cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
YUSUF ADIWIBOWO
Contact Email
lentera.hukum@unej.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
lentera.hukum@unej.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. jember,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Lentera Hukum
Published by Universitas Jember
ISSN : 23554673     EISSN : 26213710     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
E-Journal Lentera Hukum merupakan sarana ilmiah bagi mahasiswa untuk menyalurkan pemikiran-pemikiran ilmiah di bidang ilmu hukum. Artikel yang dikirim belum pernah dipublikasikan atau tidak dalam proses penerbitan dalam berkala ilmiah lain. E-Journal Lentera Hukum terbit tiga kali dalam setahun yaitu April, Juli, dan Desember. Diterbitkan secara elektronik atas kerjasama Fakultas Hukum dan UPT Penerbitan Universitas Jember
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 4 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): LENTERA HUKUM" : 4 Documents clear
Evaluating Data Breach Notification Protocols: Comparative Analysis of Indonesia and South Korea Situmeang, Ampuan; Park, Jihyun; Sudirman, Lu; Silviani, Ninne Zahara; Agustini, Shenti
Lentera Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v12i1.47621

Abstract

Data protection is one of the most important aspects of the digital economy, with its legal implications extending across digital landscapes. The failure to protect data in data breaches can threaten the interests of owners and expose them to various risks. Legal compliance regarding how owners are notified of data breaches is important to prevent this, necessitating deep legal discourse and analysis. Using a comparative legal research method with a statutory approach, this study dissects norms within Indonesia and South Korea’s legal systems to analyze their differences in legal compliance regarding this issue. The findings of this study highlight the discrepancies in legal frameworks between Indonesia and South Korea. It particularly notes Indonesia's lack of a governing body for data breach notifications and the absence of comprehensive privacy impact assessments or cybersecurity compliance. Ultimately, the study underscores the need for Indonesia to develop a normative model for data protection to address its significant regulatory gaps—contrasting with South Korea's more robust legal mechanisms and the GDPR's systematic oversight.KEYWORDS: Data Breach, Data Breach Notification, Data Protection.
Should Indonesia adopt a Stewardship Code? Mangunsong, Nathaniel O L; Dewi, Yetty Komalasari
Lentera Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v12i1.51890

Abstract

Shareholder stewardship has rapidly become a popular concept among policymakers, companies, and investors around the world. On its first release in 2010, the inaugural United Kingdom stewardship code was primarily targeted to incentivize institutional investors to be actively engaged as “stewards” in the corporate governance of companies in which they are shareholders. In Southeast Asia, Singapore has adopted separate stewardship codes for institutional investors and family companies. This article aims to explore if Indonesia should adopt a Stewardship Code like the above codes in Singapore and, if yes, how these codes should be adopted in Indonesia.KEYWORDS: Shareholder stewardship, Stewardship code, Corporate governance.  
Transforming Tax Policy Towards Gender Equality: Strategies for Indonesia and Global Challenges Ispriyarso, Budi; Purwanti, Ani; Wibawa, Kadek Cahya Susila
Lentera Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v12i1.52888

Abstract

Fiscal policy, especially in relation to state tax regulations, significantly influences gender disparity. This study aims to analyze and assess the issues at hand, ultimately formulating a design for tax reform that fosters gender equity. This research seeks to offer insights that could support the attainment of gender justice through the lens of tax policy in Indonesia. This study employs a qualitative research methodology utilizing a doctrinal research approach. Indonesia’s tax policies, despite undergoing various reforms, need to adequately consider gender-specific issues and the unique challenges that women encounter. The Indonesian G20 Presidency has highlighted the significance of Gender-Based Taxation (GBT) in addressing these disparities. Feminist tax policies may enhance family incomes and increase women’s workforce participation; however, they do not fully address the wider objectives of feminism. Tax policy reforms present numerous benefits compared to reforms in other legal areas, establishing it as an essential mechanism for advancing gender equality in Indonesia. Achieving equitable taxation requires the implementation of policies that are progressive and redistributive while also addressing gender issues. This includes the introduction of taxes on capital and wealth, alongside a reduction in reliance on consumption taxes. International frameworks such as CEDAW must be incorporated into fiscal policy to guarantee appropriate resource distribution aimed at addressing unpaid care work and enhancing investments in gender-responsive social services.KEYWORDS: Tax Reform, Tax Law, Gender Equality, CEDAW, Feminist Tax Policy.
Debating Political Rights: The Revocation of Former Convict's Rights to Be Elected in Indonesian Elections Suarda, I Gede Widhiana; Anggono, Bayu Dwi; Setyawan, Fendi; Taniady, Vicko
Lentera Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v12i1.52923

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyse the revocation of the political right of former convicts to candidacy as public officials in the Indonesian context based on positive law and decisions of the Indonesian Constitutional Court. In addition, this article aims to conduct a comparative study analysis of the issue, namely, between the arrangements in Indonesia and those in the United States and Australia. In Indonesia, everyone has the right to stand as a candidate for public office, including former prisoners, with certain conditions in accordance with positive law. However, the matter of revoking the political rights of former convicts remains a matter of debate, especially before the General Election. The Constitutional Court affirmed that the political right of former convicts to hold elected public office must fulfil several requirements. The political rights of former convicts are still guaranteed, but there are certain limitations. In Australia and the United States, the political rights of former convicts are also maintained, but with exceptions for some instances, such as corruption or treason against the state. Looking at the existing debate, it is necessary to safeguard civil and political rights universally, while paying attention to the specific cases that underlie the prohibition on former convicts from running for public office.KEYWORDS: Elections, Political Rights, Former Convicts.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 4

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025): LENTERA HUKUM Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): LENTERA HUKUM Vol. 11 No. 3 (2024): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 11 No 2 (2024): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 11 No 1 (2024): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 10 No 3 (2023) Vol 10 No 2 (2023): Human Rights and Economy in the Global South Vol 10 No 1 (2023): Human Rights in Indonesia and Beyond Vol 9 No 3 (2022): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 9 No 2 (2022): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 9 No 1 (2022): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 8 No 3 (2021): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 8 No 2 (2021): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 8 No 1 (2021): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 7 No 3 (2020): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 7 No 2 (2020): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 7 No 1 (2020): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 6 No 3 (2019): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 6 No 2 (2019): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 6 No 1 (2019): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 5 No 3 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 5 No 2 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 5 No 1 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 4 No 3 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 4 No 2 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 4 No 1 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 3 No 3 (2016): December 2016 Vol 3 No 1 (2016): April 2016 Vol 3 No 3 (2016): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 3 No 2 (2016): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 3 No 1 (2016): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 2 No 3 (2015): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 2 No 2 (2015): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 2 No 1 (2015): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 1 No 2 (2014): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 1 No 1 (2014): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 1, No 1 (2014) More Issue