cover
Contact Name
Ahmad Mustaniruddin
Contact Email
ahmad_mustanirruddin@uinjambi.ac.id
Phone
+6285369694000
Journal Mail Official
tajdid@uinjambi.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jambi Ma. Bulian KM.16, Simp. Sei Duren, Jambi Luar Kota, Muaro Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia, 36361
Location
Kota jambi,
Jambi
INDONESIA
TAJDID Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin
ISSN : 25023063     EISSN : 25415018     DOI : https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v25i1.5205
Core Subject :
TAJDID Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin focuses on the renewal of Islamic scholarship through critical, contextual, and integrative studies that bridge classical texts, Islamic thought, social and cultural Muslims to contemporary realities and issues. The journal welcomes literature and empirical research in the field of Islamic studies especially on, but not limited to the Quran and Hadith, Islamic Theology (Kalam), Islamic Philosophy, Islamic Mysticism (Tasawuf), Islamic Politics, and Religious Studies. All of these disciplines are acceptable as long as they are aligned with that focus. TAJDID emphasizes an interdisciplinary and innovative approach that promotes intellectual renewal (Tajdid Al Fikr Al Islami), encouraging dialogue among scholars who seek to reinterpret Islamic knowledge in the evolving context of the Muslim world and humanity at large to support The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), prevent a clash of civilizations and promote Islam Rahmatan Li Al Alameen. Scholars from any country and region concerned with the renewal of Islamic scholarship throughout Muslim history and geography in the Islamic World and beyond may submit their articles to Tajdid and use this open access journal.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 211 Documents
ANALYZING ISHĀRĪ AND ‘ILMĪ EXEGETICAL APPROACHES IN CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC PREACHING: A Comparative Study of Hanan Attaki and Adi Hidayat Lillah Isyqilah Amiladinah; Badrudin Badrudin; Agus Ali Dzawafi; Muhammad Naufal Afif
TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 25 No. 1 (2026): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Religious Studies UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/tjd.v25i1.6138

Abstract

The growing prominence of Islamic da’wah in digital spaces has increased public exposure to diverse interpretations of the Qur'an, yet academic studies remain largely focused on theoretical aspects of tafsīr rather than their practical application in contemporary preaching. This study aims to comparatively analyze how the Ishārī and ‘Ilmī approaches to Qur'anic interpretation are implemented in the da’wah of Ustadz Hanan Attaki and Ustadz Adi Hidayat, and to identify the distinctive characteristics emerging from the application of these two approaches. The methodology employs a qualitative approach based on library research with a descriptive-comparative analytical design, utilizing content analysis techniques on selected da’wah materials uploaded on digital platforms, particularly YouTube, supplemented by secondary data from books, journals, and relevant articles. The findings reveal that Attaki consistently applies Ishārī tafsīr emphasizing inner meaning, spiritual reflection, moral transformation, and emotional resonance, as evident in his interpretation of hijrah as an inner journey and khusyu’ as heartfelt presence before God. Conversely, Adi Hidayat employs ‘Ilmī tafsīr prioritizing linguistic analysis, rational argumentation, empirical verification, and correlation with modern scientific discoveries, such as his embryological interpretation of Qur'an. 23:12-14. Both approaches prove to be complementary rather than contradictory, each addressing the distinct spiritual and intellectual needs of diverse audiences in the digital era. This study contributes theoretically by demonstrating that the dichotomy between spiritual and rational interpretation is increasingly obsolete in modern Muslim societies, while practically offering an integrative model for contemporary da’wah that combines spiritual depth and intellectual rigor. Future research is recommended to empirically investigate how audiences synthesize these complementary messages in their daily religious practices.