cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Akbar Narum
Contact Email
akbar.nasrum@gmail.com
Phone
+6282293685122
Journal Mail Official
pengelolajme@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Pemuda No. 339, Kab. Kolaka, Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia
Location
Kab. kolaka,
Sulawesi tenggara
INDONESIA
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education)
Published by Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
ISSN : 25282468     EISSN : 25282026     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31327/jomedu
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
The Journal of Mathematics Education (JME) aims to serve as a scientific platform for researchers, practitioners, and educators in the field of mathematics education to publish their original research. JME welcomes contributions that advance theory, practice, and policy in mathematics education across all educational levels. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to: Teaching and learning of mathematics Mathematics curriculum development Technology in mathematics education Mathematics teacher education Assessment and evaluation in mathematics education Systematic literature reviews Bibliometric analyses related to mathematics education The journal accepts quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods approaches relevant to these topics.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 9 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JME" : 9 Documents clear
ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS' ERRORS OF CLASS XI SMKN 2 PALU IN SOLVING MATRIX STORY PROBLEMS USING NEWMAN Ni Luh Ermayanti; Gandung Sugita; Alfisyahra Alfisyahra; I Nyoman Murdiana
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v9i2.1985

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain a description of the mistakes made by class XI students of SMK Negeri 2 Palu in solving word problems on matrix material based on Newman's stages. The type of research used is qualitative research. The research design consists of planning, implementation and completion stages. The research subjects were 3 students of class XI at SMK Negeri 2 Palu. The results of this study indicate that DE subjects experienced errors at the stages of understanding the problem, the stage of transformation, the stage of processing skills, and the stage of writing the final answer. The HR subject experienced errors at the stage of transformation, stage of process skills and stage of writing the final answer. The RW subject experienced errors at the stages of understanding the problem, the transformation stage, the process skills stage, and the final answer writing stage. Therefore, it was concluded that all subjects did not experience errors in the question reading stage.
ANALYSIS OF STUDENT’ MISTAKES IN SOLVING PROBLEM ON PYTHAGORAS THEOREM AT SMP NEGERI PALU Mustamin Idris; Yuyun Selasti; Anggraini Anggraini; Gandung Sugita
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v9i2.2059

Abstract

The purpose of this study is: to describe students' mistakes in solving Pythagorean Theorem problems at SMP Negeri 9 Palu using qualitative research methods. The subjects of this study were 3 students who were taken from 26 students who had studied the Pythagorean theorem. The selection of research subjects took into account: (1) these students made more mistakes; (2) different errors; (3) represent mistakes made by other students; (4) students' ability to communicate well and (5) recommendations from math teachers. Data collection techniques used are assignments and interviews. The analysis in this study uses Gagne's theory. The results of this study indicate that some of the mistakes students experienced in solving Pythagorean theorem problems were: (1) Subjects EN and SF made mistakes in using the Pythagorean theorem formula; (2) Subjects EN and SF made mistakes in writing mathematical symbols; (3) Subjects EN, MR and SF made mistakes in determining the hypotenuse of a right triangle; (4) Subjects EN, MR and SF made the mistake of not using the rank; (5) Subjects EN, MR and SF made mistakes in not writing down work procedures completely and accurately and (6) Subjects SF made mistakes in not doing calculations correctly.
ANALYSIS OF STUDENT ERRORS IN SOLVING STUDENT MATHEMATICS UAS QUESTIONS ACCORDING TO CASTOLAN CRITERIA Mustamin Idris; Ulvina Tangke Lembang; Muh. Rizal; Rita Lefrida
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v9i2.2068

