Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
4.646
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Arena Hukum Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Journal of SouthEast Asian Human Rights Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Unram Law Review Jurnal Budaya Nusantara BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan JURNAL HUKUM dan KENOTARIATAN MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ADIL : Jurnal Hukum Mulawarman Law Review Majalah Hukum Nasional Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences International Journal of Business, Law, and Education YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Administrative and Environmental Law Review International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Perspektif Hukum Indonesia Law Reform Journal (ILREJ) The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies Warkat
Imam Koeswahyono
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 46 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 46 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Memerankan Disiplin Antropologi Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Agraria koeswahyono, imam
Jurnal Budaya Nusantara Vol 2 No 1 (2015): Nusantara & Kontemporer
Publisher : LPPM Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36456/b.nusantara.vol2.no1.a697

Abstract

Approach to study of law especially for dispute resolution concerning agrarian resources has been bound on normative positivistic approach
The Notion of Divine Principle (Asas Ilahiah) in Indonesian Contract Law Djumikasih, Djumikasih; Luth, Thohir; Budiono, Abdul Rachmad; Koeswahyono, Imam
Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Vol 8, No 1 (2021): Contemporary Issue in Private Law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2021.008.01.09

Abstract

This study is legal research aiming to find out the essence of Divine Principles in Indonesian Contract Law from the review of the Natural Law theory, the Sunt-Servanda theory, the Awareness and Legal Obedience Grundnorm theory, and Truth theory. This research reveals that the Divine Principle's essence is the most fundamental principle or guideline derived from God but exists in humans, aiming to find the truth and regulate the parties in making agreements. The application of the Divine Principle aims to find the truth and regulate the parties in the agreement's field.  Indonesian citizens could realize and practice the Precepts of Godhead in their agreement activities. In establishing the agreement, the parties are applying the teachings of their respective religions. This study reveals that the Divine principle needs to be incorporated into one of the upcoming National Agreement Laws principles, especially in the contract born because of the agreement. This study maintains that the divine principle can be applied comprehensively for Indonesian citizens who are parties to the agreement, not only limited to the Indonesian Muslim citizens.
The Responsibility Of Land Office On Landfarm Functional Shift To Housing Tanazza Zalsabella Firsty; Imam Koeswahyono; Rachmad Safa'at
Unram Law Review Vol 3 No 2 (2019): Unram Law Review (Ulrev)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ulrev.v3i2.74

Abstract

Regarding the transfer of agricultural land to housing, the reduction in the area of agricultural land in Blitar City is due to land conversion functions such as the construction of housing and other public facilities that are not in accordance with article 3 paragraph (1) letter g PERDA of the Blitar City Spatial Plan. In fact, regulations with reality that occur in the field are not in accordance with applicable regulations. The facts that occur on the ground are agricultural land being converted into housing that causing agricultural land to decrease. Based on this, the author made this study with the aim of analyzing the implementation of policies and accountability of the Blitar City Land Office for the conversion of agricultural land for housing in Blitar City.The research method used by the author is juridical empirical with a legal sociology approach. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that there is a lack of firmness in law enforcement towards the conversion of agricultural land which is still quite widely found in buildings in the form of housing and land converted to other non-agricultural land and not licensed. The results of the study show that there is a need for coordination between the City Government as a policy maker and agencies related to the conversion of agricultural land for housing, so that integrated supervision can be carried out so that changes in land use can be known earlier so that agricultural land does not decrease every year.
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HAK ATAS TANAH PETUANAN DALAM HAL PENYEDIAAN TANAH UNTUK PENYELENGGARAAN PROGRAM TRANSMIGRASI Sovia Alfit; Imam Koeswahyono
Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan Vol 6, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (310.234 KB) | DOI: 10.33474/hukeno.v6i1.14158

