cover
Contact Name
Zulkardi
Contact Email
zulkardi@unsri.ac.id
Phone
081287447886
Journal Mail Official
jme@unsri.ac.id
Editorial Address
Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sriwijaya Kampus FKIP Bukit Besar Jl. Srijaya Negara, Bukit Besar Palembang - 30139
Location
Kab. ogan ilir,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Journal on Mathematics Education
Published by Universitas Sriwijaya
ISSN : 20878885     EISSN : 24070610     DOI : https://doi.org/10.22342/jme
Core Subject : Education, Social,
The Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) is an international electronic journal that provides a platform for publishing original research articles, systematic literature reviews (invited contributions), and short communications related to mathematics education. The whole spectrum of research in mathematics education are welcome, which includes, but is not limited to the following topics, such as Realistic Mathematics Education (RME), Design/Development Research in Mathematics Education, PISA Task, Mathematics Ability, and Ethnomathematics.
Articles 292 Documents
Empowering early childhood educators to foster spatial and numeracy reasoning through play-based learning Winarti, Destina Wahyu; Widjaja, Wanty; Razi, Fakhrur; Huzaimah, Sitti; Prianggi, Assila; Setyawan, Iwan Aries
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol. 16 No. 3 (2025): Journal on Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya in collaboration with Indonesian Mathematical Society (IndoMS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.v16i3.pp871-888

Abstract

Despite the growing awareness of the importance of spatial reasoning in schooling years, there is a notable gap in research literature to promote spatial reasoning in early childhood education in Indonesia. This research aims to address this gap by building the capacity of Indonesian early childhood educators in designing play-based activities to support children’s spatial thinking and reasoning. Twenty early childhood education (ECE) educators coming from different area in Java, Indonesia participated in the study. The study employed design-based research methodology to examine the way in which research team and ECE educators work collaboratively to bring about innovative learning processes and changes in ECE’s practices. A key design principle of the study features play-based activities to promote children’s spatial reasoning skills in the early years were analyzed.  This study finds that the professional learning program provides support for ECE educators in three areas, such as foster an understanding of key numeracy concept including one-to one correspondence and cardinality and how it is being implemented, offer insights about spatial ability and its constructs, and exposure to spatially rich play-based activities that could be adopted for ECE centers.
Seeing data differently: Developing a local instructional theory for culturally relevant statistical literacy in Indonesian teacher education Utari, Rahma Siska; Putri, Ratu Ilma Indra; Zulkardi; Hapizah
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol. 16 No. 3 (2025): Journal on Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya in collaboration with Indonesian Mathematical Society (IndoMS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.v16i3.pp915-936

Abstract

Statistical literacy has emerged as a central competence in mathematics education, particularly for prospective teachers who must be able to interpret, analyze, and critically evaluate data in a world increasingly shaped by information and statistics. However, previous research shows that many prospective teachers continue to struggle with developing statistical literacy, especially in connecting abstract concepts to meaningful contexts. This gap highlights the need for instructional designs that not only strengthen statistical reasoning but also draw on culturally embedded practices to enhance relevance and engagement. Addressing this challenge, the present study develops a Local Instructional Theory (LIT) that supports prospective teachers’ statistical literacy through the integration of local cultural contexts in South Sumatra, designed within the framework of Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) as adapted in Indonesia, namely Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI). Employing a design research methodology, the study was conducted in three phases: a preliminary investigation, a design experiment (pilot and teaching experiment), and a retrospective analysis. The resulting LIT was structured around three context-based learning trajectories, each targeting a key dimension of statistical literacy: data visualization, data interpretation, and critical evaluation. Instructional activities were grounded in authentic cultural contexts—such as Pempek demand during Ramadan, the Bekarang Iwak fishing tradition, and coffee productivity in Pagar Alam—which were used to bridge statistical concepts with learners lived experiences. Findings from the teaching experiments indicate that prospective teachers demonstrated notable shifts from procedural to conceptual reasoning and from descriptive analysis to reflective critique. Participants also showed improved ability to select appropriate graphical representations, interpret contextual data, and critically assess the credibility and sufficiency of statistical information. These outcomes underscore the potential of culturally relevant instructional design to foster holistic statistical literacy. The study contributes both theoretically and practically by offering a validated model for integrating cultural contexts into mathematics education, thereby enriching prospective teachers’ curriculum and providing a replicable approach for diverse educational settings.
Mathematics in the Tordauk jerpara tel tradition: Contribution of local wisdom to mathematics education innovation in elementary schools Labuem, Susana; Sa'dijah, Cholis; Parta, I Nengah; Sulandra, I Made
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol. 16 No. 3 (2025): Journal on Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya in collaboration with Indonesian Mathematical Society (IndoMS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.v16i3.pp955-980

Abstract

This research aimed to present a unique approach by integrating the Tordauk jerpara tel tradition of the Aru community into formal mathematics learning, describing the relationship between local cultural practices and mathematics concepts. The objectives were to identify the mathematics values contained in tradition and design a strategy for integrating the values into the elementary school curriculum to improve conceptual understanding and global mathematics literacy. A qualitative approach with an ethnomathematics design was adopted, additionally 20 third-grade elementary school students in Aru Regency were selected as participants. Data were collected through observation, role playing, interviews, and document analysis. The results showed the Tordauk jerpara tel tradition contained the concepts of addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, fractions, decimals, ratios, averages, and modulo arithmetic, which could be systematically mapped into the formal elementary school mathematics. The five-stage learning strategy, namely contextual exploration, mathematics identification, formalization, contextual reflection, and extension, can increased student engagement, abstraction ability, thinking flexibility, and internalization of social values. This research made theoretical contributions to ethnomathematics and culture-based mathematics education, while also proposing an adaptable strategy implemented in international contexts. Practical implications include the development of contextual with further research directions focused on strategy validation across cultural contexts.
Estimating probabilities through the Mongolian Shagai game: A culturally responsive approach to teaching statistics Miyejav, Itgel; Otgonbaatar, Khajidmaa
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol. 16 No. 3 (2025): Journal on Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya in collaboration with Indonesian Mathematical Society (IndoMS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.v16i3.pp1043-1062

Abstract

Culturally responsive approaches in mathematics education have been widely advocated; however, empirical investigations that embed traditional artifacts into probability and statistics instruction remain limited. This study addresses this gap by employing Shagai—a traditional Mongolian four-sided ankle bone—as an ethnomathematical instrument to support the development of statistical reasoning. In total, 10,050 single-throw trials were conducted across three groups: community participants (n = 5,000), pre-service mathematics teachers (n = 5,000), and a researcher-led demonstration (n = 50). Empirical probabilities for the four Shagai outcomes—horse, camel, sheep, and goat—were estimated as 0.12, 0.13, 0.39, and 0.36, respectively, with convergence achieved after approximately 8,000 trials, indicating a statistically stable but non-uniform distribution. These results informed the design of a four-hour instructional workshop with nine doctoral students in education. Participants conducted Shagai-based experiments, calculated statistical measures, and analyzed data using SPSS. Qualitative reflections were subjected to thematic analysis, which revealed enhanced statistical understanding, interdisciplinary insight, and awareness of cultural integration. A paired-sample t-test confirmed a statistically significant improvement in conceptual understanding . The findings suggest that embedding traditional knowledge systems into statistics education can deepen conceptual comprehension and enrich culturally relevant pedagogy.
Metacognitive skills in low self-efficacy students: A case study of junior high school students in the using of the Pythagorean theorem Pathuddin; Azizah, Nurul; Lefrida, Rita; Alfisyahra
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol. 16 No. 3 (2025): Journal on Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya in collaboration with Indonesian Mathematical Society (IndoMS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.v16i3.pp783-798

Abstract

Metacognitive skills are increasingly acknowledged as a decisive determinant of mathematical proficiency, as they enable students to plan, monitor, and evaluate their cognitive strategies in problem-solving. However, empirical studies rarely focus on how these skills are exhibited by students with low self-efficacy, a population particularly vulnerable to persistent underachievement in mathematics. Addressing this gap, the present study provides novel insights into the metacognitive functioning of low self-efficacy students when engaging with problem-solving tasks, specifically in the context of the Pythagorean Theorem. The study aimed to describe the manifestation of metacognitive skills among junior high school students with low self-efficacy and analyze their problem-solving strategies and underlying thought processes. Employing a descriptive qualitative design, participants were identified as low self-efficacy students using a standardized questionnaire. Data were obtained from self-efficacy questionnaires, problem-solving tasks, and semi-structured interviews, and subsequently analyzed through metacognitive indicators embedded within Polya’s problem-solving framework. Findings indicate that while low self-efficacy students exhibited consistent awareness and evaluative monitoring, their regulatory skills were less developed, particularly in the reviewing stage of problem-solving. Although planning and assessment strategies were evident, frequent errors required iterative adjustments before arriving at correct solutions. These results highlight the intertwined relationship between metacognition and affective-motivational factors, suggesting that mathematics instruction should explicitly integrate self-efficacy enhancement with metacognitive training. The study contributes to advancing the theoretical discourse on mathematics learning and offers practical implications for designing instructional models that accommodate learners with diverse motivational profiles.
Geometric patterns of the Papua crown: A culturally inclusive approach to mathematics learning Lestari, Nining Puji; Nengsih, Luluk Wahyu; Pagiling, Sadrack Luden; Yamin, Ade; Rosadi, Asep
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol. 16 No. 3 (2025): Journal on Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya in collaboration with Indonesian Mathematical Society (IndoMS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.v16i3.pp819-840

