Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM)
Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) welcomes any articles from various disciplines, such as Public Policy, Urban Planning and Design, Environment and Sustainable Development, Economics and Fiscal Policy, Creative Financing, Taxation and Finance, Law, Engineering, Sociology, and other fields related to infrastructure policy and management. The topics may include but not limited to: Public-Private Partnership for infrastructure development Economic and financial aspects, including creative financing schemes and asset management (funding and investment, taxation, life-cycle cost, risk mitigation and management, cost and budgeting, public private partnership, innovative financing, data management and technology integration, capacity building) Infrastructure policy (governance and public policy innovation, bureaucratic reform, and institutional arrangements) Urban and rural planning (land use, zoning regulation, housing, smart/healthy cities, heritage preservation, ICT for spatial planning and management) Sustainability and waste management (environment, energy, climate change, resource use and efficiency, smart and green technology, city resilience) Law and regulations (contractual agreements, safety regulations, data privacy, cyber security, land use, and zoning regulations) Engineering (design and technical specifications, quality control and assurance, geotechnical issues, material selection and durability, innovative technology, architecture, smart architecture) Community development and social engineering (infrastructure development and social inclusion, community resettlement, community resilience and participation, social justice) Transportation issues (road, railway, seaport, airport) Digital application for infrastructure innovation (artificial intelligence, machine learning, etc.)
Articles
84 Documents
<![CDATA[Value for Money Assessment for Government and Business Entity Cooperation Projects by Using the Availability Payment Model: Proposition Methodology ]]>
<![CDATA[Andreas Wibowo]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This paper proposes a quantitative methodology for ex-ante value-for-money (VfM) assessment to select the best modality option between conventional procurement and public-private partnership under the availability payment model for infrastructure provision within the Indonesian context. The proposed methodology incorporates efficient risk allocation principles into assessment to monetize risk retained by the government and risk transferred to the private sponsor. A simple numerical example under different scenarios of risk allocation for a road maintenance project case is presented to demonstrate its applicability. This paper also identifies some relevant issues, acknowledges limitations of the proposed methodology, and recommends directions for future research efforts.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementasi Metode Project Development Routemap pada Proyek KPBU di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Nadya Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Agung Budi Broto]]>;
<![CDATA[Hari Purwanto]]>;
<![CDATA[Roihans Muhammad Iqbal]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The availability of road infrastructure is one of the important aspects of accelerating the national development process. With all the fiscal limitations in financing the need for large infrastructure provisions, an optimal funding strategy is needed to achieve development goals through alternative financing of the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) scheme to bridge the financing gap through investment. However, the realization of infrastructure investment is a complex matter, so a quality PPP project preparation and planning process is needed so the project visions can be achieved effectively and efficiently. This study aims to observe the application of the Project DevelopmentRoutemap Method on the Gedebage – Tasikmalaya – Cilacap Toll Road project which is a project carried out by PPP scheme. The Project Development Routemap Method assessed the complexity and strategic risk of a project and assessed the capability of key areas of responsisbility involved, as well as developed reccomendations and action plans as research outputs. Based on the result of the study, it was found that The Gedebage – Tasikmalaya – Cilacap Toll Road is a high-complexity project. The capabilities of the stakeholders including Sponsors (PJPK), Clients (BUJT), Aset Managers (Operators), and Markets (Service Providers) are currently working appropriately, but there are still some areas that need to be improved. Six areas needed improvement, and three practices that were appropriate and needed to be continued.]]>
<![CDATA[How to Manage Residual Impacts of Infrastructure Projects in Developing Countries ]]>
<![CDATA[Diva Muhammad Alfirman]]>;
<![CDATA[Annisa Nur Fauziah]]>;
<![CDATA[Ahmad Zaki Arifin]]>;
<![CDATA[Dwi Susanto]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Infrastructure projects in developing countries are crucial to improve the interconnectivity and equality of national economic development. However, infrastructure projects may lead to social impacts. For example, land acquisition may cause involuntary resettlement that may impact the livelihoods of Project-Affected People (PAP). The land is a critical resource for infrastructure development and the government has established regulations to stipulate land acquisition mechanisms and mitigate the social impacts. However, in practice, social impacts on PAP are usually insufficiently mitigated. Based on applicable regulation, the cost for land acquisition must be calculated with fair compensation, considering both physical and economic losses. It is common that residual impacts remain as some aspects are not fully counted such as: post-land acquisition life management and sustainability of life for squatters without legal ownership assets and are usually left behind. On the other hand, investors have concern with this risk as it can affect investment value and project sustainability. Here, we propose thoughts of improvements for a better practice of land acquisition mechanism and Institutional arrangement with a case study in Indonesia. The proposed improvement is expected to achieve a win-win solution for Project Proponent and PAP by minimizing the economic losses and increasing the benefits shared between land users and the affected communities. This paper also highlights the importance of Stakeholders’ engagement on effective management of the residual impact of land acquisition for infrastructure development in Indonesia. In this case, Stakeholders include Regulators, Project Proponent, Financiers, Local Government, NGOs, and other relevant stakeholders).]]>
<![CDATA[Fiscal Policies for Gender Equality ]]>
<![CDATA[Gabriela Rigoni]]>;
<![CDATA[José A. Stracquadaini]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Preventing economic distortions and providing for gender equality should be a main goal that could be achieved not only by promoting labor laws and ensuring welfare benefits, but also with the design of a tax-benefits system that could address those issues. A gender-sensitive tax-benefits system would become a permanent safeguard policy for gender issues, promoting gender inclusion.]]>
<![CDATA[Spillover Effects of Digital Infrastructure and Financing ]]>
<![CDATA[Naoyuki Yoshino]]>;
<![CDATA[Tifani Husna Siregar]]>;
<![CDATA[Dina Azhgaliyeva]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This article proposes a tax sharing scheme between governments and private sector investors of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) infrastructure. The current COVID-19 pandemic has not only emphasized the crucial need of ICT infrastructure development, but has also expanded government budget deficits in many countries. Therefore, participation from the private sectors is necessary to close the widening investment gap in ICT infrastructure. One of the measures to attract private sectors’ involvement in ICT infrastructure is by creating a steady stream of income for the investors. To ensure the success of the proposed financing scheme, this article also recommends the development of supporting hard and soft infrastructure as well as the digitalization of tax reporting systems]]>
<![CDATA[Aligning Sustainability Integration, Digitalization and Inclusivity for Green, Sustainable Recovery ]]>
<![CDATA[Dalal Aassouli]]>;
<![CDATA[Mohamed Eskandar Shah]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This article provides a roadmap for sustainable recovery that can aid policymakers in implementing sustainable recovery and improving the well-being of people. The roadmap will prioritize three areas of action: sustainability, digitalization, and inclusivity. This article emphasizes the involvement of the private sector and innovative financing solutions (including Islamic finance) in meeting the financing gap for investment in relevant infrastructure for all three pillars. This articles demonstrates that financial innovation, investment in green and social projects, market awareness, and synergies among the various sustainable finance segments will form the foundation for long-term recovery and create a vibrant and resilient economy.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Dampak Ekonomi dan Sosial Pembangunan Infrastruktur di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Prita Amalia]]>;
<![CDATA[Yogi Suprayogi]]>;
<![CDATA[Yudi Azis]]>;
<![CDATA[Wawan Hermawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Eksa Pamungkas]]>;
<![CDATA[Adi Nurzaman]]>;
<![CDATA[Anhar Fauzan Priyono]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Infrastructure projects are expected to deliver positive economic and social impact to the community. However, the model to analyze the economic and social impact is still limited. Therefore, this study aims to develop an economic and social impact model to be used for study the impact of infrastructure projects. The research focuses on several case studies of infrastructure projects which guaranteed by Indonesia Infrastructure Guarantee Fund (IIGF) both PPP (Public-Private-Partnership) Scheme and non-PPP Scheme on telco, water, tourism Sector. These sectors are believed to represented the major infrastructure development that cover both local, national, and international perspectives. The analytical method used to measure economic impacts from infrastructure development is a quantitative approach by using following attributes: Sectoral Economic Analysis, Potential Economic Analysis, Growth Accounting, Input-Output Table Analysis, and Statistical Forecasting. While, to analyse the social impact of infrastructure development, quantitative and qualitative approaches are used by In-depth Interview through questionnaire filling technique and Social Impact Assessment (SIA) method. In addition, this study also used legal approach method. The results show various economic impacts of project investment development, both in terms of potential and realization. Meanwhile, in terms of social impacts, there are various community responses to the realization of project development.]]>
<![CDATA[Culture-Sensitive Public Procurement Benchmarking ]]>
<![CDATA[Brian F. Fabrègue]]>;
<![CDATA[Léo J. Portal]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[In this brief we will address the measure of managing public procurement taking into consideration cultural, corporate and organizational specificities, with a sustainable development strategy in mind. When such tools are used in conjunction, the efficiency of production applications is increased. Further research should focus on the investigation of foreign markets for industrial and state businesses’ public procurement, including private law state-owned companies, as well as on developing a mechanism to evaluate public procurement that takes economic, social, and environmental factors into account. Finally, we need to be aware that integrating cultural factors when dealing with public procurement is fundamental when it comes to leadership issues. Underpinning leadership is an ability to comprehend people, their values, and characteristics, and how these factors may correct and adapt public procurement methodology.]]>
<![CDATA[Alternative Approach to Sustainable Urban Mobility in Developing Countries ]]>
<![CDATA[Dimas Nu’man Fadhil]]>;
<![CDATA[Arimbi Jinca]]>;
<![CDATA[Puguh Prakoso]]>;
<![CDATA[Julianto Hoegeng]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Cities in developing countries are facing intertwined urban mobility challenges: urban sprawl and traffic jam. Having not enough reliable and standardized public transport supply means the residents are forced to opt for traveling by private vehicles such as cars or motorcycles. There is a swell of tailpipe emission and economic losses due to traffic jam. Overcoming urban sprawl and at the same time building massive public transport is not an easy feat to accomplish, as both require immense investments and years of construction. Therefore, cities must have innovative plans to increase public-transport coverage and articulate density through paratransit formalization & digitalization, demand management, and land consolidation.]]>
<![CDATA[Improving Governance in Major Infrastructure Projects ]]>
<![CDATA[Phalguni Sundaram Biswal]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[From an economic growth perspective, infrastructure is not only an enabling factor for development or for facilitating private investments and competitiveness across all sectors of national and regional economies, but can also be an attractive investment opportunity in itself. Although infrastructure investment opportunities are plentiful across developing countries, investors are not fully seizing them, often due to gaps in the enabling environment for such investment. The infrastructure sector presents specific risks to private investors, and since private participation in infrastructure delivery is a relatively recent form of procurement in many countries, governments do not necessarily have the experience and capacity needed to effectively manage these risks. Beyond case-by-case project preparation and financing, concrete, implementation-oriented guidance that can help governments identify and manage reforms is needed to make the broader infrastructure investment environment more open to private participation.]]>
