cover
Contact Name
M YAHYA WAHYUDIN
Contact Email
mochyahyawahyudin@gmail.com
Phone
+6281221759136
Journal Mail Official
htn@uinsgd.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl AH Nasution No 105 Kota Bandung
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica
ISSN : 3025664X     EISSN : 29883865     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica adalah jurnal ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Prodi Hukum Tatanegara (Siyasah) Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung dalam dua periode pertahun. Jurnal ini membahas perkembangan hukum tatanegara yang dilihat dalam berbagai khazanah keilmuan dengan berbagai pendekatannya. Ruang lingkup Jurnal SIYASI:Trias Politica memfokuskan pada kajian Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Tata Negara Islam. SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica terbit dua kali dalam setahun (Mei dan November). Proses review journal double-blind peer-review, antara reviewer dan penulis tidak saling mengetahui.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 72 Documents
Tinjauan Kritis Polri Sebagai Komponen Pendukung Dalam Pertahanan Negara Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 27/PUU-XIX/2021 Wadi, Raines; Agustin, Ruli; Triadi, Irwan
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Siyasi: Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v2i1.37653

Abstract

The status of the National Police as a Supporting Component as stated in the National Resources Management Law for National Defense and confirmed in Constitutional Court Decision Number 27/PUU-XIX/2021 is problematic. This is because Article 30 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia states that the position of the National Police is to carry out efforts to protect and secure the state as the main component. So, the author wants to examine it thoroughly in relation to, firstly, the position of the National Police in protection and security efforts in terms of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Second, analyze the existence of the National Police in the Supporting Component of state protection and security efforts. There are two conclusions, namely: First, the position of the National Police in national defense and security efforts based on the initial intention of amending the 1945 Constitution is to synergize with the TNI, especially if a war or armed battle occurs. Second, placing the National Police as a Supporting Component has equalized their rights as citizens who have the principle of the right to refuse military service, while the National Police's protection and security efforts are a constitutional obligation while citizens in military service have a constitutional right.
Kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah dalam Pengelolaan ZIS: Analisis Peraturan Daerah Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2011 Iskandar, Landi
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Siyasi: Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v2i1.37654

Abstract

This study examines the development of Zakat, Infaq, and Sedekah (ZIS) management from a legislative perspective in Indonesia. The research problem focuses on the authority of local governments to establish regional regulations regarding ZIS management after the enactment of Law Number 23 of 2011 on Zakat Management. This research employs a normative juridical method with a statute approach to analyze the authority of regional regulation formation and its relationship with the hierarchy of legislation. The findings reveal that local governments do not have the authority to establish regional regulations on ZIS management because zakat management is a religious affair under the authority of the central government. The national authority for ZIS management rests with the National Zakat Agency (BAZNAS), established under Law Number 23 of 2011, without any delegation of authority to local governments to regulate through regional regulations. This study concludes that the establishment of regional regulations on ZIS by local governments is inconsistent with the principles of attribution and delegation of authority in the formation of legislation.
Praktik Otoritarianisme dalam Demokrasi Indonesia Pasca Reformasi: Analisis Konstitusional dan Politik Rachmawan, Muchamad Dicky; Wahyudin, M Yahya
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Siyasi: Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v2i1.37697

Abstract

Democracy does not operate without flaws. Although it represents the best concept of governance among the worst, democracy always contains the potential to lead toward authoritarian regimes. The problem of authoritarianism is a social psychology issue concerning a regime type that suppresses popular sovereignty. In various countries that have experienced it, authoritarianism does not emerge on its own; there are preconditions that can be analyzed based on the ongoing socio-political context, including in post-reform Indonesia. To demonstrate how authoritarian practices operate in Indonesia, this research employs a literature study approach, as its focus relies on sources derived from literature. The research findings indicate that symptoms of authoritarianism such as abusive constitutionalism practices, electoral cartelized systems, juristocracy, and autocratic legalism have occurred in Indonesia, reinforced by various factors such as the formation of legislation that disregards constitutional principles, electoral autocracy, and the partiality of judicial power to the political will of those in power. There are several recommendations for rebuilding Indonesian democracy to make it better, including legal reforms on limiting Presidential powers before elections, tightening ethical oversight of judges, strengthening the authority of state institutions that have been weakened, and encouraging parliament to undertake transformative legislature in order to implement democracy more substantively.
Kesejahteraan Sosial dalam Konsep Welfare State dan Maqashid Syari’ah Hadi, A. Syahid Syamsul
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Siyasi: Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v2i1.37698

Abstract

  Abstract: This study examines the ideal concept of social welfare from the perspectives of Welfare State and Maqashid Syariah as theoretical frameworks for realizing a welfare state. The research problem focuses on the relevance of these two concepts in the context of social welfare development in Indonesia. This research employs a descriptive qualitative method with juridical-empirical and socio-legal approaches, utilizing literature review and legislative analysis as data collection techniques. The findings reveal that the Welfare State concept, rooted in the philosophy of Socrates and Plato, emphasizes the state's obligation to ensure citizens' welfare through comprehensive social service provision regardless of social class. Meanwhile, the Maqashid Syariah concept developed by Jamaluddin Athiyah classifies welfare objectives into four dimensions: individual dimension (protection of life, intellect, religion, honor, and property), family dimension (protection of relationships, offspring, and education), community dimension (strengthening social relations, security, and knowledge dissemination), and humanity dimension (leadership establishment, international peace, and human rights). This study concludes that both concepts share fundamental similarities in achieving social welfare through social security mechanisms, public services, and community empowerment, albeit with different philosophical foundations.
Advokasi Kebijakan Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Urusan Pelindungan Mata Air Demi Kelangsungan Hidup Masyarakat Kabupaten Bandung Fauziah, Karina Puji
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Siyasi : Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v2i2.24815

Abstract

Water is a vital resource for human life and ecosystems, yet its existence is increasingly threatened by population growth, industrialization, and environmental degradation. Bandung Regency has abundant spring water potential; however, only about 19.48% of its residents obtain clean water access from the government, while the rest depend on private providers and community initiatives. This condition indicates weak management and protection of spring water at the regional level. This study aims to analyze the urgency of spring water protection in Bandung Regency and to examine policy advocacy efforts through the drafting of a Regional Regulation (Raperda) on Spring Water Protection. The research employs literature review, policy analysis, and documentation of the process from the preparation of the academic manuscript to the discussion of the Raperda. The findings show that the local government and the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) have carried out a series of stages, including problem identification, literature review, comparative studies, focus group discussions (FGD), regulatory review, and public hearings involving academics, communities, and stakeholders. The Raperda outlines the scope of regulation covering conservation, maintenance, restoration, utilization, licensing, and community participation in spring water protection. In conclusion, protecting spring water through regional policies is crucial to ensuring sustainable clean water supply, preserving ecosystems, and achieving equitable welfare for the people of Bandung Regency.
Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 78/PUU-XXI/2023 Tentang Penghapusan Larangan Penyebaran Berita Hoaks Perspektif Maslahah Ruth, Fatiya Adinda; Farkhani
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Siyasi : Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v3i1.40146

Abstract

Freedom of opinion is a fundamental right that has existed since birth and has been recognized nationally to internationally. There is a recognition of the guarantee of the right to freedom of opinion, it is clear that this right must be respected. Nowadays, the scope of freedom of expression of opinions is very wide. Social media is the main source of human beings to share, receive, and channel opinions without any pressure. However, there are still many civilians whose right to expression is silenced. The focus of this research is the birth of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 78/PUU-XXI/2023 as evidence that the shackles of the right to freedom of opinion are still rampant. Where the content of the decision examines several articles that are often used as a basis of reference to silence the right to freedom of opinion which has been clearly recognized and guaranteed by the constitution. The Constitutional Court's decision needs to be further studied regarding the benefits of the results of the decision for the public interest. This research is normative research using a conceptual approach and a case approach. The primary legal materials to support this research are the Constitutional Court Decisions, the Human Rights Law, and other related regulations, while the secondary legal materials are journals related to the benefits. This research shows that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 78/PUU-XXI/2023 has a good impact, unraveling the shackles on the right to freedom of opinion, upholding the legal umbre protection to freedom of opinion, and the decision is beneficial because it provides benefits for everyone and is in accordance with the conditions of maslahah.
Menakar Ulang Besaran Persentase Ambang Batas Parlemen yang Konseptual di Indonesia Tazakka, Wijdan Daurut
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Siyasi : Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v3i1.41333

Abstract

This research aims to provide legal certainty and a conceptual basis for determining the percentage threshold for parliamentary representation. (parliamentary threshold). The method used in this research is normative juridical (law-normative) relying on literature: books, journals, laws, Constitutional Court decisions, and the internet as the analytical tools in this study. Basically, Indonesia has quite a number of political parties. Viewed from the electoral contests from 1999 to the 2024 elections, according to Satori, Indonesia falls into the category of an extreme multi-party system. With an average of 5 or more relevant political parties in Parliament, this impacts government and political stability. Looking at its history, Indonesia has already responded to this and intends to simplify the party system in parliament. Starting from the implementation of the electoral threshold and parliamentary threshold, this is one of the government's steps towards achieving a simple multiparty system. However, it becomes a problem when the threshold numbers, especially the parliamentary threshold, increase year by year, from 2.5%, 3%, to the current 4%. However, the attainment of these percentage figures lacks a conceptual basis, as they are merely the result of agreements between political parties. Therefore, this research discusses the formulation to obtain the ideal percentage figure using Taagepera's theory, and the ideal figure in Indonesia according to Taagepera's theory is 1%.
Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 39/PUU-XVII/2019 tentang Pengujian Pasal 416 Ayat 1 Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum Terhadap Pemilihan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Azwar, Syaipil
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Siyasi : Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v2i2.41863

Abstract

Article 416 Paragraph 1 of Law Number 7 of 2017 on General Elections creates legal uncertainty regarding presidential and vice-presidential eligibility criteria when only two candidate pairs participate. This article replicates Article 159 Paragraph 1 of Law Number 42 of 2008, previously annulled by the Constitutional Court through Decision Number 50/PUU-XII/2014. This research aims to analyze judicial considerations and implications of Constitutional Court Decision Number 39/PUU-XVII/2019 on presidential elections. The research employs a normative juridical approach with literature study methods. The findings show the Constitutional Court granted the petition by declaring Article 416 Paragraph 1 conditionally unconstitutional due to constitutional harm. Judges considered that vote distribution requirements of minimum 50% and 20% apply only to elections with more than two candidate pairs based on Article 6A of the 1945 Constitution interpretation. This decision provides legal certainty that when only two candidate pairs exist, the winner is determined by the most votes, thereby avoiding election repetition and constitutional harm to society.  
Implikasi dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja (Omnimbus Law) Wardiyan, Riyan Agung
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Siyasi : Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v2i2.41868

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 regarding Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation has created legal uncertainty due to ambiguities in its ruling. The decision declared the Job Creation Law conditionally unconstitutional due to formal defects in its formation, yet simultaneously stated it remains valid until revisions are completed within 2 years. This study aims to analyze the implications and implementation of this decision on legal certainty in Indonesia. The research employed a normative juridical approach by examining decision documents, legislation, and literature related to formal judicial review. The findings reveal contradictions between point 3 of the ruling, which states the law has no binding legal force, and point 4, which declares the law remains valid. The implications create problems regarding the validity and efficacy of the Job Creation Law, failing to meet juridical, philosophical, and sociological aspects as stipulated in Law Number 12 of 2011. Post-decision implementation has generated ambiguity concerning the boundaries of strategic policies with broad impacts, and confusion in regulatory hierarchy as the omnibus law method regulating 79 laws is incompatible with the Civil Law system adopted by Indonesia. The study concludes that the Job Creation Law experiences a legal vacuum as it remains valid but cannot be implemented, necessitating reevaluation of the Constitutional Court's decision to ensure legal certainty.
Analisis Penerapan Asas Rahasia dalam Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Umum Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum Malviani, Silvi; Nuriman, Nuriman; Rosidin, Utang
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Siyasi : Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v2i2.43015

Abstract

The secrecy principle in elections is enshrined in Law Number 7 of 2017 and other related regulations. However, in practice, its application is only enforced within the voting booth. Moreover, various external factors, such as advances in information technology and the presence of quick-count survey institutions, have contributed to the erosion of the secrecy principle in elections. This study aims to provide recommendations to legislative bodies and raise public awareness of the need to uphold the secrecy principle from the beginning of the election process through to its conclusion. The research adopts a normative juridical method, requiring the collection of both primary and secondary data, followed by an analytical process. Three theories are used: the theory of legal purpose, the theory of legislative hierarchy, and the theory of democracy. This article concludes that the secrecy principle as stated in Law Number 7 of 2017 is no longer relevant, emphasizing the need for legal reform to better align with Indonesia’s evolving dynamics.