cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andi Akram
Contact Email
sekretariatjurnalkumdil@gmail.com
Phone
+6221-29079286
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhukumperadilan@mahkamahagung.go.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jend. A. Yani Kav. 58 Lt. 10 Cempaka Putih Jakarta Pusat
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Peradilan MA RI
ISSN : 23033274     EISSN : 25281100     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is published by the Research Center for Law and Judiciary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. JHP aimed to be a peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information on legal and judiciary studies. The scope of JHP is analytical, objective, empirical, and contributive literature on the dynamics and development of legal studies, specifically in Indonesia. JHP welcomes scientific papers on a range of topics from research studies, judicial decisions, theoretical studies, literature reviews, philosophical and critical consultations that are analytical, objective, and systematic. However, from a wide range of topics that researchers can choose from, JHP puts more attention to the papers focusing on the sociology of law, living law, legal philosophy, history of national law, customary law, literature studies, international law, interdisciplinary, and empirical studies. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is a media dedicated to judicial personnel, academician, practitioners, and law expertise in actualizing the idea of research, development, and analysis of law and judiciary. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan comes out three times a year in March, July, and November.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 653 Documents
 52   53   54   55   56 
THE ROLE OF RELIGIOUS COURT IN PREVENTION UNDERAGE MARRIAGE Suadi, Amran
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 9 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.9.1.2020.116-131

Abstract

Indonesia is the second highest country in ASEAN in the prevalence of underage marriage after Cambodia and ranks 7th highest in the world for the absolute number of child brides. The tangent point of child marriage with the Religious Court enters through the case of marriage dispensation. As the authority of the Religious Courts, marriage dispensation is very dilemmatic and debatable because simultaneously the case is biased in value, between benefit, harmness, and community behavior. In sociology, society always changes and the difference is only in the nature or level of change. One of the fundamental aspects of the reflection of the Religious Court decisions that put forward efforts to prevent child marriages is to narrow the space for filing child marriage cases, examine the case more carefully by adding to the burden of proof, and the commitment of the parties to respond to the negative consequences of child marriages.
THE REFORMULATION OF PARTIES DOMICILE REQUIREMENTS IN SMALL CLAIM COURT Rohmatin, Izzatun Tiyas; Syafiuddin, M Nur
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 9 No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.9.3.2020.523-542

Abstract

The requirements of domicile (the same domicile of both parties) in small claim court still become an obstacle in a real application. The purpose of this study is: first, to analyze the linkage between small claim court with the principle of simple, fast, and low-cost. Second, to analyze the realization of the principle of simple, fast, and low cost in both parties' setting domicile in small claim court. Third, to find the formulation of regulation criteria of both parties domicile in small claim court. This research is normative law research, which emphasizes the same domicile requirements on a small claim court. The research results showed that: first, the settlement of the small claim court is the realization of the simple, fast, and low-cost principle. Second, the simple, fast, and low-cost principles are not fully implemented in the  arrangement of  the parties  domicile. Third, the reformulation of the setting of the domicile of the parties in small claim court is: the parties are domiciled in the same court jurisdiction; If the Plaintiff is not domiciled in the same jurisdiction with the Defendant, the Plaintiff can be called electronically and/ or Plaintiffs can file a lawsuit and appoint a power of attorney, the power of the incidental or representative located in the jurisdiction of domicile of the Defendant with a letter of assignment from the institution of the Plaintiff.
LAWSUIT IN ADMINISTRATIVE COURT AFTER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS BASED ON PERMA NO. 6 OF 2018 Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 8 No 3 (2019)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.8.3.2019.458-480

Abstract

The enactment of Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration very much changes the paradigm of the proceedings in the State Administrative Court. One of the fundamental things is about administrative proceedings as pre-litigation proceedings. Under Article 75 of Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, citizens who feel disadvantaged by a Government’s Decision or Action can file an administrative proceedings, and then file a lawsuit in the Administrative Court. Regarding this regulation, two interpretations arise regarding the obligation of administrative proceedings as pre-litigation proceedings. One party argues that the administrative proceedings as pre-litigation proceedings must be carried out before filing a lawsuit in the Court, and the other argues this is not mandatory. For a period of four years, the interpretation of the obligation of administrative proceedings as a pre-litigation proceedings in Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration is floating in the realm of discourse. It was only on December 4th, 2018 that the Supreme Court issued a Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 6 of 2018 concerning Guidelines for Resolving Disputes Regarding Government Administration After Administrative Proceedings, finally the Supreme Court dictates that administrative proceedings as a pre-litigation proceedings is a must. However, the PERMA does not regulate fundamental things regarding lawsuit after administrative proceedings, namely, who will be seated as the defendant, and what is the object of the lawsuit. In addition, there are also a number of things that needed to be reviewed regarding the arrangements in the PERMA, such as regarding the deadline for a lawsuit in the Court.
MELACAK ILLAT HUKUM LARANGAN WARIS BEDA AGAMA Wahyudi, Muhamad Isna
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 10 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.10.1.2021.155-172

