cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andi Akram
Contact Email
sekretariatjurnalkumdil@gmail.com
Phone
+6221-29079286
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhukumperadilan@mahkamahagung.go.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jend. A. Yani Kav. 58 Lt. 10 Cempaka Putih Jakarta Pusat
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Peradilan MA RI
ISSN : 23033274     EISSN : 25281100     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is published by the Research Center for Law and Judiciary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. JHP aimed to be a peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information on legal and judiciary studies. The scope of JHP is analytical, objective, empirical, and contributive literature on the dynamics and development of legal studies, specifically in Indonesia. JHP welcomes scientific papers on a range of topics from research studies, judicial decisions, theoretical studies, literature reviews, philosophical and critical consultations that are analytical, objective, and systematic. However, from a wide range of topics that researchers can choose from, JHP puts more attention to the papers focusing on the sociology of law, living law, legal philosophy, history of national law, customary law, literature studies, international law, interdisciplinary, and empirical studies. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is a media dedicated to judicial personnel, academician, practitioners, and law expertise in actualizing the idea of research, development, and analysis of law and judiciary. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan comes out three times a year in March, July, and November.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 653 Documents
 40   41   42   43   44 
MASALAH “LEGAL STANDING” DALAM PUTUSAN - PUTUSAN HAK UJI MATERIIL MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 2012 – 2014 Elpah, Dani
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.2.2015.299-322

Abstract

The paradigm has changed from disadvantaged right equalized with the interest, without classifying the requirement of disadvantaged right that must fulfill 5 (five) requirement, those are : (a) there is a right for applicant that is given on law and regulation (b) this right is disadvantaged if considered by applicant c) the disadvantage must be specific and actual or at least potential (d) causality connectivity must be exist; (e) the disadvantage will not happen if the application is acceptedKeywords : Legal Standing, Judicial Review, Supreme Court
PEMANFAATAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI UNTUK MENDORONG PERCEPATAN PENYELESAIAN PERKARA DI MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nursobah, Asep
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.2.2015.323-334

Abstract

Utilization of information technology by Supreme Court is to boost the eficiency and effectivity the resolution of the case, but in fact the Utilization of information technology still focus on electronic record only, the technology hasn’t been optimalized yet to improve the performance of judiciary institution.Keywords: Information Technology, Cases Settlement, Supreme Court
ASPEK HUKUM PENINJAUAN KEMBALI LEBIH DARI SATU KALI DALAM PERKARA PIDANA (PERSPEKTIF PENEGAKAN KEADILAN, KEPASTIAN DAN KEMANFAATAN HUKUM) Suhariyanto, Budi
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.2.2015.335-350

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision No. 34 / PUU-XI / 2013 has opened the space PK is not just one time as provided for by the Article 268 paragraph (3) Criminal Procedure Code so that PK can be done many times during found and submission of PK Novum although it has done previously. Perspective is the basis of this decision is justice. Responding to the verdict of the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court publishes SEMA No. 7 Year 2014 on Reconsideration Request Submission In Criminal Case. Through the SEMA Supreme Court warned that provisions PK only once outside the Article 268 Criminal Procedure Code which was canceled by the Constitutional Court, therefore, PK criminal cases (in a similar case) is more than 1 (one) can not be accepted. Restrictions on the desired PK criminal case the Supreme Court is to provide legal certainty in the process of final settlement of criminal matters. Government through Minister of Law and Human Rights take strategic steps in resolving the legal expediency vision polemic filing legal remedies PK criminal cases, by coordinating state agencies and relevant ministries so as to produce an agreement that filing PK many times can not be executed until the issuance of PP. Therefore still valid set forth in the Judicial Authority Law and the Law on the Supreme Court.Keywords : Legal Aspects, Reconsideration, Criminal Case
TITIK SINGGUNG WEWENANG ANTARA MA DAN MK MD, Moh Mahfud
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4 No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.1.2015.1-16

