cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Saiful Mustofa
Contact Email
sayfulmuztofa@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
sayfulmuztofa@gmail.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. tulungagung,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Episteme: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung
ISSN : 19077491     EISSN : 25023705     DOI : -
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Art,
Religion Arts Humanities
Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman merupakan jurnal akademik multidisipliner yang diterbitkan oleh Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Tulungagung. Epistemé terbit dua nomor setiap tahunnya, pada bulan Juni dan Desember. Artikel yang diterbitkan meliputi kajian Islam yang ditinjau dari berbagai perspektif, mulai dari komunikasi, antropologi, pendidikan, ekonomi, sosiologi, filologi, pendidikan, filsafat dan lain sebagainya. Jurnal ini didedikasikan kepada akademisi, dan pemerhati bidang kajian studi Islam. Artikel yang diterbitkan harus berupa karya orisinal dan tidak harus sejalan dengan pandangan redaksi.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 342 Documents
 8   9   10   11   12 
REPOSISI KONSEP KETUHANAN: TANGGAPAN MUHAMMAD IQBAL DAN SAID NURSI ATAS PERJUMPAAN ISLAM DAN SAINS Maftukhin, M
Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman Vol 12, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/epis.2017.12.1.77-102

Abstract

Artikel ini menghadirkan dua cara pandang berbeda antara Muhammad Iqbal dan Said Nursi dalam upaya reposisi konsep ketuhanan saat Islam bertemu sains. Artikel ini memperlihatkan bagaimana Iqbal menerima sains dengan melakukan penyesuaian ajaran Islam agar sejalan dengan epistemologi sains dan rasionalisme dengan tetap merujuk pada al-Qur’an. Konsep ketuhanan teis yang dirasa tidak sesuai dengan rasionalisme dan perkembangan sains, mendapat sentuhan Iqbal dengan dikonstruksi menjadi konsep panentheisme. Sementara itu, Said Nursi, meskipun ia juga mendorong adopsi sains, namun Nursi hampir tidak melakukan penyesuaian apa pun dalam konsep ketuhanan Islam. Sebagai pewaris pemikiran al-Asy’ariyyah, justru Nursi memilah sains dalam dua kategori, yaitu sains yang memuat nilai positif dan sains yang memuat aspek negatif. Selanjutnya Nursi hanya mengambil aspek positif dan meninggalkan aspek negatifnya. Dengan menggunakan teori Ian Barbour, artikel ini memasukkan pendekatan Iqbal dalam kategori integrasi epistemologis, sedangkan pendekatan Said Nursi masuk dalam kategori integrasi ontologis.This article seeks to presents a distinct view of two Muslim thinkers on repositioning concept of God in the face of adoption to science. That is of Muhammad Iqbal’s and of Said Nursi’s. It shows that Iqbal used methods of reconstruction on Islamic theology in order for which go in line with scientific epistemology despite it remains strongly based on the Qur’an. Iqbal is of the view that theistic God of Islam appears to come in contrast to the rationalism and modern scientific approaches. For that reason, Iqbal changed this theistic God to be a panentheistic God of modern sciences. On the other side, Said Nursi urges Muslim community to adopt science as well, but—in contrast to Iqbal—he did almost nothing in reconstructing Islamic theology. As in heritor of the doctrines of Ash’arite, instead he classified modern science into two camps, that of the positive in term of Islamic interests and that of the negative. He adopts the positive one while keeping at bay the rest. Departing from Ian Barbour’s theory, this article categorizes Iqbal’s and Nursi’s adoption to science as integration. This article proposes that the method of Iqbal’s integration during his reconstruction on Islamic theology is an epistemological integration, meanwhile Nursi’s approach is ontological integration.
FISIKA ATOM SEBAGAI BASIS FILOSOFIS ILMU DALAM PERSPEKTIF AL-GHAZALI Mustofa, Imron
Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman Vol 12, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/epis.2017.12.1.53-75

Abstract

Diskusi tentang atom tidak selalu berbicara ilmu fisika modern. Al-Ghazali seorang filsuf Muslim pada abad ke-12 silam telah jauh mendalami hal ini. Bahkan, atom dijadikannya sebagai konsep dasar ilmu hakiki yang mampu menyingkap hakikat objek pengetahuan, yang pada zamannya mampu menggoncang kemapanan hegemoni filsafat Helenisme di dunia Islam. Secara konseptual, hakikat atom hanya ada dalam pikiran karenanya wujud darinya baru terlihat ketika ada aksiden yang menempel padanya. Implikasi dari itu, akan melahirkan suatu pola pikir yang tidak hanya bersandar pada realita sempiris-rasionalis belaka sebab setidaknya ada lima hierarki realitas yang ada; essential, sensory, imaginal, conceptual dan similar existence. Adanya lima hal itu secara tidak langsung telah mengidentifikasikan lima tingkatan filter bagi “sesuatu” dapat dikatakan logis. Dengan kata lain, apa yang secara esensial (objektif) benar belum tentu dapat diterima kebenarannya melalui perspektif subjektif seseorang. Begitu juga dengan apa yang digambarkan pikiran kita dapat diterima secara konseptual (rasio) ataupun secara empiris.Untuk itu kebenaran yang hakiki bagi al-Ghazali tidak hanya sebatas konseptual ataupun imajinal belaka, namun merupakan suatu kebenaran yang dibimbing wahyu (al-hudūriy), yang mampu mencakup kelima realitas di atas, bukan semata hasil olah pikir (al-husūliy). Hal terakhir ini pulalah yang selama ini menjadi andalan para filsuf Helenisme.The discussion about atom doesn’t always talk about physics. Al-Ghazali as one of Muslim philosopher in past 12 th century has been profound talk about it. Moreover, the atom is being modified as the basic concept of true science, unveils the reality of the object of science. Which in its day has been able to shake up the established hegemony of Greek philosopher on the Islamic world. From the philosophical point of view, what al-Ghazali builds–conceptually, we may assert that he is enthusiastically want to emphasize that the reality of atom “is only in the mind”, hence its physical embodiment is only able to be seen by the presence of “accident” adhere to. Logically, it will cause a way of thinking to occur, not simply be based on empiric-rational reality, but rather on five hierarchy of existences; essential, sensory, imaginal, conceptual and similar existence. Those fives indirectly identify five standards of filter for “thing” can be classified as “logic”. It means the thing which is essentially (objectively) true, in definitively is accepted as so from subjective angle. Indeed, what we think as valid, is unabsolutely will be accepted from conceptual (ratio) and empirical point of view. That’s why, the reality of truth-according to al-Ghazali, is not purely based on the conceptual or imaginal angle, but a divine guided truth (al-hudūriy). It encompasses all those five realities, not only as the product of thought (al-husūliy). In short, what al-Ghazali offers is an integrated point of view, to understand the existing reality, using unseparated way, unites between methods of deductive and inductive, rational and empirical and so on.
TREN PENGEMBANGAN ILMU DI UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA Muslih, Mohammad
Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman Vol 12, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/epis.2017.12.1.103-139

Abstract

Pergumulan UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta dalam diskursus integrasi keilmuan, berujung pada pembangunan paradigma keilmuan yang berciri-khas, yaitu integrasi-interkoneksi. Satu dasawarsa berjalan, universitasitu telah mengembangkan tradisi akademik baru, yang ditandai denganpola pengembangan bidang penelitian dan produk-produk karya ilmiah sivitas akademikanya. Artikel ini mengungkap pengembangan keilmuan sebagaimana ditunjukkan pada karya dosen-dosennya. Dengan perspektif filsafat ilmu, kajian ini melihat implementasi paradigma UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta pada tataran pola pengembangan ilmu. Oleh karena itu, objek kajiannya adalah buku-buku karya dosen melalui metode survei kritis, satu model penelitian dengan melakukan pembacaan, memahami maksud, membandingkan dan mengindentifikasi aspek-aspek tertentu dalam kerangka pembacanya. Secara umum, karya-karya dosen bercorak memperkokoh, mengembangkan, dan mem-breakdown paradigma keilmuan yang dikembangkannya. Meski demikian, ada beberapa karya yang merupakan penerapan dari empat model aplikasi pengembangan keilmuan,yaitu komplementasi, konfirmasi, kontribusi, dan komparasi. Pola ini ternyata menempatkan al-Qur’an dan al-Sunnah pada posisi yang sejajar dengan konsep, teori, dan temuan sains padahal hingga di bangunan paradigma “spider web”-nya, kedua sumber itu berposisi sebagai “sentral keilmuan”.The involvement of UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta in the integration of scientific discourse, led to the development of distinctively scientific paradigm, namely integration-interconnection. A decade running, the university has developed a new academic tradition, characterized by patterns of development in the field of research and the products of scientific work of the academic community. This article reveal the scientific development as shown in the workof the lecturers. With the perspective of philosophy of science, this study sees the implementation of UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta paradigm on the level of science development pattern. Therefore the object of the study is the books of lecturers through critical survey methods, a model of research by reading, understanding the purpose, comparing and identifying certain aspects in the frame of the reader. In general, the works of the lecturers is to strengthen, develop, and detailing the scientific paradigm, which he developed. However, there are some works which is the application of the four models of the application of scientific development, namely complementation, confirmations, contributions, and comparisons. This pattern turns placing al-Quran and al-Sunnah in a position parallel with the concepts, theories, and scientific findings, while in the paradigm building of “spider web”, both sources playsas “central of science”.
KONSEP KHILAFAH ISLᾹMIYYAH HIZBUT TAHRIR INDONESIA: Kajian Living al-Qur’an Perspektif Komunikasi Hayati, Nilda
Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman Vol 12, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/epis.2017.12.1.169-200

Abstract

Artikel ini merupakan kajian living Qur’an dengan menggunakan perspektif komunikasi. Living Qur’an adalah salah satu kajian fenomenologi kontemporer yang menelisik tentang bagaimana isi kandungan al-Qur’an dijadikan sebagai way of life. Objek kajian yang akan ditelusuri adalah konsep Khilafah Islamiyyah sebagaimana diusung oleh Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI). Dalam menyebarluaskan doktrin khilafah, organisasi tersebut menggunakan berbagai efek media komunikasi. Fenomena tersebut bisa dikatakan sebagai sebuah manifesto ayat-ayat al-Qur’an tertentu yang menjadi landasan doktrin tersebut. Diawali dengan kajian tiga bingkai resepsi (hermeneutis, estetis, kultural) HTI atas ayat-ayat al-Qur’an, tulisan ini juga menjelaskan bagaimana ayat al-Qur’an yang menjadi landasan konsep khilafah, “hidup” dalam jejaring komunikasi yang kompleks di tengah pergumulan media massa. Hasilnya, dengan berkeyakinan pada pendirian khilafah yang dilandaskan kepada beberapa ayat al-Qur’an, HTI berusaha membangun negara khilafah dan penegak syariah yang lengkap dengan gagasan pemikiran yang mereka tuangkan dalam berbagai media baik cetak maupun elektronik dalam rangka mengkomunikasikan pesan mereka kepada khalayak.This paper is a living Qur’an studies through the lens of communication approach. Living Qur’an is one of contemporary phenomenology study on how the contents of Qur’an used as a way of life. The object of study that will be explored is the concept of the Islamic Caliphate (khilafah) as promoted by Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI). In spreading the doctrine, they use some mass communication effect. The phenomenon can be regarded as a manifesto of certain Qur’anic verses that became the foundation of the doctrine. Start on a study of three frames of receptions (hermeneutic, aesthetic, cultural) on HTI and the verses of the Qur’an, this paper also describes how the Qur’anic verses that underlie the concept of the caliphate, “live” in a complex communication network in the mass media. As a result, the belief in the establishment of a caliphate which is based on some verses of the Qur’an, HTI trying to build caliphate state and sharia enforcement is complete with the idea of thinking that they pour in a variety of print and electronic media in order to communicate their message to the society.
STUDI NEGOSIASI KULTURAL YANG MENDAMAIKAN ANTARETNIK DAN AGAMA DI KOTA TANJUNGPINANG Hanani, Silfia
Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman Vol 12, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/epis.2017.12.1.201-230

Abstract

Indonesia merupakan negara multietnik, ras, agama, suku dan seterusnya. Keberagaman ini dapat memicu ketidakharmonisan dalam kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara, bahkan bisa mengakhiri sejarah suatu bangsa. Hal ini bisa dilihat dari konflik-konflik yang terjadi di berbagai belahan dunia. Untuk mengatasi dampak negatif tersebut, dibutuhkan kajian-kajian bangunan toleransi lokalitas yang tumbuh dan hidup dalam masyarakat. Tradisi-tradisi lokalitas itu menjadi satu khazanah dalam membangun keharmonisan dalam masyarakat yang multietnis, agama, ras tersebut. Konstruksi-konstruksi keharmonisan ini bisa dilihat dari praktik toleransi lokalitas etnik Melayu dan Cina di Kota Tanjungpinang. Keharmonisan itu dibangun oleh negosiasi-negosiasi kultural yang sudah ditradisikan secara langsung atau tidak langsung. Tradisi-tradisi kultural lokalitas itu patut dijaga dan dikembangkan secara terus-menerus sehingga negara yang dihuni oleh keberagaman ini bisa menemukan model toleransi sesuai dengan lokalitas-lokalitasnya sendiri karena dalam lokalitas yang dimiliki itu ada kearifan yang bisa menyatukan dan berguna bagi masyarakat untuk membangun kehidupan yang harmonis.Indonesia is a multiethnic country, race, religion, tribe, etc. This diversity can trigger disharmony in the life of nation and state, and even terminate the history of a nation. It can be seen from the conflicts occur in the world. In order to overcome the negative impact, it takes a study of locality tolerances which arise and live in society. The locality traditions become a treasure in establishing harmony in a multiethnic, religious, racial society. These charismatic constructions can be seen from the practical tolerance of Malay and Chinese ethnicity in Tanjungpinang; the harmony is built by cultural negotiations that have been applied directly or indirectly. The locality of cultural traditions should be maintained and developed continuously so that the country in habited by this diversity can find a model of tolerance in accordance with its own locality, because in the locality possessed by, there is wisdom that can unite and useful for the community to build a harmony of life. 
INTERAKSI SIMBOLIS PONDOK PESANTREN SALAFI DAN MASYARAKAT Nashirudin, Muh.
Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman Vol 12, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/epis.2017.12.1.141-167

Abstract

Pondok pesantren “salafi” selama ini diasumsikan memiliki interaksi yang tidak harmonis dengan masyarakat. Penelitian ini membahas tentang salah satu pondok pesantren “salafi”, yaitu Pondok Pesantren Imam Bukhari (PPIB) Selokaton, Karanganyar; tentang bagaimana sejarah berdirinya danbagaimana interaksi PPIB dengan masyarakat sekitarnya. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian lapangan dengan data yang dikaji adalah data-data tertulis dalam sejumlah dokumen resmi dari PPIB yang berhubungan dengan kegiatan keagamaan di masyarakat sekitarnya dan berbagai wawancara yang melibatkan pihak PPIB dan pihak-pihak terkait seperti para takmir masjid di sekitar PPIB serta beberapa tokoh masyarakat. Asumsi tentang interaksi yang tidak harmonis pondok pesantren “salafi” dengan masyarakat tersebut ternyata tidak selamanya benar. Penelitian ini menemukan adanya interaksi simbolis antara PPIB dan masyarakat sekitarnya. PPIB memilih untuk membuat kegiatan yang berupa tahsin al-Qur’an yang notabene merupakan kegiatan yang dapat diterima oleh semua kalangan dengan berbagai latar belakang keagamaan yang berbeda-beda. Dengan cara ini, PPIB bertindak agar tidak mendapatkan reaksi penolakan dan pertentangan dari masyarakat Selokaton. PPIB juga memilih tema yang bersifat umum dalam khutbah Jum’at yang makmumnya memiliki keragaman pemahaman keagamaan untuk menghindari adanya konflik dengan masyarakat. Hal ini juga dilakukan oleh masyarakat Selokaton dalam berinteraksi dengan PPIB. Kesediaan mereka mengundang ustaz atau penceramah dari PPIB dalam beberapa kegiatan keagamaan mereka, kesediaan mereka melakukan salat ‘Id di pelataran PPIB menjadi sebuah simbol penerimaan mereka akan keberadaan PPIB.It was being assumed that the salafy boarding school was in disharmony with its surrounding society. This research is about the one of salafy boarding school: Pondok Pesantren Imam Bukhari (PPIB) Selokaton Karanganyar. This research seek to descripe its history and its interaction with the surrounding community. This study is a field research. All data were collected from PPIB’s official documents that are related to religious activities in its surrounding community. Interview with the key informans from PPIB and clerical otorities like Ta’mir masjid was also conducted. The assumtion of the disharmony occurance in the interaction between PPIB dan its surrounding society was no longer true. The research found there was a symbolic interaction between PPIB and its surrounding communities. PPIB created activities like tahsin Qur’an that could be accepted by all people with the various religious backgrounds. For not getting the rejection and opposition from the Selokaton people, PPIB choose the common theme for a Friday sermon that had the difference followers of religious understanding. It was also to avoid conflict with the public. This was also done by the Selokaton people in their interaction with PPIB. Their willingness to invite the religious teacher from PPIB to their religious activities, like performing the id prayer in the PPIB’s courtyard was a symbol of their acceptance of the PPIB existence.
REVISITING INTERRELIGIOUS DIALOGUE IN THE HISTORY OF INDONESIA: The Case of Malino Declaration for Maluku Hidayati, Mega
Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman Vol 12, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/epis.2017.12.2.457-480

Abstract

Conflict between Muslims and Christians in Moluccas (1999-2002) is one of the worst conflicts in Indonesia which brings great damage in all fields of human life. The significant result of reconciliation can be found in Central Government’s effort called as Malino Declaration II. This paper aims to find a positive contribution on formulating the key for facing the fact of religious plurality in Indonesia by revisiting the Malino Declaration II. By critically analyzing the discourse of the Malino Declaration contents, it concludes that Malino Declaration is shaky for several reason, (1). The role of Government is so dominant, thus Government is in the safe position. Therefore, it isunderstandable why many people view Government aims to “clean” its mistakes in the conflict. (2). Military as a tool was not only ineffective and bias, but also it caused mass killings under the banner of national stability. (3) Malino Declaration indicates obviously and strongly that the conflict is pure between Muslim and Christian communities in Moluccas, as the result the blame is theirs, (4) contain of declaration gives an impression that the participants who are representative of each community do not have enough room in expressing and waging in dialogue. In other words, Malino Declaration is still far from genuine dialogue.Konflik antara Muslim dan Kristiani di Maluku (1999-2002) adalah salah satu konflik terburuk di Indonesia yang menyebabkan kerusakan luar biasa di segala bidang kehidupan manusia. Hasil rekonsiliasi yang signifikan adalah usaha pemerintah pusat terkait perumusan Deklarasi Malino II. Dengan meninjau kembali Deklarasi Malino II, tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menemukan kontribusi positif dalam merumuskan kunci dalam menghadapi fakta pluralitas agama di Indonesia. Dengan menganalisis secara kritis isi Deklarasi Malino, dapat disimpulkan bahwa Deklarasi Malino lemah dengan alasan: pertama, peran pemerintah sangat dominan sehingga pemerintah ada di posisi aman. Karenanya, dapat dipahami mengapa banyak orang melihat pemerintah bermaksud “membersihkan” kesalahannya dalam konflik tersebut; kedua, militer sebagai alat tidak efektif dan bias serta menyebabkan pembunuhan massa di bawah bendera kestabilan nasional; ketiga, deklarasi Malino mengindikasikan secara jelas dan tegas bahwa konflik tersebut antara komunitas Muslim dan Kristen di Maluku sehingga kesalahan adalah pada kedua kelompok ini; keempat, isi deklarasi memberikan kesan bahwa para partisipan yang mewakili masing-masing komunitas tidak mendapatkan ruang yang cukup dalam mengekspresikan dan melaksanakan dialog. Dengan kata lain, Deklarasi Malino masih jauh dari makna dialog yang sebenarnya.
KESARJANAAN TRADISIONALIS AL-QUR’AN DI ERA KONTEMPORER: Telaah terhadap The Study Quran a New Translation and Commentary karya Seyyed Hossein Nasr dan Tim Muchlisin, Annas Rolli
Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman Vol 12, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/epis.2017.12.2.287-310

Abstract

Two years ago, a Qur’anic translation and interpretation work was published in English which was initiated by Seyyed Hossein Nasr and his team: CanerK. Dagli, Maria Massi Dakake, Joseph E. B. Lumbard, and Mohammed Rustom. The work that they named as the Study Quran A New Translation and Commentary covers both translation and interpretation of the Qur’an in fully 30 chapters, and was added by some essays written by scholars from various academic and country backgrounds. In other side, this work represents Nasr and his team’s thought on “tradition”. For them, tradition is not like was understood by several people who consider it as something old-fashioned, but rather as a set of principles that revealed from God. In some places, this traditionalist insight emerges in their interpretation. This paper attempts to study on the methodology used in the work and to see its position in hermeneutics typology. From that study, it could be seen some interpretation principles held by its authors, such as emphasizing the sacred nature of the Qur’an, explaining that the Qur’an contains all doctrines about reality natures in all of its levels, using universalist perspective in comprehending Qur’anic verses that related to religious traditions, and presenting traditional Qur’anic interpretation.From hermeneutics typology, this work could be categorized in obyektivis-cum-subjektivis interpretation.
ISLAMOLOGI TERAPAN SEBAGAI GERBANG ANALOG PENGEMBANGAN ISLAMIC STUDIES: Kajian Eksploratif Pemikiran Mohammed Arkoun Baedhowi, B
Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman Vol 12, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/epis.2017.12.2.347-379

Abstract

Applied Islamology is a Mohammed Arkoun’s thought and the critical notion of the weaknesses of Islamology. The weakness of Islamology because of its study of Islam and Islamic discourse is textual, ahistorical and only moves Islamic studies from certain texts and certain figures that are considered to represent,without relating to various phenomena of Islam and religious social reality,so that it reduces and forgets various elements, such as oral culture, unwritten experiences, both spoken and discourse or unspoken. Applied Islamology as an analogue of Islamic studies can also be explored, developed and will become an important Islamic study when it is always associated with various religious phenomena and social realities in society. Therefore, the dialectical relationship between the textual factor (language) - History and Islamic Studies is a unity and linkage in Islamic studies. Their absence of dialectical relationships will lead to gaps in both methodological and epistemological plots in the praxis of Islamic studies. This dialectical relationship that the writer wants to emphasize in studying Islamic studies. I think this dialectical relationship is the dynamics of the substance and function of religious studies with the existing Islamic discourse from time to time. In such a context, various social, methodological theories that are in line with our locality are indispensable for understanding the existing empirical social and religious realities. In this “introduction” paper, the writer will examine the dynamics of the dialectical relations of these three domains for the development of Islamic studies.
MEMBANGUN MODEL BERNEGOSIASI DALAM TRADISI LARANGAN-LARANGAN PERKAWINAN JAWA Huda, Miftahul
Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman Vol 12, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/epis.2017.12.2.381-409

Abstract

This paper seeks to explore the model of negotiating the five families of Nahdliyyin-Muhammadiyah to the Ponorogo community over the traditional dispute over the prohibitions of Javanese marriage. The traditions of the Javanese marriage that is “weton”, “ngalon-ngulon”, “Golan-Mirah”, marriage of “lusan” and “madep-ngarep” marriage. Excavation model of the negotiation result is divided into three models. First, the model of negotiating within the frame of kalam (theology) and adat (tradition) connections the nappears to be incompatibility and inconsistency between the two. This is due to the emergence of different assumptions due to syirik (belief in more than of God) stereotype, because it is more holding the tradition than the existing of religious rules. Second, the model of negotiating within the framework of the Jurisprudence and adat connections that gave birth to the relationship of proximity and flexibility in responding to Javanese marriage customs or traditions so that it can be an alternative pattern of settlement. Third, the model negotiates within the framework of wisdom and diversity of customs/traditions. In the category of this meaning, the problem of the tradition of the prohibitions on Javanese marriage can be resolved by returning to the wisdom and diversity of tradition. Let the tradition solve itself. It seems that with this category the negotiation process goes fluently.

Page 10 of 35 | Total Record : 342

 8   9   10   11   12 

Filter by Year

2012 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 20 No 01 (2025) Vol 19 No 02 (2024) Vol 18 No 1 (2023) Vol 17 No 01 (2022) Vol 17 No 2 (2022) Vol 16 No 02 (2021) Vol 16 No 01 (2021) Vol 15 No 02 (2020) Vol 15 No 1 (2020) Vol 14, No 2 (2019) Vol 14 No 2 (2019) Vol 14, No 1 (2019) Vol 14 No 1 (2019) Vol 13 No 2 (2018) Vol 13, No 2 (2018) Vol 13, No 1 (2018) Vol 13 No 1 (2018) Vol 12, No 2 (2017) Vol 12 No 2 (2017) Vol 12 No 1 (2017) Vol 12, No 1 (2017) Vol 11, No 2 (2016) Vol 11 No 2 (2016) Vol 11 No 1 (2016) Vol 11, No 1 (2016) Vol 10, No 2 (2015) Vol 10 No 2 (2015) Vol 10, No 1 (2015) Vol 10 No 1 (2015) Vol 9 No 2 (2014) Vol 9, No 2 (2014) Vol 9, No 1 (2014) Vol 9 No 1 (2014) Vol 8, No 2 (2013) Vol 8 No 2 (2013) Vol 8 No 1 (2013) Vol 8, No 1 (2013) Vol 7, No 2 (2012) Vol 7 No 2 (2012) More Issue