cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Mahrus Ali
Contact Email
sengkomahrus@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
sengkomahrus@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law Merdeka University Surabaya Jl. Ketintang Madya VII/2 Surabaya
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains
Published by Universitas Merdeka Surabaya
ISSN : 20866852     EISSN : 25985892     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health, Social,
Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The scope of the articles published in YURISDIKSI Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Civil Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Constitutional Law, Environmental Law, Procedural Law, Antropological Law, Medical Law, Law and Economic, Sociology of Law and another section related contemporary issues in Law. YURISDIKSI Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Seni dan Humaniora (Lain-Lain)
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress" : 12 Documents clear
The Constitutional Rights of Children Born Wedlock As Legal Subjects Wico, Standy; Rachmi Sulistyarini; Satria Amiputra Amimakmur
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.323

Abstract

This study examines legal subjects, focusing on illegitimate children as legal subjects in the Indonesian legal system. Legal subjects include individuals or legal entities with legally recognized rights and obligations. In this context, children, as human beings, are legal subjects with basic rights guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution and related laws and regulations, including the Child Protection Law and the Marriage Law. Illegitimate children, born from unregistered marriages, often face challenges in legal recognition and the fulfillment of their rights. However, Indonesian law emphasizes that parents' marital status should not be a basis for discrimination against children, so that illegitimate children still have the right to legal recognition, identity, protection, and access to social, economic, and educational rights. This study emphasizes the importance of the principles of justice and legal certainty in providing protection for all legal subjects, including illegitimate children, to ensure their rights are fulfilled fairly and equitably. Thus, legal recognition of illegitimate children not only reflects compliance with national and international legal provisions but also supports the creation of social justice and child welfare. This research is expected to form the basis for a deeper understanding of the role of law in protecting children's rights as legal subjects without discrimination, as well as providing recommendations for more inclusive legal practices and policies.
Legal Certainty of The Temporary Abolition of Rights Under Article 53 Paragraph (1) of Agrarian Law Alivia Febriyanti; M. Hamidi Masykur; Bambang Eko Supriyadi
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.328

Abstract

This study discusses legal certainty in the elimination of temporary rights, namely mortgage rights, profit-sharing rights, right to ride, and agricultural land lease rights, based on Article 53 paragraph (1) of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). These temporary rights are a legacy of the colonial and customary systems that still give rise to legal uncertainty and agrarian conflicts. This study uses a normative-juridical approach with a literature study of laws and regulations, legal doctrine, and literature related to the principle of legal certainty. The results of the study indicate that the elimination of temporary rights must be implemented with the principle of legal certainty that emphasizes clarity of norms, consistency of application, and procedural openness. Legal certainty, as explained by Jan Michiel Otto, refers not only to the existence of written rules, but also to the effectiveness of implementation and real benefits for the community. In the context of Article 53 of the UUPA, the elimination of temporary rights must be accompanied by the transfer of rights to more permanent and registered forms of rights, such as ownership rights or use rights, thereby providing legal guarantees for farmers and the beneficiary community. This study emphasizes that the principle of legal certainty plays a strategic role in preventing arbitrary practices, reducing agrarian conflicts, and realizing social justice. With clear and consistent regulations, the elimination of temporary rights can support equitable land ownership, strengthen legal legitimacy, and improve public welfare. These findings suggest that the successful implementation of Article 53 of the UUPA depends heavily on the harmonization of written regulations, administrative practices, and public understanding of agricultural rights.
Implementation of The Obligation To Provide Free Notarial Services For Underprivate People In Malang Arsy Azuhra; Istislam; R. Imam Rahmat Sjafi'i
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.329

Abstract

The implementation of the obligation to provide free notarial services in Malang City has not been effective as mandated in Article 37 paragraph (1) of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Notary Position (UUJN). The provisions that emphasize the obligation of notaries to provide free legal services to the underprivileged have not been fully implemented due to the absence of implementing regulations governing the mechanism, recipient criteria, and supervision procedures. The results of the study indicate that most notaries only provide pro bono services to clients whose economic conditions are known, so that implementation is subjective, sporadic, and non-standardized. The main obstacles in its implementation are divided into three aspects, namely structural, normative, and sociological. From the structural side, the lack of public knowledge and the absence of technical guidelines are the main obstacles. From the normative aspect, there is no clear definition regarding the criteria for "underprivileged people" and the types of deeds included in the obligation for free services. Meanwhile, from the sociological aspect, the low level of social awareness and professionalism of notaries also worsens the effectiveness of implementation. This disharmony between legal ideals and empirical reality hinders the realization of the principles of certainty, benefit, and justice in notarial services. Therefore, comprehensive implementing regulations are needed from the Ministry of Law and Human Rights and the Indonesian Notaries Association to ensure the effective, accountable, and equitable implementation of pro bono notarial obligations across the region.
Legal Protection for Housing Developers under Protected Rice Field Policy Nolanda Fadiahaya Trigosa; Herlindah; Indah Dwi Qurbani
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.332

Abstract

This research examines the legal implications arising from the unilateral conversion of land ownership status into Protected Rice Fields (Lahan Sawah Dilindungi or LSD) in Madiun Regency following the issuance of the Decree of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (Decree of the Minister of ATR/BPN) Number 1589/SK-HK.02.01/XII/2021 of 2021. The designation creates legal uncertainty for housing developers who had previously obtained legal land rights based on Regional Regulation Number 9 of 2011 concerning the Spatial Plan of Madiun Regency for 2009–2029. The absence of synchronization between the LSD policy and the Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW) generates normative inconsistencies, resulting in legal and economic losses for developers. This study, therefore, seeks to analyze the legal status of the LSD designation and the forms of legal protection available for affected developers. Using a normative juridical method with statute, conceptual, and case approaches, the research analyzes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials through descriptive-analytical techniques employing grammatical and systematic interpretation. The findings show that the legal position of the Ministerial Decree is problematic in both authority and hierarchy. Although the Ministry of ATR/BPN possesses attributive authority to establish LSD, implementing such designation without harmonization with regional spatial planning constitutes an overextension of authority and ignores decentralization principles. As a result, the decree holds weak normative force and should be considered an administrative policy requiring alignment with regional regulations. Furthermore, legal protection for developers may be provided preventively through regulatory harmonization between RTRW and LSD policies, and repressively through administrative remedies or judicial review before the Administrative Court (PTUN), including claims based on on-rechtmatige overheidsdaad.
Legal Status of Shareholder Agreements on GMS Quorum Deviations Susiani; Budi Santoso; Satria Amiputra Amimakmur
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.333

Abstract

This study examines the legal status of the shareholders agreement, which regulates the quorum of the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) differently from the provisions of the Limited Liability Company Law (UUPT) and the Company's Articles of Association (AD), with a case study of a share ownership dispute and the implementation of the GMS at PT Indo Mineralita Prima. The dispute began with the sale and purchase of shares based on a share pledge agreement, which then resulted in a secret transfer of ownership and the implementation of the GMS without notification to one of the shareholders. The shareholders had previously agreed to a shareholders agreement that required that changes to the Board of Directors and Board of Commissioners must be approved by 100% of the shareholders. However, in practice, some shareholders made changes to the company's structure, share transfers, and capital increases without following these provisions. This gave rise to a lawsuit for breach of contract by PT Investasi Internasional Indonesia, as the 28% shareholder, who felt aggrieved due to share dilution and decision-making without a valid quorum. The Panel of Judges in its decision stated that the defendants had committed a breach of contract and annulled several GMS deeds as a result of the violation of the shareholders agreement. However, the author's analysis shows that the shareholder agreement cannot override the Company Law and the Articles of Association, so that the 100% quorum requirement, which is not regulated in the Articles of Association, is not binding on the company. Therefore, the shareholder agreement is only legally binding on the parties as long as it does not conflict with statutory regulations and the Articles of Association. This research emphasizes the importance of harmonizing private shareholder agreements and corporate law to create legal certainty in corporate governance.
Notarial Use of Electronic Signatures: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and South Korea Dwi Kinasih, Klaura; Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto; Diana R.W. Napitupulu
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.334

Abstract

The advancement of digital technology has significantly transformed notarial practices, particularly regarding the use of electronic signatures in the creation of authentic deeds. This study provides a normative legal analysis comparing the regulation of electronic signatures by notaries in Indonesia and South Korea, focusing on legal certainty, document validity, and authenticity. In Indonesia, the regulation is governed by Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions as last amended by Law Number 1 of 2024, Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 on the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions, and the Notary Position Act (UUJN), which requires that deeds be signed in the physical presence of a notary. Meanwhile, South Korea comprehensively regulates this matter through the Electronic Signature Act (ESA) and the Notary Act, which authorizes notaries to use certified electronic signatures supported by a government-integrated digital verification system. This research employs a normative juridical approach with comparative legal analysis to examine the alignment and divergence of legal norms between the two countries, as well as their relation to the authenticity principle of deeds as stipulated in Article 1868 of the Indonesian Civil Code. The findings reveal that South Korea has fully implemented electronic signatures in notarial practice through robust legal and technological infrastructure, whereas Indonesia still faces normative conflicts among the ITE Law, the Notary Position Act, and the Civil Code. Therefore, regulatory harmonization is necessary to ensure that Indonesia's notarial system can transition toward digitalization while preserving authenticity and legal certainty.
Conceptualization of Crypto Asset As A Collateral Object In Indonesian Positive Law Firda Shafira; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti; Stephanie Wilamarta
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.335

Abstract

The development of digital technology has given rise to crypto assets as a new form of digital wealth with economic value and can be legally traded in Indonesia, based on Bappebti regulations. However, their legal status as fiduciary collateral remains controversial because Indonesian property law does not fully accommodate intangible assets such as crypto assets. This study aims to analyze the feasibility of crypto assets as fiduciary collateral from the perspective of Indonesian positive law, using normative juridical research methods through legislative and conceptual approaches. The results show that functionally, crypto assets fulfill the characteristics of objects in collateral law, as they have economic value, can be legally transferred, and can be used as a basis for debt repayment. However, the lack of a mechanism for registration, assessment, and execution of digital collateral creates legal uncertainty in financing practices. Comparisons with other countries such as Switzerland, the United States, and Singapore indicate that the successful recognition of crypto assets as collateral depends heavily on a clear legal framework governing ownership protection and oversight mechanisms. In the Indonesian context, Law Number 4 of 2023 concerning the Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector (P2SK) provides an opportunity for reform by expanding the authority of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in regulating digital financial assets. Therefore, harmonization of the Civil Code, the Fiduciary Guarantee Law, the P2SK Law, and Bappebti regulations is necessary to ensure that crypto assets can be legally and effectively accommodated as collateral. With appropriate regulations, national law will be able to adapt to digital innovation without sacrificing the principles of legal certainty, justice, and expediency.
The Urgency of Regulating Priority Rights for Former Land Rights Holders Over Management Rights Salimah, Maratul Muslimatus; Koeswahyono, Imam; Supriyadi, Bambang Eko
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.340

Abstract

Regulations regarding management rights are still considered sporadic and fragmented, making the substance of management rights difficult to understand. One of the authorities of the holder of management rights is to use and utilize all or part of the land with management rights for their own use or in collaboration with third parties through land utilization agreements. Third parties can utilize the part of the land that is collaborated with the right to cultivate, right to build, or right to use. As is known, land rights can be granted over state land and management rights. If the term of land rights over state land expires, the former holder of the land rights is given priority rights to extend the land rights. This is different from land rights over management rights, where currently there are no regulations regarding the granting of priority rights to former rights holders. Third parties who utilize land with management rights properly and in accordance with spatial plans should be given priority rights to extend the land rights over management rights. This type of research is normative legal research with a statutory regulatory approach, a case approach, a conceptual approach, and a historical approach. The results of this study indicate that there is an urgency to regulate the priority rights of former holders of land rights over management rights, considering that the substance of management rights is part of the state's right to control. Thus, the characteristics of management rights in the context of land use agreements by third parties are in line with the objectives of the state's right to control, namely for the greatest prosperity of the people.
Analysis of Priority Criteria In Offering Special Mining Business Permit Areas (WIUPK) To Religious Community Organizations Firlia Nurani Rakhma; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti; Tri Sulistiowarni
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.342

