cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhammad Arif Mustaqim
Contact Email
islamikainside@gmail.com
Phone
+6285648630339
Journal Mail Official
islamikainside@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Humaniora UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember Jl. Mataram No.1, Karang Miuwo, Mangli, Kaliwates, Jember, East Java, Indonesia 68136
Location
Kab. jember,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
ISSN : 24769541     EISSN : 25808885     DOI : https://doi.org/10.35719/islamikainside.v8i2.154
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Art, Social,
Religion Arts Humanities Social Sciences
This journal focuses on in-depth studies of Islamic studies and the social-humanity perspective through the publication of scientific articles and reports on the results of Islamic research
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 106 Documents
 7   8   9   10   11 
Methodological Innovations in Contemporary Qur’anic Exegesis by Muslim Intellectuals in the West: Bridging Tradition and Modernity Siti Khodijah; Moh. Yardho; Isam Abdul Azeez T. M.
Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Humaniora (FUAH) UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/islamikainside.v11i2.305

Abstract

The study of the Qur’an in the West has developed into a robust academic discipline, marked by significant methodological transformations in interpreting the sacred text. Diverging from the classical Islamic tradition of tafsir, Western approaches frequently incorporate historical-critical methods, hermeneutics, and literary analysis. This article aims to examine the methodological evolution of Qur’anic exegesis in the West, highlighting the contributions of prominent contemporary Muslim scholars, including Fazlur Rahman’s Double Movement, Abdullah Saeed’s Contextual Approach, and Amina Wadud’s Feminist Hermeneutics. Employing a qualitative methodology rooted in library research, this study utilizes content analysis to elucidate the principles underpinning these innovative approaches. The findings indicate that these methodologies offer a more contextualized and modernly relevant reading of the Qur’an, addressing contemporary challenges while integrating historical analysis, a hierarchy of values, and principles of gender justice. These approaches facilitate the development of inclusive and adaptive interpretations that remain grounded in the fundamental values of Islam. However, they also encounter critiques, particularly concerning the application of hermeneutics to the interpretation of sacred texts. This article underscores the pivotal role of contemporary Muslim intellectuals in the West in reshaping the methodology of Qur’anic interpretation, forging a critical bridge between Islamic tradition and global academic discourse.
The Deconstruction of Milk al-yamīn Muhammad Shahrūr and Abdul Aziz's Interpretation: Analysis of Maqāṣid al-Sharīah from the Perspective of Maslahat and Mafsadat Muhammad Miqdad Al Ghifari Syatta; Ahmad Baehaki; Ida Fitri Anggarini
Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Humaniora (FUAH) UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/islamikainside.v11i2.329

Abstract

The interpretations of milk al-yamīn proposed by Muhammad Shaḥrūr and Abdul Aziz have been characterized as liberal by various Muslim scholarly communities. This characterization stems from their apparent neglect of established interpretative methodologies and the disregard for the prevailing moral frameworks that have historically governed such exegeses. Consequently, their readings are perceived to align with the objectives of secular feminist discourse. In response, Abdul Mustaqim offers a critical evaluation of their work, identifying several key deficiencies, including ontological, methodological, ideological, and epistemological shortcomings. In light of these critiques, a more rigorous reassessment of Shaḥrūr and Abdul Aziz’s interpretations is warranted, particularly through the lens of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah (the objectives of Islamic law). Such an analysis aims to delineate the theoretical boundaries that these scholars may have transgressed. Employing a qualitative research design, this study examines Shaḥrūr’s Al-Kitāb wa Al-Qur’an alongside Abdul Aziz’s dissertation, utilizing theoretical and critical analytical techniques. The qualitative critical analysis facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the appropriate interpretative framework for milk al-yamīn.
Pesantren Peace Theology as a Framework of Islamic Public Ethics: Negotiating the Religion-Politics Nexus in Contemporary Indonesia Abd Munib; Khairuddin; Erfan Efendi; Dahlan Nur Busri; Moh. Asy’ari
Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): In Progress
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Humaniora (FUAH) UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/islamikainside.v12i1.355

Abstract

The growing politicization of religion in contemporary Indonesia has increasingly transformed religious values into instruments of political contestation, thereby weakening the ethical function of religion, intensifying democratic polarization, and undermining social cohesion. While previous studies have examined pesantren as Islamic educational institutions, civil society actors, or promoters of religious moderation, the conceptual foundations of pesantren as a framework of Islamic Public Ethics remain theoretically underdeveloped. This study synthesizes scholarship on pesantren, Islamic political thought, and public religion to construct Pesantren Peace Theology as a framework of Islamic Public Ethics for negotiating the religion–politics nexus in contemporary Indonesia. Employing a qualitative conceptual research design, documentary sources were analyzed through document analysis and synthesized using Jaakkola's theory synthesis approach involving concept identification, conceptual integration, and theoretical proposition development. The study constructs Pesantren Peace Theology as an integrated framework comprising four ethical dimensions—Ethical Political Engagement, Moral Autonomy, Intergroup Mediation, and Non-Partisan Social Engagement—which collectively constitute an ethical mechanism through which pesantren negotiate the religion–politics nexus by preserving moral autonomy, fostering public trust, facilitating inclusive dialogue, and promoting the common good. The study contributes to scholarship on public religion and Islamic political thought by constructing Pesantren Peace Theology as a framework of Islamic Public Ethics that explains how religious institutions can participate in democratic politics without becoming instruments of partisan political contestation, thereby providing a conceptual foundation for strengthening democratic coexistence in Indonesia's plural public sphere.
Theology from Marginalized Experience: Humanistic Islam and Transgender Muslim Subjectivity in Indonesia Muhammad Arif; Robby Habiba Abror; H. Zuhri
Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): In Progress
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Humaniora (FUAH) UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/islamikainside.v12i1.360

