cover
Contact Name
Nurhani Fithriah
Contact Email
nurhani@unib.ac.id
Phone
+6285267259054
Journal Mail Official
jurnalilmiahkutei@unib.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. WR Supratman, Kandang Limun Bengkulu. Telp dan Fax. (0736) 349733
Location
Kota bengkulu,
Bengkulu
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei
Published by Universitas Bengkulu
ISSN : 14129639     EISSN : 29629683     DOI : 10.33369/jkutei.v22i1
Core Subject : Social,
Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei (P-ISSN: 1412-9639/ E-ISSN: 2962-9683) diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bengkulu sejak Tahun 2001. Kata Kutei berasal dari bahasa Rejang yang artinya lembaga adat. Nama ini dipilih untuk menandakan keunikan dari jurnal Kutei. Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei merupakan jurnal atau media informasi dan komunikasi di bidang hukum berisi artikel ilmiah hasil penelitian terkait bidang ilmu hukum yang meliputi Hukum Pidana, Hukum Perdata, Hukum Ekonomi/Bisnis, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Hukum Tata Negara, Hukum Acara, Hukum Islam, Hukum Lingkungan, Hukum Adat, Hukum Perlindungan Perempuan dan Anak, Hukum Internasional dan Hukum Ketenagakerjaan. yang berhubungan dengan masalah-masalah hukum.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 84 Documents
Telaah Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Sengketa Administratif dan Keabsahan Ijazah Khairul Fani; Benny Sultan
Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei Vol 25 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jik.v25i1.48863

Abstract

The controversy regarding President Joko Widodo’s academic degree has become a widely discussed issue in society and is often viewed from political and public opinion perspectives. However, this debate also has an important legal dimension that needs to be examined from the perspective of administrative law. This study aims to evaluate the status of diplomas as products of state administration and assess their potential classification as State Administrative Decisions (Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara/KTUN), as well as their legal implications for dispute resolution processes within administrative courts. This research employs a normative legal research method using secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, namely legislation, and secondary legal materials. The approach used consists of a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, which are then analyzed descriptively through interpretation. The findings of this study indicate that, normatively, a diploma exhibits characteristics similar to those of KTUN elements, namely being in written form, issued by an institution or official exercising governmental functions, in accordance with legal regulations, and being concrete, individual, and final, as well as capable of producing legal consequences. However, the classification of a diploma as an object of administrative dispute is not absolute and highly depends on its context of use, the legal effects it generates, and the legal standing of the parties involved. This study concludes that the debate concerning President Joko Widodo’s diploma is more appropriately viewed as an issue within the conceptual domain of administrative law rather than as an administrative dispute that can be directly brought before the Administrative Court.
Analisis Yuridis Restorasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Pasca Berlakunya KUHP Dan KUHAP Baru Aprilia Fitri Ningsih; Moenaqistin Nur Novianti
Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei Vol 25 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jik.v25i1.48928

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis konstruksi yuridis dan implementasi restorative justice dalam penegakan hukum pidana pasca berlakunya KUHP baru dan arah pembaruan KUHAP di Indonesia. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan dukungan data empiris terbatas melalui studi kepustakaan dan analisis dokumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa KUHP baru telah mengakomodasi prinsip restorative justice melalui tujuan pemidanaan, pengenalan sanksi alternatif, serta pembukaan ruang penyelesaian perkara di luar peradilan. Arah pembaruan KUHAP memperkuat legitimasi prosedural melalui mekanisme penghentian perkara berbasis keadilan restoratif. Implementasi di tingkat kepolisian dan kejaksaan menunjukkan perkembangan yang signifikan, namun masih menghadapi kendala berupa keterbatasan kapasitas aparat, belum adanya standar operasional yang seragam, serta hambatan kultural dalam masyarakat. Kesenjangan antara norma dan praktik menunjukkan bahwa restorative justice belum terintegrasi secara optimal dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan regulasi, peningkatan kapasitas kelembagaan, serta harmonisasi antara norma dan praktik untuk mewujudkan sistem peradilan pidana yang lebih berkeadilan dan berkelanjutan
Madurese Tangkeppan Customary Law in The Relationship between Islamic Law and National Law: An Analysis of Customary Law Reception Theory Safiatus Zahro; Alfi Karomah; Nadya Artika Maulani; Muhammad Ali Fikri; Roibin
Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei Vol 25 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jik.v25i2.51502

Abstract

This study analyzes the tangkeppan customary practice of the Madurese community in its relationship with Islamic law and national law through the theory of legal reception. Tangkeppan refers to the practice of apprehending unmarried men and women suspected of engaging in conduct considered to be approaching zina (illicit sexual relations), which in certain circumstances may result in marriage being encouraged or compelled by their families and the community. This practice is rooted in the community’s moral and religious values, particularly the prevention of conduct perceived as approaching zina and the protection of family honor (hifẓ al-‘ird). However, its implementation raises legal concerns when the resolution disregards consent (riḍā), justice, public benefit (maṣlaḥah), and individual freedom. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and historical approaches through library research involving primary and secondary legal materials. The analysis is conducted descriptively and analytically by applying three theories of legal reception sequentially. Receptio in Complexu is used to identify Islamic legal values internalized within the tangkeppan customary practice. Receptie is employed to analyze the formation and manifestation of these values through community norms and social mechanisms. Subsequently, Receptie a Contrario is used to examine the limits of the applicability of the customary mechanism based on its conformity with Islamic law. The findings indicate that tangkeppan embodies values of preventing immoral conduct and protecting honor, which may be understood as the internalization of Islamic values. However, the mechanism of forced marriage cannot automatically be justified on the basis of customary practice or maṣlaḥah. The practice therefore requires reconstruction to preserve its objective of moral protection without disregarding the principles of consent, justice, maṣlaḥah, and the provisions of national law.
Strengthening Jambi Malay Customary Law in Indonesia’a Plural Legal System Saudah Sjafi'i; PG Ismail PG Musa
Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei Vol 25 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jik.v25i2.51742

Abstract

This research evaluates the contemporary standing of Jambi Malay Customary Law as a living law within the pluralistic legal architecture of Indonesia. Even though the 1945 Constitution formally enshrines Indigenous Peoples and their inherent rights, customary dispute settlement mechanisms have increasingly been sidelined by the overriding influence of state-enforced statutory law. Adopting a library-based normative legal method, this investigation applies statutory and conceptual analytical frameworks. The primary legal instruments reviewed include the 1945 Constitution, Constitutional Court Jurisprudence (Decisions No. 35/PUU-X/2012 and No. 181/PUU-XXII/2024), and Jambi Provincial Regulation No. 2 of 2014. Findings reveal that while Jambi Malay Customary Law continues to endure through deep-rooted societal norms, its operational capacity in binding dispute resolution has diminished significantly. Regional Regulation No. 2 of 2014 concentrates heavily on structural governance rather than practical procedural integration. To remedy these shortcomings, this study formulates the Jambi Malay Customary Law Strengthening Model (JMCLSM), which rests upon five interconnected pillars: regulatory enhancement, institutional fortification, legal harmonization, customary revitalization, and collaborative governance. This framework provides an actionable blueprint for harmonizing living law into national legal development.