Abstract

This study examines the legal implications and urgency of setting priority criteria for the offering of Special Mining Business License Areas (WIUPK) to Religious Community Organization-Owned Enterprises (BU-OMK) as stipulated in Article 83A of Law Number 3 of 2020 and Article 75 of Government Regulation Number 96 of 2021. The main focus of the study lies in the lack of norms governing priority parameters, including aspects of feasibility, operational capacity, and verification mechanisms for BU-OMK. Using a normative juridical method based on analysis of laws and regulations and the principles of good mining governance, this study finds that this lack of regulation creates legal uncertainty and opens up broad scope for interpretation for decision-makers. As a result, there is potential for unequal treatment, conflicts of interest, and abuse of power in the process of granting WIUPK. This study also shows that giving priority to BU-OMK is a form of positive discriminatory policy (affirmative discrimination) that is theoretically justifiable, as long as it is implemented through a proportional, objective, and accountable mechanism. However, without clear priority criteria-including legality of the business entity, financial capability, technical capacity, environmental protection assurance, and governance integrity—this policy risks inefficiency and potential irregularities, including the use of BU-OMK as intermediaries for certain interests (beneficial ownership risks). Therefore, this study emphasizes the need for the establishment of comprehensive, auditable derivative regulations that align with the principles of government administrative law to ensure the effectiveness, accountability, and sustainability of the WIUPK bidding policy.
Legal Protection of Workers In Employment Termination Disputes Without Judicial Review Notodiguno; Budi Santoso; Sugeng Santoso PN
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.344

Abstract

This study examines legal uncertainty in the resolution of employment termination disputes resulting from the absence of regulation on the extraordinary legal remedy of judicial review (Peninjauan Kembali) under Law Number 2 of 2004 on the Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes. The research gap lies in the lack of normative analysis explaining the legal rationale and implications of excluding judicial review, despite its recognition in general civil procedural law and judicial practice. This study offers novelty by conceptualizing the exclusion of judicial review as a deliberate legislative policy to ensure finality and expedited dispute resolution in industrial relations. Employing a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study finds that positioning cassation as the final and binding legal remedy is intended to provide legal certainty and prevent prolonged disputes. Legal protection for workers is achieved when cassation decisions consistently deliver clear legal reasoning and definitive rulings on the fulfillment of workers’ normative rights. Accordingly, consistent treatment of cassation as the ultimate legal remedy is essential to ensuring legal certainty and effective legal protection in employment termination disputes.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): December Vol. 21 No. 2 (2025): September Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025): June Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): March Vol. 20 No. 3 (2024): December Vol. 20 No. 2 (2024): September Vol. 20 No. 1 (2024): June Vol. 19 No. 4 (2024): March Vol. 19 No. 3 (2023): December Vol. 19 No. 2 (2023): September Vol. 19 No. 1 (2023): June Vol. 18 No. 4 (2023): March Vol. 18 No. 2 (2022): 30 September 2022 Vol. 18 No. 3 (2022): December Vol. 18 No. 1 (2022): June Vol. 17 No. 4 (2022): March Vol. 17 No. 3 (2021): December Vol. 17 No. 2 (2021): September Vol. 17 No. 1 (2021): Juni Vol. 16 No. 4 (2021): March Vol. 16 No. 3 (2020): Desember Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): September Vol. 16 No. 1 (2020): Juni Vol. 15 No. 2 (2020): March Vol. 14 No. 1 (2019): September Vol. 13 No. 2 (2019): March Vol. 12 No. 1 (2018): September Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): March Vol. 10 No. 1 (2017): September More Issue