cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhammad Ishar Helmi
Contact Email
jlruinjkt@gmail.com
Phone
+6281291179663
Journal Mail Official
jlruinjkt@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Ir. H. Juanda No. 95 Ciputat Tangsel
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
ISSN : 27157172     EISSN : 27157164     DOI : 10.15408
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Education, Social,
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other
Journal of Legal Research is a peer-reviewed journal on legal research published quarterly (February, May, August, November) since 2019 by Departemen Legal Studies Faculty of Sharia and Law Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta in cooperation with Center for the Study of Constitution and National Legislation (POSKO-LEGNAS). Journal of Legal Research aims primarily to facilitate scholarly and professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian laws. The Review, hence, welcomes contributions from international legal scholars and professionals as well as from representatives of courts, executive authorities, and agencies of development cooperation. The Review basically contains any topics concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. Novelty and recency of issues, however, is a priority in publishing. It aims primarily to facilitate scholarly and professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. Published exclusively in English, the Review seeks to expand the boundaries of Indonesian legal discourses to access English-speaking contributors and readers all over the world. The Review, hence, welcomes contributions from international legal scholars and professionals as well as from representatives of courts, executive authorities, and agencies of development cooperation. The Review basically contains any topics concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. Novelty and recency of issues, however, is a priority in publishing. The range of contents covered by the Review spans from established legal scholarships and fields of law such as privacy laws and public laws which include constitutional and administrative law as well as criminal law, international laws concerning Indonesia, to various approaches to legal studies such as comparative law, law and economics, sociology of law and legal anthropology, and many others. Specialized legal studies concerning various aspects of life such as commercial and business laws, technology law, natural resources law and the like are also welcomed.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 312 Documents
 14   15   16   17   18 
Tindak Pidana Mempekerjakan Anak Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 293/ K/Pid.Sus/2018 Fithania Wahyu Fitria Saputri; Rosdiana Rosdiana; Mohamad Mujibur Rohman
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i1.23788

Abstract

This study explains how Law Number 13 of 2003 on Employment makes child labor a crime. It also looks at Supreme Court Verdict Number 293 K/Pid.Sus/2018, which was made by the Supreme Court in 2018. Qualitative methods are used in this study, which takes a look at the case from a constitutional (statutory) point of view (case approach). On the basis of Law Number 13 Year, 2003 on Employment and Manpower, employers aren't allowed to hire children. Some people say that children between the ages of 13 and 15 can do light work, but they can't do anything that could harm their health or development in any way. The threat of punishment for people who do things that are illegal There are rules about how to get a job in Law Number 13 of the Year 2003 about Manpower, which you can find in Articles 181, 183, and 182. (1). People who work for the Supreme Court think about things that aren't related to law when they make decisions about Supreme Court No. 293 K/Pid.Sus 2018. That is because it was revealed at the trial that the child witnesses didn't have any problems with their bodies, minds, or social lives. Indonesia's law on employment was used to look at Supreme Court No. 293/K/Pid.Sus/2018, and it was found to be in line with the law.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investor Akibat Praktik Manipulasi Transaksi Di Pasar Modal Budi Firmana Firdaus; Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian; Nisrina Mutiara Dewi
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 3, No 6 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v3i6.18070

Abstract

Metode Penelitian ini menggunakan tipe kajian pustaka (Library Research) yang mengkaji berbagai dokumen terkait penelitian. Metode yang digunakan peneliti adalah  metode penulisan  yuridis  normatif  dengan  menggunakan  pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (Conceptual approach).Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa regulasi terkait dengan perlindungan  hukum  bagi  investor  pada  pasar  modal  di  Indonesia  sudah memiliki kerangka dan kekuatan hukum yang jelas. Hal ini dibuktikan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 tentang Pasar modal dalam 3 (tiga) pasal, yaitu pasal 91, pasal 92, dan pasal 93. Dalam rangka melindungi para investor di pasar modal dari tindak kejahatan manipulasi transaksi yang sedang marak, dilakukan melalui 2 (dua) cara yaitu perlindungan hukum preventif dan perlindungan hukum represif. Perlindungan hukum preventif melalui Lembaga Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), sedangkan perlindungan hukum represif dilakukan dalam bentuk pemeriksaan, penyidikan dan penerapan sanksi-sanksi yang telah ditentukan oleh OJK.   
The Role of Arbitrators in Settlement of Land Acquisition Cases according to Law Number 30 of 1999 Rusdiannor Rusdiannor; Taufiqurachman Taufiqurachman
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 3, No 4 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v3i4.24981

