cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhammad Ishar Helmi
Contact Email
jlruinjkt@gmail.com
Phone
+6281291179663
Journal Mail Official
jlruinjkt@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Ir. H. Juanda No. 95 Ciputat Tangsel
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
ISSN : 27157172     EISSN : 27157164     DOI : 10.15408
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Education, Social,
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other
Journal of Legal Research is a peer-reviewed journal on legal research published quarterly (February, May, August, November) since 2019 by Departemen Legal Studies Faculty of Sharia and Law Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta in cooperation with Center for the Study of Constitution and National Legislation (POSKO-LEGNAS). Journal of Legal Research aims primarily to facilitate scholarly and professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian laws. The Review, hence, welcomes contributions from international legal scholars and professionals as well as from representatives of courts, executive authorities, and agencies of development cooperation. The Review basically contains any topics concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. Novelty and recency of issues, however, is a priority in publishing. It aims primarily to facilitate scholarly and professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. Published exclusively in English, the Review seeks to expand the boundaries of Indonesian legal discourses to access English-speaking contributors and readers all over the world. The Review, hence, welcomes contributions from international legal scholars and professionals as well as from representatives of courts, executive authorities, and agencies of development cooperation. The Review basically contains any topics concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. Novelty and recency of issues, however, is a priority in publishing. The range of contents covered by the Review spans from established legal scholarships and fields of law such as privacy laws and public laws which include constitutional and administrative law as well as criminal law, international laws concerning Indonesia, to various approaches to legal studies such as comparative law, law and economics, sociology of law and legal anthropology, and many others. Specialized legal studies concerning various aspects of life such as commercial and business laws, technology law, natural resources law and the like are also welcomed.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024)" : 6 Documents clear
Problematika Perizinan Penyadapan Oleh KPK Pasca Revisi Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 Rachman, Andi Nur; Syarif, Mujar Ibnu
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i1.22068

Abstract

The revision process of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Law resulted in structural changes with the formation of the KPK Supervisory Board. This change impacts the work procedures of KPK investigators, especially in conducting wiretapping of corruption suspects. This article analyzes the problematic issues of wiretapping permits by the KPK after the revision of Law Number 19 of 2019, which introduced a multi-layered bureaucracy. This study uses a normative legal method with statutory regulations. The results of the study indicate that the revision of the law requires the KPK to obtain permission from the Supervisory Board before conducting wiretapping, which has the potential to hinder the effectiveness and speed of investigations. However, after a judicial review was conducted at the Constitutional Court, it was decided that wiretapping could be carried out without permission from the Supervisory Board but must still be notified within a specific period. This decision is measured as a positive step in maintaining a balance between the effectiveness of corruption eradication and the accountability of the KPK institution.
Analisis Yuridis Pemberhentian Sepihak Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1888 K/Pdt/2020 Syabrina, Erica Dwi
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i1.32093

Abstract

Legal protection against unilateral termination of the direction of a Limited Liability Company (PT) through a General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) is an important issue, as seen in the Supreme Court Decision Number 1888 K/Pdt/2020. This study analyzes legal protection as a direction terminated without clear reasons and the opportunity to defend itself. This study uses normative legal research with a case and regulatory approach. The results of the study show that the unilateral termination of the directors of PT Multi Daya Wonua was carried out verbally without a strong legal basis, so it is contrary to Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, especially Article 105 which stipulates that directors must be allowed to defend themselves before being dismissed. Although the court ruled that the GMS has the authority to dismiss, the decision did not consider aspects of justice and the right of direction. This can be justified as an unlawful act. Directors who are unlawfully terminated are entitled to legal protection in the form of cancellation of the GMS decision or compensation according to the remaining term of office. Therefore, fairer law enforcement and stronger protection for the direction are needed to prevent arbitrary actions in the management of PT.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pekerja Dari Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Sepihak Akibat Union Busting Analisis Putusan Nomor 229/Pdt.Sus-Phi/2019/Pn.Bdg dan Nomor 436 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020 Izza, Amalia Sofa; Sulaiman, Abdullah
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i1.32484

Abstract

Unilateral termination of employment due to union-busting practices is a serious problem in industrial relations in Indonesia. This study analyzes legal protection for workers against unilateral termination of employment due to union busting, referring to the Industrial Relations Court (PHI) Decision Number 229/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2019/PN.Bdg and the Supreme Court Decision Number 436 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020. This study uses a normative juridical method with a case approach, a regulatory approach, and data collection techniques through literature studies. The results of the study indicate that PT. Asmo Indonesia (PT. Denso Manufacturing) is predicted to have carried out union-busting practices by unilaterally terminating the employment of the union chairman without going through the bipartite and tripartite mechanisms by the provisions of the regulations. Although there are indications of violations of the right to associate as regulated in Law Number 21 of 2000, the courts at the PHI and cassation levels do not explicitly summarize the practice of union busting in their legal considerations. Unilateral termination of employment of active workers in trade unions can be charged as an unlawful act. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen legal protection for workers to prevent discriminatory and repressive actions by employers against freedom of association. In addition, judges in industrial relations cases need to consider more comprehensively the aspects of Human Rights and the principle of justice in every decision related to employment.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemilik Kondominium Atas Pailitnya PT. Dwimas Andalan Bali Sebagai Pengembang Mulyawan, Kiasnabila; Hasani, Ismail; Alam, Faris Satria
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i1.33232