Abstract

Embracing inclusivity and integrating cultural artifacts into mathematics teaching and learning has sparked the attention of many researchers for decades. Despite these conceptual advancements, the design and implementation of inclusive mathematics instruction in Papua, Indonesia, remains limited. Mathematics teaching and learning in Papua are still primarily dominated using government-provided textbooks. Addressing this void, this article discusses the use of Papua Crown as an inclusive mathematics learning medium due to its relevance to learners' daily lives. We highlight the exotic and rich patterns of the Papua Crown, which can be utilized to teach elementary school mathematics, particularly geometry. We employed an ethnographic approach by conducting observations with the artisans and users of the Papua Crown, interviews with two artisans, a museum curator, an archaeologist, and an anthropology lecturer, and documentation. We analyzed the connection between the geometric patterns in the Papua crown and the geometric concept that the teacher can potentially utilize in their practice. The findings elucidate that there are three geometric patterns in the Papua Crown: the triangle, symbolizing the human spiritual relationship with nature and God; the square, representing beliefs and ways of life based on nature; and the circle, personifying the life cycle of Papuan society. We hypothesize that Papua Crown can provide meaningful and engaging mathematics teaching and learning, as learners can identify existing patterns in geometry, particularly 2D shapes. Third, using geometry patterns from the Papua Crown in teaching and learning mathematics is predicted to assist learners in learning mathematical concepts contextually and appreciate culture by constructing knowledge from their experiences. This study is expected to contribute significantly to the development of a culturally inclusive mathematics learning that enables learners to understand mathematics concepts and honor the pluralism of Indonesian society.
Prospective teachers’ iceberg designs in realistic mathematics education approach: Connecting mathematics and the SDGs Sari, Yurizka Melia; Fiangga, Shofan; El Milla, Yulia Izza; Shahrill, Masitah; Yanti, Liza Puspita
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol. 16 No. 3 (2025): Journal on Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya in collaboration with Indonesian Mathematical Society (IndoMS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.v16i3.pp981-1000

Abstract

The Iceberg Design framework has been utilized to represent the progression of students’ mathematical understanding, moving from informal, contextually grounded reasoning toward formal mathematical abstraction. This study investigates how prospective mathematics teachers develop Iceberg Designs within the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) framework, a model that enhances contextual learning and supports mathematical literacy. Thirty prospective mathematics teachers from Universitas Negeri Surabaya participated in this qualitative study, collaboratively designing Iceberg models as part of their coursework. Data from document analysis, interviews, and observations were evaluated using content analysis, the research evaluated the depth and coherence of their designs across four key components: situational contexts which evaluates the relevance and variety of real-world situations, model-of representations which examines the assistance of mathematical representation to connect the context into mathematical concept, model-for abstractions which assess the use of mathematical models toward formalization, and formal mathematical concepts which assess the mathematical ideas being explicitly involved. The findings reveal significant variation in the quality and completeness of the Iceberg Designs. Models for equivalent ratios and quadratic equations exhibited strong integration, using multiple, varied contexts to bridge situational and formal mathematical understanding effectively. Conversely, designs for fraction multiplication and quadrilateral area conservation were often surface level, relying on a single, underdeveloped context that hindered abstraction. Importantly, the study underscores the potential of Iceberg Designs to support the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly in fostering critical thinking, practical problem-solving, and meaningful contextual learning for high quality of education (SDG 4) and decent work for sustainable economic growth (SDG 8). These insights indicate the need for deeper integration of RME principles in teacher education and curriculum development through sustained investment in this area.
Advancing future mathematics teachers' geometric thinking through a Van Hiele-based elementary geometry course Shmigirilova, Irina B.; Rvanova, Alla S.; Tadzhigitov, Askar A.; Beloshistova, Yana S.
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol. 16 No. 3 (2025): Journal on Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya in collaboration with Indonesian Mathematical Society (IndoMS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.v16i3.pp799-818

