cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ikhsan
Contact Email
jurnal@utu.ac.id
Phone
+6285362161970
Journal Mail Official
jurnal@utu.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Alue Peunyareng, Gunong Kleng, Kec. Meureubo, Kabupaten Aceh Barat, Aceh 23681
Location
Kab. aceh barat,
Aceh
INDONESIA
Jurist Argumentum Pemikiran Intelektual Hukum
Published by Universitas Teuku Umar
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29883687     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Jurist Argumentum (JJA) adalah jurnal mahasiswa ilmu hukum yang berada di naungan Prodi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Teuku Umar. JJA merupakan jurnal ilmiah yang mewadahi dan memfasilitasi seluruh mahasiswa, akademisi, paktisi hukum dan pengamat hukum yang ingin berkontribusi terhadap ide, gagasan maupun pemikirannya dalam jurnal ilmiah ini untuk dapat dipublikasikan sehingga dapat bermanfaat bagi perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan khususnya Ilmu Hukum.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 34 Documents
 1   2   3   4 
TINJAUAN YURIDIS EMPIRIS TERHADAP REKLAME YANG MELANGGAR SYARIAT ISLAM BERDASARKAN QANUN KABUPATEN ACEH BARAT NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2021 TENTANG KETENTERAMAN MASYARAKAT DAN KETERTIBAN UMUM DI KECAMATAN JOHAN PAHLAWAN Cut Bella Roza; Nouvan Moulia
Jurist Argumentum: Pemikiran Intelektual Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35308/jjm.v4i1.15127

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of West Aceh Regency Qanun Number 3 of 2021 concerning Public Peace and Order, specifically Article 45 letter i, which prohibits advertisement billboards (reklame) from displaying content that violates Islamic law. Despite the existing regulation, violations persist among beauty salons in the Johan Pahlawan sub-district, where promotional materials frequently display women's aurat, contrary to local socio-religious norms. The objective of this research is to analyze the implementation of the aforementioned Qanun and identify the underlying obstacle factors hindering its enforcement. This research employs an empirical juridical method. Primary data were collected through field interviews with salon owners, customers, and key government officials, including representatives from the Civil Service Police Unit and Wilayatul Hisbah (Satpol PP and WH) and the Investment and One-Stop Integrated Services Agency (DPMPTSP). The collected data were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive approach. The results indicate that the implementation of the Qanun remains ineffective. This is primarily characterized by suboptimal inter-agency coordination, a reactive rather than preventive approach to law enforcement, and an absence of direct supervision following the issuance of business permits. Furthermore, the implementation has not fully aligned with the principles of Good Governance, particularly regarding transparency and public legal education. The primary obstacles lie in the discrepancy between the legal structure and legal culture. While the legal substance is clear, structural operational limitations and a profound lack of legal awareness among business owners—exacerbated by modern visual normalization and inadequate socialization—impede compliance. The study concludes that a transformational approach, shifting from repressive enforcement to educative, persuasive, and participative strategies, is essential to foster genuine social awareness and legal compliance.
Studi Kasus Amsal Christy Sitepu: Analisis Disparitas Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berbasis Jasa Kreatif CITA MALIKA PRAHASTI HANDOKO
Jurist Argumentum: Pemikiran Intelektual Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35308/jjm.v4i1.15507

Abstract

This study examines judicial disparity in the corruption case of Amsal Christy Sitepu by focusing on a creative-service-based dispute, namely the production of village profile videos. The case is academically significant because the object of the dispute is not a conventional physical procurement project, but an intangible creative service whose economic value is determined by ideas, technical work, and audiovisual production processes. The study aims to identify the pattern of judicial considerations, assess the existence of disparity between aggravating and mitigating considerations, and explain how the character of creative services influences judicial criminal assessment. Using a normative legal method with a juridical-normative approach, this research relies on library research and document analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The analysis is conducted descriptively and interpretatively, with frequency-and-weight scoring used only as an auxiliary tool to observe judicial tendencies. The findings indicate that the core dispute lies not in the absence of work, but in the valuation of creative components such as concept development, editing, cutting, dubbing, and microphone use, which were disputed by the prosecutor and auditor as zero-valued items. At the same time, the evidentiary record shows that the work was completed, delivered, and regarded as beneficial by village heads, while the panel of judges ultimately concluded that the element of unlawful conduct was not proven and acquitted the defendant.  The case demonstrates that the intangible character of creative services complicates the construction of state-loss evidence and can shift judicial attention from a purely numerical assessment toward a more contextual evaluation of professional judgment, contractual performance, and criminal liability. Accordingly, the study argues that judicial disparity in corruption cases may arise not only from differences in weighing aggravating and mitigating factors, but also from the evidentiary instability created by creative-service valuation.
ANALISIS PASAL 1263 KUH PERDATA DALAM PERKARA WANPRESTASI PERJANJIAN PEMBIAYAAN MULTIGUNA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 13/PDT.G.S/2023/PN.MDN) Hanief Angie Prabhata; Jalaluddin Jalaluddin
Jurist Argumentum: Pemikiran Intelektual Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35308/jjm.v4i1.16064

Abstract

Indonesia merupakan negara hukum yang mewajibkan seluruh aktivitas masyarakat, termasuk transaksi pembiayaan multiguna, tunduk pada norma hukum yang berlaku untuk menjamin ketertiban dan perlindungan bagi para pihak. Perikatan bersyarat dengan syarat tangguh sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 1263 KUH Perdata merupakan instrumen hukum di mana perikatan baru berlaku setelah syarat tertentu dipenuhi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penerapan Pasal 1263 KUH Perdata terhadap perkara wanprestasi pada perjanjian pembiayaan multiguna dalam Putusan Nomor 13/Pdt.G.S/2023/PN.Mdn serta menganalisis pertimbangan hakim dalam perkara tersebut. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif atau kepustakaan dengan menggunakan pendekatan kasus (case approach) dan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan Pasal 1263 KUH Perdata termanifestasi dalam klausul cross-collateral pada Pasal 6 ayat 9 Perjanjian Pembiayaan, yang menyatakan bahwa kreditur berhak menyimpan BPKB asli hingga seluruh kewajiban debitur pada perjanjian terkait maupun perjanjian lainnya terpenuhi dengan baik. Dalam Putusan Nomor 13/Pdt.G.S/2023/PN.Mdn, hakim menolak seluruh gugatan penggugat karena terbukti bahwa perjanjian tersebut merupakan perjanjian bersyarat di mana penggugat belum menyelesaikan kewajiban pada perjanjian kedua, sehingga syarat penyerahan BPKB belum terpenuhi secara hukum. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan perlunya penjelasan konkret mengenai Pasal 1263 KUH Perdata serta edukasi hukum yang lebih mendalam bagi masyarakat atau calon konsumen untuk menghindari kesalahan penafsiran klausul kontrak di masa depan.
ANALISIS HUKUM PELAKSANAAN JUAL BELI TANAH DIBAWAH TANGAN DI GAMPONG MESJID KECAMATAN KAWAY XVI Sella Putri; Nila Trisna
Jurist Argumentum: Pemikiran Intelektual Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35308/jjm.v4i1.16067

Abstract

Land as property rights is regulated in the Basic Agrarian Law No. 5 of 1960. Ownership rights can be transferred based on sale and purchase, in accordance with Government Regulation no. 24 of 1997 in Article 37 paragraph 1 that the transfer of land rights and ownership rights to house units through sale and purchase, exchange, grants, entry into companies and other legal acts of transfer of rights, can only be registered if proven by a deed made by PPAT, There are provisions for the transfer of rights, but in Gampong Mesjid, Kaway XVI. The aim of this research is to analyze legal protection for the practice of buying and selling land under the hands in Gampong Mesjid and analyze the factors that cause people in Gampong Mesjid to buy and sell land under the hands. This research uses empirical juridical research methods. Researchers conducted interviews with the Keuchik Gampong Mesjid, as well as interviews with four respondents. The results of the research show that in Gampong Mesjid, Kaway XVI District, there is still the practice of buying and selling land under the hands. The public's knowledge about buying and selling must be done before a PPAT/Notary is still limited, on the other hand, the majority of people still choose to carry out land buying and selling privately due to limited costs, faster time, practicality, and the process does not take a long time. Factors that influence the occurrence of underhand buying and selling are the permissibility of the customary law process regarding the transfer of rights by the UUPA itself, lack of socialization of legal understanding, public ignorance about the conditions for buying and selling transfer of rights, the high cost of buying and selling before the PPAT and the low legal culture of the community itself.

Page 4 of 4 | Total Record : 34

 1   2   3   4 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4, No 1 (2026) Vol 3, No 2 (2025) Vol 3, No 1 (2025) Vol 2, No 2 (2024) Vol 2, No 1 (2024) Vol 1, No 2 (2023) Vol 1, No 1 (2023)