Abstract

The bankruptcy of a developer company often directly impacts condominium owners who have made a sale and purchase transaction, in the case of the bankruptcy of PT. Dwimas Andalan Bali condominium owners experience legal protection because the units that have been purchased are included in the bankruptcy estate. This study analyzes the developer's responsibility towards consumers in bankruptcy conditions and the legal status of condominium objects that are part of the bankrupt assets. The method used is normative legal research with a case approach focusing on the Supreme Court Decision Number 437 K / Pdt. Sus-Pailit / 2019. The study results show that in bankruptcy conditions, developers still have legal obligations to consumers who have fulfilled their achievements in the sale and purchase transaction. Based on Article 36 of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, consumers have the right to submit a request to the curator to ensure the process of extending condominium ownership rights to the Deed of Sale and Purchase (AJB) stage. Consumers are entitled to compensation or damages if these obligations are not met. In the case of developer bankruptcy, consumer rights must still be protected through available legal mechanisms, either through an application to the curator or other legal efforts. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen legal protection for consumers so that they are not harmed in bankruptcy-related property transactions.
Penggunaan Strict Liability Dalam Pertanggungjawaban Secara Perdata Pada Sengketa KLHK Melawan PT. Waringin Agro Jaya Kurniawan, Denis
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i1.39129

Abstract

The right to access a good and healthy environment is a right for all citizens guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution. The right to obtain a good and healthy environment is not only limited by the rights of the current generation but also a right that future generations can feel with pro-environment sustainable development. The state's right to sue the central government through the Ministry of Environment and Forestry is an effort to protect the environment from polluters and/or environmental destroyers, one of which is filing a civil lawsuit. This research is a normative or doctrinal legal research with a statute, conceptual, and case approach. This study concludes that the legal liability carried out by PT Waringin Agro Jaya can be justified based on strict liability because, in principle, strict liability is a liability without fault in every business or activity categorized as Abnormally Dangerous Activity.
Konstruksi Hukum Pembuktian Penuntut Umum Terhadap Sonny Widjaja Dalam Kasus Korupsi PT. ASABRI Fadila, Jihan; Alfitra, Alfitra
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i1.40666

Abstract

Evidence is crucial to the criminal process, especially in corruption cases. This study analyzes the strength of the evidence presented by the Public Prosecutor in the corruption case of the reconstruction of investment funds of PT. ASABRI with Sonny Widjaja's response. The focus of this study is to assess the extent to which the evidence meets the elements of a crime as regulated in Article 2, paragraph (1) of Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption. This study uses a normative method with a statutory regulatory approach and a case approach. The study results indicate that the Public Prosecutor proved the elements unlawful, enriching oneself or others and causing losses to state finances with a loss value of Rp22.78 trillion. The evidence was carried out through five main pieces of evidence, namely witness statements, expert statements, letters, statements from prostitutes, and clues, including electronic evidence. The Panel of Judges accepted the evidence and declared the perpetrator guilty based on the primary charge, thus imposing a prison sentence of 18 years and a fine of Rp750 million. This study confirms that a strong evidentiary strategy by the Public Prosecutor plays an essential role in shaping the judge's conviction and upholding justice in large-scale corruption cases.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025) Vol 6, No 2 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024) Vol 6, No 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024) Vol 5, No 2 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023) Vol 5, No 1 (2023): ARTICLES IN PRESS Vol 5, No 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023) Vol 4, No 6 (2022) Vol 4, No 5 (2022) Vol 4, No 4 (2022) Vol 4, No 3 (2022) Vol 4, No 2 (2022) Vol 4, No 1 (2022) Vol 3, No 6 (2021) Vol 3, No 5 (2021) Vol 3, No 4 (2021) Vol 3, No 3 (2021) Vol 3, No 2 (2021) Vol 3, No 1 (2021) Vol 2, No 5 (2020) Vol 2, No 4 (2020) Vol 2, No 3 (2020) Vol 2, No 2 (2020) Vol 2, No 1 (2020) Vol 1, No 6 (2019) Vol 1, No 5 (2019) Vol 1, No 4 (2019) Vol 1, No 3 (2019) Vol 1, No 2 (2019) Vol 1, No 1 (2019) Vol 1, No 1 (2019): Journal of Legal Research More Issue