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the errors made by students in completing final semester exam (UAS) questions in the field of mathematics, namely linear programming, matrices and transformation geometry. The subjects of this study were students of class XI Nursing at SMK Kesehatan Indonesia Jaya Parigi. In determining the research subjects, purposive sampling technique was used . The data collection technique for this study used documentation of essay questions for the final semester exam and documentation of student answer sheets and interviews. The data analysis technique used according to Miles and Huberman is condensation of UAS and interview results data, presenting UAS and interview results data and drawing conclusions. The results of this study indicate that the errors made by students are conceptual errors, procedural errors and technical errors. Indicators of conceptual errors made by students are not being able to interpret problems/use terms, concepts, and principles, students are not able to choose formulas/properties correctly and students are not able to apply formulas/properties accurately. Indicators of procedural errors are inconsistencies in the solution steps with the questions asked and not being able to complete the questions until the final stage. Indicators of technical errors are errors in arithmetic operations and errors in moving numbers or arithmetic operations from one step to the next. Factors causing errors made by UAS participants are not understanding the questions well, lack of mastery of concepts in Matrix, Linear Programs and Transformation Geometry materials, rarely practicing reworking examples of questions, students only see and read examples of questions.
PROFILE OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS OF STUDENTS IN CLASS VII SMP ON FRACTION ADDITION MATERIAL IN TERMS OF GENDER Reski Amelia; Alfisyahra Alfisyahra; Mustamin Idris; Rita Lefrida
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v9i2.2067

Abstract

This study aims to obtain an overview of the critical thinking skills of male and female students in class VII A SMPN 9 Palu on fraction addition material. This research aims to: 1) to obtain a description of the critical thinking ability of male students on the addition and subtraction of fractions 2) to obtain a description of the critical thinking ability of female students on the addition and subtraction of fractions. This type of research is descriptive using a qualitative approach. The subjects of this research were 2 students taken from 31 students of class VII A SMPN 9 Palu consisting of 1 male student with high mathematics ability and 1 female student with high mathematics ability. The results of this study showed that male and female subjects with high mathematics ability were able to fulfill the indicators of critical thinking ability by Facione (2015), namely: (1) can interpret the problem by identifying the information known and asked appropriately and able to interpret and understand the symbols contained in the problem, (2) connect between statements, questions and concepts by making mathematical modeling appropriately (3) determine and use the right strategy in the calculation process so as to find the right final solution, (4) able to draw conclusions from what is asked in the problem, and (5) have the awareness to re-examine the solution of the problem given by identifying errors in determining the strategy or in the calculation process and then being able to believe the answer.
SELF-REGULATED LEARNING DESIGN AS AN APPLICATION OF STUDENT'S SELF-ASSESSMENT IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING Nabila Nurhaliza Ali
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v9i2.2097

Abstract

Self-regulated learning is one of the important factors in learning to control oneself in thinking and acting. The purpose of this research is to analyze how much students have achieved their independence in learning. Student learning independence includes all matters of student learning independently without the help of others, student learning motivation or things that affect student independence in learning, especially in learning mathematics. This analysis study will be continued as an effort to improve self-regulated learning. The scope of self-regulated learning was analyzed by descriptive quantitative method through data collection techniques in the form of questionnaires on the object of research taken from a population of 25 students. Data collection was carried out with a questionnaire consisting of 20 statements from indicators of students' self-regulated learning ability. In learning mathematics, students who have initiative and instrinsic learning motivation, apply learning targets, and set a learning schedule in the percentage of almost half of the students do according to these indicators of independence. Almost all students diagnose learning needs, view difficulties as challenges, utilize and seek relevant sources. However, a small proportion of students lack self-efficacy or confidence in their abilities and are still low in evaluating the learning process and results. So that as an educator this needs to be considered to be able to improve students' self-regulated learning abilities (learning independence) in order to improve student achievement.
UNVEILING HIDDEN MISCONCEPTIONS: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS' ALGEBRAIC UNDERSTANDING Fadhila Kartika Sari; Alfiani Alfiani; Isbadar Nursit; Ukhti Raudhatul Jannah; Raju Raju
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v9i2.2231

