cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
M. Roem Syibly
Contact Email
roemsyibly@uii.ac.id
Phone
+628112505178
Journal Mail Official
editor.mawarid@uii.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung K.H.A. Wahid Hasyim - Kampus Terpadu UII Jl. Kaliurang KM 14.5 Sleman Yogyakarta Telp. (0274) 898462
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH)
Published by Universitas Islam Indonesia
ISSN : 26561654     EISSN : 2656193X     DOI : 10.20885/mawarid
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Science, Social,
Religion Humanities Astronomy Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
al-Mawarid: Jurnal Syariah & Hukum is a peer-reviewed journal published two times a year (February and August) by the Department of Ahwal Syakhshiyah, Faculty of Islamic Studies, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Formerly, first published in 1993, al-Mawarid was initially published as Al-Mawarid: Jurnal Hukum Islam, an Indonesian bi-annual journal on Islamic Law. Since 2019, to enlarge its scope, this journal transforms its name to al-Mawarid: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum. al-Mawarid warmly welcomes graduate students, academicians, and practitioners to analytically discuss and deeply explore new issues in relation to the improvement of shariah and law challenges and beyond.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 102 Documents
 7   8   9   10   11 
DEVELOPING HALAL TOURISM BASED ON TRADITIONAL CULINARY HERITAGE: AN ISLAMIC LAW AND SWOT ANALYSIS OF CERTIFICATION COMPLIANCE IN TANGERANG, INDONESIA Abdul Rachman; Muhammad Azizan Fitriana; Hidayat; Risyda Nurul Qolbi; Bilaly Sangare
al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/mawarid.vol8.iss1.art5

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to analyze the gap between the economic potential of traditional cuisine in the halal tourism ecosystem and the level of compliance of business actors with certification requirements, as stipulated in the Halal Product Guarantee Law. This study also examines the factors influencing the halal tourism ecosystem and halal guarantees among business actors in Laksa Tangerang. Methods – This study used a qualitative descriptive method with a normative juridical approach. The analysis was conducted by linking the culinary practices of Laksa Tangerang with SWOT analysis and halal product assurance regulations in Indonesia. Data were obtained through observations in the culinary tourism area in Laksa Tangerang, interviews with Laksa vendors, visitors, and the local community, and relevant literature. Findings – This study shows that the stagnation of halal culinary growth in Laksa Tangerang is caused by multidimensional structural constraints, including limited innovation, weak segmentation and promotion, and governance issues. The SWOT analysis identified several strategic strengths that position Laksa Tangerang as a potential hub for halal tourism development. From an Islamic law perspective, its integration into the halal tourism ecosystem requires formal halal certification as a Halal Product Guarantee, so that halal assurance is institutionalized in a credible manner. Therefore, strengthening halal literacy, expanding certification, and improving governance are prerequisites for transforming Laksa Tangerang into a competitive and sustainable halal culinary tourism destination. Research contribution/limitations – This study contributes to providing space for the actualization of sharia values in local economic practices and offers a contextual and applicable SWOT analysis framework. Originality/value – This research offers a new perspective on integrating traditional culinary heritage into the Islamic legal framework in a contextual manner, thereby offering a model for sustainable Halal tourism development.
HYBRID AUTHORITY AT THE INTERSECTION OF CONSTITUTION AND SHARIA: JURISDICTIONAL DILEMMAS AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF ISLAMIC FAMILY LAW IN NIGERIA Muhammad jibril, Abubakar; Thomas Sheku Marah; Nura Sani Yusuf; Jelly Akter; Hoda Gueddi; Sulaiman Dalha Ahmad
al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/mawarid.vol8.iss1.art3

Abstract

Purpose – This study examines why the constitutional recognition of Sharia family courts in Nigeria has failed to resolve ongoing tensions over power, legitimacy, and jurisdiction, revealing a structural dilemma in which constitutional supremacy and Sharia authority coexist without meaningful integration. Methods – This study uses a normative legal method based on doctrinal analyses. Primary data include constitutional provisions and legal instruments governing Sharia courts, while secondary data consist of established scholarly studies on Islamic legal theory, constitutional law, and legal pluralism. Data were analyzed using interpretive and analytical techniques to assess jurisdictional structures, sources of authority, and adjudication patterns. Findings – These findings show that Islamic family law in Nigeria operates through a dual structure of constitutional legality and religious legitimacy, resulting in the persistent fragmentation of authority that produces doctrinal inconsistency, judicial minimalism, and institutional caution. Rather than offering a principled framework for coexistence, constitutional supremacy functions primarily as a mechanism of subjugation, placing Sharia family law in a state of formal validity but with normative uncertainty. Thus, the stability of Islamic family law does not arise from the resolution of conflicts of authority but rather from the ability of the judicial system to manage normative tensions through case-specific accommodations within a stable but conceptually fragile space of legal pluralism. Research contribution/limitations – This study is limited to normative legal analysis and does not include empirical court data or litigants’ perspectives. Therefore, the conclusions cannot be generalized beyond doctrinal interpretations. Originality/value – This study offers a conceptual reframing of Islamic family law as a semi-autonomous normative subsystem within the constitutional order, contributing to the debate on legal pluralism and religious courts.

Page 11 of 11 | Total Record : 102

 7   8   9   10   11 

Filter by Year

2019 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) More Issue