cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 369 Documents
 30   31   32   33   34 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI), THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS), DAN PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG PADA MATERI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK SISWA SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016 Hermawati, Evi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (498.096 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: 1) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement: Group Investigation (GI)  model, Think Pair Share (TPS) model, or direct instructional model, 2) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement: linguistic intelligence students, mathematics-logic intelligence students, or interpersonal intelligence students, 3) in each type of multiple intelligences which one providing better mathematics learning achievement: GI model, TPS model, or direct instructional model, and 4) in each learning models which one providing better mathematics learning achievement: linguistic intelligence students, mathematics-logic intelligence students, or interpersonal intelligence students. This research used the quasi experimental research method. The design of the research was a 3 × 3 factorial. The population was the students of the seventh grade of Junior High School in Surakarta City on academic year 2015/2016. The technique of sampling was stratified cluster random sampling. The proposed hypothesis of the research were tested by the unbalanced two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of this research were as follows. 1) GI model provided better mathematics learning achievement than TPS model, or direct instructional model; TPS model provided mathematics learning achievement as good as direct instructional model. 2) The mathematics-logic intelligence students had better mathematics learning achievement than linguistic intelligence students, or interpersonal intelligence students; the mathematics learning achievement of linguistic intelligence students as good as interpersonal intelligence students. 3) In each type of multiple intelligences, GI model provided better mathematics learning achievement than TPS model, or direct instructional model; TPS model provided mathematics learning achievement as good as direct instructional learning. 4) In each learning models, the mathematics-logic intelligence students had better mathematics learning achievement than linguistic intelligence students, or interpersonal intelligence students; the mathematics learning achievement of linguistic intelligence students as goog as interpersonal intelligence students.Keywords: Group Investigation, Think Pair Share, direct instructional learning, multiple intelligence, mathematics learning achievement 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) DAN TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN KUADRAT DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN PONOROGO Haniah, Wahyu Nur; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (381.797 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was determine the effect of the learning models TGT, NHT, and direct learning model on mathematics learning achievement viewed from the students mathematics anxiety. This research was quasi experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design. The study population was all tenth grade students of Senior High Schools in Ponorogo district. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANAVA with unbalanced cell. The results could be concluded as follows. 1) Students who were treated with the cooperative model of TGT and NHT have equal mathematics achievement, students who were treated with the cooperative model of TGT got better achievement than students treated by direct learning, in addition students who were treated with the cooperative models of NHT and direct learning have equal mathematics achievement, 2) Students with low and average mathematics anxiety got mathematics achievement better than students with high mathematics anxiety, then students with low mathematics anxiety got mathematics achievement better than students with average mathematics anxiety, 3) In each mathematics anxiety category, students who were treated with the cooperative model of TGT and NHT have equal mathematics achievement, students who were treated with the cooperative model of TGT got better achievement than students treated by direct learning, in addition students who were treated with the cooperative model of NHT and direct learning have equal mathematics achievement, 4) In each learning models, students with low and average mathematics anxiety got mathematics achievement better than students with high mathematics anxiety, then students with low mathematics anxiety got mathematics achievement better than students with average mathematics anxiety.Key words: Team Games Tournament  (TGT), Numbered Head Together (NHT), Direct Learning, Mathematics Anxiety.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BILANGAN DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA SMP NEGERI KELAS VII DI-KABUPATEN BOYOLALI Pratama, Fika Widya; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (462.035 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics learning achievement viewed from self regulated learning (SRL). The learning models compared were cooperative learning model of TAI-PS, NHT-PS, and classical-PS learning. The research used the quasi-experimental research with the factorial design of 3  3. The population of the research were all of the students in grade VII of junior high school at Boyolali regency in the first semester of the academic year 2014/2015. The hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells at the significance level of . The result of these research are as follows. (1) TAI-PS model gives better mathematics learning achievement than NHT-PS and classical-PS, whereas NHT-PS model gives better mathematics learning achievement than classical-PS. (2) Students with high SRL are better in mathematics learning achievement than students with medium and low SRL, and also medium SRL have better mathematics learning achievement than low SRL. (3) (a) TAI-PS with high, medium, and low SRL have the same mathematics learning achievement. (b) NHT-PS with high and medium SRL and also medium and low SRL have the same mathematics learning achievement, whereas high SRL have better mathematics learning achievement than students with low SRL. (c) classical-PS with high SRL are better in mathematics learning achievement than students with medium and low SRL, whereas students with medium and low SRL have the same mathematics learning achievement. (4) (a) The high SRL with the TAI-PS, NHT-PS, and classical-PS give the same mathematics learning achievement. (b) The medium SRL with TAI-PS and NHT-PS, and also NHT-PS and classical-PS give the same mathematics learning achievement, whereas TAI-PS give better in mathematics learning achievement than classical-PS. (c) The low SRL with TAI-PS and NHT-PS give the same mathematics learning achievement, whereas TAI-PS and NHT-PS give better in mathematics learning achievement than classical-PS.Keywords: Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), Numbered Heads Together (NHT), classical learning, scientific approach, and Self-Regulated Learning (SRL).
KSPERIMENTASI PENDEKATAN PEMBELAJARAN RECIPROCAL TEACHING DENGAN ALAT PERAGA PADA POKOK BAHASAN LINGKARAN DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA Thalib, Faradila; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sutrima, Sutrima
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (209.565 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims at revealing:(1) which one results better learning achievement on the subject of circle among Reciprocal Teaching with Learning Tools, Reciprocal Teaching, and conventional approach; (2) which one has better mathematics learning achievement among students with high, average, or low creativity; (3) at each of creativity levels (high, average, and low), which one results better learning achievement on the subject of circle among Reciprocal Teaching with Learning Tools, Reciprocal Teaching, and conventional apprroach; (4) at each of teaching approaches (Reciprocal Teaching with Learning Tools, Reciprocal Teaching, and conventional approach), which group of students has better learning achievement among groups with high, average, or low creativity. This research was quasi-experimental research which employs 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of this research was all of the eleventh grade students of State Junior High Schools in Ternate. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. There were 178 students selected as the sample of this research. Based on the research findings, it can be concluded that: (1) students taught by Reciprocal Teaching with Learning Tools have better mathematics learning achievement than those taught by Reciprocal Teaching, students taught by Reciprocal Teaching have better mathematics learning achievement than those taught by conventional approach, and students taught by Reciprocal Teaching have better mathematics learning achievement than those taught by conventional teaching; (2) students with high, average, and low creativity have the same mathematics learning achievement; (3) at each of creativity levels (high, average, and low), Reciprocal Teaching with Learning Tools results better mathematics learning achievement than Reciprocal Teaching and conventional approach do, and Reciprocal Teaching results better mathematics learning achievement than conventional approach does; (4) at each of teaching approaches (Reciprocal Teaching with Learning Tools, Reciprocal Teaching, and conventional approach), students with high, average, and low creativity have the same mathematics learning achievement.Keywords: Reciprocal Teaching with Learning Tools, Reciprocal Teaching, Conventional Approach, Creativity, Mathematics Learning Achievement.
PELATIHAN PENERAPAN BEBERAPA APLIKASI DARI MICROSOFT: OFFICE MIX, ONENOTE, SWAY DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BAGI GURU-GURU MATEMATIKA SMA DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN Usodo, Budi; Sutopo, Sutopo; Chrisnawati, Henny Ekana; Kurniawati, Ira; Kuswardi, Yemi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (264.114 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: Community service program aims to improve the quality of education in Sragen to broaden the horizon of teachers of mathematics senior high school in Sragen on information and communication technology in the form of applications from Microsoft and is able to use it in the learning of mathematics in senior high school. The design of these training activities began with a presentation from guest speaker activity to 60 senior high school math teacher who joined the senior high school math MGMPs Sragen. Exposure training material is divided into two stages. The first exposure of the material associated with the explanation office mix, OneNote and Sway application program. The second stage of material related exposure how to use these three applications to make draft lesson of mathematics with microsoft applications in senior high school. After the exposure of the activities activities continued with a training resource persons assisting the preparation of the learning device oriented material that has been presented. Devices that have been compiled implemented at SMAN 2 Sragen. In the implementation of activities carried out observations of the ability of teachers in implementing the learning, student activities and student response to learning. The results of the observations are learning simulation activities, the ability of teachers to manage learning in the simulation activities achieve good category. Microsoft office applications make use of student activity is better and the results of students responses, suggests that Microsoft application deployments in learning can build learning environment for the better, more interactive and can enhance students interest in participating in the learning of mathematics. Once implemented in the classroom reflection to be improved and further implemented in school trainees.Key words: Microsoft, office mix, OneNote, Sway, training activities.
INTUISI SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 1 NGANJUK DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) Etika, Erdyna Dwi; Sujadi, Imam; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (417.025 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to  describe: (1) the category of intuition of seventh grade student of SMPN 1 Nganjuk with type of climber, camper, and  quitter in solving mathematics problems. (2) the type of intuition of seventh grade student of SMPN 1 Nganjuk with type of climber, camper, and quitter in solving mathematics problems. The type of this research was a case study research. The prosedure of selecting the subject used purposive snowball sampling. Data was collected by using think aloud method. To determine the validity of data was undertaken with time-triangulation. The results showed as follows: (1) The category of intuition on the students of SMP N 1 Nganjuk : (a) students with climbers type, students used category affirmatory intuition in understanding the problem; students used affirmatory intuition in devising a plan; students used anticipatory intuition in carrying out the plan; students used affirmatory intuition in looking back the answer. (b) Students with campers types, students used affirmatory intuition in understanding the problem; students used  antisipatori intuition in devising a plan; students didn’t use intuition in carrying out the plan; students  didn’t use intuition in looking back the answer. (c) Students with quitters types, students didn’t use intuition in understanding the problem; students used affirmatory intuition in devising a plan; students used anticipatory intuition in carrying out the plan; students didn’t use intuition in looking back the answer. (2) Type of intuition on students of SMP N 1 Nganjuk: (a) Students with climber types, students used intuition based on the senses in understanding the problem; students used intuition based on the senses in devising a plan; students use intuition based on the senses in carrying out the plan; students used intuition based on the senses in looking back the answer. (b) Students with campers types, students used intuition based on the senses in understanding the problem; students used intuition based on real mathematical thinking in devising a plan; students didn’t use intuition in carrying out the plan; students didn’t use intuition in looking back the answer. (c) Students with quitters types, students didn’t use intuition in understanding the problem; students used intuition based on the senses in devising a plan; students used intuition based on the sense in carrying out the plan; students didn’t use intuition in looking back the answer.Keywords: Intuition, Category of intuition, Type of intuition, Adversity Quotient (AQ) 
PENGEMBANGAN BAHAN AJAR DENGAN EDMODO UNTUK MENINGKATKAN LEVEL BERPIKIR PROBABILISTIK SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 12 SURAKARTA Kurniasih, Rini; Sujadi, Imam; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (300.168 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this study were: 1) to determine the process and to get the development of learning materials in accordance with Edmodo, 2) to decide whether the level of students probabilistic thinking that use learning materials with Edmodo better than the level of probabilistic thinking that use the existing learning materials or not.This study is a research and development (R&D). This study is divided into three stages namely the preliminary stage, the development stage and the testing stage or experimentation. Preliminary stage includes research and information collecting. The development stage includes planning and develop preliminary form product, preliminary field testing and main product revision, main field testing and operational product revision, operational filed testing and final product revision. The testing stage includes the qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test . Data analysis that used is descriptive analysis and the quality of learning materials based on the criteria of validity, practicality and effectiveness of learning materials. Determination of the final product is done by focus group discussion (FGD) between researchers and teachers or practitioners. Based on the study results obtained the following conclusions : 1) the preliminary stage is concluded learners at the level of the subjective and transitional; the development stage is conclude the obtained validity with an average of 3.57 of a media expert, 3.67 of subject matter experts; the practicality has exceeded the criteria above 75 % and the effectiveness gained an average response learners receive is 93.25 %; and from the result of FGD concluded that learning materials can be used in the process of learning in the curriculum 2013 and can be disseminated, 2) learning that use Edmodo learning materials is more effectively to improve the level of probabilistic thinking learners than the learning that use the existing learning materials.Key words: learning material, Edmodo, level, probabilistic thinking
PROSES BERPIKIR REFLEKTIF SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 3 POLANHARJO KLATEN DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH PECAHAN Wahyuni, Fina Tri; Sujadi, Imam; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (222.407 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research was to describe the characteristics of reflective thinking process of the students in Grade VII of State Junior Secondary School 3 of  Polanharjo Klaten who have the high, moderate, and low abilities in solving fractional problems. This research used qualitative case study approach. The data of research were gathered through task-based in-depth interview. The results of research were the characteristics of reflective thinking process of the students as follows: 1) The students with the high initial ability in Mathematics: (a) in the problem understanding phase, they were able to mention information of the problems and to explain what has been done; (b) in the problem-solving planning phase, they were able to identify the concept of the problems and to explain what has been done; (c) in the implementation of problem-solving plan phase, they were able to realize the mistakes and to fix them, to examine the truth of an argument, to employ the internal knowledge, to relate the information that they have known, and to communicate ideas with symbols instead of pictures or direct objects; and (d) in the reexamination phase, they were able to draw conclusions to return the answers back into the contexts and to explain what has been done. 2) The students with the moderate initial ability in Mathematics: (a) in the problem understanding phase, they were able to mention information of the problems and to explain what has been done; (b) in the problem-solving planning phase, they were able to identify the concept of the problems, to employ the internal knowledge, to relate the information that they have known, and to explain what has been done; (c) in the implementation of problem-solving plan phase, they were unable to do reflective thinking; (d) in the reexamination phase, they were able to draw conclusions to return the answers back into the contexts and to explain what has been done. 3) The students with the low initial ability in Mathematics were able to do reflective thinking merely on the problem understanding phase, with the following characteristics: they were able to mention information of the problems and to explain what has been done.Keywords: Characteristics of reflective thinking process, problem solving, and initial ability in Mathematics.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DAN TWO STAY-TWO STRAY (TS-TS) PADA POKOK BAHASAN PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN KUADRAT DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR PADA SISWA SMA NEGERI KELAS X DI KABUPATEN PONOROGO Fuany, Anggun; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (293.047 KB)

Abstract

Abstract. The objectives of this research were to determine: (1) which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, instructed with TPS, TS-TS, or direct learning; (2) which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those with the converger, diverger, assimilator, or accommodator learning style; (3) in each learning style, which  students had better mathematics learning achievement, instructed with TPS, TS-TS, or direct learning; (4) in each learning model, which students had a better mathematics learning achievement, those with the converger, diverger, assimilator, or accommodator learning style. This study was  aquasi-experimental study with 3 x 4 factorial designs. The study population was a tenth grade student of State SMA in Ponorogo in academic year of 2015/2016. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The study sample consisted of students in 3 schools namely SMA Negeri 1 Badegan, SMA Negeri 1 Kauman, and SMA Negeri 1 Bungkal with a sample size of 226 students. Data analysis used unbalanced two-way ANAVA with a significance level of 5%. The results of the research are as follows. (1) The students instructed with TPS had learning achievement as good as TS-TS, those with TPS had learning achievement better than those with direct learning, while those TS-TS had learning achievement as good as those with direct learning. (2)The students with the converger learning style had learning achievement better than those with the diverger and assimilator learning style, the students with the converger learning style had learning achievement as good as those with the accommodator learning style, the students with the diverger, assimilator, and accommodator learning style had a same learning achievement. (3) In each learning style, the students mathematics learning achievement was in consistency with the result (1); (4) In each learning model, the students mathematics learning achievement was in consistency with the result (2).Keywords: TPS, TS-TS, Direct Learning, learning styles, and learning  achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) DAN TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) PADA MATERI SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINEAR DUA VARIABEL DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP SE-KABUPATEN REMBANG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016 Proborini, Ellen; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (258.602 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning model on learning achievement viewed from students’ learning style. The learning models compared were TGT, TSTS and direct learning. The population of this research was the students in grade VIII of state junior high schools in Rembang year 2015/2016. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two way analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follow. 1) TGT and TSTS learning model gave equal students achievement, the students achievement that given TGT was better than direct learning, and the students achievement that given TSTS was better than direct learning. 2) The auditory students achievement was better than visual, but the auditory and kinesthetic have equal students achievement, and visual and kinesthetic have equal students achievement, 3) In TGT, auditory and kinesthetic have equal students achievement, auditory and visual have equal students achievement, and kinesthetic students achievement was better than visual. In TSTS, the auditory and visual have equal students achievement, auditory and kinesthetic have equal students achievement, and visual students achievement was better than kinesthetic. In direct learning, the auditory and visual have equal students achievement, the auditory and kinesthetic have equal students achievement, and kinesthetic and visual have equal students achievement, 4) In auditory, TGT and TSTS learning model gave equal students achievement, wether TSTS and direct learning gave equal students achievement, and TGT and direct learning gave equal students achievement. In visual, students achievement that given TSTS was better than TGT, wether TGT and direct learning gave equal students achievement, and TSTS was better than direct learning. In kinesthetic, students achievement that given TGT was better than TSTS, wether direct learning and TGT gave equal students achievement, and direct learning and TSTS gave equal students achievement.Key words: TGT, TSTS, Direct Learning, Learning Style.

Page 32 of 37 | Total Record : 369

 30   31   32   33   34 

Filter by Year

2013 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue