cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Robi Assadul Bahri
Contact Email
aninunbahri@gmail.com
Phone
+6282118810800
Journal Mail Official
jphgalunggung@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. K.H. Lukmanul Hakim No. 17 Kota Tasikmalaya, Provinsi Jawa Barat
Location
Kab. tasikmalaya,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
JPH Galunggung
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Galunggung
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30466903     DOI : https://doi.org/10.1234
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung (JPH Galunggung) is a national journal published three times a year (April, August, and December) by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Galunggung (LPPM STHG). This journal discusses various aspects of legal studies in both national and international contexts. The primary language used in this journal is Indonesian. The journal facilitates the publication of scholarly articles related to legal studies, which undergo a rigorous review process by the Review Team. We welcome and invite all members of the academic community—lecturers, researchers, students, and academic staff—to publish their scholarly works here. This journal is an open-access publication. The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics, including: criminal law, business law, civil law, administrative law, Islamic Law, constitutional law, international law, legal philosophy, customary law, economic law, human rights law, and another section related contemporary issues in law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 41 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
KONSEP, FILOSOFIS, DAN KEBIJAKAN FISKAL ISLAM DI INDONESIA Rani Mariana
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung Vol 2 No 3 (2025): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.1234/jphgalunggung.v2i3.79

Abstract

Fiscal policy in Indonesia is generally based on the concepts of efficiency, equitable development, and macroeconomic stability. The goals are positive economic growth, expanding employment opportunities, improving public welfare, and maintaining economic competitiveness. The philosophy of fiscal policy in Indonesia is enshrined in the 1945 Constitution, which prioritizes the prosperity of the people. State financial management prioritizes the principles of accountability, transparency, and value for money. Furthermore, justice and equity in development are also the basis for preparing the annual State Budget (APBN). Fiscal policy is implemented through careful planning and management of the APBN to maintain fiscal sustainability, primarily through optimizing domestic revenues, rationalizing state spending, and prudently managing the budget deficit. Islamic fiscal policy instruments in Indonesia have been accommodated through regulations on zakat (zakat), waqf (waqf), and Islamic finance, although they have not yet been fully implemented. Islamic fiscal policy is aimed at achieving income equality and social justice, encouraging real sector-based growth, maintaining monetary stability, and improving public welfare. Thus, Islamic fiscal policy in Indonesia is expected to spur improvements in the welfare of the Indonesian people at both the macro and micro levels through the multiplier effect of sustainable economic development.
DAMPAK PUTUSAN MEDIASI KOMISI INFORMASI YANG BERKEKUATAN HUKUM TETAP TERHADAP KEWAJIBAN BADAN PUBLIK DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM, POLITIK, DAN KOMUNIKASI Demi Hamzah Rahadian
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung Vol 2 No 3 (2025): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.1234/jphgalunggung.v2i3.80

Abstract

In a democratic rule-of-law state, the decisions of the Information Commission—including mediation agreements formalized as binding decisions—are final and legally enforceable. In practice, however, many public bodies ignore or delay the implementation of such decisions. This research employs a normative juridical method using conceptual, statutory, and case approaches, enriched by insights from political science and information-communication studies. The analysis covers the constitutional basis of the right to information, the normative construction of Law No. 14 of 2008 on Public Information Disclosure (UU KIP), and the position of Information Commission decisions within the Indonesian administrative justice system. From a political perspective, the article explores the power relations between public authorities and citizens and the implications of information disclosure for democratic quality. From an information and communication perspective, it discusses information as a source of power, the basis of public trust, and a tool of social oversight. The findings indicate that non-compliance by public bodies with mediation decisions of the Information Commission that have obtained permanent legal force constitutes a violation of the rule of law, the general principles of good governance, and citizens’ fundamental right to information. The absence of effective enforcement mechanisms, weak sanctions, and bureaucratic resistance are the main factors that undermine the enforceability of Information Commission decisions. The article recommends regulatory and institutional reforms, including stronger enforcement mechanisms through tighter integration with the Administrative Court (PTUN), clearer administrative and criminal sanctions, and the digitalization of information services to promote transparency and accountability.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN PENYEKAPAN DAN EKSPLOITASI ANAK DI KOTA TASIKMALAYA Robi Assadul Bahri
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung Vol 2 No 3 (2025): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.1234/jphgalunggung.v2i3.81

Abstract

The case of child confinement and alleged sexual exploitation in Tasikmalaya highlights persistent weaknesses in Indonesia’s legal protection mechanisms, which are intended to safeguard the safety, dignity, and welfare of children confronted with multilayered forms of victimization. Although Indonesia possesses a relatively comprehensive legal framework, inconsistencies in the application of norms and suboptimal implementation of victim protection provisions reveal a significant gap between the ideal regulatory structure and actual practice. This study aims to assess the adequacy and effectiveness of legal regulations governing child confinement and exploitation through a comparative examination of the Child Protection Law, the Sexual Violence Crimes Law, the former Criminal Code, and the new Criminal Code. Employing a normative legal research method supported by statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, this study conducts norm identification, juridical interpretation, and a comprehensive evaluation of victims’ rights and criminal liability. The findings indicate that the existing legal regime provides sufficient normative grounds for layered prosecution—covering deprivation of liberty, kidnapping, coercion, threats of violence, and sexual exploitation—yet the effectiveness of victim protection ultimately depends on the ability of law-enforcement authorities to formulate integrated charges and consistently uphold victims’ rights. The study concludes that effective child protection requires a multidisciplinary approach that incorporates penal, restorative, and procedural safeguards, along with strong inter-agency coordination to prevent secondary victimization. The practical implications emphasize the need to strengthen institutional capacity, standardize child-sensitive procedures, and ensure enforcement of restitution and rehabilitation as integral components of justice for child victims.
IMPLIKASI KETERLAMBATAN PERPANJANGAN SURAT IJIN PRAKTIK TENAGA MEDIS DALAM PELAYANAN KESEHATAN Ai Uuh Muhlasoh; Mery Herlina; Dede Permana
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung Vol 2 No 3 (2025): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.1234/jphgalunggung.v2i3.82

Abstract

This research is motivated by the importance of a Practice Permit (SIP) as the legal and administrative basis for medical personnel to legally provide health services to the public. According to Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health, a SIP is valid for five years and must be renewed before it expires. Delays in the SIP renewal process can result in medical personnel being deemed illegal in their practice, which can lead to termination of services and the threat of legal and administrative sanctions. The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the impact of delays in SIP renewal on health services and to identify obstacles and efforts made by medical personnel in the process, specifically at Jasa Kartini Hospital in Tasikmalaya City. The research method used is empirical juridical, namely a combination of a normative approach and empirical observation in the field. The results show that the main obstacles in SIP renewal include technical issues with the online system, complex administrative requirements, lack of socialization, and high workloads. Suggested solutions include early renewal applications, digitization of required documents, technical training, and improving complaint services from relevant agencies. This study emphasizes the need for reform of the licensing system to ensure the continuity of fair, effective, and legal health services.
PARLIAMENTARY THRESHOLD PADA PEMILIHAN UMUM LEGISLATIF TAHUN 2024 BERDASARKAN PERSPEKTIK TEORI KEDAULATAN RAKYAT Nadilla Nur Farah; Mery Herlina; Dede Permana
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung Vol 2 No 3 (2025): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.1234/jphgalunggung.v2i3.83

Abstract

The parliamentary threshold is the minimum number of votes that a political party participating in an election must obtain in order to be included in the distribution of seats in the House of Representatives. Since its inception, the parliamentary threshold has always been a subject of debate because it is considered to be contrary to Article 1 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution, which states that “sovereignty is in the hands of the people and is exercised in accordance with the law and the theory of popular sovereignty.” This study aims to determine the parliamentary threshold in the 2024 legislative elections based on the perspective of the theory of popular sovereignty and the impact of the parliamentary threshold on the 2024 legislative elections. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative and conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the parliamentary threshold contradicts the values contained in Article 1 paragraph (2) and the theory of popular sovereignty, because both require power to come from the people, while the parliamentary threshold negates the voices of the people (voters) whose parties fail to reach the 4% parliamentary threshold requirement. The parliamentary threshold also has a huge impact on the representative system, consisting of positive impacts, namely simplifying the party system and improving the quality of people's representatives, as well as negative impacts, namely the waste of people's votes, political representation, and the dominance of political parties in parliament. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the parliamentary threshold regulation and also adjust it to the proportional election system with an open list.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERALIHAN PERUNTUKAN TANAH WAKAF DI KOTA TASIKMALAYA DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 41 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG WAKAF Syaira Anabila; Apip Nur; Rika Maryam
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung Vol 2 No 3 (2025): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.1234/jphgalunggung.v2i3.84