Abstract

Resolution of conflicts through civil channels is particularly stated in Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration, which governs the arbitration process. According to the findings of the investigation, the matter was decided by the Amuntai District Court on July 14, 2014, by the issuance of decision letter No. 08/PDT.G/2011. The research method that was employed was a normative research method that took a legislative approach to the problem. Document studies and interviews are utilized to gather information, which is then processed. While qualitative analysis is the method of data analysis employed here. According to the findings of the study, it can be inferred that the conflict has not been resolved, but is still in the midst of being resolved.
Implementasi Pembinaan Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Melalui Rehabilitasi Pada Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Nurlaila Nurlaila; Kristiawanto Kristiawanto; Mohamad Ismed
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i1.24812

Abstract

Discussion of the Implementation of Guidance for Victims of Narcotics Abuse in Correctional Institutions via Rehabilitation. This legal research takes a normative juridical approach, which means that it examines still-in-force legal concepts and norms. According to Article 54 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, addicts and victims of drug abuse must undergo medical and social rehabilitation. Additionally, pursuant to Law Number 12 of 1995 concerning Corrections, special narcotics prisons are provided for violators of narcotics crime laws. Fostering victims of drugs misuse in Correctional Institutions is accomplished in two ways: medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation in accordance with court rulings. Where medical rehabilitation is provided to victims of narcotics misuse in accordance with the therapy plan established by the Doctor Team from the Integrated Assessment Team and in accordance with the program applicable to the rehabilitation institution. Meanwhile, a rehabilitation institute built by the Provincial National Narcotics Agency provides social rehabilitation for victims of narcotics usage.
Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Aplikasi Bigo Live Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Asheila Fahira A Assagaf; Afwan Faidzin; Syafrudin Makmur
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 3, No 6 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v3i6.16628

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe development of information technology today is very rapid with a variety of electronic information, namely social media. One of them is the Bigo Live Application. Bigo Live application itself is a Live Streaming application that is used as a place to disseminate pornographic content that is shown on social media for profit. Showing parts of the body that should not be exhibited and performing indecent acts. This is very inappropriate and can damage the morale of society, especially children.This study uses a juridical normative method, which uses written legal norms that are absolute based on the Act. Namely in the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE).The results of this study illustrate that the dissemination of pornographic content on social media on the Bigo Live application has fulfilled the elements of pornographic crime and has been regulated in Article 27 paragraph (1) Jo Article 45 paragraph (1) of Law Number 19 Year 2016 concerning Information and Transactions Electronics (ITE) and Article 4 paragraph (1) Jo Article 29 of Law Number 44 Year 2008 concerning Pornography.
Persekongkolan Dalam Tender Preservasi Rekonstruksi Jalan Dan Pemeliharaan Rutin (Studi Putusan KPPU Nomor 05/KPPU-L/2018 Akmal Mutiara; Isnawati Rais; Fitriyani Zein
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 3, No 6 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v3i6.15836

Abstract

Salah satu permasalahan dalam persaingan usaha di Indonesia adalah berkenaan dengan proses pengadaan barang atau jasa pemerintah. Dalam proses pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah banyak dijumpai praktek persekongkolan untuk menentukan pemenang dalam sebuah tender. Penelitian ini memiliki rumusan masalah bagaimana pertimbangan-pertimbangan hakim dalam putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha nomor 05/KPPU-L/2018 tentang persekongkolan dalam tender tender preservasi rekonstruksi jalan dan pemeliharaan rutin di Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah dan benarkah putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha nomor 05/KPPU-L/2018 telah sesuai dengan ketentuan pasal 22 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menjelaskan pertimbangan-pertimbangan hakim dalam putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha nomor 05/KPPU-L/2018 dan menganalisisnya dengan ketentuan dalam Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Franchisor Dalam Hal Penggunaan Merek Tanpa Hak Setelah Berakhirnya Perjanjian Waralaba (Studi Putusan Nomor 4/Pid.Sus/2015/PN Bla) Anisa Katria Utami; Asep syarifuddin Hidayat; mustolih mustolih
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 3, No 5 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v3i5.14637

