Verstek
Jurnal Verstek is a peer-reviewed journal published by Procedural Law Department, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret three times a year in April, August, and December. This Journal aims primarily to facilitate undergraduate students paper over current developments on procedural law issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian procedural laws and legal system. It provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to public support a greater global exchange of knowledge. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Procedural Law, included but not limited to legal construction of procedural law, critical construction of procedural law in practice, trends and changes in procedural law, and the technical challenges faced in proedural law.
Articles
453 Documents
<![CDATA[PELAKSANAAN PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PADA TAHAP PENUNTUTAN DALAM PERKARA PENGANIAYAAN DI KEJAKSAAN NEGERI SURAKARTA ]]>
<![CDATA[Athadia, Muhammad Daffa]]>;
<![CDATA[Setiawan, Vincentius Patria]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.73076
<![CDATA[This article was written to determine the implementation of the application of restorative justice in solving persecution cases at the prosecution stage. This research is in the form of normative or doctrinal legal research with a case approach, which is prescriptive and applied. The technique of collecting legal materials used in this study is document studies or literature studies obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. The analytical technique used in this study is the deduction syllogism method, which is drawing conclusions using syllogistic logic for legal reasoning derived from legal rules and facts. Based on this research, it was found that there was a compatibility between the termination of prosecution carried out by the Public Prosecutor and Prosecutor's Regulation no. 15 of 2020 concerning the termination of prosecution based on restorative justice. In this case, the suspect NOVYAN PUTRANTO Alias NOVYAN Bin EDY KUSNANTO committed a crime for the first time. The criminal act of persecution committed by the suspect is regulated in article 351 of the Criminal Code with criminal threats regulated in article 1. This case can also be stopped from prosecution based on Article 3 Paragraph 1 of Prosecutor's Regulation no 15 of 2020. The implementation of restorative justice must refer to applicable regulations and the role of the victim who determines the success of the implementation of restorative justice. Keywords: Restorative Justice; Prosecution; Persecution; Application]]>
<![CDATA[NILAI DAN KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN KETERANGAN SAKSI TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU ]]>
<![CDATA[Tarigan, Daniel Milano]]>;
<![CDATA[Rustamaji, Muhammad]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.73452
<![CDATA[There has been a lot of research on obscenity, but the discussion on the use of testimonium de auditu in obscenity cases is of interest to the author. This thesis aims to examine the value and strength of the evidence of the testimonium de auditu and the testimony suitability of witnesses from the testimony of de auditu in cases of sexual abuse of children under the provisions of criminal procedural law. The type of this research is normative legal research which is prescriptive and applied. This legal research uses a case approach. The legal materials used on this research consist of primary and secondary legal materials. The collection of legal material used in this research use library research. The legal material analysis technique used in this law research is the syllogism method with deductive thinking patterns. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that the value and strength of evidence in criminal procedural law are all of free value to the judge, as well as the testimony of the testimonium de auditu. Keywords: Testimonium De Auditu; Value and strength of evidence; Witness testimony]]>
<![CDATA[KESALAHAN PENERAPAN HUKUM SEBAGAI ALASAN KASASI TINDAK PIDANA TURUT SERTA MEMALSUKAN SURAT SECARA BERLANJUT ]]>
<![CDATA[Raflyansyah, Arief Agha]]>;
<![CDATA[Septiningsih, Ismawati]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.73134
<![CDATA[This legal research aims to find out the misapplication of the law by the District Court Judge as the reason for the Public Prosecutor's cassation against the acquittal in the criminal case of participating in forging letters related to the provisions of Article 253 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the suitability of the Supreme Court's consideration in examining and deciding the Public Prosecutor's cassation in Supreme Court Decision Number 1086 K/Pid/2022. This legal research is a prescriptive and applied normative legal research with a case study approach. The source of legal material for this research comes from primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The legal material collection technique used is document study or literature study. The technique of analyzing legal materials in this study uses the syllogism method with deductive thinking patterns. The results of the research and discussion obtained are that the Public Prosecutor can prove the suitability of the reasons for cassation submitted by him with the reasons for cassation contained in Article 253 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, namely in terms of whether it is true that a legal rule is not applied or applied improperly. Therefore, the Supreme Court granted the cassation of the Public Prosecutor and found the defendant guilty of committing the crime charged, then imposed a prison sentence of 6 (six) month.Keywords: Cassation, Mail Forgery, Acquittal Decision.]]>
<![CDATA[TINJAUAN PUTUSAN DI LUAR SURAT DAKWAAN TERHADAP PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DAN PENGABAIAN SEMA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2017 ]]>
<![CDATA[Prasetya, Yuan Angger]]>;
<![CDATA[Aldyan, Arsyad]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.59752
<![CDATA[This research aims to find out the reasons for the judge’s decision outside the indictment against a narcotics crime case associated with the theories in the Criminal Procedure Code and also SEMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2017. This research was conducted using doctrinal or normative legal research methods that are perspective or applied by using primary and secondary legal sources which are certainly related to the topic. The collection of legal materials by means of a literature study and using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach with a deductive syllogism so that it can be found whether the judge can decide on a case of narcotics crime outside the indictment. Keywords: indictment, judge decision, narcotics crime case.]]>
<![CDATA[RESTORATIVE JUSTICE SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA ]]>
<![CDATA[Tambun, Joel Christofel Hinsa]]>;
<![CDATA[Rustamaji, Muhammad]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.75165
<![CDATA[This study aims to find out how restorative justice as an alternative dispute resolution in Indonesia and the benefits obtained when compared to conventional criminal justice processes. The type of research used is normative legal research which is prescriptive and applied. This legal research approach uses a case approach. The legal materials used consist of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The legal material collection technique used is library research. The legal material analysis technique used in writing this paper is the syllogism method with deductive thinking patterns. Based on the results of research and discussion it can be seen that the settlement with restorative justice as an alternative settlement of criminal cases focuses on restoring the original conditions between victims, perpetrators and society. Besides that, restorative justice settlement is the answer to the accumulation of files in court.Keywords: alternative dispute resolution; crimes; restorative justice]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN DIKABULKANNYA PENINJAUAN KEMBALI PADA PERKARA KORUPSI (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 237/PK/PID.SUS/2020) ]]>
<![CDATA[Alfalah, Muhammad Faza]]>;
<![CDATA[Kristiyadi, Kristiyadi]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.74042
<![CDATA[Abstract: This study examines the judges' considerations in the Supreme Court Decision Number 237 PK/Pid.Sus/2020 where in the decision the supreme judge is of the opinion that the request for judicial review on behalf of Fahmi Darmawansyah can be accepted so that, in his decision the supreme judge imposes a sentence with reduced circumstances verdict previously handed down by a court of first instance. This research is a normative legal research that is prespective and applied with case studies. The technique of collecting primary and secondary legal materials used in this research is by studying laws, documents, and library materials. The results of this study show that the Supreme Court Decision Number 237/Pid.Sus/PK/2020 granted the Return Application on behalf of the applicant Fahmi Darmawansyah. The author is of the opinion that the legal considerations of the judges in the Supreme Court Decision Number 237/PK/Pid.Sus/2020, which states that giving a sum of money and goods to the Sukamiskin Headquarters is considered a form of generosity is inappropriate, because the concept of generosity should not be in accordance with the actions that have been committed. conducted by Fahmi Darmawansyah. So it is not appropriate for the judge to grant the convict's request. Moreover, the defendant had previously committed a repeat of a similar crime.Keywords: Judge's Consideration, Criminal Corruption, Bribery, Judicial Review]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS PERMOHONAN PRAPERADILAN TENTANG KEABSAHAN PENETAPAN STATUS TERSANGKA (STUDI PUTUSAN PRAPERADILAN NOMOR: 2/Pid.Pra/2021/ PN.Wat) ]]>
<![CDATA[Hartono, Anisya Noviana]]>;
<![CDATA[Septiningsih, Ismawati]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.76176
<![CDATA[This article aims to determine the compatibility between the reasons for submitting a pretrial request regarding the validity of determining the suspect's status in the Pretrial Decision Number: 2/Pid.Pra/2021/PN.Wat with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and other provisions relating to pretrial. This research is included in normative legal research with a case approach. Types of legal materials consist of primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the research on the writing of this law show that the reason for submitting a pretrial request regarding the validity of determining the status of a suspect in the Pretrial Decision Number: 2/Pid.Pra/2021/PN.Wat is not in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, this is in accordance with the provisions of the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 21/PUU-XII/2014 and Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2016. This shows that the provisions regarding Pretrial in the Criminal Procedure Code are not perfect, so several additional regulations are needed to perfect them as contained in the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 21/PUUXII/2014 and Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2016. Therefore, it is necessary to prepare pretrial procedural legal instruments in the form of a law that can ensure that the pretrial process can be carried out in a fair and accountable manner.]]>
<![CDATA[KESESUAIAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MAHKAMAH AGUNG MENOLAK KASASI PENUNTUT UMUM PADA PERKARA NARKOTIKA BERDASARKAN KUHAP ]]>
<![CDATA[Diva, Khansa]]>;
<![CDATA[Santoso, Bambang]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.75429
<![CDATA[This article analyzes the considerations of the Supreme Court judges in deciding the cassation request by the Public Prosecutor in Decision Number 2729 K/Pid.Sus/2022. The purpose of this article is to analyze the suitability of the Supreme Court Judge's considerations in deciding the cassation request by the Public Prosecutor in Decision Number 2729 K/Pid.Sus/2022 with the Criminal Procedure Code. The research method used is normative research, with the technique of collecting legal materials using library research where the types of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. From the results of the study it can be concluded that the considerations of the Supreme Court Judge in deciding the Public Prosecutor's cassation request against narcotics cases in Decision Number 2729 K/Pid.Sus/2022 are in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code, especially Article 254 and Article 255 paragraph (1) .Keywords: Cassation; Supreme Court; Narcotics; Consideration]]>
<![CDATA[DAMPAK HUKUM KREDITOR ATAS PEMBATALAN HAK TANGGUNGAN BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Kinayungan, Zaidan Yusuf]]>;
<![CDATA[Harjono, Harjono]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.76040
<![CDATA[This article analyzes the legal impact on creditors of a mortgage rights that is cancelled by law based on a court decision. This article aims to find out how the legal consequences of amortgage rights that is cancelled by law based on a court decision. The research method used in this article is a normative legal research method. This research is prescriptive and applied. The technique of collecting legal material used in this research is a literature study with primary and secondary legal materials. Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that the legal impact of creditors on the cancellation of mortgage rights based on court decisions is the loss of the creditor's position as a separatist creditor with the right to parate execute on the basis of the executorial title to become a concurrent creditor who has the same position as other creditors without mortgage rights.Keywords: Cancellation of Mortgage Rights, Legal Impact, Creditor’s Position]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN VISUM ET REPERTUM SEBAGAI BUKTI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PEMERKOSAAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Diwayanti, Salafiyyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Aldyan, Arsyad]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.74874
<![CDATA[This study aims to explain how the strenght of evidence (bewijskracht) for Visum et Repertum as evidence in the crime of rape in Decision Number 42/Pid.B/2021/PN.Kds. The research method used is a normative legal research method with a prescriptive nature of research and uses a case approach. This research shows that Visum et Repertum is important as evidence in the crime of rape because it plays a role in the process of proving a criminal case which can provide a clear picture of crime. Strenght of Evidence (bewijskracht) for Visum et Repertum in Decision Number 42/Pid.B/2021/PN.Kds is independent for the judge. The evidence presented in this case in the form of witness testimony, defendant’s statement, Visum et Repertum letter are related to one another. The strenght of the evidence is the same, no one exceeds the other. The strenght of the proof is free and not binding, depending on the judges’s assesment Keywords: Strenght of Evidence, Visum et Repertum]]>