Abstract

 Masyarakat Pertuanan negeri leisela merupakan salah satu masyarakat adat di Kabupaten Buru, sebagian besar dari masyarakatnya memiliki mata pencaharian dalam bidang pertanian dan peternakan. Hal ini tentu saja menjadikan tanah sebagai hal yang begitu penting terhadap kelangsungan hidupnya khususnya dalam bidang ekonomi yang menyebabkan dalam hal pemanfaatannya sering mengalami benturan kepentingan antar pengguna tanah. Pada daerah petuanan tersebut sering terjadi sengketa tanah. Sengketa yang sering terjadi yakni sengketa perdata yang berkaitan dengan masalah-masalah tanah diantara masyarakat adat dalam hal pemilikan dan penguasaan tanah. Sengketa-sengketa tersebut berasal dari tanah-tanah hak ulayat seperti kasus sengketa hak ulayat yang terjadi antara masyarakat adat petuanan negeri leisela dengan pemerintah Kabupaten Buru dalam hal penyediaan tanah untuk penyelenggaraan program transmigrasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa terkait dengan penyebab sengketa hak atas tanah petuanan dalam hal penyediaan tanah untuk peyelenggaraan program transmigrasi dan penyelesaian sengketa hak atas tanah petuanan dalam hal penyediaan tanah untuk penyelenggaraan program transmigrasi di Desa Awilinan Kecamatan Air Buaya Kabupaten Buru. Metode penelitian ini adalah Yuridis Empiris dengan pendekatan yuridis antropologis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang dilakukan, bahwa faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan timbulnya sengketa hak atas tanah petuanan dalam hal penyediaan tanah untuk penyelenggaraan program transmigrasi di desa awilinan kecamatan airbuaya adalah perbedaan kepentingan antara masyarakat adat petuanan negeri leisela dengan pemerintah daerah Kabupaten Buru. Dalam kasus ini, penyelesaian sengketa hak atas tanah petuanan dalam hal penyediaan tanah untuk  penyelenggaraan program transmigrasi di desa Awilinan kecamatan Air Buaya dilakukan melalui penyelesaian sengketa berdasarkan hukum adat setempat dengan cara kakawai.Kata-Kunci: Sengketa, hak atas tanah petuanan, transmigrasi The Leisela State Pertuanan Community is one of the indigenous peoples in Buru Regency, most of the people have a livelihood in agriculture and animal husbandry. This of course makes land a very important thing for its survival, especially in the economic field which causes conflicts of interest in terms of its use between land users. In the petuanan area, land disputes often occur. Disputes that often occur are civil disputes relating to land issues among indigenous peoples in terms of land ownership and control. These disputes originate from customary land rights, such as the case of customary rights disputes that occurred between the indigenous people of the land of Leisela and the government of Buru Regency in terms of providing land for the implementation of the transmigration program. This study aims to analyze the causes of disputes over petuanan land rights in terms of providing land for the implementation of the transmigration program and resolving disputes over petuanan land rights in terms of providing land for the implementation of the transmigration program in Awilinan Village, Air Buaya District, Buru Regency. This research method is Juridical Empirical with juridical anthropological approach. Based on the results of the research conducted, that the factors that cause disputes over petuanan land rights in terms of providing land for the implementation of the transmigration program in Awilinan village, Airbuaya sub-district are the differences in interests between the indigenous peoples of Petuanan Negeri Leisela and the local government of Buru Regency. In this case, the settlement of disputes over petuanan land rights in terms of providing land for  the implementation of the transmigration program in Awilinan village, Air Buaya sub-district, was carried out through dispute resolution based on local customary law by the kakawai method.Keywords: dispute, petuanan land rights, transmigration
RATIO LEGIS PERJANJIAN KERJASAMA ANTARA NOTARIS DENGAN DEVELOPER PENGUSAHA PROPERTI DITINJAU BERDASARKAN PASAL 16 AYAT (1) HURUF A UNDANG-UNDANG JABATAN NOTARIS M Rizky Aditya Zuhdi; Imam Koeswahyono; Dyah Aju Wisnuwardhani
Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan Vol 5, No 4 (2021): November
Publisher : Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (252.221 KB) | DOI: 10.33474/hukeno.v5i4.13867

Abstract

 Penulis akan membahas mengenai Perjanjian kerjasama antara Notaris dengan pengembang (developer) property. Perjanjian tersebut menimbulkan suatu hubungan hukum antara kedua belah pihak yakni pihak Notaris dengan pihak pengembang (developer) properti yang didalamya terdapat hak dan kewajiban masing-masing pihak. Secara mutatis mutandis notaris menjadi pihak dalam suatu perjanjian, hal ini tentunya bertentangan dengan Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf a Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris bahwa notaris dalam melaksanakan tugasnya sebgaai pejabat umum maupun sebagai profesi harus melaksanannya secara mandiri tanpa keberpihakan kepada salah satu pihak. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menganalisis ratio legis perjanjian kerjasama antara notaris dengan pengembang yang bergerak di bidang properti yang dikualifikasi bermasalah terkait keberlakuan prinsip kemandirian notaris dan Akibat hukum apa yang timbul apabila terdapat perjanjian kerjasama antara notaris dengan pengembang yang bergerak di bidang properti yang dikualifikasikan bermasalah sebagaimana Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf a Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian Yuridis Normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil dari Penelitian ini yaitu Ratio Legis dalam Perjanjian kerjasama antara notaris dan Pengembang (developer) Properti melanggar Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf a Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris tentang kemandirian serta ketidakberpihakan notaris menjalankan jabatannya, Sehingga berakibat terdegradasinya Akta Otentik yang dibuat Notaris menjadi Akta dibawah tangan sebagai konsekuensi atas dilanggarnya asas Proporsionalitas yang melekat pada jabatan Notaris. Bahwa Perjanjian Notaris dengan Developer Pengembang Properti hanya berlaku antara pihak-pihak yang membuatnya. Suatu perjanjian tidak dapat membawa rugi dan manfaat bagi pihak ketiga dengan tetap memperhatikan ketentuan 1365 KUHPerdata. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini, Adanya perjanjian Kerjasama ini melanggar Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf a UUJN, pelanggaran tersebut merupakan pelanggaran yang bersifat procedural yang berakibat terdegradasinya Akta Otentik menjadi Akta dibawah tangan.Kata Kunci: Ratio Legis, Perjanjian Kerjasama, Notaris, Pengembang Properti. The author discussed the cooperation agreement between a notary and a property developer (developer). The agreement creates a legal relationship between the two parties, namely the notary party and the property developer in which there are rights and obligations of each parties. Mutatis mutandis, a notary is a party to an agreement, of course, contrary to Article 16 paragraph (1) letter an of the Notary Position Law, that in carrying out his duties as a public official and as a profession, he must carry out his duties independently without taking sides with either party. The purpose of this study is to analyze the ratio legis for cooperation agreements between notaries and developers engaged in the qualifying property sector with problems related to the enforceability of the principle of notary independence and what legal consequences arise if there is a cooperation agreement between a notary and a developer engaged in the problematic qualifying property as Article 16 paragraph (1) letter a Law of Notary Position. The type of research used is juridical normative research with a statutory approach and a case approach. The results of this study are the Legis Ratio in the cooperation agreement between a notary and a property developer in violation of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter a of the Notary Position Law concerning the independence and impartiality of notaries in carrying out their positions, resulting in degradation of the Authentic Deed made by the Notary into the Deed. under the hands as a consequence of violating the principle of proportionality attached to the position of a notary public. That the Notary Agreement with Property Developer Developer is only valid between the parties who make it. An agreement cannot bring losses and benefits to a third party while still paying attention to the provisions of the 1365 Civil Code. This research concludes that the existence of this cooperation agreement violates Article 16 paragraph (1) letter a UUJN, this violation is a procedural violation that results in the degradation of the Authentic Deed into an Underhanded Deed.Keywords: Ratio Legis, Cooperation Agreement, Notary, Property Developer. 
DASAR HUKUM BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL TIDAK MELAKSANAKAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA NOMOR: 131/G.TUN/2004/PTUN-JKT Wiwin Febrianasari; Imam Koeswahyono; Supriyadi Supriyadi
Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan Vol 5, No 3 (2021): Agustus
Publisher : Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (239.915 KB) | DOI: 10.33474/hukeno.v5i3.10972

Abstract

 Sengketa pertanahan merupakan suatu permasalahan yang sudah banyak terjadi di berbagai daerah. Mengenai sengketa pertanahan, dapat dilihat dari adanya penyebab mendasar yakni ketimpangan kepemilikan dan penguasaan sumber-sumber agraria. Seperti halnya sengketa pertanahan antara PT. Sumber Sari Petung dengan masyarakat Kecamatan Ngancar, dimana tanah Hak Guna Usaha yang akan diperpanjang masa jangka waktu oleh PT. Sumber Sari Petung diduduki oleh masyarakat, sehingga masalah ini menjadi berlarut-larut diantara kedua belah pihak. PT. Sumber Sari Petung yang merasa dirugikan melakukan upaya untuk mencari kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum yakni dengan cara menggugat ke Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara terkait dengan dikeluarkannya Surat Keputusan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 66/HGU/BPN/2000 yang berisi bahwa tanah Hak Guna Usaha yang diajukan permohonan perpanjangan oleh PT. Sumber Sari Petung dikurangi luas obyek tanahnya seluas 250 Ha dan selanjutnya akan di redistribusikan kepada masyarakat di Kecamatan Ngancar khususnya di desa Sugihwaras, desa Sempu dan desa Babadan sebagai obyek landreform. Metode penelitian dalam penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dan menggunakan metode pendekatan kasus. Hasil dari penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa konsekuensi dari permohonan perpanjangan jangka waktu Hak Guna Usaha yakni dapat dikabulkan dan tidak dikabulkan, sehingga keputusan dari Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara mengenai pembatalan Surat Keputusan Nomor: 66/HGU/BPN/2000 tentang Pemberian Hak Guna Usaha atas Tanah yang terletak di Kabupaten Kediri Propinsi Jawa Timur pada tanggal 18 Desember 2000 menjadi non executable.Kata Kunci: Sengketa HGU, Surat Keputusan BPN, PTUN. Land dispute is a problem that has occurred in many regions. Regarding land disputes, it can be seen from the fundamental cause, namely inequality in ownership and control of agrarian resources. Like the land dispute between PT. Sumber Sari Petung and the community of Ngancar District, where the land was land use rights that would be extended by PT. Sumber Sari Petung is occupied by the community, so that this problem becomed a protracted between the two parties. PT. Sumber sari Petung, who felt that he was aggrieved, made efforts to seek legal certainty and legal protection, namely by filing a lawsuit with the State Administrative Court regarding the issuance of the Decree of the Head of the National Land Agency Number 66/HGU/BPN/2000 which stated that the proposed land use rights were application for extension by PT. Sumber Sari Petung reduced the land object area of 250 hectares and then redistributed it to the community in Ngancar District, especially in Sugihwaras Village, Sempu Village and Babadan Village as landreform objects. The research method in this study uses normative legal research and uses a case approach. The results of this study can be concluded that the consequence of the application for extension of the term of land use rights is that it can be granted and not granted, so that the decision of the State Administrative Court regarding the cancellation of Decree Number: 66/HGU/BPN/2000 concerning the Granting of Business Use Rights over Land located in Kediri Regency, East Java Province on December 18, 2000 becomes non-executable.Keywords: Dispute the concession, Decree of the Head of the National Land Agency, State Administrative Court.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI NASABAH PIALANG PERDAGANGAN BERJANGKA DALAM HAL TERJADINYA WANPRESTASI YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH PIHAK PIALANG PERDAGANGAN BERJANGKA Nugrah Maulid; Imam Koeswahyono; Yuliati Yuliati
Jurnal ADIL Vol 8, No 2 (2017): DESEMBER 2017
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Universitas YARSI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (518.759 KB) | DOI: 10.33476/ajl.v8i2.659

Abstract

Perlindungan Hukum bagi nasabah pialang perdagangan berjangka akan menjadifokus penelitian ini, terutama bila terjadi pelanggaran kontrak. Penulis akanmenganalisa peraturan perundang-undangan di bidang perdagangan berjangkayang terkandung dalam UU No.32 / 1997 sebagaimana telah diubah dengan UUNo.10 / 2011 tentang sejauh mana kedua undang-undang tersebut telahmemberikan mekanisme perlindungan hukum di bidang perdagangan masa depanketika pialang adalah melanggar perjanjian. Adanya mekanisme perlindunganhukum yang adil di bidang ini tentunya akan memberikan kepastian hukum bagiorang-orang yang terlibat dalam transaksi perdagangan berjangka.
RASIO LEGIS PASAL 43 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2011 TERKAIT DENGAN IMPLEMENTASINYA Landya Maria Simatupang; Imam Koeswahyono; Bambang Sugiri
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 46, No 4 (2017): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2016.94 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.46.4.2017.291-298

Abstract

Setelah terbitnya Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2011 tentang Rumah Susun, muncul permasalahan saat implementasi UU dimaksud yaitu perjanjian/akta apa yang dapat dipergunakan dalam hal syarat-syarat untuk melaksanakan PPJB sebagaimana di atur dalam Pasal 43 UU Rumah Susun belum terpenuhi. Pasal  43  UU Rumah  Susun  mengijinkan  pengembang   untuk   melakukan  penjualan  satuan    rumah  susun  yang  dibangunnya,  asalkan   memenuhi  persyaratan  -  persyaratan   yang  diatur  dalam  Pasal  43 UU ayat (2) tersebut. Selanjutnya, dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis empiris, penulis mengkaji lebih lanjut apa yang menjadi rasio  legis pengaturan dari Pasal 43  UU Rumah Susun yang  wajib dipatuhi  oleh  pengembang. Kemudian dari hasil penelitian tersebut diketahui bahwa rasio legis pengaturan ketentuan tersebut adalah dalam rangka perlindungan konsumen.
KONTROVERSI HUKUM DOKUMENTASI TRANSFER KEPEMILIKAN TANAH DAN/ATAU BANGUNAN BERDASARKAN TAX AMNESTY LEGAL CONTROVERSY OF LAND AND/OR BUILDING TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP DOCUMENTATION UNDER TAX AMNESTY Adji Kuntadewi; Imam Koeswahyono; Tunggul Anshari Setia Negara
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 46, No 2 (2017): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1775.129 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.46.2.2017.100-111

Abstract

Undang-Undang No. 11 tertanggal 1 Juli 2016 tentang Pengampunan Pajak (Undang-Undang Pengampunan Pajak) mensyaratkan pengalihan harta tidak bergerak berupa tanah dan/atau bangunan milik Wajib Pajak selambat-lambatnya pada tanggal 31 Desember 2017, untuk memperoleh pembebasan Pajak Penghasilan. Namun, dalam faktanya tidak semua produk hukum Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah terkait pengalihan tanah dan bangunan tepat diaplikasikan untuk formalisasi transaksi wajib pajak dimaksud.  Melalui pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan metode penemuan hukum (rechtsvinding), Penulis menganalisis bentuk dokumen hukum Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah yang dapat mengakomodasi kebutuhan Wajib Pajak untuk memperoleh pembebasan pajak penghasilan berdasarkan Undang-Undang Pengampunan Pajak. 
Implikasi yuridis parate eksekusi obyek hak tanggungan Lydia Kurnia Putri Rosari; Imam Nur Koeswahyono; Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 13, No 1 (2022): April 2022
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v13i1.5189

Abstract

To analyze and study the juridical implications of separate execution on the object/s of mortgage are the objectives to be achieved in this research and also to find out what are the obstacles faced by the Bank PT. Central Bank Asia Tbk. Kediri Branch in implementing para te execution with the object of the mortgage. The method used in this research is empirical legal research with interview data collection techniques, literature studies, and documentation. The results of the research with the method above show the obstacles that might occur is an obstacle that came from the debtor's side, for example, the existence of resistance from the debtor or third party and the emptying of the object of the liability right. The obstacle from the creditor's side is the difficulty in finding auction buyers for the object of the execution auction. The juridical implication of the execution parade with the object of collateral is to obtain creditor assurance regarding the repayment of his debt from the debtor, in addition to accelerating the repayment process of creditors when the debtor defaults by giving the creditor the right to sell the Collateral Right Object of his own power through a public auction.How to cite item: Rosari. L.K.P., Koeswahyono I., Wisnuwardhani. D.A. (2022). Implikasi Yuridis Parate Eksekusi Objek Hak Tanggungan. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(1). doi:10.26905/idjch.v13i1.5189.
Co-Authors Abdul Rachmad Budiono Adji Kuntadewi Afuw, Tanzizal Agusti, Tasya Moedy Ahmad, Arwani aini, Nur’Aini Aiska, Gitta Sabilla Akib, Muhammad Kibar Alexander Dewa Gede Kyle Pranajaya Putra ANGGRAINI, ERNA Anjel Ria Meiliva Kanter Arfandy, Muh Farhan Ariananto Waluyo Adi, Emmanuel Arief Rahman Mahmoud Bakri, Moch Bambang Sugiri Bayu Sagita Damopolii Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani Diah Pawestri Maharani, Diah Pawestri Djumikasih Dwi Qurbani, Indah Dyah Aju Wisnuwardhani Fitrianingsih, Suci Hadi Prabowo Hairan Hairan Hamjah Hanif Nur Widhiyanti Haykal, Haykal Hendrarto Hadisuryo I Nyoman Nurjaya Ilham Nugroho Indah Dwi Qurbani Ismudyahwati, Ika Istijab, Istijab Iwan Permadi Kanter, Anjel Ria Meilivia Karina, Ida Ayu Aditya Landya Maria Simatupang Luth, Thohir Lydia Kurnia Putri Rosari M Rizky Aditya Zuhdi Maharani, A Rafika Masykur, Hamidi Masykur, Mohammad Hamidi Moch Bakri Mohammad Fadli Mohammad Hamidi Masykur Muhammad Arsyad Muhammad Dahlan Muhammad Takeshi Yusran Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo Nugrah Maulid Nurhayati, Prawatya Ido perkasa, surya rimba Pratama, LM Alif Puspitasari, Ratna Ayu Putra Pangestu, Hendy Qudsi, Mohammad Syafiq Rachmad Safa'at Rachmad Syafaat Rachmi Sulistyarini Rahmawati, Nadyah Maylika Ramadhina, Asyifa Aulia Putri Retno Mumpuni Safa’at, Rachmad Sari, Fitrizka Eka Setiawan, Endrianto Bayu Shinta Hadiyantina Soekesi, Titik Soeryati Sovia Alfit Sri Kawuryan, Endang Suhariningsih Suhariningsih Suhariningsih Sukarmi Sukarmi, Sukarmi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Syahriza Alkohir Anggoro Tanazza Zalsabella Firsty Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa Tunggul Ansari Setia Negara Walid Siagian, Abdhy Wardana, Azna Abrory Wisnuwardhani , Diah Ayu Wiwin Febrianasari Wiwin Febrianasari Yuliana Fatma Ira Crisantika Yuliati Yuliati Yusril, Muh.