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi franchisor dalam hal penggunaan merek tanpa hak setelah berakhirnya perjanjian waralaba antara Oktavia Cokrodiharjo sebagai mantan franchisee melawan PT. K-24 Indonesia sebagai pemilik merek K-24 Indonesia, serta mengetahui pertimbangan Majelis Hakim berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4/Pid.Sus/2015/ PN Bla apakah telah sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum yang berlaku.Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan masuk ke dalam kategori yuridis normatif dengan menganalisis putusan dan dikaitkan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan di bidang Hukum Merek, literatur pendapat para ahli dan putusan hakim. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach).Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa perlindungan hukum bagi franchisor dalam hal penggunaan merek tanpa hak setelah berakhirnya perjanjian waralaba diatur dalam Pasal 90 dan Pasal 91 Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2001 tentang Merek, dimana dalam Pasal 90 dijelaskan bahwa apabila ada pihak lain yang dengan sengaja dan tanpa hak menggunakan merek yang sama pada keseluruhan dengan merek terdaftar milik pihak lain akan mendapatkan sanksi pemidanaan maksimal pidana penjara 5 tahun dan/atau denda maksimal Rp1.000.000.000 (satu miliar rupiah), kemudian dalam Pasal 91 dijelaskan bahwa apabila ada pihak lain yang dengan sengaja dan tanpa hak menggunakan merek yang sama pada pokoknya dengan merek terdaftar milik pihak lain akan mendapatkan sanksi pemidanaan maksimal pidana penjara 4 tahun dan/atau denda maksimal 800.000.000 (delapan ratus juta rupiah). Pertimbangan Majelis Hakim pada Putusan Nomor 4/Pid.Sus/2015/ PN Bla, perbuatan yang dilakukan Oktavia Cokrodiharjo yang masih menggunakan aksessoris/atribut yang berhubungan dengan merek K-24 Indonesia setelah perjanjian waralaba berakhir telah terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan melanggar Pasal 91 Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2001 tentang Merek.
Perlindungan Hukum Merek Asing Terkenal Yang Bergantung Pada Sistem Konstitutif Di Indonesia Muhammad Lukman Fadillah; Nahrowi Nahrowi; Ipah Farihah
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i1.22254

Abstract

In order to improve the similarity of peoples to perform passing off reputation on the other side, now, therefore, mark breaching is especially motivated by a desire to gain benefit in the goods and services trade with the other mark which has been famous or popular or with the passing off owner mark or well-known mark. Trading of the trademark in well-known mark speed on selling to the market will undoubtedly profit quickly. The behavior in violation of the law harmed a company's reputation. With regard to the "EIK, EIKA, and EIKA brand" trademark issue, this journal seeks to discover how the "EIK" trademark is protected in Indonesia against well-known foreign marks that are not registered in Indonesia. A qualitative normative legal study employing a statute and case method. The statute used in this study is Law No. 20 of 2016 governing Marks and Geographical Indications, while the case used in this study is Supreme Court Decision No. 1300 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2017. The results of this study show that Law No. 20 of 2016 Governing Marks and Geographical Indications solely protects trademark rights based on registration. The Supreme Court judges gave substantial and correct consideration to the evidence in the case between the EIK brand and EIK, EIKA, and EIKA.
Perlindungan Hukum Atas Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Pada PT Hollit International (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 971 K/Pdt. Sus-PHI/2018) Iis Priyani; Indra rahmatullah
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 3, No 5 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v3i5.14573

Abstract

Masalah yang akan diteliti dalam penelitian ini dengan adanya objek putusan yang bervariatif terkait pemenuhan hak tenaga kerja yang di PHK sehingga menyebabkan ketidak pastian hukum  mengenai prosedur dan pemenuhan hak – hak normatif dalam pemenuhan hak pekerja yang diPHK. Seperti salah satu kasus PT.Hollit International, yang dalam putusan tingkat pertama majelis hakim menolak gugatan seluruhnya hak pekerja, akan tetapi pada tingkat kasasi, majelis hakim membatalkan putusan tingkat pertama, dikarenakan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat telah salah Menerapkan Hukum.Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian kualitatif yaitu penelitian yang jenis data dan analisa yang digunakan bersifat naratif, dalam bentuk pernyataan-pernyataan yang menggunakan penalaran. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif, mengacu pada penerapan hukum yang terdapat dalam suatu putusan dan hukum yang dikonsepkan sebagai norma atau kaidah yang berlaku dalam masyarakat.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tuntutan hak pekerja yang di PHK oleh perusahaan, dengan adanya putusan yang tidak komprehensif dan kurang sinkron antara Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan dan Putusan di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat sehingga menyebabkan adanya ketidakpastian hukum  dalam proses pemenuhan hak – hak pekerja.
Implications of the Second Amendment to Law Number 17 of 2014 on the Performance of Members of the House of Representatives in the Perspective of Fiqh Siyasah Erik Yudistira; Siti Ngainnur Rohmah
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 3, No 5 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v3i5.24982

Abstract

Transparency in the legislative process is essential for the successful implementation of legislation that is in the public's best interests. As previously indicated, when one examines the problematic rules contained in this new iteration of the MD3 Law, one will find several articles that contribute to non-transparency in various actions carried out inside the DPR, particularly in the Baleg DPR. understand the legal rules contained in Law Number 17 of 2014 concerning MD3 that pertain to the performance of the DPR; in addition, understand the implications of the DPR's performance of the legislative function contained in Law Number 17 of 2014 concerning MD3 from the perspective of Siyasah Fiqh. A legal approach is taken in the research, which is done through normative legal research or library law research with a legal approach, in this case, research on legal products. The findings revealed that the legislative function of the DPR-RI as Ahlul Halli Wal Aqdi from the standpoint of fiqh siyasah increased from 16 (sixteen) bills in the 2016–2017 session year to 17 (seventeen) bills in the 2015–2016 session year, compared to the previous year. In comparison to the aim set for the 2017 Annual Priority National Legislation Program, which is 49 bills, this rise appears to be less substantial. According to Fiqh Siyasah, Ahlul Halli Wal Aqdi must prioritize policies that are beneficial to Islam and refrain from establishing laws that are in conflict with the Qur'an. Meanwhile, members of the DPR may amend rules that are in conflict with religious beliefs so long as the rules are state policies that are approved by a majority of its members.

Page 16 of 32 | Total Record : 312

 14   15   16   17   18 

Filter by Year

2019 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024) Vol 6, No 2 (2024) Vol 6, No 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023) Vol 5, No 2 (2023) Vol 5, No 1 (2023): ARTICLES IN PRESS Vol 5, No 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023) Vol 4, No 6 (2022) Vol 4, No 5 (2022) Vol 4, No 4 (2022) Vol 4, No 3 (2022) Vol 4, No 2 (2022) Vol 4, No 1 (2022) Vol 3, No 6 (2021) Vol 3, No 5 (2021) Vol 3, No 4 (2021) Vol 3, No 3 (2021) Vol 3, No 2 (2021) Vol 3, No 1 (2021) Vol 2, No 5 (2020) Vol 2, No 4 (2020) Vol 2, No 3 (2020) Vol 2, No 2 (2020) Vol 2, No 1 (2020) Vol 1, No 6 (2019) Vol 1, No 5 (2019) Vol 1, No 4 (2019) Vol 1, No 3 (2019) Vol 1, No 2 (2019) Vol 1, No 1 (2019): Journal of Legal Research Vol 1, No 1 (2019) More Issue