Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn)
Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) ISSN: 2089-9823, e-ISSN 2302-9277 is a multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed open-access international journal which has been established for the dissemination of state-of-the-art knowledge in the field of education, teaching, development, instruction, educational projects and innovations, learning methodologies and new technologies in education and learning. This journal is ACCREDITED (recognised) SINTA 2 by the Ministry of Research and Technology/National Research and Innovation Agency, Republic of Indonesia (RISTEK-BRIN) (Decree No: 60/E/KPT/2016). The EduLearn is indexed by ERIC Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education. The focus and scope of EduLearn includes the following topics: 1. Career development and training in education and learning: entrepreneurship curriculum, internship programmes, lifelong learning, technology transfer, training educational staff, university-industry cooperation, vocational training, workplace training and employability issues, etc. 2. Experiences in education and learning: curriculum design and development, educational management, educational trends and best practice contributions, enhancing learning and the undergraduate experience, experiences in game based learning, higher education area: the bologna declaration and ects experiences, learning experiences in higher and further education, learning experiences in preschool education, pre-service and in-service teacher experiences, quality assurance/standards and accreditation, special education, stem in education, transferring skills and disciplines, etc. 3. Experiences in education and learning research: academic research projects, research methodologies, links between education and research, new projects and innovations, etc. 4. International projects in education and learning: new experiences for the international cooperation, project outcomes and conclusions, university networks, exchange programmes and erasmus experiences, the internationalization of universities, funding programmes and opportunities, etc. 5. Pedagogical innovations in education and learning: learning and teaching methodologies, evaluation and assessment of student learning, accreditation for informal learning, new learning/teaching models, neuroscience in education, language learning innovations, collaborative and problem-based learning, personalized learning, tutoring and coaching, flipped learning, etc. 6. General issues in education and learning: education and globalization, multicultural education, impact of education on development, planning digital-age school and learning spaces, organizational, legal, policy and financial issues, leadership in 21st century education , barriers to learning (age, psychosocial factors, ethnicity...), ethical issues and plagiarism in education, access to internet: advances and problems, diversity issues, women and minorities, student support in education, funding programmes and opportunities, etc. 7. Computer supported collaborative work: augmented reality, collaborative virtual environments (CVEs), community building, computer-mediated communication (CMC) tools, social & digital media in education, web 2.0 and social networking: (blogs, wikis...), web 3D applications and virtual reality, etc. 8. E-content management and development: digital identity management, digital libraries and repositories, e-portfolios, intellectual property rights, knowledge management, learning analytics, open access education, security and data protection, user-generated content, etc. 9. Educational software & serious games: animation and 3D systems, computer software on education, educational multimedia and hypermedia, educational software experiences, educational/serious games, gamification, gaming consoles as learning tools, videos for learning (YouTube generation), etc. 10. e-Learning: blended learning, distance learning, educating the educators, e-learning for environmental sustainability, e-learning standards (SCORM), e-learning projects and experiences, e-moderating, e-tutoring & mentoring, intelligent tutoring systems (ITS), learning management systems (LMs), managed learning environments (MLEs), massive open online courses (MOOCs), mobile learning, online assessment, online/virtual laboratories, personal learning environments (PLEs), training, evaluation and assessment, virtual learning environments (VLEs), virtual universities, etc. 11. Emerging technologies in education: advanced classroom technology, best practices in multimedia-based education, BYOD (bring your own device) and 1:1 learning, flipped classroom, ICT for development, ICT skills and digital literacy, mobile and tablet technologies, new platforms to teach coding skills (arduino, raspberry PI,...), technology-enhanced learning, the impact of web technologies on education, web classroom applications, etc. Papers published in the three-monthly journal (Feb, May, Aug, and Nov): (1) report evaluation and research findings; (2) treat conceptual and methodological issues; and/or (3) consider the implications of the above for action; and/or (4) an extensive book reviews section and also occasional reports on educational materials and equipment.
Articles
1,255 Documents
<![CDATA[Comparative analysis of the results of multigrade and singlegrade classes based on indicators of educational productivity and efficiency: A case study of Bandar Abbas city primary and secondary schools ]]>
<![CDATA[Vahid Motamedi]]>;
<![CDATA[Fateme Khajouie]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Vol 14, No 2: May 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (402.239 KB)
|
DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v14i2.15871
<![CDATA[Research on multigradein comparison to singlegradeclasses often overlooksthe issues and challenges facing the nation's educational authorities in administering these classes. The purpose of this study was to compare multi and singlegrade classes in terms of educational efficiency and effectiveness. The population of this study consisted of all students, parents, teachers and principals of schools in Bandar Abbas city in the academic year 2017-18. A researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect educational productivity data. The findings of the study showed that there was no significant difference between self-esteem of the two groups of students but in terms of social skills and social development, students in the multigrades classes were better off. In terms of educational efficacy, singlegrade student's survival rate was better but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of promotion and repetition rate.]]>
<![CDATA[Students’ Access to and Perception of Using Mobile Technologies in the Classroom: the Potential and Challenges of Implementing Mobile Learning ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Hanif]]>;
<![CDATA[Asrowi Asrowi]]>;
<![CDATA[Sunardi Sunardi]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Vol 12, No 4: November 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (365.125 KB)
|
DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v12i4.8398
<![CDATA[In implementing mobile learning system, students’ needs and perceptions should be focused upon along with curriculum standards. Particularly in the context of higher education institutions in Indonesia, some schools authorities have refused to implement m-learning. Although m-learning is widely used in some schools and considered an effective educational tool, it is not yet fully utilised in most Indonesian schools. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate students’ access to and perception of the use of mobile devices in learning, and to understand the potential for its implementation. This study is the result of a survey conducted on 61 students in a school which banned the use of mobile technology. It seeks to understand their potential accessibility by means of ownership, interaction time and the types of mobile application used and to find their perceptions through agreement and the reasons for adopting mobile learning in the classroom. The findings indicate that students are very familiar with mobile devices and their applications. The results also reveal that students have positive perceptions toward m-learning, and indicate that mobile technologies are widely used among them. This report can be taken as the basis for applying a mobile learning system in the classroom.]]>
<![CDATA[Compare and Contrast of Knowledge Sharing of Academicians to Students-A Study in Private and Public Universities ]]>
<![CDATA[Antonette Asumptha J]]>;
<![CDATA[M. Puniyamoorthy]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Vol 11, No 4: November 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (877.819 KB)
|
DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v11i4.6580
<![CDATA[This article points out that the society is becoming more and more knowledge based. Organizations that create, share and evolve knowledge are becoming the leading organizations of success. Therefore, the study focuses on knowledge sharing practices in academic institutions, here we see interesting perspectives on faculty sharing knowledge with students .The theory of planned behaviour which consists of Attitude(AT), Subjective Norms(SN) and Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC) is reflected in this paper, this is analysed while comparing and contrasting private and public universities across three parameters AT,SN,PBC. Attitude stands the highest in private universities as compared to public.SN is the highest overall in both private and public universities taken together; proving that people’s influence in sharing knowledge in both together is high. PBC has a high score in public universities compared to private universities.]]>
<![CDATA[Bilingualism and Vocabulary Learning: A Comparison between Baluchi and Persian EFL Learners ]]>
<![CDATA[Yahya Keikhaie]]>;
<![CDATA[Amirali Khoshkhoonejad]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Vol 9, No 3: August 2015 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (113.478 KB)
|
DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v9i3.1767
<![CDATA[Bilingualism can be broadly defined as the ability to speak 2 languages; however there are many grey areas when establishing which are the first language, second language and third language of a bilingual. The paper reports on a study exploring the effect of bilingualism on the learning of a vocabulary learning of two groups of Iranian male students: Baluchi bilinguals and Persian monolingual. The present study is based on data from 80 monolingual Persian-speaking learners of English and 80 bilingual Baluchi-Persian-speaking learners of English. All the participants were male studying English as a foreign language at pre-university of Sistan and Baluchestan in Iran. The results indicates that Baluchi-Persian bilingual speakers outperformed in general and in L3 recognition vocabulary learning. The findings of this paper also showed that no significant difference was seen between Persian-speaking learners and Baluchi-Persian-speaking in L3 production vocabulary learning.]]>
<![CDATA[Teachers’ understanding about the characteristics of realistic mathematics education ]]>
<![CDATA[Cut Morina Zubainur]]>;
<![CDATA[Rahmah Johar]]>;
<![CDATA[Rahmi Hayati]]>;
<![CDATA[M Ikhsan]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Vol 14, No 3: August 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (460.342 KB)
|
DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v14i3.8458
<![CDATA[The application of Realistic mathematics education (RME) in schools has not satisfied. The efforts of educators to help teachers implement RME are an ongoing process, including by providing examples of learning process through the video lessons. This study aims to investigate teacher understanding of the characteristics of RME through watching video lessons. Three elementary school teachers in Aceh, Indonesia, were involved in this research. Data was collected through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed descriptively. The results showed that the teacher did not understand three of the five characteristics of RME. Teachers' understanding of real problems is only limited to the use of concrete objects. The teacher could not identify activities on the video about using models or symbols to scaffold students from concrete to more formal knowledge. The teacher also did not realize that the relationship between mathematical concepts can help students understand mathematics well. The implication of this study is that researchers need to guide the teacher design the learning trajectory before watching learning from other teachers. After watching the whole video lessons, the teacher also needs to be moved to identify important events related to the characteristics of RME in the learning in the video. ]]>
