cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
M. Ilham Tanzilulloh
Contact Email
m.ilham_tanzilulloh@yahoo.co.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
m.ilham_tanzilulloh@yahoo.co.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Justicia Islamica : Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Sosial
Published by Institusi Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo
ISSN : 16935926     EISSN : 25027646     DOI : -
Core Subject : Religion, Education, Social,
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other
Justicia Islamica published by the Department of Sharia and Islamic Economic IAIN Ponorogo. The journal is intended as a venue for open-minded to all people. Editor accepts writings of the results of conceptual thinking and research in the fields of law, Islamic law and social problems that have never been published. The editor reserves the right to perform editing without changing the intent of writing.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 114 Documents
 8   9   10   11   12 
Faith in God, Independence of Law and Independence of Judges (Study of Theistic Legal Realism in legal settlement) Utami, Nofi Sri; Suteki, Suteki; Saraswati, Retno; Budiono, Arief
Justicia Islamica Vol 15, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : IAIN Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/justicia.v15i2.1459

Abstract

The condition that law and legal apparatus in all levels including judges, are imprisoned in fatal positivism. This understanding reduces the law only as mere deterministic, mechanistic and esoteric laws and regulations. Solitary law is solitary law without include the transcendence, morality, or custom. The final result of this paradigm is only able to present legal certainty but lack of justice. The roots of all crises and the collapse of public trust in the law are originated from a law that educates only the mouthpiece of the legislation. The law that teaches the legislation as a sacred ideology, the law is just law or regulation. Fresh graduate of law who fill positions of legal apparatus experts have skills but they are lack of empathy, neglect of public justice and corrupt. A new legal choice paradigm is needed, namely theistic legal realism which gives judges and other legal apparatuses the freedom from the shackles of procedural justice in the style of positivism. Through the law with the Theistic Legal Realism paradigm, it is expected that the legal apparatus will have virtue, to be able to read the substance of justice with his faith in Allah rather than merely being a mouthpiece of the law and be able to guard against despicable behavior on the basis of his faith.
KEADILAN SUBSTANTIF DALAM ULTRA PETITA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Yasin, Ikhsan Fatah
Justicia Islamica Vol 15, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : IAIN Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/justicia.v15i1.1252

Abstract

Abstrak: Mahkamah Konstitusi dibentuk untuk menjadi penjaga gawang konstitusi, supaya tidak ada satupun yang melanggar konstitusi. Mahkamah konstitusi dilekati dengan empat kewenangan dan satu kewajiban, kewenangan Mahkmah Konstitusi yang pertama dan paling utama adalah menguji Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Dalam UU No. 24 tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi, Putusan yang dihasilkan dalam perkara pengujian undang-undang adalah dikabulkan, ditolak, dan tidak dapat diterima. Putusan dikabulkan jika permohonan pemohon beralasan sehingga kemudian pasal yang dimohonkan dinyatakan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat. Namun dalam perkembanganya Mahkamah Konstitusi melakukann ultra petita dengan memunculkan variasi terhadap putusan yang dikabulkan, Mahkamah Konstitusi memperkenalkan putusan konstitusional bersyarat, tidak konstitusional bersyarat dan penambahan frasa. Sehingga dalam perubahan UU No. 24 tahun 2003, dengan tegas dinyatakan Mahkamah Konsitusi dilarang menambahkan frasa, kemudian pasal tersebut juga dibatalkan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Hakim di Mahkamah Konsitusi beranggapan bahwa dalam menjaga konstitusi kewenangan Mahkamah Konsitusi tidak boleh dikungkung oleh undang-undang dan bahwa hakim diperintahkan untuk menegakan keadilan bukan menegakan undang-undang. Tulisan ini meneliti putusan-putusan Mahkamah Konsitui yang konstitusional bersyarat dan menambahkan frasa untuk menemukan apakah dalam putusan tersebut benar-benar untuk menegakan keadilan yang mana keadilan tersebut tidak bisa terwujud jika hanya menghapuskan pasal yang dimohonkan. Dari hasil penelitian, penulis menemukan bahwa putusan tersebut memang memberikan keadilan bagi pemohon dan keadilan tersebut tidak bisa terwujud jika Mahkamah Konstitusi hanya membatalkan tanpa memberikan tafsir dan menambahkan frasa terhadap pasal yang dimohonkan.Abstract: The Constitutional Court to be the constitutional goalkeeper, there is not anything contrary against constitution. The Constitutional Court has four authorities and one duty, the authority of the Constitutional Court first and foremost is judicial review the law against Constitution. According to Constitutional Court law, the Decision of judicial review is accepted, rejected and unacceptable. The decision is acceptable if the applicant's request is grounded in the state memorandum filed for which there is no binding legal force. However, in its development, they performed ultra petite by raising the difference to the granted decision, the Constitutional Court with conditionally constitutional, conditionally unconstitutional and added phrase. Amendment of constitutional court law, expressly the Constitution Law is prohibited to add the phrase, then enforced by the Constitutional Court. The judge at the Constitutional Court considered that in keeping with the constitution the institution could not be confined by law and that the judge was ordered to uphold justice rather than enforce the law. This article research decision of Constitutional Court Conditionally Constitutional and adds a phrase to find whether in the decision it is really to enforce justice which accuracy cannot be realized if it simply removes the petitioned article. From the results of the study, the authors found that it does give the constitution and cannot be applied if it only provides without interpretation and adds phrases.
REKONSTRUKSI KONSEP HAK DAN KEWAJIBAN SUAMI ISTERI DALAM PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN PERKAWINAN INDONESIA Hermanto, Agus
Justicia Islamica Vol 15, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : IAIN Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/justicia.v15i1.1455

Abstract

This study examines the construction and reconstruction of rights and duties of a husband and a wife in Indonesia marriage law. Explicitly, Indonesia marriage law is considered distinguishing division of labour for a husband and a wife: public domain is for the former and the domestic one is for the later. Such division of labour needs reconstruction to reveal implicit understanding. As a law ruling marriage in Indonesia, Indonesia marriage law firstly, is allegedly adopted from classical jurisprudence which is contextually patterned in the culture of the Arab people; secondly, was legislated in the era of the patriarchy-dominated New Order government; thirdly, was legislated 43 years ago and has not been renewed; finally, is ambiguous in terms of its chapters of rights and obligations ofa husband and a wife. This study uses library research in which the researcher reviews literatures and other written sources related to the topic. To reconstruct Indonesian marriage law concept, the researcher uses the theory of maslahat, sadd al-źarī'ah, gender and progressive. This study also approaches the topic uses interdisciplinary perspectives, namely, philosophy, history, sociology and anthropology. This study demonstrates firstly, the construction of right and obligation concept in Indonesia marriage legislation recognizes the legal capacity of women. However, in some articles, marriage law confirms rigid division of labour between men and women: public domain for men and domestic one for the other. This marriage law shows a highly ambiguous attitude of the government. In Law of No 1 of 1974 about Marriage, Article 31 paragraph (3) states that Husband is the head of the household and the wife is a housewife. Article 34 Paragraph (1) The husband is obliged to protect his wife and provide all the necessities of marriage life in accordance with his ability, and (2), the wife has to manage the household affairs well. These verses are presumably conservative; therefore, Indonesian Muslim feminists demand gender equality by reconstructing the concepts contained in the law based on principles of justice (al-adl), equality (musāwah), deliberation (al-syūra), get along well (mu'asyarah bi al-ma'rūf). This will prevent the incident of overburden for women (longer and heavier workload), subordination (neglecting political decisions), marginalization (economic impoverishment), stereotypes (negative), and violence. According to al-Shātibī, legal reformcan be conducted under three conditions; 1) it does not violate the law of syarā ', 2) it is reasonable, 3) it eases and avoids difficulty as the concept of sadd al-źarī'at suggests. It is li jalb al-masālih wa li daf'i al-mafasid, aiming at keeping religion, soul, mind, descendants, and wealth. The Indonesian Muslim feminists strive to do progressive ijtihād and assert that the law is for mankind and not humankind for the law.
Contribution of Mohammad Nawawī bin ‘Umar in Family Conflict Management Ainiyah, Qurrotul
Justicia Islamica Vol 15, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : IAIN Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/justicia.v15i2.1460

Abstract

Moeslim ulamas of Indonesia have so many works which talk about any social aspect including the concept of family. One of moeslim ulamas of Indonesia who was very active to contibute the idea in the written form was Syeikh Nawawī bin Umar. This paper will be focused on ‘Uqūd Al-Lijjain book. It is one of Sheikh Nawawi's work which describes about family management that regulate how to keep the harmonization of family. This book tends to the superiority of man. It is because this book has been written in more than one hundred years ago, where Syeikh Nawawi lived in patriarchy environment. Then, the results of this paper are；first, the education background and social life of Syeikh Nawawi which basically in islamic boarding school. Second, ‘Uqūd Al-Lijjain is a book which provides family management including the laws and relation ethics between husband and wife according to Imam Syafii madzhab. Third, ‘Uqūd Al-Lijjain answers the management conflict in a family, that is between a husband and wife should understand the right and obigation of each.

Page 12 of 12 | Total Record : 114

 8   9   10   11   12 

Filter by Year

2011 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 2 (2017): HUKUM DAN SOSIAL Vol 14, No 1 (2017): Hukum dan Sosial Vol 13, No 2 (2016): Hukum dan Sosial Vol 13, No 1 (2016): Hukum dan Sosial Vol 12, No 2 (2015): HUKUM DAN SOSIAL Vol 12, No 1 (2015): HUKUM DAN SOSIAL Vol 11, No 2 (2014): HUKUM DAN SOSIAL Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014): HUKUM DAN SOSIAL Vol 10, No 2 (2013): HUKUM DAN SOSIAL Vol 10, No 1 (2013): HUKUM DAN SOSIAL Vol 9, No 2 (2012): HUKUM DAN SOSIAL Vol 9, No 1 (2012): HUKUM DAN SOSIAL Vol 8, No 2 (2011): Hukum dan Sosial Vol 8, No 1 (2011): Hukum dan Sosial More Issue