Abstract

The existence of the Constitutional Court (MK) in Indonesia is linked to the Supreme Court (MA) both in the universal philosophy and in history and the particular debate. Being natural in practice found several points of authority tangency which must be resolved not only academically but in juridiction. If powers of the Constitutional Court was elaborated and then linked with the authority of the Supreme Court the authority then it appears there is a cross between the two institutions. The Constitutional Court judge rules conflict which is abstract at once judges conflicts (disputes) between the person or institution that is concrete. There is also the Supreme Court also adjudicates conflicts (disputes) between people or institution that is concrete as well adjudicates conflicts between rules which are abstract. Here appears the cross testing authority in legislation between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court because they both have the authority to conduct testing, but to different degrees.Keywords: Connective Point, Supreme Court, Constitutional Court
TITIK SINGGUNG WEWENANG MAHKAMAH AGUNG DENGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Isra, Saldi
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4 No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.1.2015.17-30

Abstract

The mixing of authority between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court has raised a range of issues. In turn, there is the contact authority of the two institutions which could lead to the occurrence of legal uncertainty. In connection with the authority testing regulations, for example, although the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court have the same right to test the legislation, but with different types and hierarchy of legislation being tested, then the interpretation of the rules of the legislation for which they were these institutions must be subject to a hierarchical system of laws and regulations that apply. Therefore, the validity of the norm is derived from the legislation is higher. Moreover, any decision of the judicial review of the UUD, this decision is erga omnes, including for judges of the Supreme Court and judges of the court under the Supreme Court.Keywords : Authority, Constitutional Court, Supreme Court
FREEDOM & IMPARTIAL OF JUDICIARY : ANTARA “ PERADILAN BEBAS” & “PERS YANG BEBAS Adji, Indriyanto Seno
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4 No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.1.2015.31-50

Abstract

Press of independence adopted by Law No. 40 of 1999 on the Press is an accentuation of the Libertarian Press system which requires the existence of a absolute total "freedom of pers" by putting all the legal consequences on the substance of its news through judicial institutions, without calls for criminalization forms of the press with all the reason and limitedly direction purpose. Absolute Privilege Right of the Press have signs that provide a limitation on -moral hazard- based on Interest of justice or national security or for the prevention of disorder or crime that can be issued by the judiciary as a form of Sub Judice Rule criteria or Disobeying a Court Order from Contempt of Court institutions. a proclamation which is a form of freedom of expression with the news that "prejudicial", even the news substance pose a "misleading conclusion and opinion" as well as has provided an opinion and conclusions that are misleading or incorrect and negative impact on the course of judicial proceedings and other parties broadly (as recognition of the Press Libertarian System) may be faced with a sense of responsibility of the press itself, either ethic norms and laws.Keywords : Judicial, Pers, Freedom
PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM KONTEKS UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 30 TH. 2014 TENTANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN Hadjon, Philipus M
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4 No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.1.2015.51-64

Abstract

Act No. 30 Year 2014 on Government Administration (UU AP) instead of administrative law. The concept of public administration (AP) in Article 1.1 is governance in the decision and / or action by the official agency and / or government. When compared with the Dutch Algemene wet Bestuursrecht (AWB), it seems obvious differences. AWB moved from the concept of administrative law (bestuursrecht) while the AP is the starting point of government  dministration. That in AP there are aspects of administrative  law, but the concept of administrative law is confusing. On the basis, the common explanations of AP stating AP Act is a substantive law of the State Administrative Court system becomes a big question mark. AP Act provisions concerning Administrative Court is not based on a clear conceptual approach. On the basis, AP Act concerning Administrative Court is very difficult to apply in judicial practice as well as vague concepts is also contrary to the concepts of administrative law. Keywords: Judicial, Administrative Court, Act No. 30 Year 2014 on Government Administration
MEWUJUDKAN VISI MA TENTANG BADAN PERADILAN YANG AGUNG MELALUI UNDANG-UNDANG JABATAN HAKIM Nurjannah, Siti
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4 No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.1.2015.65-82

