cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
jurnalius
Contact Email
jurnaliusunram@yahoo.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnaliusunram@yahoo.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota mataram,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan)
Published by Universitas Mataram
ISSN : 23033827     EISSN : 2477815X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal IUS established December 2012, is an institution that focuses on journal development for post graduate students and all law activists in general and specialised topics. Journal IUS publishes three times a year and articles are based on research with specific themes. Jurnal IUS was founded by a group of young lecturers who had a passion to spread their ideas, thoughts and expertise concerning law. Jurnal IUS focuses on publishing research about law reviews from law students, lecturers and other activists on various topics. As an academic centre, we organize regular discussions around various selected topics twice a month. Topics of interest: the battle of legal paradigm legal pluralism law and power
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 746 Documents
 71   72   73   74   75 
Reconstruction of the Regulation of the Quasi-Judicial Authority of the Supreme Audit Agency over the Treasurer in Fulfilling the Element of Legal Certainty Supriyonohadi; Lego Karjoko Lego Karjoko; Waluyo Waluyo
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v14i2.1928

Abstract

The Audit Board of Indonesia (Financial Audit Agency—BPK), through its Summary of Semester Audit Results (Ihtisar Semester Audit Results—IHPS), reports that state financial losses attribute to treasurers (treasury claim cases) remain significant despite advances in modern public financial management. As a constitutional body endowed with quasi-judicial authority to assess and determine state financial losses attributable to treasurers, BPK has established an administrative mechanism for resolving such losses through BPK Regulation No. 3 of 2007 on the Procedures for the Settlement of State Financial Losses Involving Treasurers. The authority and regulatory framework are intended to enable BPK to process treasury claims in a manner that upholds the principle of legal certainty. This normative legal study, employing statutory and conceptual approaches alongside ontological and ratio legal analyzes of BPK’s quasi-judicial authority, demonstrates that asymmetric information in the management of state finances provides the ratio legal underpinning BPK’s authority to assess and determine state losses involving treasurers. Nevertheless, several fundamental procedural safeguards remain inadequately incorporated into BPK’s quasi-judicial proceedings. To enhance legal certainty, the mechanism for resolving state financial losses involving treasurers through BPK decisions should be reconstructed through the revision of BPK Regulation No. 3 of 2007. Such reform should incorporate fundamental principles of due process, particularly the audi alteram partem principle by ensuring the treasurer’s direct and meaningful participation in the evidentiary and decision-making process. Furthermore, administrative efficiency and clarity of authority can be strengthened by reducing the existing span of control and enhancing the procedural and evidentiary role of BPK’s Regional Offices across provinces, as expressly provided for in the revised BPK Regulation.  
Blockchain and Knowledge Graphs for Cultural Heritage Repatriation: Strengthening Evidentiary Frameworks under Indonesian Law Ni Putu Suci Meinarni; I Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Aristamy; Rizkita Ayu Mutiarani
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v14i2.1942

Abstract

The illicit trafficking and historically wrongful removal of cultural property continue to undermine heritage protection and repatriation. Focusing on Indonesia, this article examines how blockchain and knowledge graphs might improve the integrity, traceability, and contextual organization of provenance information without treating technological immutability as proof of factual truth. It applies doctrinal analysis to Indonesian cultural-heritage and electronic-evidence law and critically assesses documented technical projects. The analysis finds that blockchain may help demonstrate whether a record has been altered after authorized entry, while knowledge graphs may connect heterogeneous sources and reveal relationships requiring further investigation. Neither tool independently establishes ownership, authenticity, or admissibility. Their evidentiary value depends on source authentication, identifiable and competent contributors, documented validation procedures, audit trails, mechanism for contestation , and compliance with Indonesian procedural law. A permissioned pilot linked to, but not legally equated with, the Cultural Heritage Register is therefore proposed for testing. The article contributes a conditional legal-technical model and identifies regulatory, institutional, financial, and data-governance issues that require empirical evaluation before national or cross-border deployment.
Hospital Decarbonization : International Climate Obligations and Implementation in Indonesia Kana Purwadi; Ade Maman Suherman; Sulistyadari Sulistyadari; Siti Kunarti; Hajar Salamah Salsabila Hariz
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v14i2.1975

Abstract

Climate change is a global health threat, yet health systems also contribute significantly to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Hospitals, as centers of energy consumption, supply chains and medical waste management, are a critical node in the decarbonization of the health sector. This article analyzes how international climate obligations and global technical standards can be translated into an effective and just national legal framework to drive the transition of hospitals toward net-zero emissions in Indonesia. The research employs a normative juridical method with a comparative approach, examining (i) international climate instruments and the evolving interpretation of state obligations, (ii) sustainability regulation and accountability practices in developed jurisdictions, and (iii) Indonesia’s sectoral regulations and guidelines on climate-resilient health facilities. The analysis identifies three major gaps: weak mandates for reporting and emission audit standards for hospitals; fragmented enforcement across health and environmental institutions; and limited capacity and access to transition financing. This article proposes an integrative governance design and a 2025-2045 roadmap that positions measurement-reporting-verification (MRV), carbon economic instruments and the principle of Just Transition as prerequisites for hospital decarbonization without compromising service access and the protection of medical and health workers.
Banking Crime Resolution through Violation Resolution: Analytical and Prescriptive Evaluation of Regulatory Reform Lastuti Abubakar; Efa Laela Fakhriah; Lies Sulistiani; Anita Afriana
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v14i2.1985

Abstract

Regulatory reform in the banking sector has become important in response to the growing complexity and dynamics of the financial industry. The rise of banking-related offences both those regulated under the Banking Law and those arising beyond its specific scope poses significant risks to national economic stability and may undermine public confidence in the banking system. This article provides an analytical and evaluative examination of recent regulatory reforms, focusing on the introduction of the violation resolution mechanism under Article 37D of Law No. 4 of 2023 concerning the development and strengthening of the Financial Sector (PPSK Law), as subsequently amended by Law No 4 of 2026. Rather than constituting a mere exercise of regulatory discretion, violation resolution is conceptualized as an adaptation of restorative justice principles to the distinctive characteristics of the banking sector. The study demonstrates that this mechanism emphasizes negotiated settlement, proportional accountability, and compensation, thereby balancing effective enforcement with the need to preserve financial-systemic stability. By situating violation resolution within criminological and regulatory scholarship, the article clarifies its normative foundations and implications for banking governance. Furthermore, the analysis substantively engages with Sustainable Development Goal 16 (peace, justice, and strong institutions), demonstrating how incorporation of restorative justice principle into financial regulation may strengthens institutional integrity, proportional enforcement, public trust, and contributes to resilient economic growth. This evaluative approach underscores that effective violation resolution is not rhetorical but substantive regulatory innovation that aligns legal certainty with sustainable development objectives.
Rethinking Filicide through Freudian Psychoanalysis: A Comparative Perspective on Indonesian and Spanish Criminal Cases Indah Sri Utari; Ridwan Arifin; Ali Masyhar; Valerio Sebastian; Souad Ezzerouali
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v14i2.1997

Abstract

Filicide is one of the most complex forms of domestic homicide. Criminal law studies generally focus on the fulfillment of the elements of the crime and criminal responsibility. In contrast, psychiatric and criminological research focuses more on the psychological condition of the perpetrator. Consequently, there is still a gap in the legal literature regarding how subconscious psychological dynamics can explain filicide without shifting the principle of criminal responsibility. This study aims to fill this gap through a Freudian psychoanalytic analysis within a comparative criminal law framework, comparing the cases of Panca Darmansyah in Indonesia and José Bretón in Spain. The study uses normative legal methods with a comparative approach combined with psychoanalytic interpretation of court decisions, legal frameworks, and forensic findings. The results show that the Indonesian and Spanish criminal justice systems both determine criminal responsibility based on the perpetrator's cognitive and volitional capacities, despite the presence of deep psychological conflict. Meanwhile, the psychoanalytic analysis reveals that filicide develops through processes of repression, narcissistic injury, identity fragmentation, symbolic objectification of the child, and the redirection of aggression. This study demonstrates that criminal responsibility and subconscious motivation exist at different but complementary levels of analysis. The contribution of this research is the development of a psycho-legal framework that integrates Freudian psychoanalysis and comparative criminal law to enrich the legal analysis of filicide and support the development of forensic assessment and criminal justice policy.
Bahasa Inggris Hafina Haula Arsy; Hadi Rahmat Purnama
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v14i2.2044

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has created new forms of child sexual abuse material that challenge existing child protection and cybercrime frameworks. This study explores the extent to which the national legal framework can address AI-generated child sexual abuse material (AI-CSAM), including semi-synthetic and fully synthetic materials. It also evaluates whether the state has fulfilled its obligations to protect children’s rights, as a component of human rights, in digital environments. This study employed a doctrinal legal research methodology, utilizing statutory and conceptual approaches. The analysis is grounded in a human rights-based approach and the theory of state obligations, with a focus on four principles of state obligation in the context of children’s rights protection: non-discrimination, the best interests of the child, participation, accountability, and the duties to respect, protect, and fulfill children’s rights. The study finds that existing legal frameworks function in a fragmented and insufficiently responsive manner to the technological characteristics of AI-generated abuse materials, particularly deepfake manipulation, prompt-based generation, synthetic victims, the abuse of datasets, and the legal obligations of digital platforms and AI developers. The state’s obligations remain only partially fulfilled due to inadequate procedures for handling digital evidence, preventing revictimization, regulating corporate responsibility, facilitating child-friendly mechanism for content reporting and removal, supporting victim recovery, coordinating institutions, and strengthening AI-specific enforcement capacity. This study conceptualizes AI-CSAM as a distinct form of technology-enabled sexual exploitation, extending beyond conventional online abuse and deepfake cases. The study argues that a more explicit, child-centered, and preventive legal framework is necessary to ensure effective protection, reporting, content removal, accountability, and recovery.

Page 75 of 75 | Total Record : 746

 71   72   73   74   75 

Filter by Year

2013 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 12 No. 3 (2024): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 12 No. 1: April 2024: Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 3: December 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 2: August 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 1: April 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 10, No 3: December 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 3: December 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 10, No 2: August 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 2: August 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 1: April 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 10, No 1: April 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 3: December 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 9 No. 3: December 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 9 No. 2: August 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 2: August 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 1: April 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 8 No. 3: December 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 8, No 3: December 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 8, No 2: August 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 8, No 1: April 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 8 No. 1: April 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 7, No 3 (2019) Vol 7, No 2 (2019) Vol 7, No 1 (2019) Vol 6, No 3 (2018) Vol 6, No 3 (2018) Vol 6, No 2 (2018) Vol 6, No 1 (2018) Vol 5, No 3 (2017) Vol 5, No 2 (2017) Vol 5, No 1 (2017) Vol 4, No 3 (2016): HUKUM YANG BERKEADILAN Vol 4, No 2 (2016): HAK DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM Vol 4, No 1 (2016): HUKUM DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB Vol 3, No 9 (2015): HAK MENGUASAI (Monopoli) NEGARA Vol 3, No 8 (2015): POLEMIK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA Vol 3, No 7 (2015): LOGIKA DAN TEROBOSAN HUKUM Vol 3, No 3 (2015): HAK MENGUASAI (Monopoli) NEGARA Vol 3, No 2 (2015): POLEMIK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA Vol 3, No 1 (2015): LOGIKA DAN TEROBOSAN HUKUM Vol 2, No 6 (2014): PLURALISME HUKUM Vol 2, No 5 (2014): HUKUM DAN TATA KUASA Vol 2, No 4 (2014): UTOPIA HUKUM - KESEJAHTERAAN Vol 2, No 3 (2014): PLURALISME HUKUM Vol 2, No 2 (2014): HUKUM DAN TATA KUASA Vol 2, No 1 (2014): UTOPIA HUKUM - KESEJAHTERAAN Vol 1, No 3 (2013): APAKAH HUKUM SUDAH MATI? Vol 1, No 3 (2013): APAKAH HUKUM SUDAH MATI? Vol 1, No 2 (2013): REALITA HUKUM DALAM MASYARAKAT Vol 1, No 2 (2013): REALITA HUKUM DALAM MASYARAKAT Vol 1, No 1 (2013): DIALEKTIKA KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN Vol 1, No 1 (2013): DIALEKTIKA KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN More Issue