cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject :
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 46, No 2 (2019)" : 6 Documents clear
Pemahaman Peneliti Psikologi mengenai Besaran Sampel: Data dan Simulasi Wiradhany, Wisnu; Adiasto, Krisna; Yulianto, Jony Eko; Kiling, Indra Yohanes
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 46, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (920.403 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpsi.24260

Abstract

The lack of knowledge on how to determine sample sizes in experiments is arguably one of the main reasons underlying the replication crisis in psychological science. A survey distributed among Indonesian students and researchers concerning 1) familiarity and understanding of statistical concepts related to sampling size determination, 2) current sample size determination practices in experiments, and 3) ideal sample sizes for experiments. Subsequently, we simulated expected statistical power given the sample sizes reported in the survey. Results demonstrated that 1) while a majority of participants were somewhat familiar with statistical concepts related to sampling size determination, they did not always endorse the correct and/or complete definition of each concept. Furthermore, 2) participants relied on practical considerations in determining sample sizes. Consequently, 3) the reported sample sizes did not have sufficient power to detect small to medium effect sizes, which are commonly present in psychological science.
Fungsi Kognitif Lansia yang Beraktivitas Kognitif secara Rutin dan Tidak Rutin Djajasaputra, Adriana Dewi Riani; Halim, Magdalena S
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 46, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (688.854 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpsi.33192

Abstract

Ministry of the Health Republic of Indonesia noted that 47% of the elderly in Indonesia still work. One activity that the elderly might do is a cognitive activity, such as watching the news, reading books, art activities, and doing analytical things. Frequent cognitive activity is thought to preserve elderly cognitive function. This study aimed to see the comparison of the cognitive function of the elderly who perform a frequent and non-frequent cognitive activity. This was a quantitative study, based on 12 subtests of cognitive function as part of the Indonesian Neuropsychological Test Battery, to two elderly groups in Jakarta (N=90, 69 women and 21 men), the elderly who performed frequent and non-frequent cognitive activities. The results indicated the presence of significant cognitive functional differences in all aspects of attention, language, and memory aspects except visual reproduction subtest and verbal learning (short term) subtest, among elderly groups who performed frequent and non-frequent cognitive activities. However, there was no significant difference in cognitive function in the executive function.
Pembuktian Validitas terkait Struktur Tes Potensi Akademik Pascasarjana (PAPS) Universitas Gadjah Mada Widhiarso, Wahyu
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 46, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (593.96 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpsi.38223

Abstract

This study examined the construct validity of the Graduate Academic Potential Test (PAPS). The examination was performed on all existing PAPS series (6 forms) to identify the consistency of dimensionality structure of PAPS. Data of this study were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The results of the analysis support assumption that the structure of the PAPS test is unidimensional. All of the model fit indices support the decision that the unidimensional model fit the data. The study also examined factor loading that the non-verbal components, especially the quantitative components that had a higher factor weight than the other components.
Adaptation and Validation of The Children’s Worlds Subjective Well-Being Scale (CW-SWBS) in Indonesia Borualogo, Ihsana Sabriani; Casas, Ferran
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 46, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (681.044 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpsi.38995

Abstract

The Indonesian research team participating in the Children’s Worlds international project has used a new context-free multi-item scale named CW-SWBS (Children’s Worlds Subjective Well-Being Scale). This psychometric instrument was previously never used in Indonesia. This study aimed to validate the adapted Indonesia language version for a representative sample of children who are elementary students in West Java province (N = 22,616), ranging from 8, 10, to 12-year-olds. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the fit of the psychometric scale, and multi-group CFA was used to check the comparability between answers given by gender and school types. Result findings showed that the instrument displays excellent fit for measuring life satisfaction in Indonesian children using five items, instead of the six original items. Answers to the items of the CW-SWBS by gender and school types were demonstrated to be comparable, suggesting that there was no different answering style between individuals in these studied groups.
Multisensory Model: Implementation and Contribution of Home Early literacy Stimulation Ruhaena, Lisnawati; Moordiningsih, Moordiningsih
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 46, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (647.754 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpsi.39593

Abstract

A multisensory model was implemented to improve the stimulation and development of early literacy skill. This implementation was conducted on 56 mothers and their children aged 3-5 years old, by giving them literacy media and assistance to the mothers. The assistance was carried out by 21 literacy ambassadors. Each literacy ambassador helped 2-3 mothers. Mixed-Method Action Research (MMAR) was conducted to implement the multisensory model and evaluate its contribution. Quantitative data were collected by scales, while qualitative data were collected by observation, interviews, and questionnaires. Quantitative data analysis was done with Paired Sample T-Test, and qualitative data analysis was conducted with content analysis. Once the multisensory model was applied, the stimulation of children's literacy shifted from a textual way to a contextual way. Multisensory models contributed to creating a storybook reading routine and playing hand puppets, letter cards, and activity books. This contribution was very important because it significantly increased literacy activity and developed children’s literacy skill.
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Parent Report (SDQ-PR) As Screening Instrument of Children Mental Health in Indonesia Wimbarti, Supra; Siregar, Juliarni; Oktaviana, Mistety; Regiastri, Regiastri
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 46, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (497.32 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpsi.46698

Abstract

This study aims at examining the agreement level between clinical diagnoses by a senior psychologist in the hospital and diagnoses/screening on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire conducted by parents. Using ICD 10 (Indonesian version) as the gold standard, a clinical child psychologist diagnosed 253 male and female elementary school children aged 7-14 years old. Parents of the same children were requested to fill-out the SDQ questionnaire (SDQ-PR).  Psychometric property of SDQ-PR was analyzed using Alpha Cronbach and Principal Axis Factoring Analysis. Screening quality of SDQ-PR was examined using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC), Likelihood Ratio (LR+ and LR-), and Chi-square. Reliabilities of SDQ-PR in all subscales were (α = 0.562 to α = 0.684) except subscale of peer-problem (α = 0.174). Different from the original version of SDQ-PR that consists of 5 subscales, this study revealed 8 subscales. LR and ROC analyses for hyperkinetic revealed LR+ = 1.84 and LR– = 0.51, sensitivity = 67.6% and specificity = 63.3% with cut-off score ≥ 6. For behavior disorder, the LR+ = 2.3, LR- = 0.42, sensitivity = 70.96%, and specificity = 69.15% with cut-off score ≥ 4. As for behavior disorder the LR+ = 1.07, LR- = 0.94, sensitivity = 50%, specificity 53.27% with cut-off score ≥ 4. Chi-square score indicated a significant correlation between SDQ-PR and the diagnoses from child psychologist for hyperkinetic and behavior disorder, but not for an emotional problem.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2019 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 48, No 2 (2021) Vol 48, No 1 (2021) Vol 47, No 3 (2020) Vol 47, No 2 (2020) Vol 47, No 1 (2020) Vol 46, No 3 (2019) Vol 46, No 2 (2019) Vol 46, No 1 (2019) Vol 45, No 3 (2018) Vol 45, No 2 (2018) Vol 45, No 1 (2018) Vol 44, No 3 (2017) Vol 44, No 2 (2017) Vol 44, No 1 (2017) Vol 43, No 3 (2016) Vol 43, No 2 (2016) Vol 43, No 1 (2016) Vol 42, No 3 (2015) Vol 42, No 2 (2015) Vol 42, No 1 (2015) Vol 1, No 1 (2015) Vol 41, No 2 (2014) Vol 41, No 1 (2014) Vol 40, No 2 (2013) Vol 40, No 1 (2013) Vol 39, No 2 (2012) Vol 39, No 1 (2012) Vol 38, No 2 (2011) Vol 38, No 1 (2011) Vol 37, No 2 (2010) Vol 37, No 1 (2010) Vol 36, No 2 (2009) Vol 36, No 1 (2009) Vol 35, No 2 (2008) Vol 35, No 1 (2008) Vol 34, No 2 (2007) Vol 34, No 1 (2007) Vol 33, No 2 (2006) Vol 33, No 1 (2006) Vol 32, No 2 (2005) Vol 32, No 1 (2005) Vol 31, No 2 (2004) Vol 31, No 1 (2004) Vol 30, No 2 (2003) Vol 30, No 1 (2003) Vol 29, No 2 (2002) Vol 29, No 1 (2002) Vol 28, No 2 (2001) Vol 28, No 1 (2001) Vol 27, No 2 (2000) Vol 27, No 1 (2000) Vol 26, No 2 (1999) Vol 26, No 1 (1999) Vol 25, No 2 (1998) Vol 25, No 1 (1998) Vol 24, No 2 (1997) Vol 24, No 1 (1997) Vol 23, No 2 (1996) Vol 23, No 1 (1996) Vol 4, No 1 (1976) More Issue