cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
KARONA CAHYA SUSENA
Contact Email
karona.cs@unived.ac.id
Phone
+6281541234500
Journal Mail Official
karona.cs@unived.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu Jl. Meranti Raya No. 32 Sawah Lebar Kec. Ratu Agung, Kota Bengkulu 383228
Location
Kota bengkulu,
Bengkulu
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum Sehasen
Published by Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu
ISSN : 25285025     EISSN : 27466485     DOI : https://doi.org/10.37676/jhs
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum Sehasen (JHS) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal that aims to publish manuscripts of high-quality research as well as conceptual analysis that studies specific fields of law, such as Islamic law, customary/adat law, philosophy of law, fundamental law, legal theory, comparative law, and human rights issues. It has 1 volume with 2 issues per year (April and October).
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 55 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Search results for , issue "Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April" : 55 Documents clear
Analisis Perlindungan Bagi Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Digital Menggunakan Transaksi Digital cryptocurrency bitcoin Lendrawati, Nessa; Hermana, M.Arafat; Royani, Ferawati
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v12i2.10812

Abstract

The development of digital technology has given rise to cryptocurrency as a new investment instrument. In Indonesia, cryptocurrency is not recognized as a legal means of payment but is classified as a commodity supervised by the Badan Pengawas Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi (BAPPEBTI), which raises legal issues related to consumer protection in volatile and high-risk transactions.mThis study aims to analyze the legal position of consumers, the forms of legal protection available, and the roles of business actors and supervisory authorities using a normative legal research method. The findings show that consumer protection for crypto assets has not been specifically regulated and still relies on general regulations. Bank Indonesia prohibits the use of cryptocurrency as a means of payment, while BAPPEBTI supervises its trading as a commodity. However, supervision and dispute resolution mechanisms remain limited, resulting in suboptimal legal certainty for consumers.
Analysis Of Civil Legal Responsibility Of Dangerous Skincare Sellers Towards Consumers (Case Study Of The Distribution Of Pinkflash Brand Cosmetics In Bengkulu) Ramadhania, Prima; Hurairah, Hurairah; Aprianto, Sandi
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v12i2.10814

Abstract

The circulation of cosmetic and skincare products that do not meet safety standards remains a serious problem in consumer protection. One example is the Pinkflash brand of cosmetics, whose distribution permit has been revoked by the Food and Drug Monitoring Agency (BPOM), yet it is still found circulating on the market and causing harm to consumers. This study aims to analyze the civil legal liability of sellers to consumers for the distribution of hazardous cosmetics and the legal protection efforts for harmed consumers. The research method used is empirical legal research with a statutory and case-based approach. Data were obtained through literature review and interviews, then analyzed qualitatively. The results indicate that sellers who continue to distribute hazardous cosmetics are civilly liable for consumer losses under Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Article 1365 of the Civil Code. Legal protection for consumers can be achieved through the role of BPOM, consumer dispute resolution, and civil lawsuits in court.
Legal Analysis Of The Validity Of Siri Marriages According To Law Number 1 Of 1974 Concerning Marriage Sartika, Pujja Dwi; Royani, Ferawati; Aprianto, Sandi
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v12i2.10815

Abstract

Marriage is a legal event that gives rise to broad civil legal consequences, both for husband, wife, and children. In the Indonesian legal system, the validity of marriage is regulated by Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, which requires the fulfillment of religious provisions and the obligation of registration by the state. However, in practice, many people still conduct unregistered marriages, namely marriages that are valid according to religious law but are not administratively registered. This phenomenon creates legal problems because it creates a dualism between religious validity and state legal legality. This study aims to analyze the legal provisions regarding the validity of marriage according to Law Number 1 of 1974 and examine the legal position of unregistered marriages from the perspective of positive law and other related laws and regulations. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory and conceptual approach, by examining primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The research results show that unregistered marriages, although valid according to religion, lack legal force under positive law because they do not meet the formal requirements for registration as stipulated in Article 2 paragraph (2) of Law Number 1 of 1974. The legal consequences of unregistered marriages weaken legal protection for wives and children, particularly regarding the rights to maintenance, inheritance, child status, and joint property. The state provides a marriage confirmation mechanism as a repressive legal protection measure, but this mechanism is limited and is not intended to legalize unregistered marriages. Therefore, marriage registration is an important instrument in achieving legal certainty and protecting civil rights within the national marriage law system.
Synchronization Of Authority To Eradicate Criminal Acts Of Corruption According To Law 31 Of 1999 Concerning The Eradication Of Criminal Acts Of Corruption Handled By The Corruption Eradication Committee (KPK), The Prosecutor's Office, And The Republic O Manurung, Mona Fidelia; Hermana, M. Arafat; Royani, Ferawati
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v12i2.10816

Abstract

Corruption is a systemic problem that has become deeply rooted in Indonesia's national life, with multidimensional impacts that harm state finances, undermine democracy, and hinder development. Efforts to eradicate corruption are carried out by three law enforcement institutions: the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, and the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia, each with authority based on statutory regulations. This study aims to analyze the synchronization of the authority of these three institutions in implementing corruption eradication in accordance with Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes (as amended) and to evaluate the impact of Law Number 19 of 2019 on their performance. The research method used is normative legal research with statutory, case, and historical approaches, as well as qualitative analysis of secondary data in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results show that normatively, regulations on corruption eradication are coherent, applying the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali. The KPK has special authority to handle corruption cases involving law enforcement officials or state administrators, cases that receive public attention, and/or those involving state losses of at least IDR 1 billion. Meanwhile, the Attorney General's Office and the National Police handle corruption cases that do not meet these qualifications, with the Attorney General's Office responsible for investigation and prosecution, and the National Police tasked with inquiry and investigation. However, in practice, there is a lack of synchronization marked by overlapping authority, differences in interpretation of regulations, and horizontal conflicts between institutions. The existence of limiting boundaries regarding the authority of each institution (National Police, Attorney General's Office, and KPK) in handling corruption crimes is intended to ensure that relations between law enforcement institutions do not lead to monopolization or overstepping of each other's duties.
Analysis Of The Application Of Customary Fines In Resolving Cases Of Violent Land Grabbing Under Timorese Customary Law In Taebenu District, Kupang Regency Humau, Rody Marsela; Medan, Karolus Kopong; Wilhelmus, Bhisa Vitus
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v12i2.10843

Abstract

Customary fines are sanctions imposed on individuals or groups who violate customary norms or traditional rules, with the aim of restoring the disturbed balance and serving as a means of social control when problems arise within a community. In Timorese customary society, customary fines continue to play an important role as a mechanism for dispute resolution, including in cases of land grabbing accompanied by violence. This study aims to analyze the application of customary fines in resolving cases of violent land grabbing under Timorese customary law in Taebenu District and to identify the factors influencing their effectiveness. This research employs an empirical legal method with a sociological juridical approach. Data were collected through interviews with customary leaders, village officials, perpetrators, and victims, and were supported by a literature review of relevant legal materials. The findings indicate that the imposition of customary fines is carried out through customary deliberation mechanisms involving customary leaders, community leaders, village authorities, and the disputing parties. The customary sanctions generally consist of a combination of rice, pigs, and cash, with the amount determined according to the level of fault and the impact of the act committed. Substantively, the application of customary fines functions not only as a sanction but also as a means of restoring social relationships, maintaining community balance, and achieving peaceful conflict resolution. Normatively and culturally, this mechanism continues to be respected and practiced by the community as an integral part of Timorese customary values. The effectiveness of customary fines is supported by strong local wisdom, community respect for customary authorities, the moral pressure and social shame generated by customary sanctions, and the enduring culture of deliberation within the community. However, several obstacles remain, including the increasing economic value of land, unclear land boundaries and inheritance status, imbalance between the imposed fines and the material losses suffered by victims, and the influence of modernization that encourages some individuals to seek resolution through formal state law. These factors indicate that customary fines have not yet fully prevented the recurrence of violent land grabbing cases.
Criminological Study of Criminogenic Behavior in the Practice of Kizomba Dance within the Community of Miomaffo Tengah Subdistrict, North Central Timor Regency Kofi, Amandus Sali; Medan, Karolus Kopong; Dima, Adrianus Djara
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v12i2.10855

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the practice of Kizomba dance as criminogenic behavior and to examine the efforts undertaken to address conflicts arising from its practice in Miomaffo Tengah Subdistrict, North Central Timor Regency. This research employs a qualitative method with criminological and sociological approaches, using interviews, observations, and documentation techniques. The findings indicate that the practice of Kizomba dance has generated social reactions in the form of anxiety, tension, and social stigma among segments of the community, as it is perceived to be inconsistent with customary values, norms of decency, and religious teachings upheld within the local society. Although it does not always result in officially reported criminal acts, the practice has the potential to function as a criminogenic factor that triggers latent conflicts, particularly when influenced by alcohol consumption, peer group pressure, and weak social control. Conflict mitigation efforts are carried out through pre-emptive, preventive, and repressive approaches. Pre-emptive measures include legal education and socialization programs conducted by law enforcement authorities in collaboration with traditional and religious leaders. Preventive efforts involve limiting party hours, supervising alcohol consumption, enforcing public order regulations, and promoting local traditional dances as alternative forms of entertainment. Repressive measures are implemented through customary mediation, the application of social and traditional sanctions (Na’opab), and criminal law enforcement when conflicts escalate into criminal offenses. The study concludes that synergy between state law and customary law plays a crucial role in controlling potential conflicts, although strengthening local regulations and enhancing collective community awareness remain necessary for sustainable conflict management.
Juridical Analysis of Sentencing Disparity in Cases of Joint Commission of Rape and Murder by a Minor in Palembang Aprialda da Silva, Welmar Sonia; Pello, Jimmy; Manuain, Orpa G.
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v12i2.10887

Abstract

This study examines sentencing disparity in cases involving joint participation in rape and murder committed by minors in Palembang. Significant differences in sanctions imposed on several minors involved in the same series of serious crimes raise juridical issues concerning the application of the principle of individual criminal responsibility and proportionality within the juvenile justice system. The research addresses two main questions: why sentencing disparity occurs in such cases and how sentencing should be imposed in accordance with prevailing legal principles. The objective is to analyze the causes of disparity and to formulate an appropriate sentencing framework that reflects justice and balances the protection of child offenders with victims’ rights. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials are analyzed qualitatively through legal interpretation and reasoning methods. The findings indicate that sentencing disparity arises from the suboptimal application of individual criminal responsibility in the context of participation. Judicial considerations tend to emphasize age and the position of the principal offender without proportionally linking them to the level of involvement, intent, and actual contribution of each minor. As a result, the sentencing decisions create imbalances that do not fully reflect proportionality, equality before the law, and substantive justice within the juvenile justice system. Therefore, judges should place greater emphasis on analyzing each offender’s individual role and consistently apply the principle of individual criminal responsibility to ensure a fair balance between child protection and justice for victims.
Juridical Study of the Practice of Fishing Using Explosives (A Case Study of Fishermen on Semau Island Poto, Herli Paulus; Pello, Jimmy; Wilhelmus, Bhisa Vitus
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v12i2.10892

Abstract

The practice of fishing using explosives is a form of destructive fishing that not only violates fisheries law but also causes serious impacts on the sustainability of marine ecosystems and the socio-economic life of coastal communities. Although it has been strictly regulated under Law Number 45 of 2009 concerning Fisheries and reinforced by the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number 36 of 2023, this illegal practice continues to occur in several coastal areas, including Semau Island, Kupang Regency, East Nusa Tenggara Province. This study aims to analyze the factors that cause fishermen on Semau Island to continue using explosives in fishing activities despite legal prohibitions, and to examine the juridical impacts on perpetrators, communities, and marine ecosystems. This research employs an empirical legal research method with a case study approach. Data were obtained through interviews with fishermen, law enforcement officers from the Marine and Air Police Directorate (Ditpolairud), and other related stakeholders. These data were supported by document studies of legislation, court decisions, and relevant legal literature. The data were analyzed using a descriptive qualitative approach based on theories of law enforcement, legal certainty, criminal liability, and legal awareness. The findings reveal several key factors encouraging fishermen to continue using explosives, including economic pressure and livelihood needs, time efficiency with larger catches, easy access to explosive materials, long-standing fishing traditions, low levels of legal awareness and compliance, and limited alternative livelihoods. Furthermore, the practice results in juridical consequences in the form of criminal sanctions for offenders, socio-economic losses for coastal communities, and severe damage to marine ecosystems, particularly coral reefs and fish resources. In addition, weak law enforcement and the limited deterrent effect of court decisions have reduced the effectiveness of legal implementation in practice. This study concludes that a gap still exists between legal norms and their practical implementation in fishing activities on Semau Island. Therefore, stronger law enforcement, increased legal awareness among fishermen, and integrated policies addressing legal, social, economic, and environmental aspects are necessary to achieve sustainable and equitable fisheries resource management.
Law Enforcement and Protection for Child Victims of Sexual Violence: A Case Study in Tesi Ayofanu Village, South Central Timor Regency Kase, Samuel Jarno; Leo, Rudepel Petrus; Manafe, Deddy R. Ch.
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v12i2.10937

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis mekanisme penegakan hukum serta efektivitas perlindungan hukum terhadap anak korban tindak pidana kekerasan seksual, dengan mengambil studi kasus pada korban berinisial MK di Desa Tesi Ayofanu. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis empiris dengan metode penelitian kualitatif. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara, observasi, serta dokumentasi terhadap aparat penegak hukum, tenaga medis, aparat desa, dan masyarakat setempat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proses penegakan hukum diawali dari laporan masyarakat yang dipicu oleh kontrol sosial informal berupa desakan warga setempat. Kepolisian melalui Unit Perlindungan Perempuan dan Anak (Unit PPA) telah menerapkan prinsip perlakuan khusus terhadap korban anak dengan melakukan pemeriksaan di ruang ramah anak guna meminimalkan trauma psikologis korban. Selain itu, koordinasi antar lembaga antara kepolisian, tenaga medis di Puskesmas, serta pemerintah desa berperan penting dalam mengungkap upaya manipulasi identitas yang diduga dilakukan oleh pelaku. Dari perspektif yuridis, perlindungan hukum terhadap anak korban kekerasan seksual telah memiliki dasar hukum yang kuat melalui Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak dan Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual yang memberikan instrumen pemberatan pidana, legalitas visum et repertum sebagai alat bukti, serta hak restitusi bagi korban. Namun demikian, proses penegakan hukum masih menghadapi berbagai hambatan non-yuridis seperti relasi kuasa yang timpang akibat status sosial pelaku sebagai tokoh agama, faktor kemiskinan, serta adanya kecenderungan masyarakat untuk menutup-nutupi kasus melalui mekanisme penyelesaian informal. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa keberhasilan penegakan hukum dalam kasus kekerasan seksual terhadap anak sangat dipengaruhi oleh sinergi antara sistem hukum formal dan kontrol sosial masyarakat dalam mendorong terciptanya keadilan bagi korban
Legal Review Of The Determination Of Child Custody Rights After Divorce From The Perspective Of Indonesian Civil Law Lubis, Syna Ardia Putri; Fitrianto, Bambang; Siagian, Asman
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v12i2.10970

Abstract

The determination of child custody rights after divorce is an important issue in family law in Indonesia because divorce can have an impact on the mental condition and growth and development of children. Therefore, clear regulations are needed to ensure that children's rights are protected. This study aims to analyze the determination of child custody after divorce based on the perspective of Indonesian civil law and the forms of legal protection provided to children. The research method used is normative juridical, examining relevant legislation, doctrine, and legal literature. The results of the study show that the determination of child custody is not only based on the biological relationship between parents and children, but also prioritizes the principle of the best interests of the child. These provisions are regulated in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Law Number 23 of 2002 in conjunction with Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection, and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). Even in the event of divorce, both parents remain obligated to care for, educate, and provide for the child. Legal protection of children encompasses all activities to guarantee and protect children and their rights so that they can live, develop, and grow properly and receive protection from violence and discrimination. Legal protection for children is all activities to guarantee and protect children and their rights so that they can live, develop, and grow properly, and receive protection from violence and discrimination. Child protection in the event of parental divorce is closely linked to the parents' authority, even if the marriage ends due to divorce initiated by both parents. Therefore, legal protection for children after divorce is not solely the responsibility of one parent, but rather of both parents, the father and mother of their children. The state also has a responsibility through the courts to provide legal certainty and guarantee the future of children so that they do not become victims of their parents' divorce.

Page 3 of 6 | Total Record : 55

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April Vol 11 No 2 (2025): Oktober Vol 11 No 1 (2025): April Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Oktober Vol 10 No 1 (2024): April Vol 9 No 2 (2023): Oktober Vol 9 No 1 (2023): April Vol 8 No 2 (2022): Oktober Vol 8 No 1 (2022): April Vol 7 No 2 (2021): Oktober Vol 7 No 1 (2021): April Vol 6 No 2 (2020): Oktober Vol 6 No 1 (2020): April Vol 2 No 2 (2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019) Vol 1 No 2 (2017) Vol 1 No 1 (2015) More Issue