Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM)
Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) welcomes any articles from various disciplines, such as Public Policy, Urban Planning and Design, Environment and Sustainable Development, Economics and Fiscal Policy, Creative Financing, Taxation and Finance, Law, Engineering, Sociology, and other fields related to infrastructure policy and management. The topics may include but not limited to: Public-Private Partnership for infrastructure development Economic and financial aspects, including creative financing schemes and asset management (funding and investment, taxation, life-cycle cost, risk mitigation and management, cost and budgeting, public private partnership, innovative financing, data management and technology integration, capacity building) Infrastructure policy (governance and public policy innovation, bureaucratic reform, and institutional arrangements) Urban and rural planning (land use, zoning regulation, housing, smart/healthy cities, heritage preservation, ICT for spatial planning and management) Sustainability and waste management (environment, energy, climate change, resource use and efficiency, smart and green technology, city resilience) Law and regulations (contractual agreements, safety regulations, data privacy, cyber security, land use, and zoning regulations) Engineering (design and technical specifications, quality control and assurance, geotechnical issues, material selection and durability, innovative technology, architecture, smart architecture) Community development and social engineering (infrastructure development and social inclusion, community resettlement, community resilience and participation, social justice) Transportation issues (road, railway, seaport, airport) Digital application for infrastructure innovation (artificial intelligence, machine learning, etc.)
Articles
90 Documents
<![CDATA[Unlocking Indonesia’s Floating Solar Potential: A PPP Regulatory Review ]]>
<![CDATA[Tri Setiawan, Muchlis Ahmad]]>;
<![CDATA[Ahmad Sofwan]]>;
<![CDATA[Harahap, Dahwin Ferry]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.v8i1.97
<![CDATA[Indonesia possesses significant potential for the development of Floating Solar Power Plant, or Floating Photovoltaic (FPV) systems, with an estimated capacity of 14,701.71 MWp. Nevertheless, the actual utilization of FPV remains very low. The Ministry of Public Works (MPW) seeks to optimize the use of multipurpose dams as FPV sources through the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) scheme. According to the data released by the Directorate of Dams and Lakes, Directorate General of Water Resources, 257 out of 259 dams nationwide are considered suitable for FPV development. Despite this potential, the implementation of PPP schemes for FPV projects has encountered stagnation. The preliminary evaluations reveal regulatory misalignment between MPW and PT PLN (Persero), which has resulted in a two-stage procurement process that is inefficient and legally ambiguous. These inefficiencies have led to adverse impacts on the government, private sector entities, and society. This study employs a qualitative approach with a Normative Legal Review Gap Analysis framework. The findings highlight the need for regulatory harmonization among MPW, the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, and PT PLN (Persero). Such harmonization would facilitate the establishment of joint Contracting Agencies, a single-stage procurement process, and greater tariff certainty. The study offers policy recommendations that serve as a reference for cross-sectoral regulatory integration and enhance institutional coordination in the development of FPV infrastructure on MPW dams, thereby contributing to Indonesia’s Net Zero Emissions target by 2060.]]>
<![CDATA[Digital Measurement of the Construction Workers’ Performance through the Five-Minute Rating Method ]]>
<![CDATA[Januardi, Redityo]]>;
<![CDATA[Aliim, Muhammad Syaiful]]>;
<![CDATA[Rochman, Saeful]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.v8i1.98
<![CDATA[The Five-Minute Rating method is a simplified approach used to measure workers’ performance based on time study principles, aimed to provide representative evaluations with minimal observation samples. However, its adoption in the construction industry remains low at only 6.4%, due to perceived impracticality and time-consuming implementation. A digital solution known as the Five-Minute Rating Solver (FMR-Solver), developed as an Android-based application, has been introduced. However, the practicality of its use and the efficiency of the measurement duration have yet to be studied. This study aims to measure the efficiency of the application tool in assessing worker effectiveness compared to using the conventional Five-Minute Rating method and to evaluate users’ perceptions of using the application. A case study was conducted during the installation of foundation reinforcement. The results show that the application tool can increase measurement efficiency by 22.6%. Evaluations by five users—based on criteria of stability, accuracy, understandability, operability, usefulness, and attractiveness—indicate validity scores ranging from 76.0% to 96.0%, falling within the categories of valid to very valid. The results suggest that the method offers a practical and effective alternative for construction workers’ performance and holds promise for wider industry adoption.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Risiko Kebencanaan Indonesia untuk Mendukung Kebijakan Publik ]]>
<![CDATA[Rachman, Muhammad Gazali]]>;
<![CDATA[Zelvany, Zshelda Tiara]]>;
<![CDATA[Favali, Falkis Edo]]>;
<![CDATA[Nugraha, Muhammad Reyfangga Aji Putra]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.v8i1.99
<![CDATA[Indonesia is situated within an active tectonic zone, rendering it highly susceptible to earthquakes. Earthquake disasters not only result in physical damages and loss of life but also pose significant challenges in formulating adaptive and risk-based public policies. This study aims to analyze earthquake disaster risk in Indonesia and evaluate the extent to which public policy has addressed this potential hazard. The methodology employed is a literature review using a mixed-methods approach: qualitative analysis to examine geological and social aspects, and quantitative analysis through spatial assessments utilizing Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The analysis is grounded in a conceptual disaster risk framework encompassing three main components: hazard, exposure, and capacity. The findings reveal that the presence of active faults traversing densely populated areas, limited public awareness, and weak enforcement of technical regulations such as the Indonesian National Standard (Standar Nasional Indonesia/SNI) for earthquake-resistant buildings contribute to the high disaster risk. This study recommends the integration of disaster education into the school curriculum, the strengthening of technical regulations such as the earthquake-resistant SNI, and the incorporation of local wisdom in building practices as strategies to enhance community resilience to earthquake disasters.]]>
<![CDATA[The Influence of Foreign Loan Lender Guidelines on the Project Consulting Services Tender in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Setiawan, Budi]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.v8i1.101
<![CDATA[This study investigates the influence of the Saudi Fund for Development (SFD) guidelines on the tender process of consultancy services in Indonesia, specifically for foreign loan-financed projects. It investigates the differences between Indonesia’s national regulations, laid out in Presidential Decrees, and lender-specific guidelines, which are mandatory when external funding is used. This qualitative research applied interviews with actors holding decision-making authority within the procurement process. The data were examined through a thematic analysis using NVivo 12 software. Two significant differences between the SFD guidelines and Indonesia’s national regulations were established. First, a manual process is stipulated by SFD guidelines, yet an electronic platform is preferred by Indonesia’s regulations, which triggers extensive delays. Second, obtaining a No Objection Letter (NOL) from a lender for every phase of the tender process is a time-consuming demand that creates bottlenecks situation and prolongs the process. The research emphasizes that critical issues arise when balancing such differing sets of regulations, which are counterproductive for a smooth and timely process. Thus, harmonized national and lender-specific regulations are needed to minimize delays and accelerate a smooth process of service procurements.]]>
<![CDATA[Kebijakan Pendaftaran Elektronik: Perspektif Regulasi, Teknologi, dan Aksesibilitas ]]>
<![CDATA[Mujiburohman, Dian Aries]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.v8i2.118
<![CDATA[This study examines the electronic land registration policy as a reform measure in land services in Indonesia. Through Minister of ATR/BPN Regulation Number 3 of 2023, the land administration system has begun to transition from a manual to a digital format to improve efficiency, transparency, and data security. Although this system offers numerous benefits, its implementation in the field still faces several obstacles, including limited internet access, a lack of technological understanding, and the public’s reliance on physical documents. This situation demonstrates that the success of an electronic system depends not only on the readiness of technology and regulations but also on how easily the public can access and utilize it. This article presents a more comprehensive approach by promoting synergy among policymakers, technology service providers, and the broader community. If all parties are actively involved, the electronic land registration system will not only be an administrative change but also a tool to strengthen land rights and improve the quality of public services.]]>
<![CDATA[Embedding Ethical AI in Digital Public Infrastructure: Strategic Governance Pathways for Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Bachtiar, Goutama]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.v8i2.123
<![CDATA[Indonesia’s accelerating digital transformation, driven by programs such as Digital ID and INA Digital, has introduced both significant opportunities and complex governance challenges as Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes integrated into public-sector decision-making. This conceptual paper proposes a strategic governance framework for ethical AI that aligns international standards such as the OECD AI Principles, the EU AI Act, and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework with Indonesia’s institutional and regulatory environment. The study contributes to the literature by articulating a policy-oriented model operationalizing ethics, transparency, and accountability within the national digital ecosystem. It further demonstrates how anticipatory governance, multistakeholder collaboration, and adaptive regulation can be embedded through ongoing programs led by the Ministry of Communication and Digital (Komdigi), BSSN, and BRIN. By linking global frameworks with local implementation pathways, this research provides conceptual advancement and policy relevance for emerging economies seeking to institutionalize trustworthy AI governance.]]>
<![CDATA[Decarbonizing Infrastructure in Indonesia: Opportunities, Barriers, and Stakeholder Perspectives ]]>
<![CDATA[Hidayat, Lenny]]>;
<![CDATA[Ramadhan, M. Ilham]]>;
<![CDATA[Tasliman, Michael Timothy]]>;
<![CDATA[Octora, Anggita]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.v8i2.130
<![CDATA[Infrastructure development is a major driver of climate change, accounting for ~79% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and 88% of adaptation costs since 2022. In Indonesia, emissions are led by the energy sector (31%), which remains coal-dependent for power infrastructure operations. Other contributors include transport (17%), wastewater (8%), solid waste (5%), and process emissions from cement (5%) and iron–steel (6%). While the country has rapidly expanded roads, ports, airports, and dams, these gains have coincided with deforestation and reduced carbon sequestration. This study investigates barriers and stakeholder aspirations for decarbonizing Indonesia’s infrastructure by applying a 5M business management lens—material and machine, methodology, money, and manpower—aligned with four decarbonization pillars (reduce, reuse, replace, remove), using evidence from focus group discussions, desktop reviews, and inductive analysis. Findings identify four principal barriers: (i) materials and technology—uptake of low-carbon options is constrained by cost perceptions and limited use of recycled inputs; (ii) standards and regulation—fragmented guidance and weak enforcement of green procurement; (iii) cost and funding—high certification expenses and underdeveloped green finance instruments; and (iv) skills and capabilities—insufficient technical expertise in low-carbon practices. Stakeholders call for systematic material mapping, stronger tax incentives, adoption of harmonized standards, and deeper academia–industry collaboration. The study proposes a policy roadmap to coordinate actors and accelerate infrastructure decarbonization.]]>
<![CDATA[Flood Damages in an Infrastructure Climate Risk Stress Test: A Case Study of a Solar Power Plant Project ]]>
<![CDATA[Pasha, Muhammad Dafa Sultan]]>;
<![CDATA[Dirgantara, Gan Gan]]>;
<![CDATA[Wiliandi, Sandi Krisna]]>;
<![CDATA[Budianto, Endi Trimawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.v8i2.137
<![CDATA[Climate change presents significant risks not only to the environment but also to financial systems. In response, climate risk stress testing (CRST) has become an important tool for regulators and financial institutions. However, most applications of CRST to date have focused on real estate and mortgage exposures, with little attention given to infrastructure assets. This paper addresses that gap by exploring methodologies to analyze flood-related physical risk for infrastructure in the context of CRST. The study applies the hazard–vulnerability–exposure approach by combining global flood hazard data from the Aqueduct tools, depth-damage functions, and simplified assumptions on asset exposure. A case study on an anonymized solar power plant project in Indonesia is conducted to demonstrate the methodology. The analysis produces estimates of financial loss using both single-event damage and Expected Annual Damage (EAD), which can then be integrated into project-level financial stress tests. The results show that this framework provides a practical and transparent way to quantify climate-induced flood risk for infrastructure, offering a starting point for regulators, development finance institutions, and multilateral development banks. At the same time, several weaknesses are identified, including the coarse resolution of global hazard maps, generic vulnerability functions are not calibrated for local conditions, and the absence of considerations for flood protection and indirect financial impacts.]]>
<![CDATA[Estimasi Kerugian Fisik Akibat Gempa Bumi pada Infrastruktur Jalan dan Jembatan: Studi Kasus Fly Over di Kota Bandung ]]>
<![CDATA[Milyardi, Roi]]>;
<![CDATA[Natanael, Ariel]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.v8i2.138
<![CDATA[Indonesia’s geographical location, which is prone to earthquakes and high economic losses in the infrastructure sector, requires a quantitative approach to support post-disaster financial resilience. This study aims to estimate earthquake losses to road and bridge infrastructure in a flyover in the City of Bandung using the HAZUS method developed by FEMA in the United States. The research methodology involved analyzing losses on the 550-meter flyover at the Jakarta street, the City of Bandung, which consisted of road and bridge segments. Estimates were made based on eight earthquake scenarios with different recurrence periods, using seismic parameters from the 2017 Indonesian Earthquake Map correlated to meet annual physical loss requirements (AAL). The analysis components included hazard (PGD and S1), fragility curves, and cost variables for each damage level. The results showed that the AAL values for sections AB, BC, and CD were IDR 23.46 million, IDR 14.29 million, and IDR 28.67 million, respectively. These findings indicate that the HAZUS method can be used to systematically map potential road infrastructure losses and support the planning of Disaster Pool Funding (PFB) allocations. Despite limitations in local data and design parameters, this study provides a strong basis for the development of more contextual and applicable loss estimation models in Indonesia. ]]>
<![CDATA[Closing Legal Loopholes in Public-Private Partnership Schemes for Waste Management in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Mappuji, M. Raihan]]>;
<![CDATA[Sarsito, Akiyo Ramadhan]]>;
<![CDATA[Miolo, Tsaquila Shafa Raissa]]>;
<![CDATA[Saputra, Budi]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.v8i2.139
<![CDATA[In recent years, Public-Private Partnership (PPP) schemes have been increasingly used in Indonesia. PPP schemes attract foreign investment because they are cost-efficient. However, the waste-management sector has not reaped these benefits due to a gap in sectoral regulation. This paper addresses the issues of legal loopholes and proposes fundamental elements that should be included in future waste-management PPP legislation. The results of this paper are intended to assist legislators in developing future regulations for the sector. We employed a qualitative research method, specifically through a normative legal approach by relying on international standards and comparative provisions across jurisdictions. Our analysis identifies three main aspects that future legislation should include. First, waste-management PPPs require an explicit legal and policy framework that governs financing schemes, including clear and investor-friendly principles and options. Second, tax incentives are essential. To enable effective participation, legislation should provide tax and customs incentives (e.g., tax holidays and exemptions). Third, incentives related to local content requirements (TKDN) are highly required. One persistent barrier to market entry in PPP projects is strict TKD requirements and high import costs. Therefore, we propose TKDN mechanisms that incentivize investors to participate in the projects by reducing TKDN thresholds in the sector.]]>