<![CDATA[Self Assessment For Student Performance Based on Higher Order Thinking Skills in Physics Learning ]]>
<![CDATA[Wulan Trisnawaty]]>;
<![CDATA[Alfina Citrasukmawati]]>;
<![CDATA[M. Anas Thohir]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Vol 11, No 4: November 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (132.42 KB)
|
DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v11i4.6456
<![CDATA[This research is aimed to develop Self Assessment Based on Higher Order Thinking Skills (SSA-HOTS) instrument in learning physics to train student’s higher order thinking Skills. The development model using 4D from Thiagarajan with the subjects of the study was selected by random at high school student of IPA Major. Data collection techniques include test, observation, and questionnaire distribution then analyzed using correlation test. From the result of the research, it is found that the developed instrument is deserve to use, high reliability value, difficulty of problem proportional, and test item sensitive. Correlation assessment between student and teacher on cognitive, psychomotor, and affective aspects on the character of honesty and cooperation each 0.95; 0.83; 0.81; And 0.80 are in the high category. Students also responded positively to this instrument. So it can be concluded that the self assessment instrument based on Higher Order Thinking Skills is deserve to be used to train student higher order thinking skills.]]>
<![CDATA[Blended Project Based Learning: Metacognitive Awareness of Biology Education New Students ]]>
<![CDATA[Husamah Husamah]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Vol 9, No 4: November 2015 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (24.077 KB)
|
DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v9i4.2121
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyse the difference of metacognitive awareness of treatment (using Blended Project Based Learning) and control class. This is a quasi-experimental research with Non-equivalent Control Group Design. This research was conducted at Department of Biology Education, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, in the first semester of the academic year 2014/2015. Metacognitive awareness of treatment class and control class was measured by using Metacognitive Awareness Inventory. Metacognitive awareness difference analysed with One-way ANOVA, processed with SPSS 22 for Windows. The results showed that there were difference Mean values in metacognitive awareness (knowledge about cognition and regulation of cognitive) between treatment and control. Mean value of treatment class was higher than control class. It means that Blended Project Based Learning effectively to develop and stimulation metacognitive awareness of new students (Biology teachers candidates). ]]>
<![CDATA[Influence of motivation on teachers’ effectiveness in Ilorin West local government, Kwara State ]]>
<![CDATA[Uyanne Elizabeth Obiageli]]>;
<![CDATA[Omoshalewa Lasbat]]>;
<![CDATA[Balogun Abdulrasaq Olatunji]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Vol 14, No 3: August 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (453.199 KB)
|
DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v14i3.16214
<![CDATA[Motivation is the vital tool that can enhance effectiveness and aid good performance. Individual job performance and behaviour depend greatly on motivational factors. A number of studies have been done in the area of motivation for teachers and its benefits towards better performance for the students. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of motivation on teachers’ effectiveness in Ilorin West Local Government Area, Kwara State. Adopted research design for this study was the descriptive survey method. The respondents comprises of 150 teachers which were simple randomly selected from 10 schools in Ilorin West. The instrument that was used for collecting data for this study was adopted from Ayuba (2017) titled Motivation and Teachers’ Effectiveness Questionnaire (MTEQ). Frequency count, percentage and mean score were used to answer research questions while Pearson Product Moment Coefficient (PPMC) and t-test were employed to test the research hypothesis. Findings revealed that teachers’ effectiveness is low and there was no significant influence of motivation on teachers’ effectiveness.]]>
<![CDATA[Challenges in Providing Trainings for English Teachers of Elementary Schools ]]>
<![CDATA[Nury Supriyanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Vol 6, No 3: August 2012 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (43.267 KB)
|
DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v6i3.159
<![CDATA[Primary English provision in Indonesia has started in 1994 in which English has the position as the local content subject in the elementary schools. English has then been part of the Indonesian elementary schoolchildren’s daily routines in many different ways. In the major cities, which are geographically then educationally more privileged, the children might enjoy their English lessons because they have the qualified teachers who know English and how to teach it to young learners, they have appropriate and interesting materials as well as appropriate techniques to learn by. The case is quite different for the children of the less privileged areas where access to qualified teachers, appropriate materials and fun learning is almost impossible. These children have to be content with teachers with no English or child teaching background who are hired because only them who are available. The paper describes the struggle of the English Education department of the Yogyakarta State University in the development of the EFC courses in order to contribute to the provision of English to elementary schools in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[What should be the object of research with respect to the notion of mathematical proof? ]]>
<![CDATA[Zakaria Ndemo]]>;
<![CDATA[David J Mtetwa]]>;
<![CDATA[Fred Zindi]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Vol 13, No 1: February 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (268.07 KB)
|
DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v13i1.9558
<![CDATA[Despite its central place in the mathematics curriculum the notion mathematical proof has failed to permeate the curriculum at all scholastic levels. While the concept of mathematical proof can serve as a vehicle for mathematical thinking, studies have revealed that students experience serious difficulties with proving that include: not knowing how to begin the proving process, the proclivity to use empirical verifications for tasks that call for axiomatic methods of proving, resorting to rote memorization of uncoordinated fragments of proof facts. While several studies have been conducted with the aim of addressing students’ fragile grasp of mathematical proof the majority of such studies have been based on activities that involve students reflecting and expressing their level of convincement in arguments supplied by the researchers thereby compromising the voice of the informants. Further, research focus has been on the front instead of the back of mathematics. Hence, there is a dearth in research studies into students’ thinking processes around mathematical proof that are grounded in students’ own proof attempts. Therefore current research strides should aim at identifying critical elements of students’ knowledge of the notion of proof that should be informed by students’ actual individual proof construction attempts.]]>
