cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andi Akram
Contact Email
sekretariatjurnalkumdil@gmail.com
Phone
+6221-29079286
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhukumperadilan@mahkamahagung.go.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jend. A. Yani Kav. 58 Lt. 10 Cempaka Putih Jakarta Pusat
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Peradilan MA RI
ISSN : 23033274     EISSN : 25281100     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is published by the Research Center for Law and Judiciary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. JHP aimed to be a peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information on legal and judiciary studies. The scope of JHP is analytical, objective, empirical, and contributive literature on the dynamics and development of legal studies, specifically in Indonesia. JHP welcomes scientific papers on a range of topics from research studies, judicial decisions, theoretical studies, literature reviews, philosophical and critical consultations that are analytical, objective, and systematic. However, from a wide range of topics that researchers can choose from, JHP puts more attention to the papers focusing on the sociology of law, living law, legal philosophy, history of national law, customary law, literature studies, international law, interdisciplinary, and empirical studies. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is a media dedicated to judicial personnel, academician, practitioners, and law expertise in actualizing the idea of research, development, and analysis of law and judiciary. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan comes out three times a year in March, July, and November.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 653 Documents
 16   17   18   19   20 
ACCESS TO POSBAKUM IN PANDEMIC TIMES AND THE DIGITAL ERA FOR THE COMMUNITY AS A MEANING OF SOCIAL JUSTICE FULFILLMENT Muhamad Zaky Albana; Zulfia Hanum Alfi Syahr
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11, No 3 (2022)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.3.2022.545-562

Abstract

Access to justice for the community is a mandate from the Constitution Article 28 Paragraph 1, which states that everyone has the right to recognition, guarantees, protection, fair legal certainty, and equal treatment before the law. The development of access to posbakum is a form of fulfilling social justice for the community following the mandate of the fifth principle of Pancasila. It is also stated in Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, which requires the court to assist justice seekers, try to overcome all obstacles, and achieve a simple trial, fast and low cost. Therefore, a legal aid post (Posbakum) is established at every court to help the underprivileged gain access to justice and equality before the law. So far, posbakum can only be accessed by going to court directly, so during the Covid-19 pandemic, people were hampered from getting these services. Especially for people who live in villages far from the courts, it is tough for them to access and obtain legal aid services from the courts. This paper examines how to develop posbakum so that village communities can more easily access it. It will also investigate the obstacles people in rural areas face in obtaining posbakum services. The method used is qualitative with data collection techniques through library research and interviews, coupled with a normative study of related regulations. This study shows that the existence of Posbakum, through partnerships with the village government, can provide better access to justice for village communities.
Freedom Of Religion And Belief Under Supreme Court Verdict Study Case On Supreme Court Decision Number 17/P/HUM/2021 Zainal Amin Ayub; Ari Wirya Dinata; Nur Sulistyo Budi Ambarini; Pipi Susanti; Arie Elcaputera
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.1.2023.1-28

Abstract

Freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) is one of the human rights stated in the 1945 Constitution. Article 29 paragraphs (1) and (2) of the 1945 Constitution. The recognition of religion guarantees the independence of each of its inhabitants to embrace their respective religions and to worship according to their religion or beliefs. The state guarantee on FoRB consists of assurance for the internal and external forums. Freedom to embrace religion or belief is an internal forum for everyone, an absolute right as regulated in ICCPR that Indonesia has also ratified. In fact, this provision is also regulated in Article 28 I paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. The fulfillment of the right to FoRB is frequently discriminated against in Indonesia. The  issue of forcing to wear school uniforms with hijab for non-Muslim female students is still common in many public schools in Indonesia. The State has issued a joint decree (SKB) of 3 ministers to normalize the discriminatory status quo. However, the attempt to return it to its normal position was thwarted by the LKMM, which carried out the SKB test. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court (SC) canceled the SKB because schools have the right to carry out religious education and instilled values. The judges ratio decidendi made by the SC Justices were very dry from the perspective of freedom of religion or belief in canceling the 3 Ministerial Decrees. The judge saw the issue of forcing to wear hijab on non-Muslim students from the perspective of the majority religious thought without noticing that Indonesian society is very diverse. Therefore, the protection of the right to FoRB should also safeguard the religious minorities rights. This paper will examine decision made by judiciary power in term protecting the FoRB right. This verdict will be reviewing toward to justice consideration (ratio decedendi) and legal archicteture in filling the norm FoRB. Moreover, it will also appraise to judicial behavior based on breakfasting theory.
Indonesian Omnichannel Banking: How Far Do Governing Laws Protect Customer's Data Privacy Fontian Munzil; Nadisah Zakaria
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.1.2023.29-56

