Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM)
Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) welcomes any articles from various disciplines, such as Public Policy, Urban Planning and Design, Environment and Sustainable Development, Economics and Fiscal Policy, Creative Financing, Taxation and Finance, Law, Engineering, Sociology, and other fields related to infrastructure policy and management. The topics may include but not limited to: Public-Private Partnership for infrastructure development Economic and financial aspects, including creative financing schemes and asset management (funding and investment, taxation, life-cycle cost, risk mitigation and management, cost and budgeting, public private partnership, innovative financing, data management and technology integration, capacity building) Infrastructure policy (governance and public policy innovation, bureaucratic reform, and institutional arrangements) Urban and rural planning (land use, zoning regulation, housing, smart/healthy cities, heritage preservation, ICT for spatial planning and management) Sustainability and waste management (environment, energy, climate change, resource use and efficiency, smart and green technology, city resilience) Law and regulations (contractual agreements, safety regulations, data privacy, cyber security, land use, and zoning regulations) Engineering (design and technical specifications, quality control and assurance, geotechnical issues, material selection and durability, innovative technology, architecture, smart architecture) Community development and social engineering (infrastructure development and social inclusion, community resettlement, community resilience and participation, social justice) Transportation issues (road, railway, seaport, airport) Digital application for infrastructure innovation (artificial intelligence, machine learning, etc.)
Articles
84 Documents
<![CDATA[Unlocking Indonesia’s Floating Solar Potential: A PPP Regulatory Review ]]>
<![CDATA[Tri Setiawan, Muchlis Ahmad]]>;
<![CDATA[Ahmad Sofwan]]>;
<![CDATA[Harahap, Dahwin Ferry]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.v8i1.97
<![CDATA[Indonesia possesses significant potential for the development of Floating Solar Power Plant, or Floating Photovoltaic (FPV) systems, with an estimated capacity of 14,701.71 MWp. Nevertheless, the actual utilization of FPV remains very low. The Ministry of Public Works (MPW) seeks to optimize the use of multipurpose dams as FPV sources through the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) scheme. According to the data released by the Directorate of Dams and Lakes, Directorate General of Water Resources, 257 out of 259 dams nationwide are considered suitable for FPV development. Despite this potential, the implementation of PPP schemes for FPV projects has encountered stagnation. The preliminary evaluations reveal regulatory misalignment between MPW and PT PLN (Persero), which has resulted in a two-stage procurement process that is inefficient and legally ambiguous. These inefficiencies have led to adverse impacts on the government, private sector entities, and society. This study employs a qualitative approach with a Normative Legal Review Gap Analysis framework. The findings highlight the need for regulatory harmonization among MPW, the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, and PT PLN (Persero). Such harmonization would facilitate the establishment of joint Contracting Agencies, a single-stage procurement process, and greater tariff certainty. The study offers policy recommendations that serve as a reference for cross-sectoral regulatory integration and enhance institutional coordination in the development of FPV infrastructure on MPW dams, thereby contributing to Indonesia’s Net Zero Emissions target by 2060.]]>
<![CDATA[Digital Measurement of the Construction Workers’ Performance through the Five-Minute Rating Method ]]>
<![CDATA[Januardi, Redityo]]>;
<![CDATA[Aliim, Muhammad Syaiful]]>;
<![CDATA[Rochman, Saeful]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.v8i1.98
<![CDATA[The Five-Minute Rating method is a simplified approach used to measure workers’ performance based on time study principles, aimed to provide representative evaluations with minimal observation samples. However, its adoption in the construction industry remains low at only 6.4%, due to perceived impracticality and time-consuming implementation. A digital solution known as the Five-Minute Rating Solver (FMR-Solver), developed as an Android-based application, has been introduced. However, the practicality of its use and the efficiency of the measurement duration have yet to be studied. This study aims to measure the efficiency of the application tool in assessing worker effectiveness compared to using the conventional Five-Minute Rating method and to evaluate users’ perceptions of using the application. A case study was conducted during the installation of foundation reinforcement. The results show that the application tool can increase measurement efficiency by 22.6%. Evaluations by five users—based on criteria of stability, accuracy, understandability, operability, usefulness, and attractiveness—indicate validity scores ranging from 76.0% to 96.0%, falling within the categories of valid to very valid. The results suggest that the method offers a practical and effective alternative for construction workers’ performance and holds promise for wider industry adoption.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Risiko Kebencanaan Indonesia untuk Mendukung Kebijakan Publik ]]>
<![CDATA[Rachman, Muhammad Gazali]]>;
<![CDATA[Zelvany, Zshelda Tiara]]>;
<![CDATA[Favali, Falkis Edo]]>;
<![CDATA[Nugraha, Muhammad Reyfangga Aji Putra]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.v8i1.99
<![CDATA[Indonesia is situated within an active tectonic zone, rendering it highly susceptible to earthquakes. Earthquake disasters not only result in physical damages and loss of life but also pose significant challenges in formulating adaptive and risk-based public policies. This study aims to analyze earthquake disaster risk in Indonesia and evaluate the extent to which public policy has addressed this potential hazard. The methodology employed is a literature review using a mixed-methods approach: qualitative analysis to examine geological and social aspects, and quantitative analysis through spatial assessments utilizing Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The analysis is grounded in a conceptual disaster risk framework encompassing three main components: hazard, exposure, and capacity. The findings reveal that the presence of active faults traversing densely populated areas, limited public awareness, and weak enforcement of technical regulations such as the Indonesian National Standard (Standar Nasional Indonesia/SNI) for earthquake-resistant buildings contribute to the high disaster risk. This study recommends the integration of disaster education into the school curriculum, the strengthening of technical regulations such as the earthquake-resistant SNI, and the incorporation of local wisdom in building practices as strategies to enhance community resilience to earthquake disasters.]]>
<![CDATA[The Influence of Foreign Loan Lender Guidelines on the Project Consulting Services Tender in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Setiawan, Budi]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35166/jipm.v8i1.101
<![CDATA[This study investigates the influence of the Saudi Fund for Development (SFD) guidelines on the tender process of consultancy services in Indonesia, specifically for foreign loan-financed projects. It investigates the differences between Indonesia’s national regulations, laid out in Presidential Decrees, and lender-specific guidelines, which are mandatory when external funding is used. This qualitative research applied interviews with actors holding decision-making authority within the procurement process. The data were examined through a thematic analysis using NVivo 12 software. Two significant differences between the SFD guidelines and Indonesia’s national regulations were established. First, a manual process is stipulated by SFD guidelines, yet an electronic platform is preferred by Indonesia’s regulations, which triggers extensive delays. Second, obtaining a No Objection Letter (NOL) from a lender for every phase of the tender process is a time-consuming demand that creates bottlenecks situation and prolongs the process. The research emphasizes that critical issues arise when balancing such differing sets of regulations, which are counterproductive for a smooth and timely process. Thus, harmonized national and lender-specific regulations are needed to minimize delays and accelerate a smooth process of service procurements.]]>