Abstract

This article examines how the religious experiences of waria (transgender Muslims) in Indonesia can articulate a Humanistic Islamic Theology centered on human dignity, justice, and ethical recognition. While previous studies have predominantly examined waria pesantren through sociological, educational, and gender perspectives, their implications for contemporary Islamic theology remain insufficiently explored. This study employs a qualitative, critical-hermeneutic inquiry based on a narrative-textual corpus, drawing primarily on Masthuriyah Sa'dan's Santri Waria (2020), complemented by scholarship in Islamic theology, lived religion, and gender studies. The corpus is examined through interpretive textual analysis to identify patterns of religious meaning, dignity, exclusion, and theological subject formation. The findings are interpreted through the ethical-emancipatory framework of Asghar Ali Engineer and Mohammed Arkoun's critique of epistemic closure in official Islamic discourse. The study finds that the Humanistic Islamic Theology cultivated within Pesantren Waria functions as a restorative religious space that reconstructs dignity through access to Qur'anic learning, ritual purification, congregational prayer, religious study, and communal solidarity, thereby enabling transgender Muslims to reclaim legitimate religious subjectivity despite enduring social and theological exclusion. Conceptually, this article contributes to contemporary Islamic theology by developing Humanistic Islamic Theology as an analytical framework that makes the lived religious experiences of marginalized Muslims legitimate sources of theological reflection, thereby expanding the ethical horizons of Islamic thought beyond juridical orthodoxy. These findings suggest that Islamic theology can be enriched by recognizing marginalized religious experience as a valid source of theological knowledge and by reorienting theological inquiry from legal conformity toward ethical recognition, human dignity, and social justice in contemporary Indonesia.
Reflexive Hybrid Public Identity: Negotiating Modernity through Capital Conversion among Madurese Santri Hairus Saleh; Shofiatul Jannah; Shujaur Rahman
Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): In Progress
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Humaniora (FUAH) UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/islamikainside.v12i1.368

Abstract

This article examines how expanding social roles reconstruct the public religious identity of Madurese santri. Rather than measuring expansion by the number of occupations, it analyzes the qualitative shift from pesantren-centered piety to participation in education, community organizations, economic initiatives, politics, government, and digital publics. A qualitative single-case study was conducted at Pesantren Mambaul Ulum Bata-Bata in Madura in 2025. Data were generated through in-depth interviews with resident santri, alumni, and ustad, supported by participant observation and institutional documentation. The analysis integrates Bourdieu's concepts of habitus, capital, and field; Giddens' reflexive agency; Hall's identity as positioning; and Bhabha's in-between space. The findings demonstrate four connected movements: the translation of personal piety into public usefulness through khairu al-nasi anfa'uhum li-al-nasi; the conversion of religious knowledge, discipline, networks, and moral reputation into resources recognized in differentiated social fields; reflexive negotiation amid value conflict, competence demands, and public scrutiny; and the formation of an identity that is neither wholly traditional nor uncritically modern. The article conceptualizes this formation as a reflexive hybrid public identity: an institutionally rooted, field-responsive, and service-oriented identity produced through active positioning in public life. It also develops digital religious habitus to explain how pesantren dispositions are reformulated within platform-mediated religious communication.
Reconstructing Management Epistemology through Maqasid al-Shariah: Towards an Integrative Framework Beyond Positivism Irfan Harmoko; Abdelmounaim Graiguer
Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): In Progress
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Humaniora (FUAH) UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/islamikainside.v12i1.372

Abstract

The dominance of positivist epistemology has profoundly shaped management science by privileging empirical objectivity, instrumental rationality, and value-neutral inquiry as the primary standards of scientific legitimacy. While this paradigm has contributed substantially to methodological rigor, it has also marginalized ethical, spiritual, and teleological dimensions that are essential for understanding complex organizational realities. Existing studies commonly employ maqasid al-shariah as a normative framework for evaluating managerial practices; however, its potential as a foundation for reconstructing management epistemology remains underdeveloped. This study aims to reconstruct the epistemological foundations of management science through maqasid al-shariah by developing an integrative epistemological framework that transcends the limitations of positivism. Employing an integrative conceptual synthesis, the study combines thematic analysis, comparative epistemological analysis, and conceptual reconstruction to critically examine positivist assumptions and synthesize alternative epistemic foundations derived from Islamic epistemology and maqasid al-shariah. The findings demonstrate that maqasid al-shariah should not be understood merely as an ethical framework but as an epistemic principle governing the construction, interpretation, validation, and application of management knowledge. The proposed framework integrates revelation, reason, and empirical inquiry into a coherent epistemological architecture that preserves the analytical strengths of empirical investigation while embedding knowledge production within the higher objectives of Islamic thought. Rather than replacing positivism, the framework reconstructs its epistemological boundaries by incorporating ethical rationality and purposive knowledge into scientific inquiry. This study contributes to the philosophy of management by offering an original integrative epistemological framework that enriches contemporary debates on management epistemology, Islamic philosophy of knowledge, and epistemological pluralism beyond positivist assumptions.  

Page 11 of 11 | Total Record : 106

 7   8   9   10   11 

Filter by Year

2017 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): In Progress Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023) Vol 8 No 2 (2022): DESEMBER Vol 8 No 1 (2022): JUNI Vol 7 No 2 (2021): DESEMBER Vol 7 No 1 (2021): JUNI Vol 6 No 2 (2020): DESEMBER Vol 6 No 1 (2020): JUNI Vol 5 No 2 (2019): DESEMBER Vol 5 No 1 (2019): JUNI Vol 4 No 2 (2018): DESEMBER Vol 4 No 1 (2018): JUNI Vol 3 No 2 (2017): DESEMBER More Issue