cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Indah Purbasari
Contact Email
tlr@trunojoyo.ac.id
Phone
+6282337334798
Journal Mail Official
tlr@trunojoyo.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law, University of Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia Jl. Raya Telang - Kamal, Bangkalan.
Location
Kab. bangkalan,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Trunojoyo Law Review
Published by Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
ISSN : 26861496     EISSN : 27152081     DOI : https://doi.org/10.21107/trl
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Trunojoyo Law Review, published by Faculty of Law University of Trunojoyo, Madura. Its a biannual refereed journal concerned with the practice and processes of law and justice. It provides a forum for academics, practitioners and community representatives to explore issues and reflect on practices relating to the full range of engaged activity. This journal is a peer-reviewed online journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality research focused on research, implementation. The mission of Trunojoyo Law Reveiw is to serve as the premier peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal to advance theory and practice related to all forms of social science and humanities. This includes highlighting innovative endeavors; critically examining emerging issues, trends, challenges, and opportunities and reporting on studies of impact in the areas of law and justice. We proudly announce that Trunojoyo Law Reveiw has indexed by Google Scholar, Portal Garuda, Dimensions, etc
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 8, No 1 (2026): February" : 6 Documents clear
Legal Reform in Indonesia’s Response to the Digital Manipulation Era: A Responsive Legal Theory Approach Antony, Antony; Sandoval, Excel Brayen; Louis, John Elvin
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 1 (2026): February
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i1.30732

Abstract

The rapid advancement of technology has brought Indonesia into the era of digital manipulation, giving rise to various new social problems. This situation reveals the weaknesses and unpreparedness of the national legal system in responding to such challenges. A modern legal framework is therefore required to effectively address the need for legal protection in the digital era. This research aims to analyze the capacity of Indonesia’s legal system in addressing challenges arising from digital manipulation and to explore the relevance of responsive law theory as a framework for reform. This study employs a normative juridical method with a descriptive specification. The approaches used include the statutory approach, which examines legislative frameworks, and the conceptual approach, which analyzes the relevance of legal theories to digital manipulation. The findings indicate that Indonesian law has not yet optimally addressed the impacts of the digital manipulation era, particularly due to weak regulations, limited responsiveness, and limited mechanisms for public protection. Responsive law theory is viewed as an appropriate framework for building a modern legal system, as it emphasizes legal reform, flexibility, justice grounded in the public interest, public participation, and openness and transparency. This research contributes to improving the effectiveness of Indonesian law in responding to the challenges of the digital manipulation era. Its implementation requires political commitment, regulatory harmonization, and active public engagement. This research recommends revising and harmonizing digital regulations, strengthening legal literacy and education, and institutionalizing legislative audits based on responsive law indicators. Future studies should empirically test responsive law in practice to ensure that Indonesia’s legal system remains adaptive to challenges posed by digital manipulation.
Building Energy Sovereignty in Madura: Legal Analysis, Energy Crisis and Implementation of President Prabowo's Asta Cita Lisan, Imam Fasichul; Barak, Ahmed Mohamed; Wijaya, Dodik Pranata; Fathorrahman, Fathorrahman; Elkaffash, Mohamed; Asyiqoh, Lin
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 1 (2026): February
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i1.31874

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal orientation and future potential of the Nipah Reservoir in Sampang, Madura, within the framework of Indonesia’s energy transition and commitment to achieve Net Zero Emissions by 2060. The main contribution of this research lies in the proposal to reinterpret reservoirs that have historically been geared toward irrigation, raw water supply, and tourism, transforming them into renewable energy projects that support both national energy sovereignty and environmental sustainability. Using juridical-normative methods through legislative and conceptual approaches, this research was enriched with electrical engineering literature and primary data through interviews with the President Director of Perum Jasa Tirta I. The results of the study show that although the Nipah Reservoir is not listed in the PLN 2024-2033 or 2025-2034 RUPTL, it has significant potential to be developed into a Microhydro Power Plant (PLTMH) and/or a Floating Solar PV (Solar PV) plant. This utilization not only reduces Madura’s dependence on fossil-fuel electricity from Java but also helps achieve the target of a new renewable energy mix of 23% by 2025. This study concludes that the reinterpretation of the legal framework is essential to align old irrigation-oriented regulations with modern renewable energy policies. The recommendation of this study is that the government issue more comprehensive regulations and integrate the Nipah Reservoir into national energy planning as a model for locally based renewable energy development.
Rokat Pandhaba Tradition as a Local Legal System from Clifford Geertz's Perspective in Madura Susantin, Jamiliya; Pahlevi, Yusron; Roibin, Roibin; Atnawi, Atnawi; Saputera, Abdur Rahman Adi
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 1 (2026): February
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i1.32099

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the Rokat Pandhaba tradition within Madurese society as a local legal system, employing Clifford Geertz’s interpretive-anthropological approach. It specifically explores the tradition’s normative dimensions, enforcement mechanisms, and its interaction with legal pluralism in Indonesia. The study offers a theoretical contribution by expanding the understanding of Indonesian customary law through Geertz’s thick description, as well as a practical contribution in the form of policy recommendations for the recognition of local legal systems within the framework of national legal pluralism. The research adopts a qualitative methodology using a legal ethnographic approach within an interpretive paradigm. Data were collected through participant observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation across several regions of Madura and analyzed using the thick description method. The findings reveal that Rokat Pandhaba functions as a local legal system characterized by normative elements (customary obligations), sanction mechanisms (both social and supernatural), and a structure of communal authority. This tradition regulates relationships among families, communities, and the spiritual realm, while simultaneously maintaining social order and collective solidarity. Rokat Pandhaba represents a form of living law that dynamically interacts with Islamic law and state law. Accordingly, this study recommends the formal recognition of local legal systems within national legal policy to strengthen an inclusive, context-sensitive model of legal pluralism.
Reconstructing Environmental Criminal Law in Indonesia Through a Comparative Zemiological Legal Study Fernando, Zico Junius; Sueni, Annisa Sabilla; Arifin, Firdaus; Ramadhani, Susi; Zulaika, Almira Novia
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 1 (2026): February
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i1.31912