Abstract

Research in mathematics education has increasingly emphasized the importance of developing deep conceptual understanding and higher-order thinking skills in geometry learning. However, traditional approaches to teaching elementary geometry in teacher education programs often remain procedural and insufficiently foster progression through the Van Hiele levels of geometric thinking. Addressing this gap, the present study introduces and examines the method of local axiomatization as a novel instructional approach for preparing future mathematics teachers. The purpose of the study is to identify, characterize, and test practical strategies for teaching an "Elementary Geometry" course through this method, with the goal of facilitating teacher candidates’ advancement across the Van Hiele model of geometric thinking. The research highlights effective educational practices, including maintaining student motivation, inquiry-based learning, collaborative interaction, integration of technology, strategic problem-solving, and reflective error analysis. Based on these principles, a university-level course in elementary geometry was designed and implemented as research training for 56 prospective mathematics teachers. Data were collected through the Van Hiele Geometry Test (VHGT), administered before and after the intervention, and through reflective essays written by participants. Statistical analysis using the Pearson criterion demonstrated a significant increase in students’ levels of geometric thinking, while qualitative reflections indicated enrichment of geometric knowledge and more independent, yet guided, learning. The findings suggest that the method of local axiomatization, despite implementation challenges, can serve as an effective and innovative pedagogical framework in mathematics teacher education, contributing to the development of both conceptual understanding and reflective practice in geometry learning.
Fostering mathematical creativity and autonomy through a STEM-based digital learning space Yulianto, Dwi; Juniawan, Egi Adha
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol. 16 No. 3 (2025): Journal on Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya in collaboration with Indonesian Mathematical Society (IndoMS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.v16i3.pp1093-1118

Abstract

Although STEM education emphasizes the integration of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics to foster 21st-century competencies, in Indonesian secondary schools STEM subjects are still commonly taught in isolation, while digital learning remains limited to passive presentation tools with little personalization. This gap highlights the need for innovative designs that connect STEM domains and foster higher-order mathematical skills. To address this, the present study develops and evaluates a STEM-Based Digital Learning Space (DLS) integrating a Personal Learning Environment (PLE) and a Personal Teaching Environment (PTE), aimed at enhancing junior high school students’ creative mathematical thinking and autonomous learning in probability. Using the 4D model (Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate), the DLS was validated by experts (Aiken’s V ≥ 0.80) and tested through multi-stage field trials: a pilot (n = 7), an expanded trial (n = 60, two schools), and a large-scale implementation (n = 120, four schools). Results confirmed high feasibility (Mean = 95.07%, SD = 1.2) and practicality (Mean = 89.38%, SD = 2.1). Effectiveness testing demonstrated significant gains in creative mathematical thinking (N-Gain = 0.554, moderate effect) and strengthened autonomous learning, supported by significant interaction effects (F = 4.62, p < .05). Specific features yielded measurable outcomes: simulations enhanced fluency and flexibility, adaptive quizzes supported metacognitive regulation, digital worksheets improved originality, and collaborative forums fostered responsibility. Overall, the DLS proved effective even in low-resource contexts and scalable through teacher training, offering evidence-based guidance for advancing digital literacy and supporting the Merdeka Belajar policy.
Metacognitive-discursive activities in Indonesian mathematics classrooms: A two-stage comparative case study Ate, Dekriati; Kusumah, Yaya Sukjaya; Cohors-Fresenborg, Elmar
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol. 16 No. 3 (2025): Journal on Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya in collaboration with Indonesian Mathematical Society (IndoMS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.v16i3.pp1023-1042

Abstract

Classroom discussions are essential for developing students’ mathematical understanding. While prior studies have examined teacher-led instruction, there remains a gap in understanding how metacognitive and discursive activities shape the quality of mathematical discussions at the whole-class level. To address this gap, this study proposes a systematic framework for analyzing public classroom discussions with a focus on metacognitive-discursive activities that support mathematical argumentation. The analysis centers on two dimensions: (1) monitoring the logical validity, correctness, and completeness of mathematical arguments, and (2) identifying how discourse quality is enhanced or obstructed by participants’ communicative strategies. This qualitative study employed a two-stage procedure: first, a fine-grained micro-level coding of classroom interactions to identify metacognitive and discursive activities, including monitoring (of terminology, methods, and argument consistency), reflection (on representational structures and methodological effectiveness), and discursive actions that either promote or hinder mutual understanding and second, a macro-level evaluation of discussion quality using a standardized rating framework. This methodological approach, applied for the first time in the Indonesian mathematics education context, enabled a more comprehensive analysis of discourse processes in whole-class discussions and helped identify phases in which strategies for enhancing the classroom discussion culture could be developed. The findings indicate that productive mathematical discussions require an environment that encourages students to articulate and critique solution strategies, justify their reasoning, and collaboratively resolve discrepancies with minimal teacher scaffolding. The study contributes to mathematics education research by providing a rigorous analytical model for examining mathematical discourse and offering evidence-based recommendations for cultivating a classroom culture that promotes deeper mathematical understanding.