Abstract

Judges official status has been affirmed as a state official, but in fact on some aspect on it is still bound by the Civil Service system. Therefore judge positions are often said to be dual status as state officials and civil servants. Nullifying the dual status is, in fact has caused serious problems in terms of both managerial and related to the potential reduction of judicial independence. If the independence start to reduce, the implications of the problems of the post of Judge is hampering efforts to realize the vision of the Supreme Court which is to realize the Supreme Courts.Keywords : Supreme Court Vision, Acts, and Official state of Judges
KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI DI PERADILAN DALAM RANGKA IMPLEMENTASI INTEGRITAS DAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM Mansyur, Ridwan
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4 No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.1.2015.83-100

Abstract

As a public institution in the field of justice, the Supreme Court is required to commit to apply the disclosure of information. Nowadays, transparency of information disclosure in the context of justice for the Supreme Court is not only the public needs but also the needs of all residents of the judiciary. With the judicial transparency, will slowly happen to strengthen accountability and professionalism and integrity of the judiciary residents. Commitment to provide disclosure of both the process and the end result is a concrete manifestation of public services as access to justice (access to justice) given by the Court at the lowest levels up to the Supreme Court.  Quality of excellent public services through the transparency of the judicial information disclosure is the estuary of execution Reform of Bureaucracy.Keywords : Information transparency, Judicial, Integrity and Legal Certainty
ASAS PEMBALIKAN BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM SISTEM HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN KONVENSI PERSERIKATAN BANGSA-BANGSA ANTI KORUPSI 2003 Mulyadi, Lilik
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4 No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.1.2015.101-132

Abstract

This article describes some problems of the result of research regarding the shifting of burden of proof upon corruption offences in the Indonesian system of criminal law with regards UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) 2003. There are two basic questions which become the research objections, firstly: to what extent the shifting of burden of proof has been implemented in the criminal court regarding corruption cases, and secondly, to what extent does the legislation policy apply for the shifting of burden of proof in relation with UNCAC 2003. The article uses normative research which regulation, conceptual, case and comparative approach. Such research emphasizes interpretation and legal construction to obtain some legal norms, conception, regulation list and its implementation in concreto cases. Regulation and conceptual approach to used how to know, existention, consistency and harmonization regarding the shifting of burden of proof upon corruption offences in legislation body. The cases approach uses comparative law regarding the reversal burden of proof upon corruption offencer between Indonesia and the other countries. This research shows that the shifting of burden of proof has never yet applied for in the corruption cases Indonesia. Those experiences is not similar with the experiences of against corruption Hong Kong and India, wihich implement the reversal burden of proof by using some approach socalled balanced probability of principles in the relation to the property or asset of defendant comes from. The Indonesian corruption regulation policy, especialy article 12B, 37, 37A, 38B apparently it’s not cleaq and disharmony to norm of sudden charge of fortune the shifting of burden of proof formulation in connection with United Nations Convention Against Corruption 2003(KAK 2003). So, necessary (needs) of modification sudden charge of fortune shifting of burden of proof formulation which preventive, represive and restorative characteristic.  Keywords: Shifting the Burden of Proof, Corruption Offences, Criminal Justice System

Page 42 of 66 | Total Record : 653

 40   41   42   43   44 

Filter by Year

2012 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 3 (2025) Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13, No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13, No 2 (2024) Vol 13, No 1 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12, No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12, No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 1 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10, No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 10, No 1 (2021) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9, No 3 (2020) Vol 9, No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8, No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol 7, No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6, No 3 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 2 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol 5, No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 1 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4, No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4, No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 3, No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3, No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 3, No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 3 (2012) Vol 1, No 3 (2012) Vol 1, No 2 (2012) Vol 1 No 2 (2012) Vol 1, No 1 (2012) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue