cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Haisyah
Contact Email
gungun.yudhistira.kalimasada@gmail.com
Phone
+6287774552655
Journal Mail Official
gungun.yudhistira.kalimasada@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Blok Kedung Gede RT. 13, RW 003 Desa Bode Lor Kecamatan Plumbon, Kabupaten Cirebon, Jawa Barat
Location
Kab. cirebon,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan
Published by CV. Kalimasada Group
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29887658     DOI : 10.59966
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Yudhistira: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan diterbitkan oleh CV Kalimasada. Yudhistira bertujuan untuk menjadi platform peer-review dan sumber informasi yang otoritatif mengenai studi yurisprudensi, hukum dan peradilan. Ruang lingkup Yudhistira adalah literatur yang bersifat analitis, obyektif, empiris, dan kontributif terhadap dinamika dan perkembangan studi hukum, khususnya di Indonesia. Yudhistira menerima tulisan ilmiah dalam berbagai topik mulai dari studi penelitian, putusan pengadilan, kajian teori, tinjauan pustaka, konsultasi filosofis dan kritis yang bersifat analitis, obyektif, dan sistematis. Namun, dari berbagai macam topik yang dapat dipilih oleh para peneliti, Yudhistira memberikan perhatian lebih pada makalah yang berfokus pada sosiologi hukum, hukum yang hidup, filsafat hukum, sejarah hukum nasional, hukum adat, studi literatur, hukum internasional, interdisipliner, dan studi empiris. JYudhistira: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan merupakan media yang didedikasikan bagi insan peradilan, akademisi, praktisi, dan ahli hukum dalam mengaktualisasikan gagasan penelitian, pengembangan, dan analisis hukum dan peradilan. Yudhistira: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan terbit empat kali dalam setahun yaitu pada bulan Maret, Juni, September, dan Desember.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 104 Documents
 7   8   9   10   11 
Dampak Hukum terhadap Penebangan Liar: Studi Kasus UU Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia Asri Puannandini, Dewi; Hardianti Putri, Efsa; Gwenda Haryadi, Zaneta
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i3.1951

Abstract

llegal logging is a major cause of forest destruction in Indonesia, with widespread impacts on ecosystems, climate change, and the well-being of local communities. To address this issue, the government has issued various regulations, including Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management (UU PPLH). This article aims to analyze the impact of this law on illegal logging practices and evaluate the effectiveness of its law enforcement through a normative legal approach and empirical case studies in several affected areas. The study shows that although the PPLH Law provides a strong legal basis for prosecuting illegal logging perpetrators, its implementation on the ground still faces many challenges. Factors such as weak oversight, corruption in the forestry sector, limited law enforcement resources, and resistance from illegal logging industry players are significant obstacles. Case studies in Kalimantan and Sumatra show that criminal and administrative sanctions often do not provide an adequate deterrent effect. On the other hand, the success of several regions in reducing illegal logging rates demonstrates that a combination of consistent law enforcement, community participation, and a local wisdom-based approach can increase the effectiveness of environmental policies. This article recommends strengthening institutional capacity, integrating law enforcement across sectors, and regulatory reform to close legal loopholes still exploited by illegal logging perpetrators. In conclusion, environmental law in Indonesia has the potential to curb illegal logging activities, but its effectiveness depends heavily on political commitment, sound governance, and the involvement of all stakeholders.
The Totem Handshake Policy During the Pandemic: Between Legal Compliance and Individual Moral Autonomy Sarip, Sarip; Nasywa, Hamidah; Ayu Anggraeni, Putri
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i3.1997

Abstract

This research explores the state's emergency policy during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly its moral dilemma in confronting the cultural tradition of handshakes and the symbolic implementation of the “Totem Handshake.” The state’s approach, limited to non-binding recommendations and symbolic language such as “physical distancing” and “social distancing,” raises critical questions about legal effectiveness. The study finds that symbolic appeals, though lacking coercive force, have a psychological and cultural impact resembling a form of “state magic” that influences public behavior. While such appeals were widely accepted, their legal standing remains weak, and the success of compliance is ambiguous—did people obey state messaging, or were they simply afraid of the virus? The research argues that the state faces greater social and legal risks if it enforces coercive regulations to restrict cultural practices. The public response varied, reflecting differing interpretations of state authority. Ultimately, this study highlights the state's reliance on symbolic language as a soft-law mechanism during moments of moral crisis. It suggests that in future emergencies, legal obedience may require not only formal authority but also cultural sensitivity and moral legitimacy, especially when asking citizens to temporarily abandon deeply rooted social traditions like handshakes.
Transformasi Hukum Islam di Era Digital: Prinsip Syariah dalam Transaksi Online Rizqi Ramadhani, Ahmad
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i3.2132

Abstract

The development of digital technology has disrupted the classical Islamic legal order, giving rise to new forms of legal interaction that have not been accommodated within the traditional fiqh structure. This study critically analyzes three main issues: the validity of electronic signatures, the problematic nature of digital contracts, and the potential for gharar in online businesses. This study combines analysis of classical Islamic legal sources such as the works of Imam Syafi'i and Al-Mawardi, the positive legal provisions in Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law), and fatwas from the National Council of Islamic Scholars (DSN-MUI) regarding digital transactions and the sharia economy. The results show that although electronic signatures and digital contracts have gained positive legal legitimacy, they do not fully fulfill the elements of a valid contract from a fiqh perspective due to the absence of explicit ṣīghat and the potential for weak consent of the parties, while digital business models such as dropshipping and pre-orders have the potential to contain gharar due to unclear ownership and high speculative risks. This study confirms that formal legal recognition of digital transactions does not necessarily guarantee their compliance with sharia principles, so that contemporary ijtihad based on maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah and istinbāṭ methods such as qiyās, istihsān, and maslahah mursalah are needed to reconstruct Islamic law that is adaptive to digital transformation while still upholding the values ​​of justice, transparency, and voluntariness in every transaction.
Analisis Masa Jabatan Kepala Desa Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2024 Junto Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa Ditinjau Dari Maslahah Mursalah Sakdi
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v2i4.2145

Abstract

The change in the term of office of village heads from six years and three terms as stipulated in Law Number 6 of 2014 to eight years and two terms through Law Number 3 of 2024 has given rise to extensive legal and political discourse. This study aims to analyze the implications of this change through an Islamic legal approach with the concept of maslahah mursalah. This study uses a normative legal research method with a qualitative approach, which examines legal norms in laws and regulations as well as relevant Islamic legal doctrines and concepts. The approaches used include a legislative approach to examine changes in legal substance in the two laws, and a conceptual approach to review the principles of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah and public welfare in the policy of extending the term of office of village heads. The data used are sourced from primary legal materials (laws and regulations), secondary (literature, books, and scientific journals), and tertiary (dictionaries and legal encyclopedias), which are analyzed descriptively and analytically. The research results show that extending the village head's term of office provides benefits in the form of leadership stability, development continuity, efficiency of election costs, and reduced potential for social conflict due to repeated political contestations. However, this change also risks weakening community evaluation mechanisms, hindering leadership regeneration, and creating the potential for concentration of power. Within the framework of maslahah mursalah, this policy is acceptable as long as the benefits outweigh the harms, provided there is strong oversight, active community participation, and trustworthy, transparent, and accountable leadership.

Page 11 of 11 | Total Record : 104

 7   8   9   10   11 

Filter by Year

2023 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): September Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Juni Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Maret Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Desember Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): SEPTEMBER Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Juni Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Maret Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Desember Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): September Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Juni Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Maret More Issue