cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM
Published by Universitas Islam Indonesia
ISSN : 08548498     EISSN : 2527502X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal is a peer-reviewed legal journal that provides a forum for scientific papers on legal studies. This journal publishes original research papers relating to several aspects of legal research. The Legal Journal of Ius Quia Iustum beginning in 2018 will be published three times a year in January, May, and September. This journal really opens door access for readers and academics to keep in touch with the latest research findings in the field of law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 982 Documents
 6   7   8   9   10 
Criminalization Policy in Residential Decrees and Synchronization With the Codified Criminal Law Teguh Prasetyo
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 16 No. 1 (2009): English Version
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The synchronization of criminal provisions in the residential decrees with the codified criminal law has not yet been made due to variety of legal sources to which residential decrees may refer. Among the differences which synchronization are the difference in the provisions of witnesses and also the difference in the interpretation made by the regulatorsKeywords: Policy, criminalization, Local Government Regulation, synchronization.
Hakekat Keadaan Darurat Negara (State Of Emergency) sebagai Dasar Pembentukan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Muhammad Syarif Nuh Syarif Nuh
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 18 No. 2 (2011)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol18.iss2.art5

Abstract

In issuing Perppu, president’s power seems to be “power full”, it can not get any intervention from any other institution until the trial in DPR decides whether the Perppu is approved or rejected. This research raises some problems; first, what is the measurement or basic of forming Perppu by President? Second, what is the substance and content of the state of emergency that leads the forced crisis? The research method is based on primary and secondary law material, and it is done through literature study and it used juridical approach method. The research result concludes, first, the measurement or basic of forming Perppu by president is based on the condition or event that is extraordinary (abnormal) from a state, in the form of the state of emergency. Second, the substance or content of the state of emergency that leads the forced crisis contains of three elements, which are, first, the element of dangerous threat; second, the element of reasonable necessity; and third, the element of limited time.Key words : State constitution, state of emergency, president’s power
Implementasi Pasal XX (b) dan (g) General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa di World Trade Organisation Sri Wartini
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 19 No. 3: Juli 2012
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol19.iss3.art5

Abstract

There is a mutual relation between international trade and environment. International trade may give negative effects to the environment. The problems that will be studied are, first, how is the implementation of Article XX (b) and (g) of GATT in the dispute settlement at WTO? Second, why is there differences in interpretation method toward Article XX (b) and (g) of GATT by Panel and Appellate Body in dispute settlement at WTO? This research os a normative research and is analyzed qualitatively. The result of the research concludes that: first, panel and Appellate Body have differences in implementing Article XX (b) and (g) of GATT. This is caused by the different interpretation done by Panel and Appellate Body; second, the difference in the interpretation of Article XX (b) and (g) of GATT by Panel and Appellate Body in the settlement of those three cases is resulted from the lack of understanding of the Panel on the interpretation way as stipulated in Article 2(3) of DSU and lack of partisanship from the Panel to the importance of health, plants, animals, and environment protections.International trade, panel, appellate body, negative effects
Politik Hukum Undang-Undang Pemilihan Presiden 2009 Mirza Satria Buana
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 16 No. 2 (2009)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss2.art5

Abstract

Normatively, an act, in whatever form in may be, shall be based on the orientation for the the people benefit and to ascertainment of the justice for people. The politics of law of presidential election issued by the relevant body is considered to be conservative and tends to be elitical. On theother hand, the success of Indonesia to exit fron the transition of democracy is determined by the lagal policiy of the govenrment. Through the issuance of act on Presidential election which is responsive, a better and more democratic new president may be ekected.Keywords : Democracy, Politics Of Law, Presidential Election
Perbandingan Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Conseil d’etat sebagai Institusi Pengawas Tindakan Hukum Tata Usaha Negara W. Riawan Tjandra
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 20 No. 3: Juli 2013
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol20.iss3.art5

Abstract

French State Administrative Court system and Indonesian State Administrative Court system basically have many similarities. The legal problem studied in this paper is related to the attempt to widely manage the judge proactivity principle in the State Administrative Court to attribute the advisory function of the State Administrative Court as a part of active dimensions of the preventive control of the State Administrative Court toward the state administrative staff before a State Administrative Decision is stipulated. The research method used to discuss the problem is the normative legal research using legal comparative approach. The result of the study concludes that there is a necessity to broaden the function of State Administrative Court in Indonesia to increase the quality of the state administrative decisions issued by the state administrative authorities.
Recent Development on Tobacco Control Policy in Indonesia: Analyzing Obstacles Faced by Indonesia in the Ratification of Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Dodik Setiawan Nur Heriyanto
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 21 No. 2: April 2014
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol21.iss2.art1

Abstract

World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (the FCTC) was adopted on 21st May 2003 and came into force on 25th February 2005. Since its adoption, Indonesia has never signed and ratified this Convention. Currently, Indonesia is the fifth largest tobacco market in the world and the third largest cigarrete consumer (WHO data in 2008), thus it is obligatory for Indonesia to obey the minimum standards of tobacco control under the FCTC. There are two problem formulations that will be answered by this writing: first, what are the obstacles faced by Indonesia during the ratification’s plan of the FCTC? Second, how far the FCTC ratification is effective in protecting public health in Indonesia? This study is normative research by using statute and comparative approaches. Indonesian policy on tobacco control always face with obstacles in the area of politic, economic, and human rights side. Most of the laws are still abstract to support public health in general. Particular researches prove that ratification efforts done by Indonesia would not cause adverse impacts to the economic advantages of tobacco but yet would be able to give effective implementation and legal certainty to protect the public health.
Imunitas Negara Asing Di Depan Pengadilan Nasional Dalam Kasus Pelanggaran HAM Yang Berat Konsekuensi Hukum Jus Cogens Terhadap Imunitas Negara Author: Sefriani
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 17 No. 1 (2010)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss1.art2

Abstract

Gross violation on human right has been occurred at many countries. Almost all of the perpetrators are state .In international law foreign state has immunity before national court. Developing of international law showed that in one side gross violation on human right is prohibited and has a status as jus cogens, peremptory nom under international law. However foreign state immunity before national court is fundamental right. International law doesn’t strictly and clearly governed legal consequences jus cogens norm over gross violation on human right. Some of national court remaining recognized state immunity to foreign state with some legal reason. However others national court denied that immunity.Key words : law’s consequences, state’s immunity, the International law
Klausula Terkait Perlindungan terhadap Buruh Migran dan Urgensinya untuk Diatur Secara Khusus di dalam Perjanjian Perdagangan Bebas antara ASEAN dan Uni Eropa Dodik Setiawan Nur Heriyanto
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 22 No. 3: Juli 2015
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol22.iss3.art1

Abstract

Economic globalization encourages some individuals to move abroad for a better living and livelihod. Currently, it is undeniable that the existence of foreign migrant workers can support the economic sutainability of European Union. However, foreign migrant workers mostly coming from ASEAN countries are only provided with limited social protection. Therefore, the research problems of this study are, first, whether the European Union rules have provided social protection for foreign migrant workers working around the territory or not? Second, what does ASEAN has to do in order to carry out its obligation to protect its citizens working outside ASEAN, especially within the framework of the agreement plan Free Trade Agreement between ASEAN and the EU? The research is conducted with normative method. The results of this study revealed two essential things: first, the rules in the European Union have not provided adequate protection for migrant workers of non-EU, especially for those coming from ASEAN countries. Secondly, there is the possibility for the inclusion of specific provisions related to social protection of migrant workers in the Free Trade Agreement between ASEAN and the EU.
Politik Hukum Negara Kesejahteraan Indonesia (Studi Tentang Kebijakan Regulasi dan Institusionalisasi Gagasan Kesejahteraan Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Nelayan di Jawa Tengah) Djauhari Djauhari
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 14 No. 4 (2007)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol14.iss4.art1

Abstract

Various government’s policies implemented through Precedential Decrees (Keppres), Precidential Instruction (Inpres),  and Precedential Regulation (Perpres), since the New Order up to the Reformation Order, have brought about the  increase of the social welfare among fishermen, especially through the schemes such as Undeveloped Regions Precedential Instruction (IDT) and  Social Security Network (JPS). However, those schemes seem to  be an ad-hoc solution which does not relate functionally to the Act on Social Welfare (UU Kesejahteraan Sosial) and the Act on Fishery Profit Sharing (UU Bagi Hasil Perikanan). Consequently, the availability of a sustainable program on social welfare cannot be achieved  since the function of  a presidential policy different from the function of an act.
Reformasi Hukum Tanah dalam Rangka Perlindungan Hak Atas Tanah Perorangan dan Penanam Modal dalam Bidang Agrobisnis Darwin Ginting
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 18 No. 1 (2011)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol18.iss1.art4

Abstract

The problem which would be discussed is how the policy format of law in the future mentioned the rights protection on individual land property and investment in agribusiness field. This research is juridical normative research using statutory approach. Data processing and analysis which was performed is descriptive qualitative. The result of the research concluded that; first, it is necessary to form regulation of land property rights, so that it could support the certainty of land property rights for individual and the certainty of law for every sector of capital investment. Second, the formation of the legislation prioritized the citizen’s aspiration and the community of agribusiness industrial field.Key words : Reformation, land titles, private and agribusiness

Page 8 of 99 | Total Record : 982

 6   7   8   9   10 

Filter by Year

1994 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 33 No. 1: JANUARI 2026 Vol. 32 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2025 Vol. 32 No. 2: MEI 2025 Vol. 32 No. 1: JANUARI 2025 Vol. 31 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2024 Vol. 31 No. 2: MEI 2024 Vol. 31 No. 1: JANUARI 2024 Vol. 30 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2023 Vol. 30 No. 2: MEI 2023 Vol. 30 No. 1: JANUARI 2023 Vol. 29 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2022 Vol. 29 No. 2: MEI 2022 Vol. 29 No. 1: JANUARI 2022 Vol. 28 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2021 Vol. 28 No. 2: MEI 2021 Vol. 28 No. 1: JANUARI 2021 Vol. 27 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2020 Vol. 27 No. 2: MEI 2020 Vol. 27 No. 1: JANUARI 2020 Vol. 26 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2019 Vol. 26 No. 2: MEI 2019 Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019 Vol. 25 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2018 Vol. 25 No. 2: MEI 2018 Vol. 25 No. 1: JANUARI 2018 Vol. 24 No. 4: OKTOBER 2017 Vol. 24 No. 3: JULI 2017 Vol. 24 No. 2: APRIL 2017 Vol. 24 No. 1: JANUARI 2017 Vol. 23 No. 4: OKTOBER 2016 Vol. 23 No. 3: JULI 2016 Vol. 23 No. 2: APRIL 2016 Vol. 23 No. 1: JANUARI 2016 Vol. 22 No. 4: Oktober 2015 Vol. 22 No. 3: Juli 2015 Vol. 22 No. 2: APRIL 2015 Vol. 22 No. 1: Januari 2015 Vol. 21 No. 4: Oktober 2014 Vol. 21 No. 3: Juli 2014 Vol. 21 No. 2: April 2014 Vol. 21 No. 1: Januari 2014 Vol. 20 No. 4: Oktober 2013 Vol. 20 No. 3: Juli 2013 Vol. 20 No. 2: April 2013 Vol. 20 No. 1: Januari 2013 Vol. 19 No. 4: Oktober 2012 Vol. 19 No. 3: Juli 2012 Vol. 18 (2011): Edisi Khusus Vol. 18 Oktober 2011 Vol. 18 No. 4 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2011) Vol. 17 No. 4 (2010) Vol. 17 No. 3 (2010) Vol. 17 No. 2 (2010) Vol. 17 No. 1 (2010) Vol. 16 No. 4 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 3 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 2 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 2 (2009): English Version Vol. 16 No. 1 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 1 (2009): English Version Vol 16, Edisi Khusus 2009 Vol. 15 No. 3 (2008): English Version Vol. 15 No. 3 (2008) Vol. 15 No. 2 (2008) Vol. 15 No. 1 (2008) Vol. 14 No. 4 (2007) Vol. 14 No. 3 (2007) Vol. 14 No. 2 (2007) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2007) Vol. 13 No. 2: Mei 2006 Vol. 13 No. 1: Januari 2006 Vol. 12 No. 30: September 2005 Vol. 12 No. 29: Mei 2005 Vol. 12 No. 28: Januari 2005 Vol. 11 No. 27: SEPTEMBER 2004 Vol. 11 No. 26: Mei 2004 Vol. 11 No. 25: Januari 2004 Vol. 10 No. 24: September 2003 Vol. 10 No. 23: Mei 2003 Vol. 10 No. 22: Januari 2003 Vol. 9 No. 21: September 2002 Vol. 9 No. 20: Juni 2002 Vol. 9 No. 19: Februari 2002 Vol. 8 No. 18: Oktober 2001 Vol. 8 No. 17: Juni 2001 Vol. 8 No. 16 (2001): Cyberlaw Vol. 7 No. 15: Desember 2000 Vol. 7 No. 14: Agustus 2000 Vol. 7 No. 13: April 2000 Vol. 6 No. 12 (1999): H A K I Vol. 6 No. 11 (1999) Vol. 5 No. 10 (1998) Vol. 6 No. 9 (1997) Vol. 5 No. 8 (1997) Vol. 4 No. 7 (1997) Vol. 3 No. 6 (1996) Vol. 3 No. 5 (1996): Hukum dan Ekonomi Vol. 2 No. 4: September 1995 Vol. 1 No. 3 (1995) Vol. 1 No. 2 (1994): KEJAHATAN KERAH PUTIH Vol. 1 No. 1 (1994): Era PJPT II More Issue