cover
Contact Name
Muhammad Syafiq
Contact Email
yppijurnal@gmail.com
Phone
+6282170781263
Journal Mail Official
yppijurnal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Tuanku Tambusai, Pekanbaru, Riau - Indonesia
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Law Studies and Justice Journal
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30326451     DOI : https://doi.org/10.62207
Core Subject : Social,
Academically focused, the Review also appeals to the wider human rights community, including those in government, intergovernmental and non-governmental circles concerned with law, policy, and fieldwork. Review of original published articles on human rights issues in their global or national context, considered from an international or comparative legal perspective.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 42 Documents
LEGAL STUDY OF THE INKRACHT DECISION ON UNFAIR BUSINESS COMPETITION IN TRADEMARK DISPUTES (CASE STUDY OF THE LEAF TRADEMARK DISPUTE IN THE SEMARANG COMMERCIAL COURT OF CENTRAL JAVA AND THE NGANJUK DISTRICT COURT OF EAST JAVA) Lisa Agustiana; Martin Roestamy; Jacobus Jopie Gillalo
Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU)
Publisher : Penelitian dan Pengembangan Ilmu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62207/xnkae090

Abstract

This article critically examines the final and binding court decisions (inkracht) in the trademark dispute between Rudy Mulyanto and PT. Unichemcandi Indonesia over the “Daun” trademark. The research is motivated by the increasing number of trademark disputes in Indonesia, which often result in unfair business practices such as predatory pricing and misuse of legal mechanisms by registered trademark owners. The study employs a normative juridical approach supported by empirical data through court decisions, expert interviews, and legal literature. Findings indicate inconsistencies in law enforcement between the Commercial Court and the District Court rulings, as well as potential misuse of the judiciary to seize market share. The article highlights the urgency of consistency in law enforcement, strengthening the role of the Supreme Court in ensuring legal certainty, and harmonizing regulations to foster fair competition in the Indonesian market.
CERTAINTY OF MEDICAL PRACTICE LICENSES PLATFORM TELEMEDICINE FROM A HEALTH LAW PERSPECTIVE AS A FORM OF COMMUNITY PROTECTION IN INDONESIA Nugroho Iman Wibisono; Endeh Suhartini; Ani Yumarni
Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU)
Publisher : Penelitian dan Pengembangan Ilmu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62207/qpevhb86

Abstract

The development of telemedicine as a form of digital transformation in the healthcare sector has emerged as an alternative solution to the uneven distribution of healthcare workers and medical facilities, particularly in underdeveloped, frontier, and outermost (3T) areas. While telemedicine expands public access to medical services, it also raises legal issues, particularly regarding the legitimacy of medical practice on online platforms. To date, there are no specific regulations governing the ownership of a Practice License (SIP) for telemedicine services. This regulatory gap creates potential legal uncertainty, weakens patient protection, and increases the vulnerability of healthcare workers to civil and criminal prosecution. This study aims to analyze the form of government oversight of telemedicine practices in Indonesia based on the Health Law, emphasizing efforts to prevent potential malpractice and guarantee legal protection for medical personnel as well as the public's constitutional rights to health services through the issuance of a License for Telemedicine Services (SIP). This study uses a normative-sociological juridical approach, which examines law from three dimensions: legal text, legal values, and social reality. The research findings indicate that SIP not only serves as an administrative instrument for legitimizing medical practice, but also as a manifestation of the state's responsibility to ensure professional competence, accountability, and legal protection for medical personnel in online therapeutic interactions with patients. Without adaptive SIP regulations, the state risks failing to fulfill its constitutional mandate to provide fair, equitable, and quality healthcare services. Therefore, SIP regulations compatible with the telemedicine ecosystem are a necessity in the era of increasingly decentralized digital healthcare.
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF PROTECTION FOR CONSUMERS WHO SUFFERED LOSSES DUE TO THE USE OF SKINCARE PRODUCTS (Based on Law Number 8 of 1999 Concerning Consumer Protection) Hanafi Dwi Laksono; Aris Prio Agus Santoso; Widi Nugrahaningsih
Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU)
Publisher : Penelitian dan Pengembangan Ilmu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62207/7tgwk287

