JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Articles
16 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 10 No 2 (2021)"
:
16 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Standard Contract on Banking Sector: Regulation and Description in Internal Banking Regulations ]]>
<![CDATA[Desak Putu Dewi Kasih]]>;
<![CDATA[Putu Devi Yustisia Utami]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i02.p05
<![CDATA[This study aims to determine the regulations regarding standard contracts in the banking sector after the existence of the authority of the Otoritas Jasa keuangan, to find out the legal consequences of violations of the provisions of standard contracts carried out by banking financial services and to determine efforts to prevent violations of standard contracts by banking financial services. This is normative legal research with with statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results show that the regulation regarding the standard contract after the existence of the OJK as a financial service consumer protection agency is regulated through the Financial Services Authority Regulation (POJK) No.1/POJK.07/2013 concerning Consumer Protection in the Financial Services Sector and in the Financial Services Authority Circular Letter (SEOJK) No. 13 /SEOJK.07 / 2014 regarding the Standard contract. The legal consequences of violating the provisions of the standard contract are not regulated in the POJK and the SEOJK. When it compared with the provisions of article 18 paragraph (3) of the Consumer Protection Law which explicitly states that violations of article 18 paragraphs (1) and (2) result in standard clauses being null and void, POJK and SEOJK only require financial service actors to make action plan, hence it is deemed to have no clear legal consequences. One of the efforts that must be made by banking financial service actors to prevent violations of the provisions of the standard contract is by making standard contract regulations independently and elaborating them in the internal banking regulations.]]>
<![CDATA[Splitsing Perkara Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Akibat Menolak Mutasi: Menguntungkan atau Merugikan Pekerja? ]]>
<![CDATA[Niki Anane Setyadani]]>;
<![CDATA[Holyness N. Singadimeja]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i02.p10
<![CDATA[The purpose of this paper is to examine the validity of termination of employment and transfer at PT. Indo Batam Ekatama and the accuracy of the legal basis used by judges to terminate employment relations. Furthermore, this paper also aims to examine the splitsing on labor law and the consequences of splitting in terms of the theory of justice and the theory of progressive law. The method used is a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results showed that the mutations and layoffs carried out by PT. Indo Batam Ekatama is illegitimate and workers are entitled to process wages but not entitled to religious holiday allowances. The legal basis used by the Panel of Judges in deciding cases is also deemed inappropriate. In addition, the concept of splitting lawsuit files on labor law has no legal basis and is considered contrary to a sense of justice because of the possibility of differences in judge decisions that result in differences in rights between workers who are dismissed. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk mengkaji keabsahan pemutusan hubungan kerja dan mutasi pada PT. Indo Batam Ekatama serta ketepatan dasar hukum yang digunakan hakim untuk memutus hubungan kerja. Selanjutnya, penulisan ini juga bertujuan untuk mengkaji splitsing pada hukum ketanagakerjaan serta konsekuensi dari dilakukannya splitsing ditinjau dari teori keadilan dan teori hukum progresif. Adapun metode yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mutasi dan PHK yang dilakukan PT. Indo Batam Ekatama tidak sah dan pekerja berhak atas upah proses namun tidak berhak atas Tunjangan Hari Raya Keagamaan. Adapun dasar hukum yang digunakan Majelis Hakim dalam memutus perkara juga dinilai tidak tepat. Selain itu, konsep splitsing berkas gugatan pada hukum ketenagakerjaan tidak memiliki dasar hukum dan dinilai bertentangan dengan rasa keadilan sebab adanya kemungkinan perbedaan putusan hakim yang mengakibatkan perbedaan hak antar para pekerja yang diPHK.]]>
<![CDATA[Does International Criminal Court have Jurisdiction over the Destruction of Cultural Property by the Islamic State of Irac and Syria? ]]>
<![CDATA[Bayu Sujadmiko]]>;
<![CDATA[Desia Rakhma Banjarani]]>;
<![CDATA[Rudi Natamiharja]]>;
<![CDATA[Desy Churul Aini]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i02.p01
<![CDATA[The cultural property becomes objects of destruction in armed conflicts, such as Syria and Iraq, which were carried out by ISIS squads (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria). For ISIS’s actions, the ICC should judge ISIS. However, new problems will arise regarding the jurisdiction of the ICC to judge ISIS. Based on the explanation of this background, the question will arise: How are humanitarian law regulations related to protecting cultural property during armed conflict? And what is the regulation of the ICC’s jurisdiction over the protection of cultural property in armed conflict by ISIS? The research in this article is normative legal research with the statue approach. According to humanitarian law, the research results show that the regulations relating to the protection of cultural property during armed conflict are contained in the 1954 Hague Convention, Additional Protocol I and Additional Protocol II of the Geneva Conventions of 1977. The destruction of cultural property carried out by ISIS is included in war crimes, one of the Rome Statute material jurisdictions. In this case, the Rome Statute applied by the ICC has juridical power to uphold justice and punish, including war crimes committed by ISIS. For the destruction of various cultural property in Iraq and Syria, ISIS can be judge by the ICC through a referral by the UN Security Council based on the provisions stipulated in the 1998 Rome Statute.]]>
<![CDATA[Efektivitas Pemenjaraan Ditengah Ide Pemidanaan Dengan Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif ]]>
<![CDATA[Diah Ratna Sari Hariyanto]]>;
<![CDATA[I Dewa Gede Dana Sugama]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i02.p15
<![CDATA[The present study seeks to find out, examine the effectiveness of criminal sanctions in the form of imprisonment in Bali, as well as discover the basis for the application of punishment with a restorative justice approach. This study belongs to empirical legal research that is descriptive in nature and makes the Correctional Institution in Bali the object of research. The results of the study suggested that the emergence of recidivists in Bali and the still negative stigma among the Balinese community subsequent to the removal of prisoners shows that correctional goals are still unachieved and the emergence of recidivists in Bali implies that the criminal sanction in the form of imprisonment still remains ineffective. The concept of an ideal criminal system to be applied in Bali related to imprisonment is the one adopting the restorative justice approach, because in addition to minimising imprisonment, in this approach, the interests of victims are more concerned by making various efforts to resolve conflicts and by making rehabilitation. Tujuan dari studi ini untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis efektivitas pemenjaraan di Bali dan menemukan landasan penerapan pemidanaan dengan pendekatan keadilan restoratif. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum empiris yang sifatnya deskriptif dan menjadikan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan di Bali sebagai objek penelitian. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa munculnya residivis di Bali dan masih adanya stigma negatif dari masyarakat Bali setelah narapidana keluar dari lapas menunjukkan bahwa tujuan pemasyarakatan belum tercapai dan sanksi penjara tidak efektif di Bali. Konsep sistem pemidanaan yang ideal untuk diterapkan di Bali terkait dengan pemenjaraan adalah konsep sistem pemidanaan dengan pendekatan restorative justice yang memperhatikan kepentingan korban dengan melakukan berbagai upaya penyelesaian konflik dan rehabilitasi, serta meminimalisasi penjatuhan pidana penjara.]]>
<![CDATA[Combating Narcotics Abuse by Children in Buleleng Regency ]]>
<![CDATA[Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i02.p06
<![CDATA[Drug abuse is a very worrying problem, especially for young people who will become the heirs and successors of the nation's struggle in the future. Narcotics abuse by children, especially in the Buleleng Regency area is high and is dominated by children aged 14-18 years who are still in school or still receiving education. The high number of narcotics abuse cases in Buleleng Regency at a young age has resulted in greater public concern due to its potentially damaging impact on all dimensions of life. The purpose of this study is to provide an effort to overcome narcotics abuse by children in Buleleng Regency. This research is an empirical legal research using a statutory approach. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the factors that influence narcotics abuse by children in Buleleng Regency are caused by internal and external factors and efforts to overcome them are carried out by penal efforts (legal channels) and non-penal efforts (non-legal channels.]]>
<![CDATA[Kewenangan BPK dan BPKP dalam Menentukan Kerugian Keuangan Negara pada Perkara Korupsi ]]>
<![CDATA[I Made Fajar Pradnyana]]>;
<![CDATA[I Wayan Parsa]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i02.p11
<![CDATA[The purpose of this research is to describe the related authority possessed by the BPK and BPKP in determining state financial losses so that the judges who handle cases of corruption can use calculations from the institutions that have been mandated by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in determining state financial losses in order to achieve legal certainty. The dualism of institutions in determining state financial losses results in overlapping powers which have an impact on the credibility of these institutions. This certainly affects practice in the field, one of which is legal certainty that is not guaranteed in implementing law enforcement against corruption, it is very possible that every agency that calculates losses incurred by the state uses different calculation techniques, and in the end, the reports given are also different. so that it can affect the performance of law enforcement agencies in dealing with allegations of corruption. The author uses the normative legal method in this research, through two kinds of approaches, namely statutory and conceptual. The results showed that the BPK authority as an independent institution to measure and determine state losses, whether committed by individuals or legal entities, while the BPKP authority as an institution under the president has the duty to ensure that the management of government state finances in the sense of the executive is good, so that the panel of judges handling criminal acts of corruption uses calculations from the national institution, namely the BPK which is mandated by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu untuk Menjabarkan terkait kewenangan yang dimiliki BPK dan BPKP dalam menentukan kerugian keuangan negara sehingga majelis hakim yang menangani kasus tindak pidana korupsi dapat menggunakan perhitungan dari Lembaga yang telah diamanatkan oleh UUD NRI 1945 dalam menentukan kerugian keuangan negara agar tercapainya kepastian hukum. Dualisme institusi dalam menentukan kerugian keuangan negara menghasilkan kekuasaan yang tumpang tindih yang berdampak pada kredibilitas institusi ini. Hal ini tentu mempengaruhi praktek di lapangan, salah satunya kepastian hukum yang tidak terjamin dalam menerapkan penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana korupsi, sangat memungkinkan bahwa setiap lembaga yang menghitung kerugian yang ditimbulkan negara menggunakan teknik penghitungan tidak sama, dan pada akhirnya, laporan yang diberikan juga berbeda sehingga dapat mempengaruhi kinerja lembaga penegak hukum dalam menangani tuduhan korupsi. Metode hukum normatif digunakan penulis dalam riset ini, melalui dua macam pendekatan yaitu perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa otoritas BPK selaku lembaga bersifat independen untuk mengukur dan menentukan kerugian negara baik yang dilakukan oleh seseorang ataupun badan hukum, sementara otoritas BPKP sebagai institusi yang berada di bawah presiden yang bertugas untuk memastikan bahwa pengelolaan keuangan negara pemerintah dalam arti eksekutif sudah baik, sehingga majelis hakim yang menangani tindak pidana korupsi menggunakan perhitungan dari Lembaga nasional yaitu BPK yang diberikan amanat dari UUD NRI 1945.]]>
<![CDATA[Non-Penal Countermeasures Efforts in Supporter Conflict (Study on PSIM vs Persis Conflict) ]]>
<![CDATA[Laras Astuti]]>;
<![CDATA[Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya]]>;
<![CDATA[R.B Sularto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i02.p02
<![CDATA[The conflict between PSIM Yogyakarta and PERSIS Solo supporters is a conflict that has been going on for a long time. These conflicts often cause casualties and damage to public facilities. Severe sanctions do not frighten supporters and a deterrent to take anarchic actions. To overcome this, preventive efforts (non-penal) can be used as an alternative in resolving supporter conflicts. Through socio-legal research, this paper aims to find out more about non-penal countermeasures based on an analysis of the factors that cause supporter conflict. The results of the study, it is known that non-penal countermeasures can be done by emphasizing the efforts of the supporter development process as part of the criminal politics of prevention without punishment. The coaching process is based on three factors that cause supporting conflicts, namely based on the nature, position of the actors, and diversity of society. The police and supporter also have a strategic role in preventing criminal acts to minimize the occurrence of clashes between supporters. These roles include providing security personnel, conducting sweeping, and coordinating between related parties.]]>
<![CDATA[Vote Buying dalam Pemilihan Kepala Desa dan Upaya Penangkalannya : Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Tabanan ]]>
<![CDATA[Piers Andreas Noak]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i02.p16
<![CDATA[This article aims to analyze the potential for the practice of buying and selling votes or vote buying in the election of village heads or Perbekel in Tabanan Regency, Bali. This article explores regulatory aspects, views, and variations that occur in society, including efforts to reduce the practice of buying and selling votes. In recent years, in every holding of village head elections or perbekel in several areas, there are always vote buying practices and various activities. To answer this question, the study in this article uses empirical legal research which analyzes the implementation of the law regarding village head elections regulation in reality in the community with a focus on two villages in Tabanan Regency, Bali. This article uses interview and documentation for data collection techniques and uses a rational choice institutionalism framework. With this theoretical framework, it tells the empirical facts that the calculated practice of buying votes is determined by calculations that are all profitable for the candidates and the voters. The opportunity for this practice to occur is considered to be large, carried out by perbekel officers with incumbent status. There are several offers to reduce this problem, namely by using a special website that manages the election of perbekel by loading the profile of the perbekel candidates specifically to ensure the accountability of the election. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis potensi terjadinya praktik jual beli suara atau vote buying dalam pemilihan kepala desa atau perbekel di Kabupaten Tabanan, Provinsi Bali. Artikel ini mengeksplorasi aspek regulasi, pandangan, dan ragam benturan yang terjadi di masyarakat termasuk upaya-upaya pereduksian praktik jual beli suara tersebut. Pada beberapa tahun belakangan, pada setiap penyelenggaraan pemilihan kepala desa atau perbekel serentak pada beberapa wilayah senantiasa di ikuti oleh adanya praktik-praktik jual beli suara atau vote buying dengan beragam bentuk aktifitasnya. Untuk menjawab persoalan tersebut, studi pada artikel ini menggunakan penelitian hukum empiris dimana menganalisis implementasi hukum terkait pelaksanaan regulasi pemilihan kepala desa dalam realitasnya di masyarakat dengan fokus dua desa di Kabupaten Tabanan, Bali. Artikel ini menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data wawancara dan dokumentasi serta dianalisis menggunakan frame teoritik rational choice institusionalism. Melalui frame teoritik ini memperlihatkan fakta empirik bahwa praktik vote buying dianggap turut ditentukan oleh kalkulasi-kalkulasi yang serba menguntungkan baik bagi kalangan kandidat maupun masyarakat pemilihnya. Peluang terjadinya praktik ini dianggap berpotensi besar dilakukan oknum perbekel yang berstatus incumbent. Terdapat beberapa tawaran mereduksi persoalan ini , yaitu dengan pemanfaatan website khusus yang mengelola pemilihan perbekel dengan memuat profil perbekel secara khusus untuk menjamin akuntabilitas pemilihan.]]>
<![CDATA[The Form of The Presidential System in Indonesia: A Comparative Study of Several Countries ]]>
<![CDATA[Putu Gede Arya Sumerta Yasa]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i02.p07
<![CDATA[The purpose of this research is to determine how the form of the presidential system adopted by Indonesia and to compare the presidential system in Indonesia with several countries such as the United States, South Korea and the Philippines. The research method used in this study is a normative legal research which used statute approach, conceptual approach, and comparative approach to examine the vacuum of norm regarding the presidential system in Indonesia. The results show that Indonesia adheres to non pure presidential system, namely a quasi-presidential system which is indicated by the horizontal relationship between state institutions. In the implementation of the presidential government system, every country has different characteristics so that it undergoes modifications depending on the situation and conditions of the country that adheres to it. When Indonesian presidential system compared with the United States, South Korea and the Philippines, it will show the special characteristics and weaknesses of each country. The indicators used in comparing presidential systems in several countries are the form of the presidential system, special characteristics, and weaknesses which in general are excess power in the executive.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementasi Perlindungan Hukum Atas Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Terhadap Pekerja Pelaku Industri Pariwisata Bali Akibat Dampak Covid-19 ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Putu Suci Meinarni]]>;
<![CDATA[Emmy Febriani Thalib]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i02.p12
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is to analyze the provision regarding the Termination of Employment and see its effectiveness in the field, especially with the current regulations regarding the current regulations concerning the Protection and the Business Continuity of Worker / Labor in related to the Prevention and Control of Covid-19 outbreaks. This research is using sociological juridical research with a statute approach and an approach called Live Case Study. The research show, these current regulations could not force employers to minimize the employment termination yet many of formal employees being laid off and terminated without any severance payment. Therefore, the government should coordinate with relevant ministries / institutions, especially the Ministry of Manpower as well the Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy in order to prioritize in providing protection and assistance of government programs for employers and employees to minimize cases in term of the Termination of Employment. Tujuan studi ini adalah untuk menganalisis ketentuan mengenai Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja serta melihat efektifitasnya di lapangan terlebih dengan adanya regulasi terkini tentang Perlindungan dan Kelangsungan Usaha Pekerja / Tenaga Kerja terkait Pencegahan dan Pengendalian wabah Covid-19 khususnya untuk Provinsi Bali yang selalu mengandalkan industri Pariwisata sebagai komoditas utamanya. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis-sosiologis dengan pendekatan Peraturan perundang-undangan dan Live Case Study. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peraturan normatif yang berlaku tidak dapat memaksa para pelaku usaha untuk meminimalkan pemutusan hubungan kerja, namun banyak tenaga kerja yang terkena PHK dan diberhentikan tanpa pembayaran pesangon. Oleh karena itu, pemerintah perlu berkoordinasi dengan kementerian / lembaga terkait, khususnya Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan serta Kementerian Pariwisata dan Ekonomi Kreatif agar dapat memprioritaskan dalam memberikan perlindungan dan bantuan program pemerintah kepada pengusaha dan pegawai untuk meminimalisir kasus PHK tersebut.]]>
