cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Firdaus Annas
Contact Email
firdaus@uinbukittinggi.ac.id
Phone
+6285272790459
Journal Mail Official
fuaduna.uinbukittinggi@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Data Center Building - Kampus II Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bukittinggi. Jln Gurun Aua Kubang Putih Kecamatan Banuhampu Kabupaten Agam Sumatera Barat Telp. 0752 33136 Fax 0752 22871
Location
Kab. agam,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Fuaduna: Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi
ISSN : 26148137     EISSN : 26148129     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/fuaduna
Core Subject : Religion, Social,
Religion Social Sciences
Jurnal FUADUNA: Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan is a peer-reviewed journal which is published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bukitinggi in collaboration with Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS) and publishes biannually in June and December. It focuses mainly on the related issues to Quran and Hadits, Islamic philosophy and thoughts, culture and social studies, Islamic history studies, and dakwah and communications studies. JURNAL FUADUNA: Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakat published at first Vol. 1, No. 1, 2017 biannually in in June and December. Reviewers will review any submitted paper. Review process employs a double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 204 Documents
 17   18   19   20   21 
Religious Time and Symbolic Hegemony: An Analysis of National Holiday Policy in Indonesia Muhammad Nasir; Dwi Wahyuni
Jurnal Fuaduna : Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article examines the national holiday and collective leave policies in Indonesia as a practice of the religious time that reflects the relationship between the state, religion, and the formation of collective memory. Through a thematic content analysis of the Joint Decree of Three Ministers concerning National Holidays and Collective Leave for the 2020–2025 period, the article demonstrates that the regulation of public time is not merely an administrative instrument but also an arena of symbolic hegemonization representing the dominance of the majority religion. The study employs a qualitative approach based on document analysis, specifically Thematic Content Analysis to uncover patterns of representation, symbolic hierarchies, and the state's construction of religious time. Drawing on Maurice Halbwachs’s perspective on collective memory, Murray Edelman’s symbolic politics, and William E. Connolly’s critique of state neutrality regarding religious representation, the study analyzes how the national calendar functions as a temporal artifact that determines which events are institutionalized as shared memory. Research findings indicate that the distribution of national holidays and collective leave days reveals a pattern of religious time dominance, particularly through the greater representation of majority religious celebrations. The article contributes to the study of state-religion relations by expanding the understanding of hegemony as a form of temporal control, specifically, how the state constructs legitimacy and collective identity through the regulation of social time. The study asserts that the national calendar is not merely an administrative list but a political space reflecting processes of inclusion, exclusion, and the negotiation of religious representation within a pluralistic society.
The Malakok Tradition as a Customary Kinship Mechanism for Building Interreligious Tolerance in Minangkabau Society Selvi Rahmadania; Novi Hendri
Jurnal Fuaduna : Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/fuaduna.v10i1.11265

Abstract

The Malakok tradition, locally known as Mangaku Induak, is a customary kinship mechanism through which individuals are incorporated into the social and genealogical structure of Minangkabau society. Beyond its function of establishing customary belonging, Malakok may also provide a social space for negotiating difference and fostering interreligious relations. This study aims to examine the process through which Malakok is practiced and to analyze its role in generating social acceptance, kinship solidarity, and interreligious tolerance in Pauh Duo District, South Solok Regency, West Sumatra. Employing a qualitative field research design, data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation involving interreligious Malakok participants, niniak mamak, customary leaders, religious leaders, community leaders, and local residents. The data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña. The findings indicate that Malakok involves family deliberation, approval by niniak mamak, and a customary ceremony that formally legitimizes an individual's incorporation into a Minangkabau kinship network. More importantly, the practice extends customary belonging across religious boundaries: Christian and Catholic individuals can be incorporated into customary families without relinquishing their religious identities. Interreligious tolerance is subsequently sustained through familial relations, participation in communal activities, mutual assistance, and everyday solidarity. The study demonstrates that Malakok functions not merely as a mechanism of customary integration but also as a locally embedded institution for negotiating religious difference, strengthening social cohesion, and sustaining interreligious coexistence in a plural society.
Revitalizing Spirituality through Socio-Sufism: M. Fethullah Gülen's Integration of Sufi Ethics and Social Engagement Aisyah Nur; Gazali
Jurnal Fuaduna : Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/fuaduna.v10i1.11289

