cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Indirani Wauran
Contact Email
refleksihukum.fh@adm.uksw.edu
Phone
+628157797192
Journal Mail Official
refleksihukum.fh@adm.uksw.edu
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Jl. Diponegoro No. 52-60 Salatiga 50711 INDONESIA
Location
Kota salatiga,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published by Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
ISSN : 25414984     EISSN : 25415417     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2021.v6.i1
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
REFLEKSI HUKUM is a peer-review scholarly Law Journal issued by Faculty of Law Satya Wacana Christian University which is purported to be an instrument in disseminating ideas or thoughts generated through academic activities in the development of legal science (jurisprudence). REFLEKSI HUKUM accepts submissions of scholarly articles to be published that cover original academic thoughts in Legal Dogmatics, Legal Theory, Legal Philosophy and Comparative Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 172 Documents
 14   15   16   17   18 
ANOMALI TUMPANG TINDIH PERATURAN MENTERI DAN PERATURAN DAERAH: TINJAUAN HIERARKI PERATURAN Bagas Fadhilah; Fahmi Ramadhan Firdaus
Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24246/jrh.2025.v10.i1.p117-136

Abstract

This article addresses the normative conflict between Ministerial Regulations and Regional Regulations arising from the ambiguous position of Ministerial Regulations within Indonesia's regulatory hierarchy under Law Number 12 of 2011. This ambiguity generates disputes over authority between central and local governments, undermines legal certainty, and weakens regional autonomy. The article argues that resolving such disharmony requires three measures: explicit clarification of the position of Ministerial Regulations within the regulatory hierarchy; strengthening of substantive harmonization mechanisms; and limiting the subject matter of Ministerial Regulations so as not to encroach upon areas of attributed regional authority. These conclusions are reached through legal research employing a legislative approach, a conceptual approach applying Hans Kelsen's Stufenbau Theory, and a comparative approach drawing on Japan's regulatory harmonization practice.
PENATAAN KEMBALI LEMBAGA EKSEKUTIF: STUDI KOMPARATIF ANTARA INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT BERDASARKAN PRINSIP CHECKS AND BALANCES Erga Yuhandra; I. Gde Pantja Astawa; Iman Jalaludin Rifa’i
Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24246/jrh.2025.v10.i1.p137-160

Abstract

Executive institutional restructuring is a crucial issue in constitutional law because it determines governmental effectiveness, institutional certainty, and the balance of power. This study analyses executive institutional arrangements in Indonesia and the United States and compares the application of the checks and balances principle in executive restructuring. It employs normative legal research with a comparative legal approach, analysing legislation, legal doctrines, and scholarly literature. The findings show that Indonesia grants the President broad authority to establish, modify, and dissolve executive institutions, whereas the United States designates Congress as the key actor in restructuring institutions. The study finds that the main difference lies in controlling presidential authority rather than the presidential system itself. Therefore, Indonesia needs a comprehensive legal framework for executive restructuring, clear criteria for institutional formation and evaluation, and stronger parliamentary oversight to achieve effective, accountable governance under the rule of law.

Page 18 of 18 | Total Record : 172

 14   15   16   17   18 

Filter by Year

2014 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7 No 1 (2022): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 6 No 1 (2021): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 5 No 2 (2021): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 5 No 1 (2020): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4 No 2 (2020): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4 No 1 (2019): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 3 No 2 (2019): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 3 No 1 (2018): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2 No 2 (2018): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2 No 1 (2017): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 1 No 2 (2017): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 1 (2016): Jurnal Refleksi Hukum Vol 1 No 1 (2016): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9 No 2 (2015): Jurnal Refleksi Hukum Vol 9 No 1 (2015): Jurnal Refleksi Hukum Vol 8 No 2 (2014): Jurnal Refleksi Hukum Vol 8 No 1 (2014): Jurnal Refleksi Hukum More Issue