cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ari Purwadi
Contact Email
aripurwadi.fhuwks@gmail.com
Phone
+6281938020282
Journal Mail Official
perspektif_hukum@yahoo.com
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya Dukuh Kupang XXV/54, Surabaya, 60225
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan
Published by Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya
ISSN : 14103648     EISSN : 24067385     DOI : https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v28i2
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
PERSPEKTIF is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes scientific articles in the field of law. The published articles are the results of original scientific research and review of legal interactions. PERSPEKTIF is published by the Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of University of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya. PERSPEKTIF accepts any manuscripts or articles in the field of law or legal studies from both national and international academicians and researchers. The articles published in PERSPEKTIF is published three times a year (in January, May, and September). Submitted article should follow the writing guidelines.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 801 Documents
 52   53   54   55   56 
URGENSI PEMBERIAN HAK ATAS TANAH KEPADA PENANAM MODAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF TEORI HUKUM ALAM Fries Melia Salviana
Perspektif Vol 25, No 3 (2020): Edisi September
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v25i3.763

Abstract

Kajian penulisan ini adalah urgensi Pemberian Hak Atas Tanah kepada Penanam Modal berdasarkan perspektif Teori Hukum Alam. Landasan pengaturannya ada pada Pasal 33 UUD 1945 bahwa pemanfaatan tanah dapat dilakukan jika digunakan untuk kesejahteraan masyarakat. Pengaturan mengenai pemberian hak atas tanah pada penanam modal asing dalam Hak Guna Bangunan, Hak Guna Usaha, dan Hak Pakai sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 2 UUPA. Pengaturan tersebut dalam rangka pemberian fasilitas dalam bentuk insentif berdasarkan kriteria berdasarkan Pasal 18 UU Penanaman Modal. Pemberian hak atas tanah kepada penanam modal asing telah sesuai dengan hukum alam yang mewajibkan adanya kebaikan umum guna mencapai keadilan protektif dengan adanya hak menguasai yang memberikan kewenangan untuk menentukan penataan penggunaan tanah dengan hak rakyat. Serta penanaman modal yang merupakan peningkatan modal untuk pembangunan ekonomi berkelanjutan dan peningkatan ekonomi, alih teknologi, peningkatan lapangan kerja dan pengembangan ekonomi kerakyatan. Sehingga dengan demikian berdasarkan dengan kebaikan negara, maka tentunya aturan yang telah dibuat terkait dengan pemberian hak atas tanah tersebut di atas tentunya adalah harus mensyaratkan kepedulian atas kebaikan bersama, yaitu peningkatan kesejahteraan di Indonesia.The study in this paper is the urgency of Granting Land Rights to Investors based on the perspective of Natural Law Theory. The basis for regulating land rights is contained in Article 33 of the 1945 that use of land can used for welfare of the community. Article 2 of the UUPA also stipulates that granting land rights to foreign investors can only be granted of Building Use Rights, Business Use Rights, and Use Rights. The granting of land rights for foreign investors which is a facility in the form of incentives is regulated with a benchmark in the form of criteria contained in Article 18 Investment Law. Granting of land rights to foreign investors is in accordance with natural law which requires public good protective justice with existence of control rights which give authority to determine the arrangement of land use by taking into account people’s rights to land. As well as foreign investment which is an increase in capital for sustainable economic development and economic improvement, technology transfer, increased employment and development of a people’s economy. The limitations and requirements provided are also a form of protection for the community so that protective justice with a standard of general good is achieved. The recommendation given is the addition of regulations regarding the granting of land rights to foreign investors particular and use of powers related to the right to control by the government by means of restrictions in the form of requirements for granting land rights. Thus, based on the goodness of the state, of course the rules that have been made regarding the granting of rights to the land mentioned above, of course, must require concern for the common good, namely increasing welfare in Indonesia.
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM CRIMINAL ACTION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A CHILD-FRIENDLY-CITY Septiana Prameswari
Perspektif Vol 25, No 2 (2020): Edisi Mei
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v25i2.764

