cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
YUSUF ADIWIBOWO
Contact Email
lentera.hukum@unej.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
lentera.hukum@unej.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. jember,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Lentera Hukum
Published by Universitas Jember
ISSN : 23554673     EISSN : 26213710     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
E-Journal Lentera Hukum merupakan sarana ilmiah bagi mahasiswa untuk menyalurkan pemikiran-pemikiran ilmiah di bidang ilmu hukum. Artikel yang dikirim belum pernah dipublikasikan atau tidak dalam proses penerbitan dalam berkala ilmiah lain. E-Journal Lentera Hukum terbit tiga kali dalam setahun yaitu April, Juli, dan Desember. Diterbitkan secara elektronik atas kerjasama Fakultas Hukum dan UPT Penerbitan Universitas Jember
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 4 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 10 No 3 (2023)" : 4 Documents clear
Exploring Efficacy Maryam, Rini; Irianto, Sulistyowati
Lentera Hukum Vol 10 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v10i3.43726

Abstract

The rising global divorce rate is reshaping the landscape of family dispute resolution, moving away from the adversarial or litigation system toward an alternative dispute resolution known as mediation. This global trend is also observed in Indonesia where the Supreme Court has mandated the use of mediation in civil cases. "Everybody wins, nobody loses" as the primary slogan of mediation emphasizes a win-win outcome for all parties involved, avoiding any losers. However, assessing its efficacy in handling divorce cases in Indonesia becomes crucial. This is mainly because the settlement rate has been discovered to be low in Indonesia since the mandatory implementation of court-annexed mediation for almost two decades compared to other countries such as Australia and the United States. In both countries, settlement is not only based on agreements but also on the process that satisfies the parties. Therefore, this study aims to examine the conceptual issues underlying the low effectiveness of divorce mediation by questioning agreements as a measure of divorce mediation effectiveness. This study uses the sociolegal framework to critique the Supreme Court Regulation 1/2016 regarding Mediation in court and its dynamics in divorce cases. Moreover, courtroom study is applied to observe the mediation process. The results showed that the success of mediation revolves around the number of agreements reached by the parties and the process did not focus on the characteristics of divorce cases, thereby considered not suitable for all cases. Furthermore, the court-annexed mediation regulation creates ambiguity between the use of marital mediation to reconcile the parties and divorce mediation to proceed post-divorce agreement or both.Keywords: Effectiveness of Mediation, Divorce Mediation, Religious Courts.
The Indonesian Outsourcing Workers' Rights in the Tourism Business Sector Sudiarawan, Kadek Agus; Dharmawan, Ni Ketut Supasti; Karunian, Alia Yofira; Dananjaya, I Komang; Lokahita, Kadek Indira
Lentera Hukum Vol 10 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v10i3.43325

Abstract

The problem of outsourcing workers extends to the tourism industry. The unique challenge of 'seasonality' makes it more difficult to protect the outsourcing workers' legal rights in the said sector. The research examines the outsourcing regulation in Indonesia by referring to the Job Creation Law, by questioning whether the existing regulations provide prominent legal protection for outsourcing workers, especially in tourism sectors, and how the future law allows for improved protection. The research method used is normative legal research with statutory and legal conceptual approaches. The results of the study show that the amendment of the Manpower Law incorporated into the Job Creation Law and its implementing legal instruments significantly changed outsourcing regulation. As the Job Creation Law has abolished Article 64 of the Manpower Law, the scheme established by the Constitutional Court to prevent companies from exploiting workers in their decisions has become vague in the Job Creation Law. Following global practices, the country can implement a flexible workers policy while simultaneously protecting their rights which Indonesia must adopt.Keywords: Outsourcing, Rights Protection, Tourism Business.
Artificial Intelligence in Indo-Pacific Putro, Yaries Mahardika; Tarigan, Muhammad Insan; Al Asyari, Haekal
Lentera Hukum Vol 10 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v10i3.43449

Abstract

The use of Artificial Intelligence in the military is like two sides of a coin. It can provide convenience and aid in military operations but has the potential to hinder military operations. Dangerous and potentially catastrophic for humanity will be inevitable as no restrictions on its use. The United States, China, Australia, Japan, and India are examples of nations whose militaries have developed artificial intelligence technology. Geographically, Southeast Asia, which is located in the middle of these nations, will experience a significant impact due to its tight maritime borders if there is no international consensus on the military application of artificial intelligence technology. An autonomous or autonomous system to operate this technology will reduce the amount of human control and allow it to operate without any human intervention. It will be a threat to the application of the fundamental principles of international humanitarian law, such as the distinction principle, and proportionality principle. Where these principles are tightly intertwined with human command and control in making decisions regarding the execution of attacks. The article employs normative legal methodology. Furthermore, this paper endeavours to assess the pertinence of principles in international humanitarian law during the era of the artificial intelligence arms race. It also delves into the contribution of ASEAN in upholding stability, peace, and security in the Southeast Asia region, thereby reinforcing the importance of this research. This research emphasises the importance of aligning the progress of artificial intelligence in military contexts with core principles of international humanitarian law. It underscores the need for ASEAN to safeguard regional peace and security by establishing a novel regulatory framework that outlines restrictions on the development and deployment of artificial intelligence for military objectives.Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, International Law, Peace and Security, Southeast Asia.
Dual-Class Share Structure in the Indonesian Equity Market Seroja, Triana Dewi; Tan, David; Fitri, Winda; Rusdiana, Shelvi
Lentera Hukum Vol 10 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v10i3.43733

Abstract

A lot of major equity markets abroad have allowed the listing of the Dual-Class Share Structure (DCSS) corporations. DCSS is an agreement in which two types of shares are issued by the very same firm, with one type of share conferring greater power compared to the other. The Indonesian Stock Exchange only allows for limited access for DCSS technology-related corporations to list on its Mainboard. To remain attractive as Southeast Asia's top financial centre, Indonesia needs to alter its securities regulations while making its listing market adaptable to meet the needs of various enterprises. This research aims to analyse and elaborate on permitting DCSS corporations to go public and devise suitable governance safeguards to guarantee the highest possible standards of corporate governance are upheld. This research explores the legal certainty and applicability of DCSS in the Indonesian equity market and abroad, using a qualitative approach and thematic analysis of secondary data. The major finding of this research is the acceptance of DCSS adds to issues with abuse of power by the controlling shareholders, which was outweighed by their cash flow rights. While those in favour of DCSS argue that the existing shareholders' main reason for choosing a DCSS arrangement is to preserve company control. Most major exchanges in the world have taken action to accommodate DCSS going public, like those in the USA, Hong Kong, Singapore, and China. Considering the magnitude of the Asian market, Indonesia can emulate the accomplishments of other exchanges too. A series of recommendations are provided to guarantee the highest standards of corporate governance can be upheld, such as: permitting DCSS for new entrants and innovative businesses, regulating the ownership of enhanced voting shares, and setting out sunset provisions for DCSS arrangement.Keywords: Company Law, DCSS, Dual-Class Shares, Equity Market.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 4

 1 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025): LENTERA HUKUM Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): LENTERA HUKUM Vol. 11 No. 3 (2024): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 11 No 2 (2024): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 11 No 1 (2024): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 10 No 3 (2023) Vol 10 No 2 (2023): Human Rights and Economy in the Global South Vol 10 No 1 (2023): Human Rights in Indonesia and Beyond Vol 9 No 3 (2022): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 9 No 2 (2022): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 9 No 1 (2022): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 8 No 3 (2021): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 8 No 2 (2021): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 8 No 1 (2021): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 7 No 3 (2020): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 7 No 2 (2020): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 7 No 1 (2020): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 6 No 3 (2019): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 6 No 2 (2019): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 6 No 1 (2019): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 5 No 3 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 5 No 2 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 5 No 1 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 4 No 3 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 4 No 2 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 4 No 1 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 3 No 3 (2016): December 2016 Vol 3 No 1 (2016): April 2016 Vol 3 No 3 (2016): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 3 No 2 (2016): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 3 No 1 (2016): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 2 No 3 (2015): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 2 No 2 (2015): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 2 No 1 (2015): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 1 No 2 (2014): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 1, No 1 (2014) Vol 1 No 1 (2014): LENTERA HUKUM More Issue