cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
M YAHYA WAHYUDIN
Contact Email
mochyahyawahyudin@gmail.com
Phone
+6281221759136
Journal Mail Official
htn@uinsgd.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl AH Nasution No 105 Kota Bandung
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
ISSN : 3025664X     EISSN : 29883865     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica adalah jurnal ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Prodi Hukum Tatanegara (Siyasah) Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung dalam dua periode pertahun. Jurnal ini membahas perkembangan hukum tatanegara yang dilihat dalam berbagai khazanah keilmuan dengan berbagai pendekatannya. Ruang lingkup Jurnal SIYASI:Trias Politica memfokuskan pada kajian Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Tata Negara Islam. SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica terbit dua kali dalam setahun (Mei dan November). Proses review journal double-blind peer-review, antara reviewer dan penulis tidak saling mengetahui.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 78 Documents
 4   5   6   7   8 
Evaluasi Pola Hubungan Tentara Nasional Indonesia dan Kepolisian Republik Indonesia dalam Pertahanan dan Keamanan Negara: Evaluation of the Relationship Pattern Between the Indonesian National Armed Forces and the Republic of Indonesia Police in National Defense and Security Mochamad Insnaeni Ramdhan; Muhamad Ikhwan Pratama; Ananda Sorya Pratama Desmala
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Siyasi
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v3i2.54837

Abstract

The Indonesian National Armed Forces and the Indonesian National Police are state institutions that serve to maintain national defense and security. However, when carrying out their respective duties, they often overlap and are inconsistent in their roles and functions. This study evaluates the pattern of relations between the two institutions in order to strengthen national defense and security through constitutional provisions. The research method used is a normative-prescriptive approach with a qualitative methodology to identify the pattern of relations between the two institutions based on the laws governing them. The conclusion drawn from this study is that the relationship pattern formed based on the laws governing the two institutions is a coordinative relationship because both institutions are under the President. However, as long as the President assigns them, the Indonesian National Armed Forces can also support police authority. This leads to overlapping roles that raise questions about the security and defense aspects. According to this study, the National Legal Development Board's (BPHN) Guideline for Evaluation of Legislation No. PHN-HN.01.03-07 regulatory substances are coherent. As a result, it is necessary to maintain consistency in the concepts of security and defense as well as the constitutionally mandated division of institutional roles.
Harmonisasi Fungsi Non-Judicial Review Ombudsman dengan Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Agung dalam Pengujian Kebijakan Publik: Harmonizing the Ombudsman's Non-Judicial Review Function with the Supreme Court's Judicial Review Authority in Public Policy Review Rena Zulfaidah; Tatang Astarudin
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Siyasi
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v3i2.56556

Abstract

This study analyzes the urgency of harmonizing the non-judicial review function of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia with the judicial review authority of the Supreme Court in assessing public policies. Amidst increasingly complex policy dynamics and the diversification of modern economic instruments, effective oversight mechanisms are crucial to maintaining the integrity of good governance. The core issue addressed is the overlap in perception and lack of systemic coordination, which leads to legal uncertainty for the public. Using a juridical-normative legal research method with a conceptual approach, this study evaluates the scope of authority, legal basis, and practical implications of both institutions. The results indicate that harmonization is the key to creating a comprehensive oversight system, wherein the Ombudsman addresses maladministration and sociological aspects, while the Supreme Court focuses on testing legislative norms. This synergy not only prevents oversight redundancy but also enhances legal process efficiency and national budget effectiveness. This study offers policy propositions regarding data integration and inter-institutional coordination as a solution model to ensure that every state action remains grounded in the principles of justice, transparency, and social benefit. Thus, this harmonization serves as an absolute prerequisite for building a responsive and just rule of law for all citizens in the contemporary era.
Eksistensi Local Self-Government dan Tantangannya dalam Pembentukan Produk Hukum Desa yang Responsif Ahmad Jaelani; Hermansyah; Utang Rosidin
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v4i1.57142

Abstract

This study examines the existence of local self-government within the framework of village governance in Indonesia and its relationship to the formation of responsive village legal products. Employing normative legal research methods with statutory, conceptual, and historical approaches, the study analyses primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials through qualitative-prescriptive analysis. The research yields two principal findings. First, although the existence of local self-government has received strong constitutional recognition through the principles of recognition and subsidiarity under Law Number 6 of 2014 on Villages and its amendments, the autonomy realised in practice remains largely formal rather than substantive; the tension between villages' normative authority and supra-village regulatory intervention, weak institutional capacity, and the ambiguous position of village regulations within the national legislative hierarchy constitute real structural obstacles. Second, the formation of responsive village legal products remains far from ideal: inadequate problem identification, ceremonial public participation, and the absence of systematic implementation evaluation mechanisms have caused most village regulations to exhibit the character of formalistic autonomous law rather than responsive law oriented toward social problem-solving. The study concludes that strengthening the existence of local self-government and the responsiveness of village legal products are two mutually determining agendas that must be pursued simultaneously through institutional capacity reform, substantive participation mechanisms, integration of local wisdom, and the repositioning of village regulations within the national legal system.
Kekosongan Hukum Batas Waktu Pengisian Jabatan Wakil Kepala Daerah Kabupaten Ciamis Pasca Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Tahun 2024 Aan Afandi; Dykasakti Azhar Nytotama
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v4i1.57201

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing the appointment of deputy regional heads in Indonesia, examine the implications of the normative vacuum regarding the time limit for filling the vacancy of the Deputy Regent of Ciamis following the 2024 Regional Head Election (Pilkada) on legal certainty and the balance of power in regional governance, and formulate an ideal regulatory model for establishing a definite time limit for such appointments. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials were analyzed through relevant legislation concerning regional government and regional head elections, supported by the theories of the rule of law, legal certainty, checks and balances, and legal vacuum. The findings indicate that existing legislation regulates the procedural mechanism for filling vacancies in the office of deputy regional heads but does not prescribe a specific time limit for candidate nomination, election by the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD), or appointment by the central government. This normative gap creates legal uncertainty and may lead to the concentration of executive power while weakening checks and balances in regional governance. Therefore, this study proposes a legal reconstruction by introducing clear and measurable time limits to ensure legal certainty and effective regional governance. .
Larangan Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia: Tinjauan Konstitusional dan Prinsip Kebebasan Beragama Mohamad Iksan; Yusuf Hidayatulloh; Imam Faturrahman; Haikal Habinurrohman; Bibin Bunyamin
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v4i1.57791

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the constitutional standing of the prohibition on interfaith marriage within Indonesia's national legal system, examine the normative tension between the guarantee of religious freedom and the permissible limitations under Article 28J paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, and identify its legal implications for legal certainty and family rights. The study employs a normative-juridical method combined with a socio-legal approach through a systematic review of legislation, Constitutional Court decisions, and reputable legal literature. The findings reveal that the prohibition on interfaith marriage holds a firm constitutional legitimacy, consistently affirmed by the Constitutional Court through Decisions Number 68/PUU-XII/2014, Number 24/PUU-XX/2022, and Number 146/PUU-XX/2024, which establish religious law as a constitutive requirement for the validity of marriage within the framework of the Pancasila state. Nevertheless, the absolute prohibition without any alternative civil protection instrument produces a disproportionate impact on children's rights and family legal certainty. This study recommends the establishment of a tertium genus legal framework that separates the domain of religious validity from the domain of civil rights protection, in order to ensure a balance between the constitutional value of Belief in One God and the state's obligation to safeguard the fundamental rights of all citizens.
Politik Hukum Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara Kontemporer: Legal Policy of the Indonesian Criminal Justice System from the Perspective of Contemporary Constitutional Law Irda Nur Khumaeroh; Muhamad Iqbal Ansori Firdaus; Angga Gustian Widodo; Fitri Khoirotunnisa; Tessa Marshandini Sofyan; Jalaludin
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Siyasi
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v3i2.57877

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal politics of Indonesia's criminal justice system from the perspective of contemporary constitutional law and to formulate the direction of its transformation toward a democratic, accountable, and substantively just system. The study employs a normative-doctrinal legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials were collected through systematic library research and analyzed qualitatively using legal interpretation, norm synchronization, legal construction, and deductive reasoning techniques. The findings reveal that Indonesia's criminal justice legal politics faces three mutually reinforcing structural deficits: a regulatory deficit stemming from disharmony among statutes, an integration deficit arising from institutional fragmentation among the police, prosecution, judiciary, and correctional subsystems, and an oversight deficit due to weak checks and balances mechanisms. A comparative analysis with Germany and the Netherlands demonstrates a significant gap in due process implementation and constitutional rights protection. Transformation must prioritize regulatory harmonization, strengthening the integrated criminal justice system, and establishing independent oversight mechanisms to ensure Indonesia's criminal justice system genuinely delivers constitutional justice for all citizens.
Implikasi Yuridis Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 28 Tahun 2025 Terhadap Kewenangan Perizinan Berusaha Daerah Rezza Dwi Purnama Gunawan
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v4i1.57975

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the ratio legis underlying the enactment of Government Regulation Number 28 of 2025 and its juridical implications for the construction of regional government authority in Indonesia, particularly concerning the shift from attributive to merely administrative mandate authority. The research employs a doctrinal legal research method, collecting data through library research on primary legal materials, including the 1945 Constitution, Law Number 23 of 2014 on Regional Government, and Government Regulation Number 28 of 2025, supplemented by secondary materials from peer-reviewed journal articles and tertiary legal references, analyzed qualitatively using statute and conceptual approaches. The results reveal that the regulation adopts an economic analysis of law framework prioritizing national standardization and digital efficiency through mechanisms such as fictive positive approval and post-audit supervision, yet substantially reduces regional discretion and fiscal independence through centralized licensing retribution. These findings indicate a constitutional dissonance between investment acceleration and the principle of the widest possible regional autonomy, suggesting that asymmetric decentralization mechanisms are necessary to restore balance between central efficiency and local economic sovereignty.
Transformasi Tahapan Verifikasi Administrasi dan Faktual Pencalonan Kepala Daerah dalam Yurisprudensi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Hari Nazarudin; Yuda Adi Kusumah; Muhammad Riefky Alfathan
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v4i1.58065

Abstract

This study aims to answer three research questions: first, how changes to nomination norms following Constitutional Court Decision Number 60/PUU-XXII/2024 and Number 70/PUU-XXII/2024 affect the verification stage conducted by the General Elections Commission (KPU); second, what Decision Number 62/PHPU.BUP-XXIII/2025 means for the standard of examining document accuracy; and third, what legal basis and design of factual verification can be applied without waiting for initial doubt. This research employs normative legal methods with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, analyzing the three Constitutional Court decisions alongside KPU Regulation Number 8 of 2024. The findings show that Decision Number 60/PUU-XXII/2024 reformulated the nomination threshold to 6.5%–10% of valid votes, while Decision Number 70/PUU-XXII/2024 affirmed that all candidate requirements must be fulfilled before determination. Decision Number 62/PHPU.BUP-XXIII/2025 demonstrates that factual clarification serves as a critical basis for the Court's assessment. The phrase "where doubt exists" in Article 113 of the KPU Regulation does not prohibit proactive factual verification. This study recommends that factual verification of core documents be made a standard obligation, supported by inter-agency data integration, official minutes, digital audit trails, and Election Supervisory Body oversight to prevent nomination disputes.

Page 8 of 8 | Total Record : 78

 4   5   6   7   8 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Siyasi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Siyasi : Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Siyasi : Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Siyasi: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol 2, No 1 (2024): Siyasi: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol 1, No 2 (2023): Siyasi: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Siyasi: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Siyasi: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol 1, No 1 (2023): Siyasi: Jurnal Trias Politica