Abstract

This study discusses the transfer of waqf land in Tasikmalaya City from the perspective of Law No. 41 of 2004 concerning Waqf. The law stipulates that waqf property is permanent and may not be transferred except through the istibdal mechanism under strict procedures. However, in practice, several cases of waqf land transfer were found to be inconsistent with the provisions, such as changes of status into grants or even sales without approval from the Minister of Religious Affairs and the Indonesian Waqf Board (BWI). This study examines: (1) how the designation of waqf land is regulated under Law No. 41 of 2004 concerning Waqf, and (2) how the process of waqf land transfer occurs. The purpose of this study is to determine the regulation of waqf land designation under Law No. 41 of 2004 and to analyze the process of waqf land transfer in Tasikmalaya City. The theories used include the theory of utility, the theory of legal effectiveness, and the theory of waqf. This research employs a juridical-empirical approach with a qualitative method through interviews. The results show that: (1) the designation of waqf land may not be changed except for public interest purposes in accordance with the general spatial plan (RUTR), based on applicable laws and regulations, and not contrary to Sharia. Such transfer may only be carried out after obtaining written permission from the Minister with the approval of the Indonesian Waqf Board and must be exchanged with property of equal or greater benefit and value. (2) The transfer process that occurred in Tasikmalaya did not comply with the provisions of Law No. 41 of 2004 concerning Waqf, as the requirements for public interest in line with the spatial plan (RUTR) were not met, written approval from the Minister and BWI was not obtained, and the exchange value was not equivalent to the original waqf property.
MERESPONS DIALOG GLOBAL PBB TENTANG TATA KELOLA AI: PENDEKATAN TWAIL (THIRD WORLD APPROACHES TO INTERNATIONAL LAW), KOLONIALISME DATA, DAN ARAH KEBIJAKAN INDONESIA Mochammad Iqbal Ruhiat
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung Vol 3 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.1234/y4s0p026

Abstract

Global artificial intelligence (AI) governance is currently being intensively negotiated across various United Nations (UN) forums, including through the Global Digital Compact and the High-Level Advisory Body on AI, which published the report Governing AI for Humanity. Employing a critical legal analysis method, this article deconstructs the discursive architecture of these multilateral initiatives from the perspective of Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL). It examines how the colonial legacy in international law risks being reproduced into digital colonialism and data asymmetry within the still-unequal global AI governance regime. Furthermore, this paper analyzes how Third World countries, particularly Indonesia, through its National Artificial Intelligence Strategy (Stranas KA) 2020–2045 and its domestic regulations, can navigate the paradox of digital sovereignty amidst dependence on foreign technological infrastructure. Grounding its analysis in the doctrines of digital sovereignty, distributive justice, and equitable participation, this article offers a concrete framework of recommendations. Its objective is to ensure that UN global dialogues do not merely legitimize the concentration of corporate technological power from Global North countries, but rather genuinely realize substantive justice, digital infrastructure independence, and human rights protection for Global South nations.
MALPRAKTIK DOKTER DALAM TINJAUAN HUKUM PIDANA Herdy Mulyana
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung Vol 3 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.1234/47y2v737

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis secara deskriptif tentang Malpraktik dokter dalam tinjauan hukum pidana dan persoalan malpraktik dokter seringkali menimbulkan polemik dalam pemecahannya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah Yuridis Normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan studi kepustakaan dan analisis data dengan analisis kualitatif. Analisis normatif memperlihatkan bahwa Malpraktik dokter pada dasarnya masuk dalam dua lapangan hukum, yakni perdata dan pidana. Masuk lapangan hukum pidana sebagai suatu kejahatan yang memberi beban pertanggungjawaban pidana. Kriteria umum malpraktik pidana ada pada sifat dan tempat pengaturan atau penyebutan dari akibat kerugian. Jika sifat kerugian dan pengaturannya ditentukan oleh hukum pidana yang menjadi unsur kejahatan maka malpraktik masuk dalam lapangan hukum pidana. Keadaan Malpraktik dokter pidana harus memenuhi syarat-syarat dalam 3 (tiga) hal pokok, yakni 1) syarat-syarat pada perlakuan medis, 2) syarat sikap batin dalam hubungannya dengan perlakuan serta akibat perlakuan medis, dan 3) akibat perlakuan yang merugikan pasien. Dalam syarat mengenai perlakuan terdiri antara lain dari wujud, cara dan alat perlakuan, kepada siapa perlakuan dilakukan; penarikan diagnosa, terapi, sampai pada perlakuan setelah terapi. Syarat sikap batin adalah merupakan culpa (culpa lata), tidak tahu - teledor baik terhadap prosedur maupun terhadap perlakuan dan akibat. Mengenai akibat haruslah akibat yang merugikan pasien yang diatur dan ditentukan hukum. Persoalan malpraktik dokter acapkali menimbulkan polemik yaitu tidak seragam pemecahannya karena tidak ada standar hukum yang mengatur secara khusus. Secara kompensional pada tataran praktik malpraktik pidana diselesaikan melalui Pasal 474 KUHP. Sebagai pemecahan masalahnya dapat dilakukan adalah setiap profesi dokter harus berhati-hati menjalankan profesinya yang mengundang risiko malpraktik, perlu pula mengikuti pendidikan-pendidikan hukum dan agar tidak menimbulkan polemik perlu segera dibuatkan standar khusus tentang penyelesaian malpraktik baik secara perdata maupun pidana.
TINDAK PIDANA LEMBAGA PERBANKAN: KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP BENTUK, MODUS OPERANDI, DAN UPAYA PENANGGULANGANNYA DI INDONESIA Nana Suryana
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung Vol 3 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.1234/xebv4221

