject to customary fines. Using a descriptive qualitative method with an Islamic legal sociology approach—applying the theories of Living Law, Symbolic Interactionism, and ‘Urf—this research involved interviews with traditional, religious, and community leaders, as well as inter-class married couples, through snowball sampling, alongside observation and documentation. The findings reveal three main stages in determining the dowry: lukuti, pesoloi, and losa, which include a lineage tracing process (tiliki) by a spokesperson (tolowea) to decide dowry amounts and customary sanctions for inter-class unions. Community leaders’ perspectives on inter-social marriages are divided, though most view the traditional prohibitions as no longer relevant amid modern social dynamics. Furthermore, the dowry custom in inter-social marriages still functions as a living law within the Buton community, as it meets the core principles of the Living Law theory.
REFORMULASI PEMBUKTIAN KEKERASAN SEKSUAL: Perbandingan Hukum Nasional dan Hukum Islam Haniyah, Haniyah; Atmari, Atmari
MAQASHID Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Mei 2025
Publisher : Malang Prodi. Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah, IAI Al-Qolam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35897/maqashid.v8i1.1974

Abstract

In the midst of increasing public awareness of sexual violence, Indonesia is still faced with serious problems in proving it in the legal realm. Many cases stop halfway or end without justice because of the difficulty of meeting formal evidence such as visum or eyewitnesses which, in practice, are nearly impossible to find in sexual violence that occurs in covert, under pressure, or power relations. This study explores how the system of proof of sexual violence can be built to be more in favor of the victim, and the extent to which Islamic legal values, especially maqāṣid al-sharī'ah, can provide relevant and contextual solutions.  In answering this study, a normative-comparative approach is used with a literature study method on laws and regulations, the doctrine of fiqh jināyah, and the principles of maqāṣid. The results show that the Islamic legal system, especially in the context of ta'zīr, opens up a wider and more flexible space for proof through the use of qarā'in (strong indications) as well as considerations of the benefit and protection of victims in obtaining justice. By combining the substantive justice values of maqāṣid al-sharī'ah and the progressive spirit of the violent crime law (TPKS Law), this study offers an alternative model of proof that is more responsive, humane, and inclusive. These findings are expected to be important inputs in formulating an Indonesian criminal law system that is more adaptive to the vulnerability of victims and able to respond to the challenges of justice in today's world.
HUKUM MENYEDIAKAN KONSUMSI KEPADA DOSEN PADA SIDANG TUGAS AKHIR: Dalam Tinjauan Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam Abdillah, Muhammad Torieq; Fatmawati, Amelia; Parahdina, Soraya; Vijaini, Akhmad; Habibah, Nor
MAQASHID Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Mei 2025
Publisher : Malang Prodi. Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah, IAI Al-Qolam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35897/maqashid.v8i1.2037

Abstract

Abstract: The provision of food and beverages to examiners during undergraduate thesis defenses is a common practice in academic settings, often regarded as a gesture of appreciation or respect by students. However, this practice raises ethical and legal concerns, particularly regarding its potential classification as gratification that could influence the objectivity of academic assessment. This study aims to examine the legal status of such practices from the perspectives of positive law and Islamic law, and to assess the extent to which this tradition is normatively and ethically acceptable. The research employs a normative legal method, incorporating statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches. Data sources include statutory regulations, religious fatwas, and scholarly literature. The findings indicate that, under positive law, the provision of food may constitute gratification if intended to influence academic decisions; however, it does not necessarily violate the law if done sincerely and within reasonable limits. From the perspective of Islamic law, such acts are permissible as long as they do not involve elements of risywah (bribery) or raise suspicion. Therefore, it is essential for higher education institutions to establish clear ethical guidelines to uphold academic integrity amidst evolving traditions of reciprocal social gestures.
PRAKTIK ISTIBDAL WAKAF DALAM PERSPEKTIF IMAM SYAFI’I DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 41 TAHUN 2004: Analisis Kemaslahatan Dan Maqāṣid Al-Syarī‘Ah Huda, Muhammad Hasbulloh; Madarik, Muhammad
MAQASHID Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Nov 2024
Publisher : Malang Prodi. Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah, IAI Al-Qolam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35897/maqashid.v8i1.2048

Abstract

Waqf is one of the Islamic social finance instruments that carries sustainable value for the benefit of the ummah. In practice, issues surrounding waqf assets that are no longer productive or need functional changes have led to the need for istibdal waqf (exchange of waqf property). This study aims to analyze Imam al[1]Shafi’i's view of istibdal waqf and compare it with the provisions of Indonesian Law No. 41 of 2004 on Waqf, using the perspective of public interest (maslahah) and maqasid al-sharia. This research employs a qualitative method with a normative-comparative approach by examining classical fiqh Syafi’iyyah literature and Indonesia’s positive legal regulations. The findings indicate that according to Imam al-Shafi’i, istibdal is only permissible under emergency conditions to prevent waqf asset negligence, while Indonesian law allows istibdal for public interest with the approval of the Indonesian Waqf Board. The study concludes that harmonization between classical Islamic law principles and national waqf regulations is essential to ensure waqf management remains beneficial and aligns with maqasid al-sharia.
CHILDFREE CHOICE IN THE DIALECTIC BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS AND ISLAMIC LAW: Navigating Bodily Autonomy and Hifz al-Nasl Hasan, Ibnu Paqih
MAQASHID Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Mei 2025
Publisher : Malang Prodi. Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah, IAI Al-Qolam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35897/maqashid.v8i1.2073

Abstract

The decision to remain childfree has raised complex ethical and legal debates between the human rights principle of bodily autonomy and Islamic law, which emphasizes hifz al-nasl (preservation of lineage) as part of maqasid al-syariah. This study critically addresses the question: “can the childfree choice be ethically and legally justified within Islamic legal discourse, or does it inherently conflict with maqasid al-syariah?. Using a normative-juridical method and conceptual analysis, this research examines classical Islamic legal sources alongside international human rights instruments (UDHR, ICCPR, and CEDAW), interpreted through Jasser Auda’s sistems theory. The findings reveal that under specific ‘illat al-hukm (legal causes)-such as grave health concerns-the decisions to be childfree may be justified within Islamic frameworks. Jasser Auda reinterprets hifzh al-nasl as promoting care for the family’s well-being. The principle includes generational continuity, quality of life, and relationship. Auda’s expands hifzh al-nafs and hifz al-‘ird to include human dignity and human rights. Consequently, the decision to be  childfree can be interpreted as a manifestation of ethical rensponsibility, aligning with both Islamic values and the principles of inclusive human rights norms.