Abstract

This study discusses legal protection for consumers who suffer losses due to the use of illegal cosmetics. The focus of the study is directed at the effectiveness of the implementation of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, as well as other regulations related to the supervision of the distribution of cosmetics by the Food and Drug Supervisory Agency (BPOM). The main issues raised are the continued rampant circulation of illegal cosmetics that endanger consumer health, weak supervision, and a lack of public legal awareness. This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach and literature study. The data used comes from primary legal materials in the form of laws and implementing regulations, as well as secondary legal materials such as literature, journals, and previous research results. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively to understand the extent to which consumer protection regulations have provided legal certainty for victims of illegal cosmetics. The results of the study indicate that legal protection for consumers is comprehensively regulated in the Consumer Protection Law and sectoral regulations such as Government Regulation No. 31 of 2019 and BPOM Regulations regarding cosmetic supervision. However, its implementation still faces obstacles such as limited supervision, low law enforcement, and a lack of public awareness to report. Therefore, synergy is needed between the government, BPOM, business actors, and consumers to strengthen legal protection, including providing compensation or redress for losses experienced by consumers.
LEGAL REVIEW OF WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RIGHTS IN LOVE RELATIONSHIPS WITHOUT MARRIAGE Nency Ayu Lianawati; Aris Prio Agus Santoso; Peter Guntara
Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU)
Publisher : Penelitian dan Pengembangan Ilmu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62207/hkfr0660

Abstract

The right to reproductive health is a human right guaranteed by various regulations in Indonesia. However, the implementation of this right often faces obstacles, particularly for women in unmarried relationships. This group often experiences limited access to services, discrimination, and social stigma, which worsens physical and psychological conditions. Therefore, this research is crucial to examine the alignment between legal guarantees and practices in the field. This research uses the following method:normative juridical with a statutory regulatory approach. The analysis focuses on Law No. 17 of 2023 concerning Health, Law No. 4 of 2024 on the Well-Being of Mothers and Children, PP No. 61 of 2014 concerning Reproductive Health, as well as Minister of Health Regulation No. 2 of 2025 concerning the Implementation of Reproductive Health Efforts. The study results show that women, including those in unmarried relationships, are legally entitled to quality, safe, and discrimination-free reproductive health services. However, respondents have not fully accessed formal health services, including education, counseling, and medical support. Support is primarily obtained from family and religious institutions. The biggest barriers lie in social stigma and discrimination, which negatively impact respondents' mental and social health.
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF ABUSE OF PKPU BY DEBTORS: BETWEEN RESTRUCTURING AND DELAY OF JUSTICE Ryzky Yan Deriza
Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU)
Publisher : Penelitian dan Pengembangan Ilmu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62207/39fy7r10

Abstract

The Debt Payment Suspension (PKPU) Regulation in Indonesia, although intended as a restructuring tool, is often misused by debtors to delay payments, creatingdelay of justiceThis phenomenon is evident in the high number of PKPU (Deferred Payment for Payment) applications compared to bankruptcies, resulting in legal uncertainty, creditor losses, and declining investor confidence. This study aims to formulate an ideal legal framework to prevent PKPU abuse, balance restructuring with creditor protection, and ensure legal certainty.Using a normative juridical approach and comparative analysis with international practices (e.g.,good faith filing AS, judicial managementIn Singapore, the study found that regulatory laxity and inconsistent judicial interpretation were the main causes of abuse. The impacts included financial losses and delays in legal proceedings. Recommendations included the addition of clausesgood faith requirement, fit and proper testfor debtors, strengthening the role of supervisory judges and independent curators, and harmonizing with international bankruptcy principles. This ideal legal framework is expected to balance the restructuring function of the PKPU with justice and legal certainty for all parties.
EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF SUBSIDIZED HOUSING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN KARANGANYAR Rhena Lastia Putri; Widi Nugrahaningsih; Rezi Rezi
Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU)
Publisher : Penelitian dan Pengembangan Ilmu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62207/632fmb73

Abstract

Humans are social creatures who have many needs, human needs include food, clothing, and shelter. The shelter in question is a house for human habitation, so humans must be smart in choosing when they want to buy a house so that the house they live in feels comfortable, clean, safe and peaceful. The purpose of this study is to answer the problem: What is the form of legal responsibility of developers in subsidized housing construction contract disputes in Karanganyar, What factors cause subsidized housing construction contract disputes between parties in the Karanganyar area. The method used is descriptive analytical research with a sociological (empirical) juridical approach using a statutory and conceptual approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, documentation studies, and participatory observations, and analyzed qualitatively interactively through data reduction techniques, data presentation, and deductive conclusion drawing. Data sources used include relevant primary and secondary legal materials. Informants were selected by purposive sampling based on certain criteria according to the focus of the study. The results of the legal responsibility research of PT. Gamersi Setia Abadi in the dispute over the construction contract for subsidized housing in Karanganyar must refer to the principles of civil law and consumer protection, with the obligation to fulfill the quality of the building and compensation for losses, while the disputes that arise are generally caused by unclear contracts, defaults, and technical and non-technical errors, the resolution of which refers to the applicable provisions of construction services law.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN SOSIAL DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH: KAJIAN NORMATIF ATAS REGULASI PERTANAHAN DI INDONESIA Indrawati Syamsuddin
Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU)
Publisher : Penelitian dan Pengembangan Ilmu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62207/kb33k291

Abstract

Penyelesaian sengketa tanah merupakan suatu upaya untuk menyelesaikan perselisihan pertanahan antara pihak yang merasa dirugikan. Kasus sengketa tanah di Indonesia terjadi akibat adanya benturan antara klaim formal yang berlandaskan sertifikat dan tuntutan masyarakat yang berakar pada rasa keadilan. Dalam proses penyelesaian sengketa tanah, ada beberapa metode yang dapat ditempuh, namun sebagian dari masyarakat merasa belum mendapatkan kepastian maupun keadilan. Beberapa pertanyaan kemudian muncul apakah regulasi pertanahan di Indonesia lebih menekankan pada kepastian hukum ataupun pada keadilan sosial. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kajian normatif atas regulasi pertanahan di Indonesia Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, doktrinal, dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa regulasi pertanahan cenderung menitikberatkan pada aspek kepastian hukum melalui pendaftaran dan sertifikasi tanah, namun seringkali mengabaikan dimensi keadilan sosial terutama bagi kelompok masyarakat kecil dan komunitas adat. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan reorientasi regulasi pertanahan agar mampu menghadirkan keseimbangan antara kepastian hukum dan keadilan sosial sebagai wujud nyata pelaksanaan prinsip agraria nasional.
DIBALIK LEGALITAS TAMBANG DI INDONESIA: IRONI KERUSAKAN LINGKUNGAN YANG TERABAIKAN Ali Umar
Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU)
Publisher : Penelitian dan Pengembangan Ilmu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62207/gfcfq978

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji paradoks antara legalitas kegiatan pertambangan di indonesia dengan realitas kerusakan lingkungan yang ditimbulkan meskipun berbagai kegiatan pertambangan beroperasi dibawah payung hukum yang sah kerusakan ekologis yang meluas justru menjadi dampak sistemik yang kerap diabaikan. Metode pendekatan menggunakan hukum yuridis normatif. Untuk mendapatkan data dalam penelitian hukum ini, penulis menggunakan beberapa pendekatan yaitu pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach). Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian pustaka dengan mendapatkan data sekunder berupa buku literatur, hasil penelitian, jurnal, artikel, maupun peraturan hukum terkait dengan objek penelitian. Sehingga hasil yang didapatkan dari penelitian ini adalah menunjukan lemahnya pengawasan oleh penegak hukum, terjadinya tumpang tindih regulasi antara daerah dan pusat, kegiatan pencemaran lingkungan yang terlembagakan, kegagalan regulasi lingkungan serta dominasi oligarki politik ekonomi maupun tergerusnya nilai-nilai moral dalam diri individu sehingga menyebabkan kerusakan lingkungan terus terjadi tanpa pertanggungjawaban yang memadai. Ironisnya kerusakan ini justru dilegitimasi oleh kerangka hukum yang tidak berpihak pada kepentingan ekologis maupun hak-hak masyarakat. Sehingga Diperlukan reformasi regulasi penguatan penegak hukum, serta menerapkan nilai-nilai moral dalam mengelola sumber daya alam yang ada sehingga dapat mewujudkan pembangunan ekonomi yang berkelanjutan dan berwawasan lingkungan.
REKONSTRUKSI KONSEP HUKUM OBLIGASI SYARIAH: TINJAUAN HERMENEUTIKA DAN UPAYA ADAPTASI HUKUM NASIONAL Shaim Muhtasib Amnur; Muchammad Ichsan
Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU)
Publisher : Penelitian dan Pengembangan Ilmu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62207/etq1ca97

Abstract

Perkembangan pesat instrumen keuangan syariah, khususnya obligasi syariah (Sukuk), menuntut kerangka hukum nasional yang adaptif dan komprehensif. Saat ini, regulasi Sukuk sering kali bersandar pada interpretasi fiqih klasik, yang kadang kala berbenturan dengan tuntutan inovasi produk dan kepastian hukum pasar modal modern. Kebutuhan untuk menyelaraskan prinsip-prinsip syariah dengan struktur pasar obligasi konvensional menciptakan diskursus interpretatif yang memerlukan pendekatan mendalam. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan rekonstruksi konsep hukum obligasi syariah melalui tinjauan hermeneutika, serta mengidentifikasi upaya dan model adaptasi hukum nasional yang paling efektif untuk menopang pengembangan Sukuk yang berdaya saing dan sesuai syariah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif-analitis, memfokuskan pada studi kepustakaan (literatur) dan dokumen hukum. Teknik hermeneutika digunakan untuk menafsirkan teks-teks primer syariah (Al-Qur'an dan Hadis) serta Fatwa DSN-MUI terkait, kemudian dikomparasikan dengan Undang-Undang Pasar Modal dan peraturan turunannya. Pendekatan ini memungkinkan analisis mendalam tentang kesenjangan normatif dan filosofis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konsep hukum obligasi syariah dapat direkonstruksi dari pendekatan maqasid syariah (tujuan syariah), bukan sekadar bentuk transaksi. Rekonstruksi ini memerlukan adaptasi hukum nasional melalui pembentukan payung hukum yang mengakomodasi diversifikasi akad dan mitigasi risiko secara syariah. Model adaptasi yang diusulkan adalah penggabungan regulasi berbasis prinsip (principle-based regulation) dengan standar akad berbasis substansi, guna menciptakan kepastian hukum tanpa membatasi inovasi produk. Rekonstruksi ini krusial untuk menjadikan Sukuk instrumen investasi yang relevan secara global dan teguh secara syariah.
IMPLEMENTASI UNDANG-UNDANG NO.16 TAHUN 2016 DI YAYASAN PENYANDANG CACAT MANDIRI BANTUL DALAM MEMBANGUN KELUARGA SAKINAH Khusnul Amalia
Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU)
Publisher : Penelitian dan Pengembangan Ilmu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62207/h86arb12

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas pembentukan keluarga sakinah di kalangan pasangan difabel di Yayasan Penyandang Cacat Mandiri (YPCM) Bantul. Penelitian ini menganalisis bagaimana implementasi Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyandang Disabilitas berperan dalam membantu terbentuknya keluarga sakinah, serta bagaimana pihak yayasan memberikan dukungan kepada keluarga difabel dalam aspek ekonomi, sosial, dan psikologis. Penelitian ini bersifat kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Data primer diperoleh melalui wawancara mendalam dengan pasangan difabel yang menjadi anggota YPCM, serta dengan pengurus yayasan. Data sekunder dikumpulkan dari dokumen resmi, literatur hukum, dan laporan penelitian yang berkaitan dengan penyandang disabilitas dan keluarga sakinah. Data yang terkumpul kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif dan kualitatif untuk memahami hubungan antara kebijakan hukum, peran yayasan, dan kondisi riil keluarga difabel. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyandang Disabilitas memberikan dampak positif dalam membantu pembentukan keluarga sakinah di kalangan pasangan difabel di YPCM Bantul. YPCM memainkan peran penting dalam mendukung aspek ekonomi, sosial, dan psikologis keluarga difabel melalui penciptaan lapangan kerja, pelatihan keterampilan yang bermanfaat, serta membangun komunitas yang saling mendukung antar anggotanya. Namun, masih terdapat tantangan seperti kurangnya fasilitas pendukung di ruang publik yang ramah bagi mobilitas penyandang disabilitas. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pembentukan keluarga sakinah pada pasangan difabel memerlukan pendekatan yang komprehensif dan inklusif, serta kerja sama yang erat antara yayasan, pemerintah, dan masyarakat.