cover
Contact Name
Haisyah
Contact Email
gungun.yudhistira.kalimasada@gmail.com
Phone
+6287774552655
Journal Mail Official
gungun.yudhistira.kalimasada@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Blok Kedung Gede RT. 13, RW 003 Desa Bode Lor Kecamatan Plumbon, Kabupaten Cirebon, Jawa Barat
Location
Kab. cirebon,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan
Published by CV. Kalimasada Group
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29887658     DOI : 10.59966
Core Subject : Social,
Yudhistira: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan diterbitkan oleh CV Kalimasada. Yudhistira bertujuan untuk menjadi platform peer-review dan sumber informasi yang otoritatif mengenai studi yurisprudensi, hukum dan peradilan. Ruang lingkup Yudhistira adalah literatur yang bersifat analitis, obyektif, empiris, dan kontributif terhadap dinamika dan perkembangan studi hukum, khususnya di Indonesia. Yudhistira menerima tulisan ilmiah dalam berbagai topik mulai dari studi penelitian, putusan pengadilan, kajian teori, tinjauan pustaka, konsultasi filosofis dan kritis yang bersifat analitis, obyektif, dan sistematis. Namun, dari berbagai macam topik yang dapat dipilih oleh para peneliti, Yudhistira memberikan perhatian lebih pada makalah yang berfokus pada sosiologi hukum, hukum yang hidup, filsafat hukum, sejarah hukum nasional, hukum adat, studi literatur, hukum internasional, interdisipliner, dan studi empiris. JYudhistira: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan merupakan media yang didedikasikan bagi insan peradilan, akademisi, praktisi, dan ahli hukum dalam mengaktualisasikan gagasan penelitian, pengembangan, dan analisis hukum dan peradilan. Yudhistira: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan terbit empat kali dalam setahun yaitu pada bulan Maret, Juni, September, dan Desember.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 115 Documents
Dampak Hukum terhadap Penebangan Liar: Studi Kasus UU Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia Asri Puannandini, Dewi; Hardianti Putri, Efsa; Gwenda Haryadi, Zaneta
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i3.1951

Abstract

llegal logging is a major cause of forest destruction in Indonesia, with widespread impacts on ecosystems, climate change, and the well-being of local communities. To address this issue, the government has issued various regulations, including Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management (UU PPLH). This article aims to analyze the impact of this law on illegal logging practices and evaluate the effectiveness of its law enforcement through a normative legal approach and empirical case studies in several affected areas. The study shows that although the PPLH Law provides a strong legal basis for prosecuting illegal logging perpetrators, its implementation on the ground still faces many challenges. Factors such as weak oversight, corruption in the forestry sector, limited law enforcement resources, and resistance from illegal logging industry players are significant obstacles. Case studies in Kalimantan and Sumatra show that criminal and administrative sanctions often do not provide an adequate deterrent effect. On the other hand, the success of several regions in reducing illegal logging rates demonstrates that a combination of consistent law enforcement, community participation, and a local wisdom-based approach can increase the effectiveness of environmental policies. This article recommends strengthening institutional capacity, integrating law enforcement across sectors, and regulatory reform to close legal loopholes still exploited by illegal logging perpetrators. In conclusion, environmental law in Indonesia has the potential to curb illegal logging activities, but its effectiveness depends heavily on political commitment, sound governance, and the involvement of all stakeholders.
The Totem Handshake Policy During the Pandemic: Between Legal Compliance and Individual Moral Autonomy Sarip, Sarip; Nasywa, Hamidah; Ayu Anggraeni, Putri
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i3.1997