Abstract

The marginalization of religious values amid secularization, materialism, and individualism has generated a need for forms of spirituality that address not only inner transformation but also contemporary social responsibility. While modern discussions of Islamic spirituality often emphasize individual piety and mystical experience, the social and ethical dimensions of Sufi spirituality remain comparatively underexplored. This article examines M. Fethullah Gülen's conception of socio-Sufism as a framework that integrates Sufi ethics with social engagement. It aims to analyze the conceptual foundations of Gülen's socio-Sufism, examine how spiritual cultivation is translated into social responsibility, and assess its relevance to the revitalization of spirituality in modern society. Employing qualitative library research with philosophical and historical-contextual approaches, the study analyzes Gülen’s major works and relevant scholarly literature through qualitative content analysis. The findings demonstrate that Gülen's socio-Sufism is structured through the dynamic relationship between tazkiyah al-nafs as inner spiritual formation, hizmet as the ethical expression of spirituality through service, and collective social praxis as the broader realization of spiritual values. This integration transforms Sufism from an exclusively inward-oriented spiritual practice into an ethically engaged mode of religious life in which personal piety and social responsibility are mutually reinforcing. The study concludes that Gülen's socio-Sufism provides a relevant conceptual framework for revitalizing spirituality by reconnecting inner moral transformation with social engagement and ethical responsibility in modern society.
Constructing Religion-Based Sexual Violence: Religious Authority and Women’s Resistance in Bidaah (2025) Yunda Fithriyah; Deni Yatri; Nurul Hasna Khoirunnisa; Leonardus Dapa Dey; Liana Septiyanti
Jurnal Fuaduna : Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/fuaduna.v10i1.11464

Abstract

Religion-based sexual violence in pesantren represents a critical form of gendered violence, particularly when religious authority is mobilized to legitimize sexual exploitation. The Malaysian religious drama series Bidaah (2025) depicts the manipulation of Islamic teachings and religious authority in sexual violence against female students. This study examines how the series represents religion-based sexual violence and reconstructs women’s critical consciousness and resistance. Employing a qualitative descriptive design, the study analyzes scene dialogues as primary data, complemented by scholarly articles, books, research reports, and credible news sources as secondary data. Drawing on Stuart Hall’s constructionist theory of representation, the study applies qualitative textual analysis to examine how religious meaning, authority, and sexual violence are discursively constructed. The findings show that sexual violence is represented through the strategic reconstruction of religious discourses, particularly obedience, religious devotion, “spiritual wife,” and “spiritual marriage,” which normalize religious authority and reframe sexual abuse as religious devotion. Simultaneously, the series portrays women’s critical consciousness through questioning, resistance, and reinterpretation, reflected in recurring expressions such as “report,” “evidence,” and “fear.” The study demonstrates that Bidaah not only exposes how religious discourse can legitimize sexual violence but also constructs women’s resistance as a process of reclaiming interpretive agency and challenging the abuse of religious authority.

Page 21 of 21 | Total Record : 204

 17   18   19   20   21 

Filter by Year

2017 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): June 2026 Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Desember 2025 Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): June 2025 Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): December 2024 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): June 2024 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): December 2023 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): June 2023 Vol 7, No 1 (2023): June 2023 Vol 6, No 2 (2022): July - December 2022 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): July - December 2022 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): January - June 2022 Vol 6, No 1 (2022): January - June 2022 Vol 5, No 2 (2021): July - December 2021 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): July - December 2021 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): January - June 2021 Vol 5, No 1 (2021): January - June 2021 Vol 4, No 2 (2020): Juli - Desember 2020 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020 Vol 4, No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): Juli-Desember 2019 Vol 3, No 2 (2019): Juli-Desember 2019 Vol 3, No 1 (2019): Januari-Juni 2019 Vol 2, No 2 (2018): Juli-Desember 2018 Vol 2, No 1 (2018): Januari-Juni 2018 Vol 1, No 2 (2017): Juli-Desember 2017 Vol 1, No 1 (2017): Januari-Juni 2017 More Issue