Abstract

AbstrakKompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) tidak mengatur waris beda agama secara jelas, KHI hanya mensyaratkan pewaris dan ahli waris memiliki agama yang sama. Di pengadilan, hakim-hakim Pengadilan Agama menggunakan wasiat wajibah untuk membagi harta warisan dengan ahli waris non-Muslim, berdasarkan yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 368 K/AG/1995. Sebagai hasilnya, perbedaan agama masih menjadi halangan bagi Muslim dan non-Muslim untuk saling mewarisi karena penerapan hukum tanpa mempertimbangkan illat hukum larangan waris beda agama. Dalam hal ini, penting untuk meneliti illat hukum hadis yang melarang waris beda agama sebagaimana yang dicoba dilakukan oleh artikel ini. Untuk melakukan penelitian tersebut, penulis menggunakan pendekatan usul fikih dan hermeneutika. Hasilnya, penulis sampai pada kesimpulan bahwa illat hukum hadis yang melarang waris beda agama adalah karena unsur permusuhan dan kejahatan, dan bukan karena perbedaan agama. AbstractKompilasi Hukum Islam does not regulate interfaith inheritance distinctly, it only requires the testator and the heirs have the same religion. At court, judges of religious courts employ obligatory bequest (wasiat wajibah) to share inheritance with non-Muslim heirs, based on jurisprudence of the Supreme Court Number 368 K/AG/1995. As the result, different faith still become hindrance for Muslim and non-Muslim to inherit each other due to law enforcement without considering the legal reason (ratio legis) of the law. In this case, it is important to investigate the legal reason (ratio legis) of the hadith that prohibits the interfaith inheritance as this article tries to do. To do the investigation, the author employs Islamic legal theories (usul fikih) and hermeneutics approach. As the result, the author comes to the conclusion that the ratio legis of the hadith that prohibits the interfaith inheritance is due to hostility and crime elements, and not due to different faith.
CAUSES OF RADICALISM BASED ON TERRORISM IN ASPECT OF CRIMINAL LAW POLICY IN INDONESIA Wahyuni, Fitri
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 8 No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.8.2.2019.196-213

Abstract

The phenomenon of radicalism based on terrorism in Indonesia shows a frightening symptom. This can be seen from a number of events that took place in several cities in Indonesia which took action in the name of acts of terror or terrorism such as the 2nd Bali Bombing which killed 22 people and 102 injured. The JW Marriot and Ritz Calton Hotel bombings in 2009 killed nine people and 50 people were injured and the Sarinah Plaza Bomb Jl. MH Thamrin Jakarta on January 14, 2016. With the many actions in the name of terrorism, it is necessary to take steps to anticipate similar actions not being repeated back. This study wants to examine and analyze further about efforts to counter terrorism-based radicalism in Indonesia through criminal law policy. The research method used is normative legal research, namely legal research conducted by examining library materials or secondary legal material while the problem approach is carried out using a legal approach and conceptual approach. The policy in counteracting terrorism in Indonesia is carried out through criminal law policies, namely criminal law policies through means of reasoning and non-reasoning. Penal means in the form of granting criminal sanctions for perpetrators of terrorism with the threat of imprisonment to the most severe threat in the form of capital punishment. But this effort has not provided a deterrent effect for the perpetrators. In criminal law, punishment is not an end in itself and is not the only way to achieve criminal objectives or objectives of the criminal justice system. Therefore another effort is needed which in criminal law is known as a non-reasoning effort.
KONTRADIKSI PENGATURAN HUKUMAN PELAKU PELECEHAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK DI ACEH Rachmad, Andi; Amdani, Yusi; Ulya, Zaki
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 10 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.10.2.2021.315-336

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menelusuri kontradiksi pengaturan hukuman dalam tindak pidana pelecehan seksual terhadap anak di Aceh pasca diberlakukannya Qanun No. 6 Tahun 2014. Pengaturan hukuman pelecehan seksual terhadap anak dalam hukum jinayat di Aceh mempunyai perbedaan penafsiran dengan peraturan perundang-undangan lainnya termasuk UU No. 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Sehingga esensi efek jera bagi pelaku yang seharusnya menjadi bagian tujuan pemidanaan tidak begitu tercapai. Selain itu, Qanun Jinayat juga berpotensi untuk terjadinya impunitas bagi pemerintah dengan adanya Pasal 9 dan Pasal 11 Qanun No. 6 Tahun 2014 mengenai alasan pembenaran serta alasan pemaaf. Metode yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini yaitu metode yuridis normatif, dengan menggunakan data sekunder atau data kepustakaan.
THE ROLE OF LAND DEED OFFICIAL REGARDING LEGAL CERTAINTY OF COMPLETE SYSTEMATIC LAND REGISTRATION Yubaidi, Ricco Survival
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 9 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.9.1.2020.27-42