Abstract

This research explores the state's emergency policy during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly its moral dilemma in confronting the cultural tradition of handshakes and the symbolic implementation of the “Totem Handshake.” The state’s approach, limited to non-binding recommendations and symbolic language such as “physical distancing” and “social distancing,” raises critical questions about legal effectiveness. The study finds that symbolic appeals, though lacking coercive force, have a psychological and cultural impact resembling a form of “state magic” that influences public behavior. While such appeals were widely accepted, their legal standing remains weak, and the success of compliance is ambiguous—did people obey state messaging, or were they simply afraid of the virus? The research argues that the state faces greater social and legal risks if it enforces coercive regulations to restrict cultural practices. The public response varied, reflecting differing interpretations of state authority. Ultimately, this study highlights the state's reliance on symbolic language as a soft-law mechanism during moments of moral crisis. It suggests that in future emergencies, legal obedience may require not only formal authority but also cultural sensitivity and moral legitimacy, especially when asking citizens to temporarily abandon deeply rooted social traditions like handshakes.
Transformasi Hukum Islam di Era Digital: Prinsip Syariah dalam Transaksi Online Rizqi Ramadhani, Ahmad
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i3.2132

Abstract

The development of digital technology has disrupted the classical Islamic legal order, giving rise to new forms of legal interaction that have not been accommodated within the traditional fiqh structure. This study critically analyzes three main issues: the validity of electronic signatures, the problematic nature of digital contracts, and the potential for gharar in online businesses. This study combines analysis of classical Islamic legal sources such as the works of Imam Syafi'i and Al-Mawardi, the positive legal provisions in Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law), and fatwas from the National Council of Islamic Scholars (DSN-MUI) regarding digital transactions and the sharia economy. The results show that although electronic signatures and digital contracts have gained positive legal legitimacy, they do not fully fulfill the elements of a valid contract from a fiqh perspective due to the absence of explicit ṣīghat and the potential for weak consent of the parties, while digital business models such as dropshipping and pre-orders have the potential to contain gharar due to unclear ownership and high speculative risks. This study confirms that formal legal recognition of digital transactions does not necessarily guarantee their compliance with sharia principles, so that contemporary ijtihad based on maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah and istinbāṭ methods such as qiyās, istihsān, and maslahah mursalah are needed to reconstruct Islamic law that is adaptive to digital transformation while still upholding the values ​​of justice, transparency, and voluntariness in every transaction.
Analisis Masa Jabatan Kepala Desa Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2024 Junto Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa Ditinjau Dari Maslahah Mursalah Sakdi
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v2i4.2145

Abstract

The change in the term of office of village heads from six years and three terms as stipulated in Law Number 6 of 2014 to eight years and two terms through Law Number 3 of 2024 has given rise to extensive legal and political discourse. This study aims to analyze the implications of this change through an Islamic legal approach with the concept of maslahah mursalah. This study uses a normative legal research method with a qualitative approach, which examines legal norms in laws and regulations as well as relevant Islamic legal doctrines and concepts. The approaches used include a legislative approach to examine changes in legal substance in the two laws, and a conceptual approach to review the principles of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah and public welfare in the policy of extending the term of office of village heads. The data used are sourced from primary legal materials (laws and regulations), secondary (literature, books, and scientific journals), and tertiary (dictionaries and legal encyclopedias), which are analyzed descriptively and analytically. The research results show that extending the village head's term of office provides benefits in the form of leadership stability, development continuity, efficiency of election costs, and reduced potential for social conflict due to repeated political contestations. However, this change also risks weakening community evaluation mechanisms, hindering leadership regeneration, and creating the potential for concentration of power. Within the framework of maslahah mursalah, this policy is acceptable as long as the benefits outweigh the harms, provided there is strong oversight, active community participation, and trustworthy, transparent, and accountable leadership.
Peran Partisipasi Publik Berbasis Digital (E-Participation) dalam Proses Perancangan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia: Tantangan dan Optimalisasi Naisabur, Nanang; Mariska Salsabila, Adzanah
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i3.2144

Abstract

Along with the advancement of information and communication technology (ICT), the form of public participation has undergone a significant transformation from conventional to digital. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of digital-based public participation (e-Participation) in Indonesia, as well as to evaluate the regulatory and implementation challenges that hinder the realization of democratic, inclusive, and comprehensive public participation. The research method used is a normative juridical method (legal research) with a conceptual statute approach and a bibliography study. The results show that in its implementation, e-Participation in Indonesia still faces various obstacles, both from ambiguous regulations and from technical limitations and public participation. Based on factual data and findings, e-Participation has not been fully able to encourage broad and sustainable public involvement in the policy-making process. Therefore, reformulation and optimization of e-Participation are needed, both normatively through strengthening the legal framework, and technically through improving digital infrastructure, public literacy, and coordination between government agencies.
Patologi Birokrasi Lembaga Publik dan Upaya Pencegahannya Luqman Hakim
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i3.2306

Abstract

Bureaucracy is a central pillar of modern governance. Ideally, it is responsible for formulating and implementing policies, delivering high-quality public services, and ensuring effectiveness, transparency, and accountability. However, the Indonesian bureaucracy continues to face serious challenges, as bureaucratic pathologies within public institutions remain deeply rooted. This study aims to explore the underlying causes of bureaucratic pathology in public institutions and to formulate preventive approaches that can be applied systematically and sustainably. This research employs a qualitative method using a library research approach. The primary sources consist of books on organizational theory, bureaucracy, public administration, bureaucratic pathology, and relevant academic journals (previous studies and research findings). The findings indicate that bureaucratic pathology in public institutions essentially stems from intertwined structural, cultural, and individual dimensions. These include organizational structure and design, human resource quality, organizational culture, bureaucratic leadership, political systems, as well as external and legal environments. Preventive approaches to address bureaucratic pathology must be carried out in layered, gradual, and continuous ways. These include structural transformation, human resource capacity building, leadership strengthening, organizational culture reform, enhancement of public ethics, improvement of public accountability mechanisms, and political–legal prevention centered on strengthening the legal system and external oversight.
Hukum Islam dan Pengelolaan Keragaman Sosial: Resolusi Konflik Identitas dalam Perspektif Moderasi Beragama Mustika, Mega; Malik, Ridwan; Walida Mustamin, Siti
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i4.2416

Abstract

The tension between the ideal of unity and the reality of social diversity in multicultural societies through the perspective of Islamic law. In the Indonesian context, such tension is not merely conceptual but is manifested in identity-based conflicts, divergent religious interpretations, interreligious relations, and the politicization of religion in the public sphere. Employing a normative-sociological approach with a library-based research design, this study analyzes classical and contemporary Islamic legal sources alongside relevant socio-religious phenomena. The article explores fundamental principles of Islamic law such as tawhid (oneness), ukhuwwah (brotherhood), ta‘aruf (mutual recognition), ikhtilaf (legitimate difference), and al-‘adl (justice) as normative foundations for managing diversity. The aim of this study is to explain the role of Islamic legal principles in managing social tensions in multicultural societies in order to achieve social harmony and integrity. The findings indicate that an Islamic legal approach grounded in maslahah (public interest), wasathiyah (moderation), and tasamuh (tolerance) has significant potential to reduce identity-based conflicts and promote social harmony. When interpreted contextually and moderately, Islamic law functions not only as a religious normative system but also as a social institution capable of safeguarding cohesion in plural societies. These findings underscore the importance of strengthening a moderate paradigm of Islamic law as both an ethical and juridical reference for managing social diversity in plural states.
Hubungan Hukum Antara Rumah Sakit, Pasien dan Tenaga Medis Michael Alfonsus; Dyah Ersita Rustanti
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i4.2409

Abstract

Hubungan hukum antara rumah sakit, pasien, dan tenaga medis merupakan bagian fundamental dalam penyelenggaraan pelayanan kesehatan yang berlandaskan prinsip perlindungan hukum, kepastian hukum, dan keadilan. Hubungan hukum tersebut timbul dari adanya perikatan yang bersumber dari perjanjian maupun ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur bidang kesehatan. Rumah sakit sebagai penyelenggara pelayanan kesehatan memiliki kewajiban menyediakan pelayanan yang aman, bermutu, dan nondiskriminatif, sementara tenaga medis berkewajiban menjalankan praktik kedokteran sesuai standar profesi, standar pelayanan, dan kode etik. Di sisi lain, pasien memiliki hak atas informasi medis, persetujuan tindakan medis (informed consent), serta perlindungan atas keselamatan dan kerahasiaan data medis. Pengaturan hubungan hukum ini diatur antara lain dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan, Undang-Undang Nomor 44 Tahun 2009 tentang Rumah Sakit, serta Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 tentang Praktik Kedokteran. Salah satu bentuk konkret hubungan hukum tersebut tercermin dalam pelaksanaan informed consent sebagai perwujudan asas kesepakatan dan perlindungan hak pasien. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum, dan literatur ilmiah. Hasil penelitian diharapkan dapat memberikan pemahaman komprehensif mengenai pola hubungan hukum antara rumah sakit, pasien, dan tenaga medis, serta kontribusi dalam penyelesaian sengketa pelayanan kesehatan secara adil dan proporsional.
Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat Muslim terhadap Mediasi di Era Digital Nasruddin; Agus Muchsin; M. Ihsan Darwis; Rahmawati; Islamul Haq
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i4.2490

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has fundamentally transformed various dimensions of human life, including the mechanisms of legal dispute resolution. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the legal awareness of the Muslim community in Parepare City, South Sulawesi, regarding the implementation of electronic mediation (e-mediation) in the digital era. Operating within the framework of the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 3 of 2022, the shift from conventional face-to-face mediation to virtual platforms presents significant sociological, psychological, and theological challenges. This research employs a qualitative descriptive method with normative-theological and empirical-juridical approaches, utilizing data from the Parepare Religious Court, Parepare Police Department, and the National Land Agency of West Bacukiki. The findings indicate that while the Muslim community in Parepare demonstrates a high preference for non-litigation dispute resolution, heavily influenced by the local culture of Siri' na Pacce and the Islamic concept of Islah (peacemaking), their adoption of fully digital mediation remains sub-optimal. The primary inhibiting factors include a stark digital literacy deficit, unstable internet infrastructure, privacy concerns, and most crucially, the loss of emotional intuition ("feel to feel") between the mediator and the disputing parties. To bridge this gap, this study proposes an optimization strategy grounded in the principles of Maqashid Al-Syariah and Restorative Justice, emphasizing the need for technical assistance hubs, culturally responsive digital training for mediators, and the development of proprietary encrypted judicial platforms to ensure confidentiality and maintain the sacredness of the mediation process.
Efektivitas Pengawasan ITWASDA terhadap Pengaduan Online dalam Meningkatkan Profesionalitas dan Kepastian Hukum di Polda Kalimantan Barat Sigit Jatmiko; Edi Saputra Hasibuan
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i4.2510

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of the Regional Inspectorate for Supervision (Itwasda) in overseeing online-based public complaints at the Regional Police of West Kalimantan in enhancing professionalism and legal certainty. The background of this research is rooted in the rapid development of digital technology, which has driven the transformation of public services through e-policing systems, yet has not been adequately supported by optimal supervisory mechanisms. Normatively, public complaints are regulated under Law Number 25 of 2009 on Public Services and the Chief of Police Regulation Number 9 of 2018 on Public Complaints. This research employs an empirical legal method with a qualitative approach, utilizing data collection techniques such as observation, interviews, and documentation. The findings indicate that the online complaint system has improved public access to reporting cases, particularly those related to online fraud, land disputes, and abuse of authority. However, the effectiveness of supervision remains relatively low, as only approximately 45% of complaints have been fully resolved, 35% are still in process, and 20% lack clear resolution. This condition reflects a gap between legal norms and practical implementation, particularly in terms of legal certainty and accountability. The main contributing factors include limited human resources, weak technological integration, difficulties in verifying electronic evidence, and inadequate coordination and transparency among units. Furthermore, organizational culture also influences the effectiveness of supervision. The implications of these findings suggest that the digitalization of complaint systems has not yet fully ensured substantive justice, as emphasized in progressive legal theory. Therefore, strengthening supervisory systems, enhancing human resource capacity, and improving technological.

Page 11 of 12 | Total Record : 115