Abstract

Since Indonesia ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child in the form of the Child Protection Act, the government has now started to pay attention to child issues. Children are in a period of growth, development, and achievement, in which children very easily absorb everything that happens to them, whether good or bad. Sadly, recently, many children have experienced criminal acts that have caused injuries to the children, not only physical injuries but also psychological/mental injuries. The problem of child protection is not only referring to children who are victims of criminal acts that receive legal protection, but also children of witnesses and children of criminal offenders who have the same legal protection needs. Various Problems of violence against children that occur and even polemics in households that consider violence against children is a natural way of educating children has become piecework for the government to protect children from other violent crimes. Currently, the government is trying to build a suitable city structure for children to live in. The regional government’s role, all law enforces, and the community is to manifest legal protection for children in a Child-Friendly-City structure.
UTILIZATION OF DEBT COLLECTOR SERVICES IN DEBT SECURED WITH FIDUSIA IN PANDEMIC PERIOD AFTER THE VERDICT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT NO. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Fani Martiawan Kumara Putra
Perspektif Vol 25, No 2 (2020): Edisi Mei
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v25i2.760

Abstract

Fiduciary guarantee institutions are guarantee institutions that are in great demand in Indonesia, in fact it is very possible that Fiduciary is currently the most widely used guarantee institution besides three other security institutions in Indonesia, namely Gadai, Hipotek and Hak Tanggungan. Determination when the default debtor, has its own rules, can not be interpreted arbitrarily, then in a pandemic like this, determining the default debtor certainly also needs to consider the economic conditions of many parties that decline, then it means, whether the use of debt collectors is still a matter that is worthy of attention to these two aspects. This is a normative legal research. The result of this research is that the Constitutional Court’s ruling drew many interpretations, one form of which was that the Fiduciary guarantee was no longer familiar with parate executies, and sales were underhanded, but had to go through the court. Even though the decree also emphasized default. This decision must be interpreted in full, not only related not to execute it, but also to understand about the default. Thus, will be clear what the purpose of the ruling of the constitutional court. This will also be useful for law enforcement on the civil debt relationship during this pandemic. Leasing as an institution that provides credit to the public, still requires classification rules for customers who can apply for credit. So that cases of customers who are negligent in debt payments and have problems with debt collectors do not occur.
PENGUASAAN HAK ATAS TANAH BAGI BADAN HUKUM ASING DI INDONESIA Desy Nurkristia Tejawati
Perspektif Vol 26, No 1 (2021): Edisi Januari
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v26i1.762

Abstract

Hak atas tanah merupakan suatu hak yang melekat dan tidak dapat dihilangkan begitu saja yang berisikan penguasaan dan pemilikan. Penguasaan hak atas tanah berisi serangkaian wewenang, kewajiban dan/atau larangan bagi pemegang haknya untuk berbuat sesuatu mengenai tanah yang dikuasainya. Kedudukan badan hukum asing di Indonesia dalam hal penguasaan hak atas tanah adalah dengan menjadi subyek pemegang hak pakai dan hak sewa atas tanah. Badan hukum asing dalam hukum Indonesia merupakan badan hukum privat dan publik, sehingga badan hukum asing dengan adanya modal yang dimiliki yaitu modal asing sehingga dapat melakukan investasi di Indonesia. Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria mengatur mengenai pembatasan dan pengecualian dalam hal pemilikan hak atas tanah oleh orang asing dan badan hukum asing. Undang-Undang No. 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal memberikan kemudahan pada badan hukum asing berkaitan dengan penguasaan hak atas tanah dalam melakukan investasi di Indonesia. Hal yang bertentangan tersebut menimbulkan problematika berkaitan dengan penguasaan hak atas tanah oleh badan hukum asing di Indonesia.The right to land is an inherent right and cannot be just eliminated, which contains control and ownership. Mastery of land rights contains a series of powers, obligation, and or prohibitions for rights holders to do something about the land and they control. The position of foreign legal entities in Indonesia in terms of control over land rights is by becoming the subject of holders of use rights and lease rights over land. Foreign legal entities in Indonesian law are private and public legal entities, so that foreign legal entities with their own capital so they can invest in Indonesia. Act Number 5 Year 1960 on Basic Agrarian Principles regulates restrictions and exceptions in terms of ownership of land rights by foreigners and foreign legal entities. Act Number 25 Year 2007 about capital investment provide convenience to foreign legal entities relating to control of land rights in investing in Indonesia. This contradiction creates problems related to the control of land rights by foreign legal entities in Indonesia.
TANGGUNG GUGAT BII TERHADAP HILANGNYA BARANG DALAM SAFE DEPOSIT BOX Metya Janastu
Perspektif Vol 25, No 3 (2020): Edisi September
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v25i3.720

Abstract

Safe Deposit Box (SDB) sebagai salah satu bentuk jasa perbankan untuk menyediakan tempat penyimpanan barang dan surat berharga milik nasabah yang telah dijamin dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di bidang perbankan. Perjanjian safe deposit box berdasarkan pada perikatan sewa menyewa. Bank memperoleh imbal balik berupa biaya jasa dalam menunaikan kewajibannya dalam menyimpan barang dan surat berharga tersebut dengan itikad baik termasuk bertanggungjawab atas hilangnya obyek safe deposit box akibat pembobolan bank karena bank dianggap lalai menunaikan kewajibannya sesuai perjanjian jasa safe deposit box. Unsur kelalaian bank harus dapat dibuktikan dalam penyelesaian kasus dengan merujuk pada ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan di bidang perbankan dan perlindungan konsumen. Penelitian normatif ini akan mengkaji mengenai tanggung gugat bank khususnya BII atas hilangnya benda menjadi obyek safe deposit box. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah pentingnya asas itikad baik bank sebagai pelaku usaha dalam pertanggungjawaban kelalaian bank serta pentingnya aspek kehati-hatian nasabah dalam pengikatan perjanjian safe deposit box.Safe Deposit Box (SDB) as a form of banking services to provide a storage area for customers’ goods and securities that have been guaranteed by the laws and regulations in the banking sector. The safe deposit box agreement is based on a lease agreement. Bank receives service fees when fulfilling its obligations to storing these goods and secutirites with a good faith, including being responsible for the loss of objects due to breaking because the bank is deemed negligent in fulfilling its obligations according to the safe deposit box agreement. Negligence factor must be proven in case settlement by referring to regulations in banking and consumer protection. This normative research will examine the accountability of banks, especially BII, for the loss of objects in safe deposit boxes. The results of this study are the importance of the principle of good faith for banks in the accountability of bank negligence as well as the importance of customer caution in binding safe deposit box agreements.
TINJAUAN NORMA HUKUM JUSTICE COLLABORATOR DAN WHISTLEBLOWER PADA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Esti Kanti Pertiwi; Noor Rahmad
Perspektif Vol 25, No 2 (2020): Edisi Mei
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v25i2.768

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui formulasi norma hukum pada justice collaborator dan whistleblower dalam tindak pidana korupsi dan pelaksanaannya. Hukum pidana memberikan peluang bagi pelaku tindak pidana agar menjadi justice collaborator dan mau bekerja sama dengan penegak hukum, dimana bentuk apresiasinya adalah mereka bisa dipertimbangkan untuk diberikan perlindungan dan keringanan hukuman. Istilah justice collaborator sering disalahartikan dengan whistleblower. Norma tentang whistleblower dan justice collaborator sudah diatur dalam peraturan bersama, SEMA dan UU No. 31 Tahun 2014, pada pelaksanaannya masih ada kelemahan-kelemahan yang disebabkan berbeda-beda penafsiran dari peraturan yang ada oleh penegak hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan penleitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang. Hasil penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa peraturan yang ada masih memiliki kelemahan dalam mengatur justice collaborator dan whistleblower. Justice collaborator dan whistleblower berperan penting dalam memberikan informasi untuk mengungkap suatu tindak pidana korupsi. Peran penting dari justice collaborator dan whistleblower menimbulkan ancaman, sehingga perlu diberikan perlindungan dari penegak hukum dan diberikan penghargaan, seperti pengurangan hukuman bagi justice collaborator.The study aims to determine the formulation of legal norms on justice collaborator and whistleblower in corruption and their implementation. ]Criminal law provides an opportunity for criminal offenders to become justice collaborators and want to cooperate with law enforcement, where the form of appreciation is that they can be considered for protection and relief from punishment. The term justice collaborator is often confused with whistleblowers. the norms regarding whistleblowers and justice collaborators are already regulated in a joint regulation, SEMA and Law No. 31/2014, in its implementation there are still weaknesses caused by different interpretations of existing regulations by law enforcement. This research uses normative legal research with a statute approach.. The results of this study reveal that the existing regulations still have weaknesses in regulating justice collaborators and whistleblowers. Justice collaborator and whistleblower play an important role in providing information to uncover a corruption. the important role of justice collaborator and whistleblower creates threats, so it needs to be given protection from law enforcers and given respect, such as reducing penalties for justice collaborators.
PERSANDINGAN LEMBAGA OMBUDSMAN DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA DENGAN OMBUDSMAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH PROVINSI Noviana Noviana
Perspektif Vol 26, No 1 (2021): Edisi Januari
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v26i1.790

Abstract

Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta memiliki dua lembaga pengawasan penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik yaitu Lembaga Ombudsman Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta dan Ombudsman Perwakilan Daerah Provinsi sehingga perlu dikaji mengenai kedudukan hukum Lembaga Ombudsman Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta dalam sistem otonomi daerah dan hubungannya dengan kedudukan Ombudsman Perwakilan Daerah Provinsi agar tidak terjadi pertentangan. Penelitian hukum normatif ini menggunakan metode pendekatan statute approach dan case approach. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Lembaga Ombudsman Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta merupakan lembaga independen daerah sebagai salah satu wujud pengejawantahan asas desentralisasi dalam menyelenggarakan pemerintahan daerah pada kerangka otonomi daerah sedangkan Lembaga Ombudsman Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta memiliki hubungan fungsional dengan Ombudsman Perwakilan Daerah Provinsi. Lembaga Ombudsman Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta berbeda dengan Ombudsman Perwakilan Daerah Provinsi namun pengaturan mengenai lembaga ombudsman nasional, ombudsman perwakilan di daerah dan ombudsman daerah masih tumpang tindih antara satu dengan yang lain serta Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 belum memberikan pengakuan terhadap lembaga ombudsman yang dibentuk oleh pemerintah daerah.The Special Region of Yogyakarta has two institutions to supervise the implementation of public services, namely The Special Region of Yogyakarta Ombudsman Institute and the Provincial Representative Ombudsman so that it is necessary to study the legal position of the The Special Region of Yogyakarta Ombudsman Institute in the regional autonomy system and its relationship to the position of the Provincial Representative Ombudsman so that there is no future conflict. This normative legal research uses a statute approach and a case approach. The results showed that The Special Region of Yogyakarta Ombudsman Institute is a regional independent institution as a manifestation of the decentralization principle in administering regional governance in the framework of regional autonomy, while The Special Region of Yogyakarta Ombudsman Institute has a functional relationship with the Provincial Representative Ombudsman. The Special Region of Yogyakarta Ombudsman Institute is still different from the Provincial Representative Ombudsman, but the regulations regarding the national ombudsman, regional representative ombudsman and regional ombudsman still overlap with one another and Law Number 23 of 2014 has not given recognition to the ombudsman institution established by regional government.
KEDUDUKAN KREDITOR SEPARATIS DALAM MENGEKSEKUSI OBJEK JAMINAN SAAT TERJADI KEPAILITAN Adilah Dea Sentika; Raden Besse Kartoningrat
Perspektif Vol 25, No 1 (2020): Edisi Januari
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v25i1.751

Abstract

Kepailitan adalah ketidakmampuan debitor membayar utangnya yang telah jatuh tempo terhadap dua atau lebih kreditornya. Dari jenis penggolongan kreditor dalam kepailitan, kreditor separatis sebagai pemegang hak jaminan kebendaan memiliki keistimewaan terhadap kreditor lainnya. Hak tersebut berupa eksekutorial terhadap harta debitor seolah-olah tidak terjadi kepailitan. Baik dalam Burgerlijk Wetboek, aturan hukum mengenai jaminan kebendaan, hingga Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Pembayaran mengatur tentang hak eksekutorial yang dimiliki kreditor separatis sebagai pemegang hak kebendaan. Di dalam penelitian ini, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, dengan tujuan untuk melakukan pengkajian teoritis-normatif mengenai pengaturan eksekusi benda jaminan oleh kreditor separatis serta kedudukannya dalam hak eksekutorial harta pailit. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian tersebut didapatkan kesimpulan bahwa kedudukan kreditor separatis sebagai pemegang hak benda jaminan diciderai oleh adanya aturan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Pembayaran. Adanya jangka waktu kreditor separatis yang harus mengeksekusi benda jaminan selama 2 (dua) bulan mengakibatkan hak eksekutorial terhadap benda jaminan yang pailit dari segi teori maupun prakteknya sangat sulit dilaksanakan.Bankruptcy is the inability of debtors to repay debts due to two or more creditors. From the type of classification of creditors in bankruptcy, separatist creditors as holders of material security rights have the privilege of other creditors. The right is in the form of executorial property of the debtor as if bankruptcy did not occur. Both in Burgerlijk Wetboek, the rule of law regarding material security, up to Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Payment regulates the executorial rights held by separatist creditors as holders of material rights. In this study, the author uses a normative legal research method, with the aim of conducting a theoretical-normative study of arrangements for the execution of collateral items by separatist creditors and their position in the executing rights of bankrupt assets. Based on the results of the study it was concluded that the position of separatist creditor as the holder of collateral rights was injured by the existence of the rules in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Payment. The existence of a separatist creditor period that must execute collateral for 2 (two) months resulted in an executorial right to the insolvent collateral in terms of theory and practice which is very difficult to implement.
NIKAH SIRI DALAM PERSPEKTIF KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM DAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN INDONESIA Kharisudin Kharisudin
Perspektif Vol 26, No 1 (2021): Edisi Januari
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v26i1.791

Abstract

Nikah Siri merupakan pernikahan yang dilakukan dengan menggunakan ketentuan-ketentuan yang sudah digariskan dan ditentukan agama atau harus memenuhi syarat-syarat secara adat dengan memenuhi persyaratan-persyaratan yang ditentukan akan tetapi tidak dicatatkan, jadi pernikahan tersebut dianggap sah oleh sebagian masyarakat namun dianggap tidak sah oleh negara. Dalam penulisan ini penulis melakukan penelitian dengan tujuan agar diketahui persepsi hukum terhadap nikah siri dari sudut Kompilasi Hukum Islam dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan di Indonesia. Pendekatan dalam penulisan karya ilmiah ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan statute approach. Kompilasi Hukum Islam menyebutkan nikah siri adalah nikah yang tidak sah, disini akan lebih jelas lagi bagaimana aturan hukum yang ada bisa menjadi tidak sama dengan pemahaman yang ada di masyarakat. Faktor personal antara lain karakteristik masyarakat dalam memahami nikah siri yang dijadikan sebagai alasan pembenar, sedangkan faktor tingkat kesadaran hukum yaitu tingkat pemahaman hukum masyarakat dan aturan yang ada dan berlaku di Indonesia khususnya UU Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 serta KHI kurang begitu diperhatikan. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah pemahaman konsekuensi hukum yang ditimbulkan dari nikah siri ditunjukkan dengan adanya kasus yang terjadi pada nikah siri ini.Siri marriage is a marriage that is carried out using conditions that have been outlined and determined by religion or must meet customary requirements by fulfilling specified conditions but are not enforced, so the marriage is dependent on a part of society but is not legal by the state. The writing of this research conducted research with the aim of knowing the legal perceptions of unregistered marriage from the perspective of Compilation of Islamic Law and the Marriage Law in Indonesia. The approach in this scientific paper is carried out using a statutory approach. The Compilation of Islamic Law states that unregistered marriage is illegitimate marriage. Personal factors are another reason for the community to understand unregistered marriage which is used as a justifying awareness factor, while the level of legal awareness, namely the level of understanding of community law and existing and applicable rules in Indonesia, especially Law Number 1 of 1974 and KHI was not given much attention. The result of this research is an understanding of the legal consequences of marriage as indicated by the cases that occur in this unregistered marriage.
IMPLEMENTASI HUKUM WARIS TIONGHOA DALAM MASYARAKAT PLURAL DI KOTA BANJARMASIN Firqah Annajiyah Mansyuroh
Perspektif Vol 25, No 3 (2020): Edisi September
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v25i3.769

Abstract

Permasalahan yang akan diteliti adalah bagaimana pelaksanaan pembagian harta warisan pada masyarakat Tionghoa di Banjarmasin serta bagaimana kedudukan hak waris anak beragama Islam dengan orangtua beda agama. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian hukum empiris ini adalah socio-legal research dalam ranah legal pluralism yang didukung dengan pengumpulan bahan hukum melalui wawancara. Heterogenitas keyakinan yang ada pada masyarakat etnis Tionghoa Banjarmasin telah mempengaruhi pilihan hukum waris. Adanya perubahan hukum waris di kalangan keluarga Tionghoa di Banjarmasin telah bergeser dari hukum adat yang hanya memberikan warisan kepada anak laki-laki, kini berubah menjadi menerapkan aturan hukum seperti pada hukum waris Perdata dimana perempuan juga mendapatkan hak waris. Pergeseran juga terjadi pada warisan yang diberikan kepada anggota keluarga penganut agama dan kepercayaan selain Tionghoa. Keluarga Tionghoa Banjarmasin yang beragama Islam kini menerapkan sistem waris sesuai dengan hukum Islam, begitu pula terhadap keluarga etnis Tionghoa yang tidak mempermasalahkan perpindahan agama tetap memberikan hak waris. Hal ini berbeda dengan keluarga Tionghoa yang masih berpegang teguh pada tradisi cenderung menghapus hak ahli waris jika berbeda keyakinan. Perbedaan pilihan tersebut disebabkan oleh asimilasi, toleransi kepada prilaku menyimpang, pendidikan, penduduk heterogen, serta pluralitas hukum yang menyebabkan perbedaan implementasi hukum waris tersebut.The problem to be studied are how the distribution of inheritance in Banjarmasin Chinese ethnic families and how the position of the inheritance rights of Moslem children with interfaith parents. The method used in this empirical legal research is socio-legal research in legal pluralism which is supported by collecting legal materials through interviews. The heterogeneity of beliefs that exist in Banjarmasin Chinese ethnic community has influenced their choice of inheritance law. The change in inheritance law among Chinese families in Banjarmasin has shifted from the customary law which only gives inheritance to boys, now changed to apply inheritance law in civil law where women also get rights. The shift also occurred in the inheritance given to family members adhering to religions and beliefs. Banjarmasin Chinese families who are Moslem are now implementing an inheritance system in accordance with Islamic law, as well as Chinese families who do not mind with religious conversion. This is different from Chinese families which still adhere to tradition, who tend to abolish the rights of the heirs. It has caused by assimilation, tolerance for deviant behavior, education, heterogeneous population, and plurality of laws that cause differences in the implementation of inheritance law.

Page 54 of 81 | Total Record : 801

 52   53   54   55   56 

Filter by Year

1996 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 31 No. 1 (2026): Edisi Januari Vol. 29 No. 2 (2024): Edisi Mei Vol. 29 No. 1 (2024): Edisi Januari Vol. 28 No. 3 (2023): Edisi September Vol. 28 No. 2 (2023): Edisi Mei Vol. 28 No. 1 (2023): Edisi Januari Vol. 27 No. 3 (2022): Edisi September Vol. 27 No. 2 (2022): Edisi Mei Vol 27, No 2 (2022): Edisi Mei Vol. 27 No. 1 (2022): Edisi Januari Vol 27, No 1 (2022): Edisi Januari Vol 26, No 3 (2021): Edisi September Vol. 26 No. 3 (2021): Edisi September Vol 26, No 2 (2021): Edisi Mei Vol 26, No 1 (2021): Edisi Januari Vol 25, No 3 (2020): Edisi September Vol 25, No 2 (2020): Edisi Mei Vol 25, No 1 (2020): Edisi Januari Vol 24, No 3 (2019): Edisi September Vol. 24 No. 3 (2019): Edisi September Vol 24, No 2 (2019): Edisi Mei Vol. 24 No. 2 (2019): Edisi Mei Vol. 24 No. 1 (2019): Edisi Januari Vol 24, No 1 (2019): Edisi Januari Vol 23, No 3 (2018): Edisi September Vol 23, No 2 (2018): Edisi Mei Vol 23, No 1 (2018): Edisi Januari Vol 22, No 3 (2017): Edisi September Vol. 22 No. 3 (2017): Edisi September Vol 22, No 2 (2017): Edisi Mei Vol 22, No 1 (2017): Edisi Januari Vol 21, No 3 (2016): Edisi September Vol 21, No 2 (2016): Edisi Mei Vol 21, No 1 (2016): Edisi Januari Vol 20, No 3 (2015): Edisi September Vol. 20 No. 2 (2015): Edisi Mei Vol 20, No 2 (2015): Edisi Mei Vol. 20 No. 1 (2015): Edisi Januari Vol 20, No 1 (2015): Edisi Januari Vol 19, No 3 (2014): Edisi September Vol. 19 No. 3 (2014): Edisi September Vol. 19 No. 2 (2014): Edisi Mei Vol 19, No 2 (2014): Edisi Mei Vol 19, No 1 (2014): Edisi Januari Vol. 18 No. 3 (2013): Edisi September Vol 18, No 3 (2013): Edisi September Vol 18, No 2 (2013): Edisi Mei Vol. 18 No. 2 (2013): Edisi Mei Vol 18, No 1 (2013): Edisi Januari Vol. 18 No. 1 (2013): Edisi Januari Vol 17, No 3 (2012): Edisi September Vol. 17 No. 3 (2012): Edisi September Vol. 17 No. 2 (2012): Edisi Mei Vol 17, No 2 (2012): Edisi Mei Vol. 17 No. 1 (2012): Edisi Januari Vol 17, No 1 (2012): Edisi Januari Vol 16, No 4 (2011): Edisi September Vol. 16 No. 4 (2011): Edisi September Vol. 16 No. 3 (2011): Edisi Mei Vol 16, No 3 (2011): Edisi Mei Vol 16, No 2 (2011): Edisi April Vol. 16 No. 2 (2011): Edisi April Vol 16, No 1 (2011): Edisi Januari Vol. 16 No. 1 (2011): Edisi Januari Vol 15, No 4 (2010): Edisi Oktober Vol. 15 No. 4 (2010): Edisi Oktober Vol 15, No 3 (2010): Edisi Juli Vol. 15 No. 3 (2010): Edisi Juli Vol 15, No 2 (2010): Edisi April Vol. 15 No. 2 (2010): Edisi April Vol. 15 No. 1 (2010): Edisi Januari Vol 15, No 1 (2010): Edisi Januari Vol 12, No 3 (2007): Edisi September Vol 12, No 2 (2007): Edisi Mei Vol 12, No 1 (2007): Edisi Januari Vol 11, No 4 (2006): Edisi Oktober Vol 11, No 3 (2006): Edisi Juli Vol 11, No 2 (2006): Edisi April Vol 11, No 1 (2006): Edisi Januari Vol 10, No 4 (2005): Edisi Oktober Vol 10, No 3 (2005): Edisi Juli Vol 10, No 2 (2005): Edisi April Vol 10, No 1 (2005): Edisi Januari Vol 9, No 4 (2004): Edisi Oktober Vol 9, No 3 (2004): Edisi Juli Vol 9, No 2 (2004): Edisi April Vol 9, No 1 (2004): Edisi Januari Vol 8, No 4 (2003): Edisi Oktober Vol 8, No 3 (2003): Edisi Juli Vol 8, No 2 (2003): Edisi April Vol 7, No 4 (2002): Edisi Oktober Vol 7, No 3 (2002): Edisi Juli Vol 7, No 2 (2002): Edisi April Vol 7, No 1 (2002): Edisi Januari Vol 6, No 4 (2001): Edisi Oktober Vol 6, No 3 (2001): Edisi Juli Vol 6, No 2 (2001): Edisi April Vol 6, No 1 (2001): Edisi Januari Vol 5, No 3 (2000): Edisi Juli Vol 5, No 2 (2000): Edisi April Vol 5, No 1 (2000): Edisi Januari Vol 4, No 3 (1999): Edisi Juli Vol 4, No 1 (1999): Edisi Januari Vol 3, No 4 (1998): Edisi Oktober Vol 3, No 3 (1998): Edisi Juli Vol 3, No 2 (1998): Edisi April Vol 3, No 1 (1998): Edisi Januari Vol 2, No 3 (1997): Edisi Oktober Vol 2, No 2 (1997): Edisi Juli Vol. 2 No. 1 (1997): Edisi April Vol 2, No 1 (1997): Edisi April Vol 1, No 2 (1996): Edisi Desember More Issue