Abstract

As an acceleration program for land registration in Indonesia that is directly led by the President, Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) should provide a guarantee of legal certainty and protection regarding land ownership rights. However, in fact, the role of the land deed official (PPAT), as a public official who receives a mandate from the Governmental Regulation no. 24 of 1997 regarding Land Registration, is not found within the implementation of PTSL. The present research aimed to investigate the role of PPAT in the implementation of PTSL. Using normative legal approach, this study employed literature study to collect the primary data. This research found that PPAT does not have any role in regulatory legislation regarding PTSL. If we see Governmental Regulation no. 24 of 1997, all transfers occurring after the issuance of the regulation requires PPAT’s deed as written evidence of land ownership. The adjudication committee as the PTSL implementer supposes to collaborate with PPAT to make sure that PTSL meets the steps of juridical data collection in order to obtain an orderly, complete land registration that provides legal certainty regarding land ownership right.
THE ENFORCEMENT OF GOMPONG IN THE QANUN OF ACEH AND ITS RELATIVE POSITION IN THE INDONESIAN CONSTITUTION Iskandar, Mizaj
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 8 No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.8.2.2019.255-274

Abstract

This paper aims to learn how the Qanun of Aceh, particularly Qanun No. 4 on Mukim and Qanun No. 5 on Gampong Government enforce Gampong as a government body. It further compares the hierarchical relationship between the qanun and the higher regulations in Indonesia such as Village Government Act No. 32 of 2004, Privileges of Aceh Act No. 44 of 1999, Special Autonomy No. 18 of 2001 and Aceh Government Act No. 11 of 2006. The study found that the Qanun integrates Acehnese identity coupled with the Islamic values into the Gampong institution. The Qanun on Gampong Government, in fact, does not negate any higher regulations in the Indonesian constitution. The principle of decentralization implemented post-Orde Baru requires a massive change in the government system in Indonesia from the centralized system of local state government, to local self-government and finally the decentralized system of the local community. The Qanun on Gampong government is in line with the local community spirit due to greater public participation channeled through Reusam Gampong. Reusam Gampong is the public aspiration, and its application shall not conflict with the higher regulation. In its cultural manifest, Resuam Gampong is an instrument that promotes the marriage between culture and religion into a single government body.
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN JUVENILE JUSTICE TO FORMULATE INTEGRATED CHILD CRIMINAL COURT Hafrida, Hafrida
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 8 No 3 (2019)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.8.3.2019.439-457

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to formulate the concept of restorative justice which balanced to protect between child offenders and the victims through the diversion (Victim-offender oriented). This goal will be realized through normative research (legal research) based on Restorative Justice concept.  In Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System the process (SPPA Law), its prioritizes the Diversion Process (Settlement outside the court) carried out through a Restorative Justice approach. Article 5 paragraph (2) of the SPPA Law states Restorative Justice is the settlement of criminal cases by involving perpetrators, victims, families of perpetrators /victims, and other related parties to jointly to find a fair solution by emphasizing recovery and not based on revenge. Empirical conditions show that balanced legal protection between criminal offenders and victims has not implemented. Evaluation of Law Number 11 of 2012 is needed to formulating the Integrated Child Criminal Court.
THE COMPARISON OF EVIDENCE IN STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT BETWEEN INDONESIA AND SOUTH KOREA Dalimunthe, Fadli Zaini
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 9 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.9.2.2020.232-254

Abstract

The judiciary under the supreme court consists of general courts, religious courts, military courts, and state administrative courts. In each procedural law court, the provisions concerning evidence are regulated. Evidence is the stage where the parties try to convince the panel of judges about the truth of the arguments put forward in a dispute based on valid evidence. Evidence has an important role because the results of evidence can be the basis for consideration by the panel of judges in making a decision. Evidence in the procedural law of the state administrative court is not only carried out in the Indonesian state administrative court but also in the South Korean Administrative Court. The historical development and organizational structure of the South Korean Administrative Court are the basis for analyzing the Evidence in the South Korean Administrative Court. Lessons from the South Korean Administrative Court can see the similarities and differences in the concept of evidence and type of evidence used in the South Korean Administrative Court with the Indonesian State Administrative Court. The approach used in this study is the statutory approach, comparative approach, and conceptual approach.

Page 54 of 66 | Total Record : 653

 52   53   54   55   56 

Filter by Year

2012 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 3 (2025) Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13, No 3 (2024) Vol 13, No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13, No 1 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12, No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12, No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 1 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10, No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 10, No 1 (2021) Vol 9, No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9, No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8, No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7, No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6, No 3 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5, No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 1 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4, No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4, No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3, No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3, No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 3, No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol 1, No 3 (2012) Vol 1 No 3 (2012) Vol 1, No 2 (2012) Vol 1 No 2 (2012) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) Vol 1, No 1 (2012) More Issue