Verstek
Jurnal Verstek is a peer-reviewed journal published by Procedural Law Department, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret three times a year in April, August, and December. This Journal aims primarily to facilitate undergraduate students paper over current developments on procedural law issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian procedural laws and legal system. It provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to public support a greater global exchange of knowledge. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Procedural Law, included but not limited to legal construction of procedural law, critical construction of procedural law in practice, trends and changes in procedural law, and the technical challenges faced in proedural law.
Articles
453 Documents
<![CDATA[PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMERIKSA DAN MEMUTUS PERKARA ITE BERMUATAN SARA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 169/PID.SUS/2017/PN.RAP) ]]>
<![CDATA[Adhilia, Dini]]>;
<![CDATA[Setiawan, Vincentius Patria]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.76681
<![CDATA[The purpose of this research is to find out the consideration of judges in examining and deciding case of hate speech and hostility cases that contain ethnicity, religion, racial, and inter-group (SARA) to Decision Number: 169/Pid.Sus/2017/PN Rap. This research is a perspective normative legal research, and applied. The approach used is case approach based on case study. The type and sources in this research use primary and secondary legal materials with legal material collection techniques in form of literature studies. The analysis technique uses syllogistic deduction by formulating the facts from the mayor premise and minor premise. The results of the research and subsequent discussion shows in deciding and examining cases of hate speech, there must be at least two pieces of evidence and from the facts that appeared at trial, apart from that there were also aggravating and mitigating circumstances so that the judge's conviction emerged to sentence him to imprisonment 2 (two) years and a fine of Rp. 1,000,000,000.00 (one billion rupiah) with the provision that if the fine is not paid it will be replaced by imprisonment for 3 (three) months.]]>
<![CDATA[KESESUAIAN PENERAPAN PUTUSAN BEBAS PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN DENGAN DASAR PEMBELAAN TERPAKSA MENURUT KUHAP ]]>
<![CDATA[Prabamawarni, Edwina]]>;
<![CDATA[Santoso, Bambang]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.68775
<![CDATA[This article analyzes the criminal procedural law related to the application of acquittals in violent crimes on the basis of forced defense in the provisions of the KUHAP. The Panel of Judges set an acquittal in this case because the Panel of Judges was not sure of the crime committed by the defendant. The purpose of this article is to prove whether the decision of the Pati District Court Number 173/Pid.B/2019/Pn Pti is in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code. The research method used isdoctrinal or normative legal research. This research is prescriptive and applied. The method of collecting legal materials is by means of literature study and the legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. Based on the results of the research and discussion to answer the problem, it can be concluded that the Panel of Judges in establishing an acquittal in the case of the crime of violence against people in the decision of the Pati District Court Number 173/Pid.B/2019/PN Pti complies with the provisions of Article 183 of the KUHAP because the terms of the decision must fulfill the conviction of the judge as stated in the article.Keywords : Free Verdict; Violent Crime; KUHAP]]>
<![CDATA[AKIBAT HUKUM DALAM PENETAPAN PENGAMPUAN PENYANDANG DISABILITAS DI PENGADILAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Fahmi, Muhammad Nur]]>;
<![CDATA[Rustamaji, Muhammad]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.76141
<![CDATA[Every human being according to law has the same rights and obligations, but not all of them are capable of carrying out legal actions. For persons with disabilities in carrying out legal actions they are under the protection of this article. The research method was carried out using a descriptive normative approach. Legal materials in the form of documents from library studies, court decisions. Analysis by examining the legal consequences arising from the judge's decision No. 53/Pdt. P/2020/PN Slw Tegal. The results of the study show that the legal consequence of determining the granting of disability by the court is in the form of giving the guardian authority to take legal action. Persons with disabilities are no longer able to carry out legal actions and in carrying out legal activities are carried out by supervisors. The custodian has the responsibility to carry out the mandate to protect those who are assisted in carrying out legal actions.Keywords: Judge's Consideration; Determination of Amnesty; Disabilities]]>
<![CDATA[HAMBATAN PRINSIP RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PROSES PERKARA PENGANIAYAAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Arinugroho, Rudy]]>;
<![CDATA[Santoso, Bambang]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.75054
<![CDATA[This study describes and examines the what are the obstacles to the principle of restorative justice in the persecution case process based on case file number BP/07/XII/2021/ SEK BYL KT at the Boyolali District Attorney's Office. This research is empirical or sociological legal research of a descriptive nature. Data types include primary data and secondary data. The data collection techniques used are the study of documents or library materials, observations or observations, and interviews or interviews, then the technical analysis used is a qualitative method that produces analytical descriptive data. The results showed that the restorative judiciary in the case file number BP/07/XII/2021/ SEK BYL KT at the Boyolali District Attorney's Office in the abuse case, agreed that the victim forgave the suspect by entering into a peace effort agreement because the victim and the suspect were still related, where the suspect was the grandson of the victim, and the suspect promised not to repeat his actions, and the response from the community in making peace efforts was quite positive. Thus, peace efforts in the case of persecution can be implemented. Keywords : Criminal Persecution, Restorative Justice, Implementation]]>
<![CDATA[PERANAN BERITA ACARA PEMERIKSAAN LABORATORIS KRIMINALISTIK DALAM PEMBUKTIAN DI PERSIDANGAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 118/PID.SUS/2019/PN SKT) ]]>
<![CDATA[Bramasto, Alwin Bobby]]>;
<![CDATA[Harjono, Harjono]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.76777
<![CDATA[This article analyzes the role of documentary evidence in the form of minutes of laboratory examination in the evidence at trial in the Decision. Number 118/Pid.Sus/2019/Pn Skt. This research uses a normative research type and is perspective and applied. This legal research uses a case approach. The basis for this approach is the ratio decidendi or reasoning, namely the judge's reasons for arriving at a decision. The source of research materials uses two materials, namely primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The data collection technique used was document study (literary study) and the data analysis technique used was the syllogistic method using a deductive mindset. In the results of the discussion and research results here, the documentary evidence in the form of minutes of laboratory examinations has an important role in proving in the cases being studied, namely being considered by the Judge in proving the charges filed by the Public Prosecutor. The judge in this case has decided the case in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code because he has considered at least two valid pieces of evidence and has also considered the facts at trial.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS DISPARITAS DALAM PENJATUHAN PUTUSAN BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA “MAIN HAKIM SENDIRI” (EIGENRICHTING). ]]>
<![CDATA[Nuriana, Adhinda Ratih]]>;
<![CDATA[Rustamaji, Muhammad]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.73825
<![CDATA[This study aims to explain the legal considerations of judges in imposing criminal penalties on perpetrators of "eigenrichting" and to analyze the disparities contained in Decision Number 235/Pid.B/2017/PN.Brb and Decision Number 84/Pid.B/2017/PN .snt. This research is a normative legal research with a prescriptive nature of research and uses a case approach. This research shows that the basis of the judge's legal considerations in the two decisions both considered the elements in Article 170 paragraph (2) 3 of the Criminal Code, all of the defendants have been proven to fulfill the elements of the article. However, in legal considerations, the judge considers juridical aspects such as the indictment, elements of the articles charged, charges and pledoi, as well as non-juridical aspects such as the facts found in the trial. Apart from that, based on the judge's legal argument, what gave rise to the disparity in the two decisions was found in the judge's considerations, namely: 1. The aggravating and mitigating circumstances of the defendant; 2. The background of the defendant's actions; 3. As a result of the defendant's actions; and 4. Purpose of sentencing. Apart from that, other factors that cause disparity are the forgiveness of Decision Number 84/Pid.B/2017/PN.Snt and the provision of condolence money to the victim's family.Keywords : Disparity, Legal Considerations]]>
<![CDATA[PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN PERKARA KDRT (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 420/PID.SUS/2023/PN JKT.BRT) ]]>
<![CDATA[Firnanda, Tesalonika]]>;
<![CDATA[Rustamaji, Muhammad]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 12, No 3 (2024): JULI-SEPTEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i3.84467
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kesesuaian pertimbangan hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 420/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Jkt.Brt sudah sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam KUHAP. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang memiliki sifat preskriptif. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berupa pendekatan kasus (case approach). Bahan hukum yang digunakan untuk penulisan hukum ini diperoleh dari bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang digunakan oleh penulis adalah studi kepustakaan. Teknik analisis bahan hukum dengan cara mengolah bahan hukum menggunakan metode deduksi silogisme. Hasil Penelitian dan Pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa pertimbangan Hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan pemidanaan terhadap terdakwa dalam Putusan Nomor 420/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Jkt.Brt sudah sesuai dengan ketentuan sebagaimana dalam Pasal 183 KUHAP.Kata Kunci: KDRT; Asas Unus Testis Nullus Testis; Pertimbangan Hakim]]>
<![CDATA[PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA PEMBUNUHAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 194 K/PID/2021) ]]>
<![CDATA[Maulidyta, Allyanisa]]>;
<![CDATA[Santoso, Bambang]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 12, No 4 (2024): OKTOBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i4.85243
<![CDATA[Artikel ini menganalisis pertimbangan hakim dalam mengabulkan kasasi penuntut umum pada perkara pembunuhan berdasarkan studi Putusan Nomor 194 K/Pid/2021 yang memutus putusan bebas terhadap terdakwa kasus pembunuhan. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah pertimbangan hakim sudah sesuai dengan Pasal 253 ayat (1) KUHAP. Penulisan artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif dengan menggunakan pendekatan kasus dan pendekatan konseptual. Temuan membuktikan bahwa pertimbangan hakim tidak sesuai dengan Pasal 253 ayat (1) KUHAP karena berkenaan dengan penilaian pembuktian dan judex factie benar dalam menerapkan hukum.Keyword: Kasasi; Pembuktian; Pertimbangan Hakim]]>
<![CDATA[TELAAH RATIO DECIDENDI JUDEX FACTI DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA PENYEBARAN BERITA PALSU IJAZAH JOKOWI ]]>
<![CDATA[Kasetyaning Putri, Adeline Dyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Rustamaji, Muhammad]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 12, No 3 (2024): JULI-SEPTEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i3.83959
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini mendeskripsikan dan mengkaji permasalahan mengenai bagaimana pertimbangan hakim dan pembuktian pada kasus penyebaran berita palsu ijazah Jokowi studi putusan perkara Nomor 318/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Skt apakah sudah sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 184 ayat (1) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP). Selain itu Hakim telah memutuskan putusan yaitu pidana penjara selama 8 tahun terhadap pelaku, pertimbangan Hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana berdasarkan Pasal 14 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1996 Jo Pasal 55 Ayat (1) tentang Menyiarkan Berita atau Pemberitahuan Bohong. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian hukum normatif bersifat preskriptif. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, dengan cara studi pustaka, teknik analisis bahan hukum yang berpangkal pada premis mayor dan premis minor. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan yang telah dilakukan Penulis, Penulis menemukan bahwa pertimbangan Hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana terhadap Terdakwa telah sesuai dengan Pasal 14 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1996 Jo Pasal 55 Ayat (1) dengan memperhatikan alat-alat bukti yang sah sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 184 ayat (1) KUHAP, sehingga Terdakwa terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan menurut hukum melakukan tindak pidana dan pertimbangan Hakim sudah berkesusaian dengan sistem pembuktian di Indonesia telah mengajukan alat-alat bukti sah, yaitu keterangan saksi, surat, dan petunjuk, sehingga kesesuaiannya dengan Pasal 184 ayat (1) KUHAP telah sesuai.]]>
<![CDATA[KEDUDUKAN BERITA ACARA LABORATORIS PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA ]]>
<![CDATA[Triasmara, Dhimas Mukti]]>;
<![CDATA[Kurniawan, Itok Dwi]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 12, No 4 (2024): OKTOBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i4.85238
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk Mengetahui dan menganalisis Kesesuaian Pertimbangan Hakim dalam memutus perkara sudah sesuai dengan ketenuan pasal 187 dan 183 KUHAP terhadap putusan No.60/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Cbi. Jenis penelitian ini adalah Normatif dengan metode pendekatan kasus. Teknik pengumpulan menggunakan metode Studi Kepustakaan. Teknik analisis menggunakan teknik analisis deduktif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini dapat diperoleh hasil bahwa, berdasarkan proses pemeriksanaan yang telah dilakukan di persidangan pada Putusan Nomor 60 /Pid.Sus/2022 PN.Cbi Pengadilan Negeri Cibinong bahwa Terdakwa telah didakwa oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum dengan 3 (tiga) dakwaan alternatif: Kesatu, melanggar Pasal 114 ayat (1). Atau Kedua, melanggar Pasal 112 ayat (1). Atau Ketiga, melanggar pasal 127 ayat (1) huruf a UU RI Nomor 35 tahun 2009 tentang narkotika.]]>
