cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
judex.laguens@gmail.com
Phone
+6281282827983
Journal Mail Official
mail@judexlaguens.ikahi.or.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Medan Merdeka Utara No.9, RT.2/RW.3, Gambir, Kecamatan Gambir, Kota Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10110
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Strategi Memperkuat Integritas Lembaga Peradilan Indonesia
Published by Mahkamah Agung Ri
ISSN : 30257182     EISSN : -     DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13738647
Core Subject : Economy, Humanities, Science, Education, Social,
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Immunology & microbiology Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science
ISSN: 3025-7182 Penerbit: Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI) 0009-0000-1749-8018 : ORCID Fokus dan Ruang Lingkup Judex Laguens bertujuan untuk menyediakan wadah bagi akademisi, peneliti, dan praktisi untuk mempublikasikan artikel penelitian asli atau artikel review. Ruang lingkup artikel yang dimuat dalam jurnal ini membahas berbagai topik di bidang hukum dan peradilan. Frekuensi: 3 terbitan per tahun (April, Agustus, dan Desember) Judex Laguens merupakan jurnal akses terbuka dan peer-review yang bertujuan untuk menyebarkan hasil penelitian atau pemikiran asli yang fokus pada isu-isu di bidang hukum dan peradilan. Penulis diundang untuk mengirimkan naskah yang termasuk dalam lingkup Judex Set Lex Laguens. Artikel-artikel yang diterbitkan di Judex Set Lex Laguens melalui proses peer-review double-blind. Oleh karena itu, diterima atau tidaknya karya ilmiah tersebut merupakan hak Dewan Redaksi berdasarkan rekomendasi peer reviewer. Silakan baca informasi tentang proses peer-review. Mohon membaca dan memahami pedoman penulis dalam penyusunan naskah. Penulis yang menyerahkan naskah ke editor harus mematuhi pedoman dan template penulis. Jika naskah yang dikirimkan tidak sesuai dengan pedoman atau menggunakan format yang berbeda, maka naskah tersebut akan ditolak oleh tim editorial sebelum ditinjau. Tim redaksi hanya akan menerima naskah yang memenuhi persyaratan format yang ditentukan.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 14 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2 No 1 (2024)" : 14 Documents clear
URGENSITAS PENGUATAN ETIKA PROFESI HAKIM Athari Farhani; Faiqah Nur Azizah; Nur Kholifah
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.1.4.2024.55-74

Abstract

Hakim sebagai unsur utama dalam pengadilan yang menempatkan profesinya tersebut sebagai wakil tuhan, sebab tugas hakim adalah untuk menentukan hukum dan keadilan dalam masyarakat, sehingga tanggung jawab yang diembannya sangatlah berat namun mulia. Oleh karena itu kekuasaan yang begitu besar dimiliki oleh profesi hakim, maka hakim dituntut dengan keseimbangan sikap yang penuh rasa tanggungjawab pada hati nurani serta nilai-nilai etik terhadap profesinya. Namun jika melihat kenyataan saat ini, terjadi penurunan kualitas hakim tidak hanya dalam putusanya namun juga menyangkut penurunan aspek moral. Penguatan etika dalam profesi hakim menjadi keharusan dan kewajiban bagi penyelenggara negara sebab etika menjadi koridor utama bagi hakim dalam mengemban tugasnya agar tetap menjalankan profesinya secara profesional tanpa mengesampingkan nilai-nilai kejujuran serta moralitas. Hal tersebut sebagai upaya dalam mewujudkan penegakan hukum yang berkeadilan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian ini adalah hakim harus mampu mengejawantahkan nilai-nilai etika dan moral sebagaimana yang telah dirumuskan dalam kode etik profesi hakim, yakni dengan menyelami rasa keadilan yang dianut masyarakat. Dengan landasan etika dan moral melalui kode etik profesi hakim, maka hakim akan mewujudkan penegakan hukum yang berkeadilan.
INTEGRITAS CHAIN OF CUSTODY PADA PEMERIKSAAN BUKTI DIGITAL Mustafa, Cecep
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.1.4.2024.75-96

Abstract

In this paper, the author discusses the urgency of implementing a digital forensic readiness framework used by the Supreme Court of Indonesia and stakeholders to identify, collect, and maintain digital evidence and respond faster during the post-incident phase than usual by initiating forensics investigations. Digital photography, as soon as possible, upon incident detection, gets digital evidence first. The proposed Guideline has been created by considering the principles of digital forensic readiness requirements based on ISO/IEC 27043.
RETHINKING: HAKIKAT INTEGRITAS DALAM DUNIA PERADILAN GUNA MEWUJUDKAN PERADABAN PUBLIK DI ERA SOCIETY 5.0 Ardhiwinda Kusumaputra
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.1.4.2024.1-24

Abstract

The law is formed is to meet human needs. The existence of a judiciary with integrity is actually a bridge in actualizing law according to the needs of society. However, in reality there are still many irregularities in the administration of the justice system in Indonesia. Demonstrates an inconsistency in its integrity. This also cannot be separated from the unclear meaning of integrity from a regulatory perspective. Addressing two main problems. First, what is the nature of integrity in the world of justice as the basis for realizing public civility? Second, what are the efforts to strengthen integrity in order to create public civilization in the era of society 5.0? Clarity on the meaning of integrity is needed, especially from the perspective of legal hermeneutics. Providing an understanding of integrity as a manifestation of God's values, integrity as a public contract, and integrity as a legal consequence. Efforts to strengthen integrity can be done with a legal system approach. First, carry out regulatory arrangements, namely by providing clarity on the formulation at the level of the law regarding integrity. Second, institutional arrangements, which in this case are built on conventional and digital integration patterns. Third, directing to new habits based on a basic understanding of integrity. Aiming at the same perspective on integrity supported by conventional and digital integration.
EKSISTENSI DAN PERAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN DI INDONESIA: ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK lahati, teddy
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.1.4.2024.97-107

Abstract

Electronic evidence in the judicial legal system in Indonesia is something new so it has become an object of study in exploring its existence and role. The legality of electronic evidence has become a polemic about how the examination of electronic evidence is regulated in statutory regulations, what is the validity of electronic evidence, what is the procedure for authenticating electronic evidence in trial examinations, and what is the practice of examining electronic evidence in trials so that appropriate solutions must be found? to answer the legal phenomenon in question. This research is descriptive-analytic normative research, namely by examining existing regulations. Data collection is carried out by collecting regulations in the ITE Law, KUHAP, Perma, and the like. The results of the research conclude that First, electronic documents have received recognition as valid evidence in civil trials, in accordance with the Company Documents Law and ITE Law Number 11 of 2008, but as part of the procedural law, electronic documents do not yet have regulations on the procedures for submitting them in trial, procedures for showing it to the opposing party. Second, the technical submission and technical aspects of showing electronic documents at trial can be answered through clear regulations or technical instructions for Elitigation in practice at trial, but to provide legal certainty it needs to be regulated in the Civil Procedure Law or compiled in Supreme Court Regulations
PRINSIP TUNTAS SEBAGAI MANIFESTASI KEADILAN DALAM UPAYA REKONSTRUKSI PUTUSAN ATAS GUGATAN TIDAK DAPAT DITERIMA Samsiati, Samsiati
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.1.4.2024.25-54

Abstract

To this date, the applicable rules and regulations in Indonesia have not specified the reasons on which a court may declare a lawsuit inadmissible (Niet-Ontvankelijk verklaard). Although there is still a substantial amount of jurisprudence that fills in legal gaps, uniformity has not been attained. This legal void may lead to Niet-Ontvankelijk verklaard contradicting the principle of prompt, simple, low cost, and complete judgment. This study employs legal research with statute approach, conceptual approach, case approach, and comparative approach to examine this issue. This study reaches conclusions: First, the ratio legis of Niet-Ontvankelijk verklaard is intended to permit civil lawsuits that do not meet the legal conditions for a lawsuit to be settled at the outset of the case settlement procedure, without first analyzing the subject matter of the case. Second, it is paramount essential to introduce new provisions in Indonesia's Civil Procedure that regulates: the types and forms of exceptions; rules on the limitation of legal remedies against Niet-Ontvankelijk verklaard; and an active and ex officio affirmation of the judge's authority stating that the lawsuit cannot be accepted, without objection or exception from the defendant, so long as the decision is based on the reasons for the exception.
MENINGKATKAN PERAN HAKIM Gonzales, Marcellino
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.1.4.2024.108-120

Abstract

The forum for organizing judges in Indonesia is the Indonesian Judges Association (IKAHI). IKAHI oversees the judges by carrying out a special mission and vision, which makes Indonesian judges qualified and professional so that they can synergize with the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. However, in its development, many judges have not been motivated by the role of IKAHI itself. Thus, in this article, the author focuses on the discussion of Has IKAHI as an organization carried out its role to motivate its members to realize modern justice? The discussion focuses on the theory of motivation and the organization's role in answering these questions. From the discussion, it was concluded that IKAHI had provided sufficient support for the development of modern justice, but more efforts are needed to build real motivation so that the performance of the judges who take shelter in it can grow optimally.
PANGGILAN SECARA ELEKTRONIK DALAM PROSEDUR SIPIL, DALAM UPAYA PENYELESAIAN WARISAN KOLONIAL sujatmikp, bagus
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.1.4.2024.121-140

Abstract

The court summon is the first spearhead of the entire trial process, especially for the civil cases. Court summon has an essential role, even the summon process may decide the legitimation of a trial that conducted by the judge. The court summon is conducted in order to inform the parties when they should appear before the judge. It becomes important due to its impact to the parties’ life fate, either its right over goods or its legal status on a family. Therefore, the laws shall ensure that every person shall know whenever their rights being challenged before the court. In civil cases the court summon is regulated under Article 390 HIR (718 RBg), which is one of its kind is known as public summon. The legal basis to conduct the public summon in last 170 years has not been changed, only public summon in certain case that amended, such as in divorce case. Even then, the change does not really change the summoning process, the summoning still conducted by using a announcing paper that put in the government building and announcing through conventional media mass such as newspaper, radio or television. However nowadays, this kind of media has been left by the people, their popularity has been stolen by the internet like youtube, facebook, Instagram and etc. The Supreme Court (Mahkamah Agung, hereafter as “MA”) shall adapt to this era, MA shall re-innovate the way public summon conducted in last 170 years, by using the innovation of the 21th century which is the “internet”, by using the “Electronic Public Summon”.
URGENSITAS PENGUATAN ETIKA PROFESI HAKIM Athari Farhani; Faiqah Nur Azizah; Nur Kholifah
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.1.4.2024.55-74

Abstract

The judge as the main element in the court places his profession as a representative of God, because the judge's job is to determine law and justice in society, so the responsibility he bears is very heavy but noble. Therefore, the profession of judges has such great power, that judges are required to balance an attitude that is full of responsibility to conscience and ethical values ​​towards their profession. However, if you look at the current reality, there has been a decline in the quality of judges not only in their decisions but also in regards to a decrease in the moral aspect. Strengthening ethics in the profession of judges is a necessity and obligation for state administrators because ethics is the main corridor for judges in carrying out their duties so that they continue to carry out their profession in a professional manner without putting aside the values ​​of honesty and morality. This is an effort to realize fair law enforcement. The research method used in this study is a normative method with a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. The results of this study are that judges must be able to embody ethical and moral values ​​as formulated in the code of ethics for the profession of judges, namely by exploring the sense of justice held by society. With an ethical and moral foundation through the professional code of ethics of judges, judges will realize fair law enforcement.
INTEGRITAS CHAIN OF CUSTODY PADA PEMERIKSAAN BUKTI DIGITAL Mustafa, Cecep
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.1.4.2024.75-96

Abstract

Dalam makalah ini, penulis membahas urgensi penerapan kerangka kerja kesiapan forensik digital, yang digunakan oleh Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia dan pemangku kepentingan dalam rangka mengidentifikasi, mengumpulkan, dan memelihara bukti digital dan merespons lebih cepat selama fase pasca-insiden tempat kejadian perkara (TKP) dari biasanya, dengan memulai pemeriksaan forensik digital sesegera mungkin, setelah deteksi insiden TKP, memperoleh bukti digital yang tersedia terlebih dahulu. Buku pedoman disusun dengan mempertimbangkan prinsip-prinsip persyaratan kesiapan forensik digital sejalan dengan standar internasional ISO/IEC 27043.
RETHINKING: HAKIKAT INTEGRITAS DALAM DUNIA PERADILAN GUNA MEWUJUDKAN PERADABAN PUBLIK DI ERA SOCIETY 5.0 Ardhiwinda Kusumaputra
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.1.4.2024.1-24

Abstract

Hukum dibentuk adalah untuk memenuhi kebutuhan manusia. Keberadaan lembaga peradilan yang berintegritas, sejatinya menjadi jembatan dalam mengaktualisasikan hukum yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan masyarakat. Namun, pada kenyataannya masih banyak terjadi penyimpangan atas penyelenggaraan sistem peradilan di Indonesia. Menunjukkan adanya inkonsistensi dalam integritasnya. Hal ini juga tidak dapat dilepaskan pada ketidakjelasan makna integritas dari segi pengaturannya. Mengarahkan pada dua permasalahan utama. Pertama, Apa hakikat integritasi dalam dunia peradilan sebagai dasar perwujudan keadaban publik? Kedua, bagaimana upaya dalam memperkuat integritas guna mewujudkan peradaban publik di era society 5.0? Kejelasan makna integritas sangat diperlukan, khususnya dari perspektif hermeneutika hukum. Memberikan pemahaman integritas sebagai manifestasi nilai Ke-Tuhanan, integritas sebagai kontrak publik, dan integritas sebagai konsekuensi hukum. Upaya dalam mengukuhkan integritas dapat dilakukan dengan pendekatan sistem hukum. Pertama, melakukan penataan regulasi, yaitu dengan memberikan kejelasan rumusan pada tingkat undang-undang tentang integritas. Kedua, penataan kelembagaan, yang dalam hal ini dibangun pola integrasi secara konvensional dan digital. Ketiga, mengarahkan pada kebiasaan baru yang didasarkan pada paham dasar tentang integritas. Mengarahkan pada satu perspektif yang sama tentang integritas yang didukung dengan integrasi secara konvensional dan digital.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 14

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 3 No 2 (2025) Vol 3 No 1 (2025) Vol 2 No 3 (2024) Vol 2 No 2 (2024) Vol 2 No 1 (2024) Vol 1 No 3 (2023) Vol 1 No 2 (2023) Vol 1 No 1 (2023)