Abstract

This study aims to uncover and analyze hidden misconceptions in algebraic understanding among first-year students in the Mathematics Education Department at a private university in Malang. Conducted from January to March 2024, the research involves two first-year students as subjects. The first subject exhibits the misconception known as "illegal canceling," while the second subject demonstrates the "assumption of distributivity of exponents." Utilizing a qualitative research methodology, diagnostic interviews and problem-solving tasks were employed to identify and understand these misconceptions. Our findings indicate that these hidden misconceptions significantly hinder the students' ability to correctly solve algebraic problems and understand underlying concepts. For the first subject, the error in illegal canceling often led to incorrect simplifications, while the second subject's erroneous application of exponent rules resulted in fundamentally flawed solutions. By systematically categorizing these misconceptions, the study offers tailored instructional strategies to effectively address and correct them. This research highlights the critical need for early detection and targeted intervention in mathematical education. By providing a deeper insight into specific algebraic misunderstandings, the study suggests practical approaches for educators to enhance their teaching methodologies, ultimately improving students' overall algebra comprehension. The novelty of this research lies in its detailed focus on hidden misconceptions and the provision of actionable solutions, offering a fresh perspective on improving algebra education for first year university students.
ANALYSIS OF THE CREATIVE THINKING ABILITY OF PGSD STUDENTS IN OPEN-ENDED PROBLEM-BASED GEOMETRY LEARNING I Ketut Suastika; Yovita Puspasari; Sri Hariyani; Nurita Prima
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v9i2.2282

Abstract

Thinking creatively is an important skill in education, especially for Primary School Teacher Education Study Program (PGSD) students. This ability is crucial for understanding concepts in depth and solving problems innovatively in learning mathematics, especially geometry. However, many students still show limitations in generating creative ideas, especially in the aspects of originality and elaboration. Therefore, this research aims to analyze the creative thinking abilities of PGSD students in open problem-based geometry learning, which gives students the freedom to explore various solutions to solving geometric problems. This research uses descriptive qualitative methods with data obtained through interviews, observation, and document analysis. Research informants include lecturers, PGSD students, heads of study programs, librarians, and the curriculum development team at STKIP PGRI Trenggalek. The research results show that the open problem-based learning method effectively improves students' fluency and flexibility. However, several obstacles still required more intensive guidance and supporting technology in originality and elaboration. With the right approach, this method can be a solution to optimize students' creative thinking abilities in learning geometry.
DEVELOPING OF E-LEARNING BASED MATHEMATICS LEARNING MODULES TO IMPROVE PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS OF STUDENTS Vera Riyanti; Yuli Budhiarti; Iis Istika
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v9i2.2288

Abstract

The availability of learning modules that are valid and easy for students to understand is essential for achieving educational objectives. Limited problem solving skills in the fundamental concepts of ordinary differential equations pose a significant challenge in the learning process. This research aims to enhance students' problem-solving abilities in the topic of ordinary differential equations through the development of a mathematics e-learning modules for students in the Mathematics Education Study Program. The research method employed is the ADDIE development model. Based on the research findings, the developed e-learning modules was validated by subject matter experts, yielding a score of 3.61, categorized as very good, while validation by media experts resulted in a score of 3.42, also categorized as very good. The evaluation from students regarding the e-learning modules received a score of 3.81, which falls into the very good category. Based on the assessment of quiz responses, the average score was 78.9, indicating an improvement in students' problem-solving abilities prior to using the e-learning modules, which had an average score of 59.8. It can be concluded that the e-learning modules on the concepts of ordinary differential equations is suitable for use in learning and can enhance students' problem-solving skills.
COLLECTIVE ARGUMENTATION AND PARTICIPATION IN SOLVING GEOMETRY PROBLEMS IN THE MATHEMATICS CLASSROOM Evi Novita Wulandari; Dwi Juniati; Siti Khabibah
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v9i2.2291

Abstract

Collective argumentation is a process in learning that can be used to train communication skills, collaboration, and understanding of mathematical concepts. In this process, both teachers and students play an active role, which is called participation. This study aims to describe the structure of collective argumentation and teacher and students participation in solving geometry problems in the classroom. This research method is a qualitative case study. The subjects in this study were a mathematics teacher with 11 years of teaching experience at the junior high school level and six 9th-grade students who had an interest in mathematics from two different classes. The structure of collective argumentation shows that this learning focuses on students while the teacher acts as a facilitator. It can be seen from the more significant number of actions taken by students than teachers. In terms of participation, teachers more often act as ghostee, while students participate more as spokesman. Overall, this study reveals the structure of argumentation in solving geometry problems at each stage of Polya. Questions and explanations given by the teacher influence students' collective argumentation. A teacher must have questioning and communication skills so that students can actively participate in learning in the classroom.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 9

 1 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JME Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): JME Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): JME Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): JME Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): JME Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): JME Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021): JME Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): JME Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): JME Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020): JME Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): JME Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): JME Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): JME Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): JME Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): JME Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JME Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): JME More Issue