cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Tri Imam Munandar
Contact Email
imamtri@unja.ac.id
Phone
+6285266101878
Journal Mail Official
pjc@unja.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Lintas Jambi - Ma. Bulian KM. 15, Mendalo Darat, Jambi Luar Kota, Muaro Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia 36122
Location
Kota jambi,
Jambi
INDONESIA
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law
Published by Universitas Jambi
ISSN : 27217205     EISSN : 27218325     DOI : https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v3i1
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law (ISSN Print 2721-7205 ISSN Online 2721-8325) is a periodical scientific publication in the field of Criminal Law. The word Pampas comes from the Malay language which means Compensation, Pampas is a traditional Jambi sanction as a law to injure people. This journal is published by the Faculty of Law, Jambi University as a medium for discussing Criminal Law. First published in February 2020, PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law is published three times a year, namely in February, June and October. In each of its publications, PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law publishes 8-10 articles on the results of research or research on criminal law. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law publishes articles on the results of research or studies of criminal law, including: (1) criminal law (2) criminal procedural law (3) criminology (4) victimology (5) special crimes (6) criminal law enforcement (7) criminal law reform (8) penal policy (9) comparative criminal law (10) criminal law and punishment (11) international criminal law (12) criminal customary law (13) criminal justice system (14) Islamic Criminal Law (15) military crime and the study of Indonesian criminal law which is global in nature in accordance with the latest developments in the dynamics of criminal law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 183 Documents
 15   16   17   18   19 
Studi Komparatif Pidana Pengawasan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia dan Belanda Ainun Majid, Muhammad Zulfitrah; Usman, Usman; Imam Munandar, Tri
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v7i1.51215

Abstract

This study aims to identify and analyze the types of acts or crimes that can be subject to criminal supervision sanctions in Indonesia and the Netherlands, as well as to provide a comprehensive understanding of the application of criminal supervision sanctions in the Indonesian and Dutch criminal law systems, so that it can be used as input for the development of national criminal law. The type of research used is normative juridical research, using legislative approach methods, comparative approaches, and conceptual approaches. The results of this study indicate that in Indonesia, the new Criminal Code stipulates criminal supervision sanctions for defendants with a maximum sentence of 5 years in prison, and a supervision period of no more than 3 years. Meanwhile, in the Netherlands, it is regulated in the Wetboek van Strafrecht for defendants who are threatened with a sentence of more than 2 years, a maximum of 4 years with a probationary period of 3 years and a maximum of 10 years, and in Indonesia the implementation is carried out by the Judicial Institution, the Prosecutor's Office, and the Correctional Institution. Meanwhile, in the Netherlands, supervision is carried out in a more structured manner by the Reclassering Institution together with the Public Prosecutor based on the Wetboek van Strafvordering, so the system is more systematic than in Indonesia. It is hoped that Indonesia will establish a special institution for criminal supervision to be more structured and systematic, and will immediately ratify the Criminal Code. ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan, untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis jenis-jenis perbuatan atau tindak pidana yang dapat dikenakan sanksi Pidana Pengawasan di Indonesia dan Belanda, dan untuk memberikan pemahaman yang komprehensif mengenai penerapan pidana pengawasan dalam sistem hukum pidana Indonesia dan Belanda, sehingga dapat menjadi bahan masukan bagi pengembangan hukum pidana nasional. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian yuridis normatif, dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan komparatif dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa di Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana baru menetapkan pidana pengawasan bagi Terdakwa dengan ancaman hukuman paling lama 5 tahun penjara, dan pidana pengawasannya tidak lebih dari 3 tahun. Sedangkan di Belanda, diatur dalam Wetboek van Strafrecht bagi Terdakwa yang diancam dengan pidana lebih dari 2 tahun maksimal 4 tahun dengan masa percobaan 3 tahun dan paling lama 10 tahun, dan di Indonesia pelaksanaannya dilakukan oleh Lembaga Peradilan, Kejaksaan, dan Badan Pemasyarakatan. Sementara di Belanda, pengawasan dijalankan secara lebih terstruktur oleh Lembaga Reclassering bersama Jaksa berdasarkan Wetboek van Strafvordering, sehingga sistemnya lebih sistematis dibanding di Indonesia. Diharapkan di Indonesia membentuk lembaga khusus untuk pidana pengawasan agar lebih terstruktur dan sistematis, dan segera mengesahkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana
Dalam Pusaran Deepfake Pornografi: Menakar Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Platform Digital Huda Alghiffary, Habil; Rapik, Mohamad; Wahyudhi, Dheny
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v7i1.53737

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence technology has given rise to the phenomenon of pornographic deepfakes, which allow the manipulation of a person's face or identity into sexual content without consent. The distribution of this content is generally facilitated by digital platforms with a wide distribution reach. The problem arises because Indonesian positive law does not explicitly regulate pornographic deepfakes or the limits of criminal liability for digital platforms. This study aims to analyze Indonesian criminal law regulations related to the position of digital platforms as legal subjects and to formulate the limits of criminal liability for the distribution of pornographic deepfake content. As a normative juridical approach, this study uses a legislative and conceptual approach, through an examination of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, the Pornografi Law, the 2023 Criminal Code, and Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Informatics Number 5 of 2020. The results show that the regulations are still partial and do not explicitly regulate the responsibility of digital platforms. Platforms cannot be automatically criminalized, but can be held accountable if proven to have an active role, negligence, or systemic negligence. This study concludes the need for more adaptive and balanced criminal law policy updates to provide legal certainty and effective protection for victims. ABSTRAK Perkembangan teknologi kecerdasan buatan telah melahirkan fenomena deepfake pornografi yang memungkinkan manipulasi wajah atau identitas seseorang ke dalam konten seksual tanpa persetujuan. Penyebaran konten tersebut umumnya difasilitasi oleh platform digital yang memiliki jangkauan distribusi luas. Permasalahan muncul karena hukum positif Indonesia belum secara eksplisit mengatur deepfake pornografi maupun batas pertanggungjawaban pidana platform digital. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan hukum pidana Indonesia terkait posisi platform digital sebagai subjek hukum serta merumuskan batas pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam penyebaran konten deepfake pornografi. Sebagai yuridis normative, penelitian ini dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, melalui kajian terhadap Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, Undang-Undang Pornografi, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Tahun 2023, serta Peraturan Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Nomor 5 Tahun 2020. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan masih bersifat parsial dan belum secara tegas mengatur tanggung jawab platform digital. Platform tidak dapat dipidana secara otomatis, namun dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban apabila terbukti terdapat peran aktif, pembiaran, atau kelalaian sistemik. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan perlunya pembaruan kebijakan hukum pidana yang lebih adaptif dan berimbang guna memberikan kepastian hukum serta perlindungan efektif bagi korban.
Urgensi Pengaturan Femisida Sebagai Tindak Pidana Dalam Hukum Pidana Nasional Indonesia Feronika BR Simamora, Elisa; Sudarti, Elly; Rakhmawati, Dessy
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v7i1.51561

Abstract

This research aims to find out and analyze the regulation of femicide in the current Indonesian national criminal law system, as well as examine the direction of Indonesia's criminal law policy towards femicide in the future. The problems analyzed include how femicide is regulated in the current Indonesian national criminal law system, as well as how criminal law policies should be carried out against femicide as a criminal act in the criminal law system in Indonesia in the future. The research method used is normative juridical with conceptual, legislative, case, and comparative approaches, especially with Brazil and Mexico which have comprehensively regulated femicide. The results of the study show that Indonesia's criminal law, including the Criminal Code and Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning the Crime of Sexual Violence, has not been able to identify femicide as gender-based murder. Law enforcement is still partial, focusing on the element of murder Law enforcement is still partial, focusing on the element of murder without paying attention to misogynistic motives and imbalances in power relations between perpetrators and victims. Comparative studies show that Brazil and Mexico have succeeded in strengthening victim protection, improving the accuracy of data collection, and improving investigation and prosecution mechanisms through special arrangements on femicide. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of the formation of a special femicide-specific offense or the application of a hybrid model in the Indonesian criminal law system. These reforms are needed to realize more comprehensive, gender- sensitive, and equitable legal protections for women as a vulnerable group to gender-based killings. ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pengaturan femisida dalam sistem hukum pidana nasional Indonesia saat ini, serta mengkaji arah kebijakan hukum pidana Indonesia terhadap femisida di masa mendatang. Permasalahan yang dianalisis meliputi bagaimana pengaturan femisida dalam sistem hukum pidana nasional Indonesia saat ini, serta bagaimana kebijakan hukum pidana seharusnya dilakukan terhadap femisida sebagai tindak pidana dalam sistem hukum pidana di Indonesia kedepan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual, perundang-undangan, kasus, dan perbandingan khususnya dengan Brasil dan Meksiko yang telah mengatur femisida secara komprehensif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum pidana Indonesia, termasuk Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana dan UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual, belum mampu mengidentifikasi femisida sebagai pembunuhan berbasis gender. Penegakan hukum masih bersifat parsial, berfokus pada unsur pembunuhan tanpa memperhatikan motif misoginis dan ketimpangan relasi kuasa antara pelaku dan korban. Studi perbandingan menunjukkan bahwa Brasil dan Meksiko berhasil memperkuat perlindungan korban, meningkatkan akurasi pendataan, serta memperbaiki mekanisme penyidikan dan penuntutan melalui pengaturan khusus tentang feminicidio. Kesimpulan penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya pembentukan delik khusus femisida atau penerapan model hybrid dalam sistem hukum pidana Indonesia. Reformasi ini diperlukan untuk mewujudkan perlindungan hukum yang lebih komprehensif, sensitif gender, dan berkeadilan bagi perempuan sebagai kelompok rentan terhadap pembunuhan berbasis gender.

Page 19 of 19 | Total Record : 183

 15   16   17   18   19 

Filter by Year

2020 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2020) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020) More Issue