cover
Contact Name
Shadu Satwika Wijaya
Contact Email
shadu.satwika@unsoed.ac.id
Phone
+628568062622
Journal Mail Official
shadu.satwika@unsoed.ac.id
Editorial Address
Program Studi Magister Administrasi Publik FISIP UNSOED Jl Kampus No. 1 Grendeng Purwokerto 53122 Jateng Telp 0281-641419
Location
Kab. banyumas,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Public Policy and Management Inquiry
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Public Policy and Management Inquiry merupakan jurnal ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Magister Ilmu Administrasi FISIP UNSOED. Jurnal ini diterbitkan dua kali secara online setiap tahun dan berisi hasil-hasil penelitian Skripsi, Tesis mahasiswa S2 Ilmu Administrasi, dan Disertasi serta pengkajian, telaah pustaka, maupun ulasan yang berkaitan dengan manajemen sektor publik, manajemen pembangunan, dan kebijakan publik. (The Public Policy and Management Inquiry is a scientific journal published by the Postgraduate Program of Public Administration of FISIP UNSOED. This journal is published twice online each year (April & November) and contains the results of Skripsi research, the Thesis of Masters in Administrative Sciences, and Dissertations as well as studies, literature reviews, and reviews relating to public sector management, development management, and public policy).
Articles 82 Documents
Normative Criticism of the Local Government Internal Control System Based on The Principles of State Financial Management to Realize Good Governance Novemyanto, Alfin Dwi
Public Policy and Management Inquiry Vol 9 No 1 (2025): Mei 2025
Publisher : Public Administration, Faculty of Politics and Social Science, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.ppmi.2025.9.1.16090

Abstract

The high weakness of the Local Government Internal Control System (SPI) as identified in the 2023 Local Government Financial Report (LKPD), which shows 5,426 findings of structural, procedural and functional weaknesses. This research examines SPI normatively within the framework of the principles of state financial management, in order to assess the extent to which SPI is able to guarantee the principles of good governance which include legality, accountability, transparency, efficiency, and effectiveness. The research method is normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, using qualitative analysis methods based on systematic, grammatical, and teleological interpretations as developed by Peter Mahmud Marzuki. The results show that SPI weaknesses not only have administrative impacts, but are also a form of violation of imperative legal norms governing public financial management. SPI that fails to perform the internal control function substantively has implications for systemic damage to fiscal governance and violations of constitutional principles. The novelty of this research lies in the meaning of SPI as a legal instrument guarding principles, not just an administrative tool, and its contribution in formulating a valuebased internal control model based on legal principles to build a legal, accountable and democratic regional financial system.
Poverty and Data Accuracy as Public Administration Issues: A Study on Social Policy in Banyumas Regency Atika, Zaula Rizqi
Public Policy and Management Inquiry Vol 9 No 1 (2025): Mei 2025
Publisher : Public Administration, Faculty of Politics and Social Science, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.ppmi.2025.9.1.16100

Abstract

This article explores the issue of poverty in Banyumas Regency within the framework of public administration, with a particular emphasis on the accuracy and consistency of poverty data as a foundation for formulating social policies. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach with purposive sampling techniques, the study uncovers discrepancies in poverty indicators and measurement approaches across local government units. These data inconsistencies significantly impact the accuracy of targeting social programs, thereby hindering the effectiveness of public policy implementation. Furthermore, the findings reveal that the problem is not merely technical but also indicative of weak data governance and poor inter-institution coordination. Therefore, the integration of data systems and harmonization of poverty indicators among institutions are crucial for supporting targeted, equitable, and data-driven policymaking.