Abstract

Environmental crimes in Indonesia are increasingly recognized not only as violations of legal norms but also as social and ecological harms affecting communities and ecosystems. However, the existing framework of environmental criminal law remains largely formalistic, emphasizing administrative violations and statutory illegality while insufficiently addressing the broader dimension of socio-ecological harm. This research examines how a zemiological perspective can contribute to the reconstruction of environmental criminal law in Indonesia through a comparative legal study. Using a normative juridical method with statute, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this study analyzes Indonesian environmental criminal law alongside developments in Belgium, the European Union, Argentina, Scotland, and the Philippines. The findings demonstrate that Indonesian law continues to rely on formal legality and weak corporate accountability, whereas comparative jurisdictions increasingly recognize severe environmental harm, ecocide, and collective victimization as bases for criminal responsibility. The contribution of this research lies in three main aspects. First, it develops a zemiological framework as a new theoretical basis for evaluating environmental criminal law beyond formal statutory violations, emphasizing social and ecological harm as the central criterion for criminalization. Second, it provides a systematic comparative legal analysis that identifies normative gaps between Indonesian law and emerging global models of harm-based environmental criminal law. Third, it proposes a conceptual model for reconstructing environmental criminal law in Indonesia by integrating the principles of social harm, the recognition of ecocide, and strengthened corporate liability.
Legal and Ethical Regulation on Childcare Digital Health System in Nigeria and Uganda: Issues and Challenges Aidonojie, Paul Atagamen; Nurhasanah, Siti; Kasmawati, Kasmawati; Aidonojie, Esther Chetachukwu; Ekpemisi, Collins; Atim, Amos Godfrey
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 1 (2026): February
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i1.32980

Abstract

The implementation of digital technologies in the healthcare system for children has a lesser but still noticeable effect on the health systems of Nigeria and Uganda. Digital tools such as electronic pediatric health records, tele-pediatric, m-health apps, and data-driven diagnostic platforms have been implemented. However, children's vulnerability in the digital healthcare domain has been significantly increased by the new technologies. The research scrutinizes the current insufficient and disorganised legal and ethical systems that control child digital healthcare in Nigeria and Uganda. The research employs a doctrine-based method, utilising the PRISMA Guide to systematically identify, screen, and analyse relevant laws, policies, and academic literature on children's rights. The results indicate that both countries have generic health and data protection laws that can be applied to digital health in general, but regulations and ethical standards (such as consent, data privacy, cybersecurity, parental authority, and professional liability) specific to children remain underdeveloped and poorly enforced, specifically in Nigeria. The study makes the case for child-friendly digital health legislation, clear consent standards, rigorous institutional oversight, and regional collaboration to ensure children's rights and welfare in digital healthcare systems.
Freedom of Contract in the Digital Age: Perspectives on the Indonesian Civil Code and Fiqh Muamalah Shoimah, Siti Nur
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 1 (2026): February
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i1.32568

Abstract

This study examines the urgency of reconstructing the principle of freedom of contract in electronic contracts through a dialectical analysis between Article 1338 of the Indonesian Civil Code and the normative framework of fiqh muamalah. This reconstruction is crucial in the context of standard-form and digital contracts, which tend to place one party in a weaker bargaining position and expose it to unilateral clauses. The study aims to formulate a more equitable and ethically grounded conception of contractual freedom that can respond to contemporary commercial practices, particularly electronic and hybrid contracts. This article contributes to the development of contract law theory by integrating civil law rationality with Islamic legal values to address structural imbalances in contractual relations. Employing a doctrinal legal research method, this study applies statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, including an analysis of constitutional jurisprudence. The findings demonstrate that a formalistic application of the principle of freedom of contract often legitimizes inequality and weakens protections for disadvantaged parties, especially in standard-form contracts. These limitations are reinforced by Constitutional Court Decision No. 83/PUU-XXII/2024, which declared Article 251 of the Commercial Code (KUHD) on the unilateral termination of insurance contracts conditionally unconstitutional and affirmed that contract termination must be based on mutual consent or a court decision. Based on these findings, this study proposes a reconstructed model of freedom of contract encompassing substantive justice, an orientation toward maslahah (social welfare), and ethical contractual morality grounded in good faith and honesty. The study concludes that harmonizing the Indonesian Civil Code with fiqh muamalah, strengthened by constitutional justice, produces a more balanced, transparent, and welfare-oriented contractual framework without undermining contractual autonomy.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 8, No 1 (2026): February Vol 7, No 2 (2025): August Vol 7, No 1 (2025): February Vol 6, No 2 (2024): August Vol 6, No 1 (2024): February Vol 5, No 2 (2023): Agustus Vol 5, No 1 (2023): FERUARY Vol 5, No 1: FERUARY Vol 4, No 2 (2022): AGUSTUS Vol 4, No 1 (2022): Februari Vol 4, No 2: AGUSTUS Vol 2, No 2 (2020): Agustus Vol 2, No 1 (2020): February Vol 1, No 1 (2019): Februari More Issue