Abstract

Sektor perbankan memiliki peran yang sangat strategis dalam pembangunan ekonomi nasional, namun sekaligus rentan terhadap berbagai modus kejahatan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis karakteristik tindak pidana perbankan, faktor-faktor pendorong terjadinya kejahatan tersebut, serta efektivitas penegakan hukum dan sistem pengawasan oleh otoritas terkait dalam meminimalisir risiko. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Data sekunder diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap regulasi perbankan, putusan pengadilan, dan literatur hukum terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tindak pidana perbankan saat ini semakin kompleks, tidak hanya melibatkan pihak eksternal tetapi juga sering kali melibatkan pihak internal bank (insider fraud), serta pemanfaatan celah teknologi informasi (kejahatan siber). Lemahnya sistem pengendalian internal, kurangnya kepatuhan (compliance), dan lambatnya adaptasi regulasi terhadap inovasi keuangan menjadi faktor utama terjadinya tindak pidana ini. Upaya penal melalui penegakan hukum dinilai belum cukup memberikan efek jera secara maksimal. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan upaya non-penal melalui optimalisasi fungsi pengawasan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), penerapan prinsip Good Corporate Governance (GCG) yang ketat, serta integrasi teknologi Artificial Intelligence untuk deteksi dini transaksi mencurigakan demi menjaga stabilitas sistem perbankan dan melindungi hak-hak nasabah.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENERAPAN GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DALAM RANGKA MEWUJUDKAN IKLIM USAHA YANG SEHAT DI KOTA TASIKMALAYA Rani Mariana
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung Vol 3 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.1234/dsctne21

Abstract

Good Corporate Governance (GCG) merupakan seperangkat prinsip tata kelola yang mengatur hubungan antara manajemen, direksi, dewan komisaris, pemegang saham, dan pemangku kepentingan lainnya guna mengarahkan dan mengendalikan kegiatan perusahaan secara transparan, akuntabel, dan bertanggung jawab. Penerapan prinsip GCG menjadi semakin penting di tingkat daerah, termasuk di Kota Tasikmalaya, mengingat keberadaan Badan Usaha Milik Daerah (BUMD) dan berbagai badan usaha lain yang berperan strategis dalam menopang pendapatan asli daerah dan pelayanan kepada masyarakat. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara yuridis bagaimana penerapan prinsip-prinsip GCG dapat diwujudkan dalam rangka menciptakan iklim usaha yang sehat di Kota Tasikmalaya, serta mengidentifikasi hambatan yuridis dan struktural yang dihadapi dalam implementasinya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), yang dianalisis secara deskriptif-kualitatif berdasarkan bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa dasar hukum penerapan GCG di Indonesia tersebar dalam berbagai peraturan, mulai dari Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas, Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah, hingga Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 54 Tahun 2017 tentang Badan Usaha Milik Daerah. Prinsip-prinsip GCG yang meliputi transparansi, akuntabilitas, responsibilitas, independensi, dan kewajaran (TARIF) belum sepenuhnya diterapkan secara optimal, terutama karena adanya intervensi kebijakan pemerintah daerah, lemahnya kompetensi manajerial, serta minimnya sistem pengawasan yang terintegrasi. Untuk mewujudkan iklim usaha yang sehat di Kota Tasikmalaya, diperlukan harmonisasi regulasi, penguatan kapasitas kelembagaan, serta komitmen bersama antara pemerintah daerah, direksi, dewan pengawas, dan seluruh pemangku kepentingan dalam menerapkan prinsip GCG secara konsisten.

Page 4 of 5 | Total Record : 41

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2024 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 3 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung Vol 2 No 3 (2025): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung Vol 2 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung Vol 2 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung Vol 1 No 3 (2024): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung Vol 1 No 2 (2024): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung Vol 1 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung