cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ahmad Mustaniruddin
Contact Email
ahmad_mustanirruddin@uinjambi.ac.id
Phone
+6285369694000
Journal Mail Official
tajdid@uinjambi.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jambi Ma. Bulian KM.16, Simp. Sei Duren, Jambi Luar Kota, Muaro Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia, 36361
Location
Kota jambi,
Jambi
INDONESIA
TAJDID Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
ISSN : 25023063     EISSN : 25415018     DOI : https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v25i1.5205
Core Subject :
TAJDID Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin focuses on the renewal of Islamic scholarship through critical, contextual, and integrative studies that bridge classical texts, Islamic thought, social and cultural Muslims to contemporary realities and issues. The journal welcomes literature and empirical research in the field of Islamic studies especially on, but not limited to the Quran and Hadith, Islamic Theology (Kalam), Islamic Philosophy, Islamic Mysticism (Tasawuf), Islamic Politics, and Religious Studies. All of these disciplines are acceptable as long as they are aligned with that focus. TAJDID emphasizes an interdisciplinary and innovative approach that promotes intellectual renewal (Tajdid Al Fikr Al Islami), encouraging dialogue among scholars who seek to reinterpret Islamic knowledge in the evolving context of the Muslim world and humanity at large to support The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), prevent a clash of civilizations and promote Islam Rahmatan Li Al Alameen. Scholars from any country and region concerned with the renewal of Islamic scholarship throughout Muslim history and geography in the Islamic World and beyond may submit their articles to Tajdid and use this open access journal.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 213 Documents
 18   19   20   21   22 
ANALYZING ISHĀRĪ AND ‘ILMĪ EXEGETICAL APPROACHES IN CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC PREACHING: A Comparative Study of Hanan Attaki and Adi Hidayat Lillah Isyqilah Amiladinah; Badrudin Badrudin; Agus Ali Dzawafi; Muhammad Naufal Afif
TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 25 No. 1 (2026): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Religious Studies UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/tjd.v25i1.6138

Abstract

The growing prominence of Islamic da’wah in digital spaces has increased public exposure to diverse interpretations of the Qur'an, yet academic studies remain largely focused on theoretical aspects of tafsīr rather than their practical application in contemporary preaching. This study aims to comparatively analyze how the Ishārī and ‘Ilmī approaches to Qur'anic interpretation are implemented in the da’wah of Ustadz Hanan Attaki and Ustadz Adi Hidayat, and to identify the distinctive characteristics emerging from the application of these two approaches. The methodology employs a qualitative approach based on library research with a descriptive-comparative analytical design, utilizing content analysis techniques on selected da’wah materials uploaded on digital platforms, particularly YouTube, supplemented by secondary data from books, journals, and relevant articles. The findings reveal that Attaki consistently applies Ishārī tafsīr emphasizing inner meaning, spiritual reflection, moral transformation, and emotional resonance, as evident in his interpretation of hijrah as an inner journey and khusyu’ as heartfelt presence before God. Conversely, Adi Hidayat employs ‘Ilmī tafsīr prioritizing linguistic analysis, rational argumentation, empirical verification, and correlation with modern scientific discoveries, such as his embryological interpretation of Qur'an. 23:12-14. Both approaches prove to be complementary rather than contradictory, each addressing the distinct spiritual and intellectual needs of diverse audiences in the digital era. This study contributes theoretically by demonstrating that the dichotomy between spiritual and rational interpretation is increasingly obsolete in modern Muslim societies, while practically offering an integrative model for contemporary da’wah that combines spiritual depth and intellectual rigor. Future research is recommended to empirically investigate how audiences synthesize these complementary messages in their daily religious practices.
NASKH AND ETHICAL PARADIGMS IN QUR’ANIC INTERPRETATION: The Sword Verse and Muslim-Non-Muslim Relations Farit Afrizal; A. Husnul Hakim; Amiril Ahmad; Abd. Kholiq; Fajar Hamid Rakhman Hakeem
TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 25 No. 2 (2026): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Religious Studies UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/tjd.v25i2.5883

Abstract

Few questions in contemporary Islamic thought are as consequential as the invocation of Q. 9:5 and the doctrine of naskh to frame Muslim–non-Muslim relations. The issue is not simply whether particular verses were historically abrogated, but how naskh became a privileged grammar through which ethical hierarchy was constructed within the Qur’anic corpus. Rather than treating the Sword Verse as an isolated legal command, this study approaches it as a nodal point in a broader discursive struggle over authority, normativity, and communal boundaries. Based on qualitative library research and close textual engagement with major classical naskh works and Qur’anic exegesis alongside selected modern jihadist writings, the study employs Foucauldian genealogy, informed by the concept of power–knowledge, with Teun A. van Dijk’s Critical Discourse Analysis to trace the historical construction of the Sword Verse’s abrogative authority and its subsequent mobilization within extremist discourse. The analysis demonstrates that portraying Q. 9:5 as nullifying a broad constellation of peace-oriented verses reflects neither textual necessity nor a stable exegetical consensus. Rather, it represents a historically contingent reordering of normative authority within the Qur’anic corpus. Reconsidering naskh in these terms opens space for rearticulating a Qur’anic ethic of interreligious coexistence that resists reduction to a single, exclusionary hermeneutic.
REINTERPRETING THE MISOGYNISTIC HADITH ON WOMAN AS DEVIL THROUGH MUBĀDALAH: A Contextual Gender Analysis Latifah Anwar; Ahmad Musadad; M. Fadli Rosyid; Muhammad Ghufron; Tri Pujiati; Imamuddin Imamuddin
TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 25 No. 2 (2026): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Religious Studies UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/tjd.v25i2.5919

Abstract

This study addresses the problem of gender bias in hadith interpretation, specifically the narration stating that “a woman comes in the form of a devil” (al-mar’atu tuqbilu fī ṣūrati shayṭān), which has been historically understood literally and contributed to female stigmatization. It aims to reinterpret the hadith using the mubādalah (reciprocity) approach integrated with contextual hermeneutics and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah to produce a contextual and gender-just understanding of the text. Employing a qualitative descriptive-analytical design based on library research, data were drawn from authoritative collections, specifically Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, alongside classical commentaries (shurūḥ), fatwās, and contemporary literature. Critical sanad and matn analyses confirm the hadith’s verified authenticity (ṣaḥīḥ), proving that problematic readings stem from ahistorical literalism rather than textual unreliability. The findings reveal that the term “devil” (shayṭān) functions metaphorically (majāz), referring to human desire (nafs) rather than female ontology, a view supported by classical scholars such as Ibn al-Jawzī, al-Qāḍī ‘Iyāḍ, and al-Nawawī. Furthermore, a ruling by Dar al-Ifta al-Misriyyah affirms that the text conveys honor and protection for women rather than demeaning their dignity. By positioning both genders as equal moral agents, mubādalah shifts the core message to universal and reciprocal self-restraint. Operationally, this reading fulfills the maqāṣid of safeguarding faith (ḥifẓ al-dīn), lineage/honor (ḥifẓ al-nasl/‘arḍ), and human dignity (ḥifẓ al-karāmah al-insāniyyah). Theoretically, this study extends mubādalah to misogynistic hadiths; practically, it offers an egalitarian framework for fostering inclusive and contextually relevant religious discourse.

Page 22 of 22 | Total Record : 213

 18   19   20   21   22 

Filter by Year

2014 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 25 No. 2 (2026): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 25 No. 1 (2026): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 22 No. 2 (2023): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 21 No. 1 (2022): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 20 No. 2 (2021): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 20 No. 1 (2021): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 19 No. 2 (2020): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 19 No. 1 (2020): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 18 No. 2 (2019): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 18 No. 1 (2019): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 17 No. 2 (2018): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 17 No. 1 (2018): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 16 No. 2 (2017): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 16 No. 1 (2017): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 15 No. 2 (2016): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 15 No. 1 (2016): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 14 No. 2 (2015): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 14 No. 1 (2015): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 13 No. 2 (2014): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies Vol. 13 No. 1 (2014): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies More Issue