Abstract

In the digital transformation era, banks have been working to implement a digital strategy that will lead to lower costs, better service, higher profitability, and the desired level of customer satisfaction. Utilising marketing technology for consumer engagement is essential to bringing in more customers without increasing costs. Omnichannel is the marketing strategy that offers more services to customers by having them interact with it across all available physical and digital channels at any time, resulting in higher customer satisfaction and loyalty. Customer data is significant information that may be used at any stage of the digital marketing process. The Protection of Personal Data Act of 2022 and the Act of Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector of 2023 govern consumer data protection at all stages of marketing activities, including data processing, profiling, and collaboration with other organisations. This study reviews how far the governing laws can protect consumer private data in utilisation in the company's digital marketing program to boost utilisation of the company's omnichannel approach. The study discovered that governing laws can protect the customer's private data in the banking omnichannel approach. Customer data are governed clearly and strongly by the regulations at all marketing program phases that could potentially be exploited, so both laws will be able to prevent illegal activities of customer data optimally in the future. Lastly, customer approval is critical for the Bank's use of all customer data.
Distribution Of Joint Properties According To Balanced Justice Principle M Ridwan; Gugun Gumilar; Amran Suadi; KN Sofyan Hasan; M Syaifuddin
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.1.2023.57-76

Abstract

The structure of joint property divided governed by Law No. 1 of 1974, and the Compilation of Islamic Law must fully reflect the importance of justice and legal clarity. Based on that, the issue addressed in this journal is how to design a more reasonable and legally specific partition of the joint property after divorce for the community in the relevant marital law in the future. This study is categorized as legal-normative research. According to the study's findings, the future concept of joint property law reconstruction is to incorporate the principle of balanced justice based on Pancasila into Article 37 of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law through amendments to Article 37 of Law Number 1 of 1974 and Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law. The notion of balanced justice has been found in various Republic of Indonesia's Supreme Court decisions. As a result, some of the legal rules in the joint property decision must be reviewed while developing joint property law regulations.
The Religious Court Trial Of Wali Adhal Cases In The Indonesian Legal System: A Legal Analysis Mardi Candra; Ramlani Sinaulan; Fahadil Al Hasan; Jelang Ramadhan
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.1.2023.77-96

Abstract

Marriage combines the husband-wife relationship and unifies two families of different ethnicities, cultures, and backgrounds. The consent of the wali is a significant function of the family, particularly the prospective bride's family. Marriage requires the permission of the wali because it is null and void without it. In actuality, the wali of the prospective bride may be hesitant to marry off the woman under his supervision for various reasons, both Shar'i and non-Shar'i. As a result, the prospective bride must apply to the Religious Court for wali adhal for the marriage to occur. This qualitative research employs a normative legal approach, which examines legal norms found in laws and regulations, judge judgments, and other legal sources. According to the findings of this study, wali adhal cases are currently evaluated by voluntary trials or unilaterally. However, because it is unilaterally assessed and there is no opponent, fulfilling the legal purpose of building integrative justice in this examination requires considerable effort. Therefore, wali adhal cases must be examined using a contentious trial.
Gender Mainstreaming through Guarantees of Legal Protection and Access to Justice for Women and Children in Religious Court Andi Akram; Agus Digdo Nugroho; Reihan Putri; Johanes Johanes
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.2.2023.267-292

Abstract

Barriers to realizing accessibility for women and children in religious courts are still quite significant. Even after five years have passed since Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2017 on Guidelines for Trying Women’s Cases in Conflict with the Law was published. The initial suspicion is that this is still an unresolved problem because law enforcement’s sensitivity to the needs of women and children has yet to be developed. Gender mainstreaming is then encouraged to overcome this. The problem that is the focus of discussion in this research is how to increase the accessibility of justice for women and children in religious courts. The aim is to elaborate and analyze the problem of how to increase the accessibility of justice for women and children in religious courts. The research method used is normative juridical, the research specification is descriptive analysis, and the data collection technique is library research. The research results show that most of the existing obstacles in access to justice and law for women and children after divorce still exist and still need to be resolved. The Supreme Court, as the supervisor of religious courts, has issued several regulations to overcome this problem. In fact, after several of these regulations were issued, difficulties with access to justice continued to occur, primarily related to the implementation of decisions/ executions. Gender mainstreaming by judges and religious court officials is needed to narrow the gap in access to justice and law for women and children after divorce. The urgency is because women and children are vulnerable parties, have limitations, and have extensive obstacles in accessing justice in court. Hence, they require support for convenience, priority access, simplification of business processes, and additional authority for judges in their positions (e.g., officio) when handling cases of women and children.
Reproduction of Islamic Law in The Era of Globalization and Pluralism Nasaruddin Umar; Irvan Mawardi; Akiho Tsuji; Tuti Haryanti
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12, No 3 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.3.2023.629-654

Abstract

The rise of globalization values: secularism, capitalism, legal liberalization and democratic freedom that is sweeping the world today can create a disharmony of diversity during legal pluralism that exists in Indonesia between state law, religious law and customary law. The context of reproduction in this study redesigns policies based on Islamic law that have a vision that can moderate diversity in Indonesia so that the existence of Islamic law can be accepted in the context of diversity and diversity in an inclusive manner. To conduct the research, the author uses conceptual approaches and statutory law. As a result, the author concluded that legal pluralism in Indonesia should not occur strong autonomy in each legal system but increasingly interact and interconnect in the context of moderation, this complementary reproduction model of pluralism is being designed in this study.
Analysis Of Labor Rights After The Job Creation Law In Perspective Of Human Rights Christina NM Tobing; Sryani Br. Ginting; Hasnul Arifin Melayu
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.1.2023.97-128

Abstract

The Job Creation Law has caused controversy from various circles of society, both in terms of the procedure for its formation and the contents, especially the labor cluster. Many materials in the Job Creation Law reduce workers’ rights by creating a flexible working relationship. The relationship is more in favor of the interests of employers, thus raising the issue of legalizing modern slavery, which is contrary to human rights. This study analyzes changes in workers’ rights, especially regarding wages, specific worktime agreements, outsourcing, and severance pay from a human rights perspective. This research was normative legal research, namely on the substance of workers’ rights after the Job Creation Law from a human rights perspective, with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The analysis revealed that the job creation law policy is an effort to create the broadest possible employment opportunities and attract greater investment to Indonesia. In addition, it is to realize the human rights of workers who have not worked. The changes in the Job Creation Law and its implementing regulations that abolish and reduce workers’ rights and make work relations more flexible can violate workers’ human rights. On the other hand, the Government is trying to strike a balance by creating new and fair workers’ rights.
Analysis of Legal Certainty Aspects in Indonesian Marriage Registration Rule Imron Rosyadi; Aisyah Kahar
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12, No 3 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.3.2023.469-488

Abstract

This paper examines the legal certainty aspects of marriage registration regulations in Indonesia. The controversy over whether or not a marriage is lawful without registration is still ongoing, depending on how Article 2 of Act No. 1/1974 regulating marriage is interpreted. The research method used in writing this paper is a literature study with normative legal research and descriptive analysis. Using the legal certainty aspect approach, the author analyzes various laws and regulations regarding marriage registration objectively. According to the findings of this study, the Marriage Act requires that every marriage be documented or registered by the marriage registration officer. However, Presidential Regulation (PERPRES) Number 96 of 2018 and Minister of Home Affairs Regulation (PERMENDAGRI) Number 9 of 2016 provide an alternative for those whose marriages have not been documented to create various population administrations by attaching a Statement of Absolute Responsibility (SPTJM). These two contradicting requirements have generated legal uncertainty in Indonesian marriage registration.
Strengthening The Implementation of E-Court-Based Judiciary As A Legal Protection In The Implementation of E-Litigation-Based Trials Juliani Paramitha Yoesuf; Fery Ramadhansyah; Sinta Elviyanti; Ade Salamah
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.2.2023.293-318

Abstract

E-Court has been implemented in all courts in Indonesia. However, among legal experts, implementing electronic-based trials (e-litigation) raises pros and cons, especially when parties must attend the trial. This situation is interesting and must be investigated immediately to create legal certainty. The issues that will be examined are: 1) the appropriateness of electronic trial arrangements (e-litigation) based on Supreme Court Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 2022 dated October 10th2020, and 2) the form of strengthening the implementation of electronic trials (E-Litigation) in e-court. The research method used in this research is normative-empirical legal research, also known as applied law research. The data types used to study normative-empirical legal research are primary and secondary. The results show that 1) Electronic trial arrangements (e-litigation) based on the Supreme Court Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 2022 concerning the Administration of Cases and Trials in Electronic Trial (e-litigation) are appropriate. However, this regulation still needs to be improved and strengthened so that the litigants as e-court users can obtain law enforcement and justice. 2) The regulation of e-courts needs to be strengthened, as the law must absorb what the community wants in judicial practice. Policy strengthening regarding e-court can be carried out through a) amendments to the Judicial Powers Act, primarily related to regulations for the electronic announcement of decisions as a consequence of legal reforms; b) establishment of the law on the implementation of e-court and e-Litigation; c) establishment of a new Perma to strengthen Perma No. 7 of 2022.

Page 18 of 66 | Total Record : 653

 16   17   18   19   20 

Filter by Year

2012 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 3 (2025) Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13, No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13, No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 13, No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12, No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12, No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 1 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10, No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10, No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 1 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9, No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8, No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7, No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6, No 3 (2017) Vol 6, No 2 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5, No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 2 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 5, No 1 (2016) Vol 4, No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4, No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) Vol 3, No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3, No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 3, No 1 (2014) Vol 2, No 3 (2013) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 3 (2012) Vol 1, No 3 (2012) Vol 1 No 2 (2012) Vol 1, No 2 (2012) Vol 1, No 1 (2012) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue