JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Articles
16 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 11 No 1 (2022)"
:
16 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Pengujian Tindakan Faktual dan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum oleh Pemerintah dalam Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara ]]>
<![CDATA[Ridwan Ridwan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p07
<![CDATA[This research aims to analyse the basis of examination to the government’s factual and unlawful actions and the compensation determination due to both actions in the Indonesian administrative court system. It is normative legal research that studies the principles and norms with the sources of law as the main objects. Various approaches used in this research are the statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The result shows that the regulations and good governance principles or governance legal norms are still used as the basis in assessing and examining the government’s factual and unlawful actions (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad) in the administrative court system. It also shows that the compensation determination remains laid on the Government Regulation Number 43 the Year 1991 concerning the Compensation and its Procedure in Administrative Court and the Treasury Minister Regulation Number 1129/KMK.01/1991 concerning the Procedural of Imposing Administrative Court Decision on Compensation Payment. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis dasar pengujian terhadap tindakan faktual dan perbuatan melanggar hukum oleh pemerintah dalam sistem PTUN dan menganalisis penentuan ganti kerugian dalam perkara tindakan faktual dan perbuatan melanggar hukum oleh pemerintah dalam sistem PTUN. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif yaitu penelitian terhadap kaidah atau hukumnya itu sendiri dan asas hukum positif, dengan menjadikan bahan-bahan hukum (sources of the law) sebagai objek kajian. Metode pendekatan yang akan digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), dan secara tidak langsung digunakan pula pendekatan kasus (case approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa dasar penilaian dan pengujian terhadap tindakan faktual dan/atau perbuatan melanggar hukum oleh pemerintah (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad) dalam sistem PTUN sampai saat ini masih berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dan AUPB atau norma hukum pemerintahan. kerugian dalam konteks tindakan faktual dan perbuatan melanggar hukum oleh pemerintah dalam sistem PTUN sampai saat ini masih menggunakan ketentuan PP No. 43 Tahun 1991 tentang Ganti Rugi dan Tata Cara Pelaksanaannya pada PTUN dan Keputusan Menteri Keuangan No. 1129/KMK.01/1991 tentang Tata Cara Pembayaran Ganti Rugi Pelaksanaan Keputusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terdaftar Akibat Tindakan Trademarks Squatting di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Tania Novelin]]>;
<![CDATA[Pande Yogantara S]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p12
<![CDATA[The purpose of this paper is the purpose of this paper is to examine, analyze and elaborate the concept of trademarks squatting and legal protection of registered trademarks due to trademarks squatting in Indonesia. This paper is a paper using a normative research method using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and an analytical approach. The results show that the concept of the Trademarks Squatting Act is not regulated in the provisions of the Trademarks and Geographical Indications Act, but in international settings, WIPO explains that trademark squatting is the act of registering or using a mark which is generally a well-known foreign mark, where the mark has not been registered in a country or the mark has been registered but has never been used by the owner of the mark concerned. As well as legal protection for registered marks as a result of trademark squatting in Indonesia, namely being able to file a lawsuit against other parties who unlawfully use a Mark that has similarities in principle or in its entirety for similar goods and/or services in the form of a claim for compensation; and/or Termination of all actions related to the use of the Mark in accordance with the provisions of Article 83 paragraph 1 of the Law on Marks and Geographical Indications. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk mengkaji, menganalisa dan mengelaborasi konsep tindakan trademarks squatting serta perlindungan hukum terhadap merek terdaftar akibat tindakan trademarks squatting di Indonesia. Tulisan ini merupakan tulisan dengan menggunakan metode peneltiian normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach) dan pendekatan analisis (analytical approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Konsep Tindakan Trademarks Squatting tidak diatur dalam ketentuan Undang-Undang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis, namun dalam pengaturan internasional, WIPO menjelaskan bahwa trademark squatting adalah tindakan mendaftarkan atau menggunakan merek yang umumnya merupakan merek asing terkenal, di mana merek tersebut belum terdaftar di suatu negara atau merek tersebut sudah terdaftar namun tidak pernah digunakan oleh pemilik merek yang bersangkutan. Serta perlindungan hukum terhadap merek terdaftar akibat tindakan trademarks squatting di Indonesia yaitu dapat mengajukan gugatan terhadap pihak lain yang secara tanpa hak menggunakan Merek yang mempunyai persamaan pada pokoknya atau keseluruhannya untuk barang dan/atau jasa yang sejenis berupa Gugatan ganti rugi; dan/atau Penghentian semua perbuatan yang berkaitan dengan penggunaan Merek tersebut sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 83 ayat 1 UU Merek dan Indikasi Geografis.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Status of Venture Capital Fund Joint Investment Contract ]]>
<![CDATA[Michael Widyaputra]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p03
<![CDATA[Indonesian Venture capital companies can manage a Venture Fund (Dana Ventura) in the form of a Joint Investment Contract (Kontrak Investasi Bersama). Venture Fund is a financial instrument to collect and manage investor funds to be used for venture capital business activities. This Venture Fund is managed together with the Custodian Bank (Bank Kustodian) whose task is to store and administer the collected funds. The concept of a Venture Fund Joint Investment Contract is similar to that of a Limited Participation Mutual Funds Collective Investment Contract (Reksa Dana Berbentuk Kontrak Investasi Kolektif Penyertaan Terbatas) which also collects and manage funds together with Custodian Bank, then to invest one of which equity securities. However, Venture Fund has not been optimally exploited in Indonesia due to unclear legal status of the fund unlike the Limited Participation Mutual Funds. The issue lies on whether the fund can act in any transactions on its own. This different with Limited Participation Mutual Funds where the regulation is clear that Mutual Funds cannot act on its own. The purpose of this study is to determine the legal status of Venture Fund by comparing it with Limited Participation Mutual Funds. The research method used is a normative legal research method. The results of this study indicate that the Venture Fund is not a legal entity. Furthermore, in conducting venture capital business activities, Venture Fund should be represented by Custodian Bank, as is the case with Limited Participation Mutual Funds.]]>
<![CDATA[Penerapan Force Majeure dalam Pemenuhan isi Kontrak Akibat Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Desak Nyoman Dwi Indah Parwati]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Sarjana]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p08
<![CDATA[This study aimed to analyze the application of force majeure related to the fulfillment of contract contents in contracts due to the covid-19 that occurred in Indonesia. Normative legal research was the method chosen in this study. The result of study indicated that has been performed display that with the issuance of Presidential Decree No. 12 of 2020 concerning Determination of Non-Natural Disasters for the Spread of Corona Virus Disease 2019 by some people as a legal basis for determining covid-19 as force majeure. Debtors are allowed to submit to creditors that the Pandemic Covid-19 has made debtor difficult for to fulfill the contents of the contract. However, not all debtors can use Covid-19 as an excuse for force majeure, only debtors who do not have a steady income and are proven directly to creditors who can use the Covid-19 excuse as force majeure and good faith is needed from the debtor. In addition, related to the impact of force majeure on the fulfillment of the contents of the contract in a contract being disrupted, the process of fulfilling the contents of the contract is delayed due to the covid-19 pandemi but does not make a contract void or can be canceled. Penelitaian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa mengenai penerapan force majeure terkait pemenuhan isi kontrak dalam kontrak akibat pandemi covid-19 yang terjadi di Indonesia. Penelitian hukum normative merupakan metode yang dipilih dalam penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dikeluarkannya kebijakan tentang Penetapan Bencana Non-Alam Penyebaran Corona Virus Disease 2019 melalui Keppres No. 12 Tahun 2020 oleh sebagian masyarakat dijadikan acuan dasar hukum penetapan covid-19 sebagai alasan force majeure. Debitur diperbolehkan mengajukan kepada kreditur bahwa adanya pandemi covid-19 menyebabkan debitur sulit untuk memenuhi isi kontrak. Namun tidak semua debitur bisa menggunakan covid-19 sebagai alasan force majeure, hanya debitur yang tidak memiliki penghasilan tetap saja dan dibuktikan langsung kepada kreditur yang bisa menggunakan alasan covid-19 sebagai force majeure serta diperlukan adanya itikad baik dari debitur. Selain itu terkait dengan dampak force majeure terhadap pemenuhan isi kontrak dalam suatu kontrak menjadi terganggu, proses pemenuhan isi kontrak menjadi tertunda akibat pandemi covid-19 namun tidak menjadikan suatu kontrak menjadi batal atau dapat dibatalkan.]]>
<![CDATA[The Enforcement of Environmental Criminal Law in Customary Law Community ]]>
<![CDATA[Sagung Putri M.E. Purwani]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p13
<![CDATA[The purpose of this paper was to examine and analyze the regulation of criminal sanctions in environmental crimes by customary law community, and analyze customary law community policies in the settlement of environmental crimes. This paper was normative research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicated that Based on all the abovementioned, it can be concluded that the regulation of Environmental Criminal Enforcement by Customary Law Community has been regulated in the provisions of environmental laws and regulations, namely Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management, Law No. 41 of 1999 concerning Forestry, and Regulation of the Minister of Environment and Forestry Number 32 of 2015 concerning Forests. Further, there are also environmental criminal laws which are regulated in other sectoral laws relating to the environment and natural resources. Regarding the Settlement of Environmental Crimes by Customary law community, it is done through efforts to arrange Deliberations and Restorations in the balance of nature and the environment that were previously damaged and polluted by customary law community. Thus, there is a need for recognition and management of customary forests that must be carried out professionally and sustainably based on local wisdom. Hence, it is expected to be able to improve equitable welfare.]]>
<![CDATA[Sub Contractors in Government Procurement Contract of Goods and Services ]]>
<![CDATA[Merry Tjoanda]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p04
<![CDATA[This research aimed to review and analyze the position of sub contractors in government procurement contract of goods/services and how the legal relationship between sub contractors and contractors in government procurement contract of goods/services. The research method used normative juridical. The approach used are the statute approach and the conceptual approach. From the results of this research it was concluded that; (1) Subcontractors as subjects of contract law are regulated in various laws and regulations, especially those government procurement contract of goods/services. This subcontractors have legal standing in contractual relationships, especially in government procurement contracts of goods/services. (2) The subcontractor has a legal relationship with the Contractor as a service provider based on the subcontract but has no legal relationship with Commitment-Making Officer (CMO)/PPK as a service user.]]>
<![CDATA[Aspek De Jure Perlindungan Lagu dan Royalti Pasca Pemberlakuan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 56 Tahun 2021 ]]>
<![CDATA[Anak Agung Sagung Ngurah Indradewi]]>;
<![CDATA[Anak Agung Istri Ari Atu Dewi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p09
<![CDATA[This writing aimed to analyze, identify and elaborate the legal protection of song and music based on the prevailing law concerning Copyrights and the mechanism of collecting and distributing of royalty after the enactment of Government Regulation Number 56 of 2021. This article was normative legal research using statutory approach, conceptual approach and analytical approach. The study indicated that song is one of the objects of copyright which is protected under the provision of Article 40-point d of the Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. The enactment of Government Regulation Number 56 of 2021 emphasized that the mechanism for managing royalties for songs and/or music is carried out through the National Collective Management Institutions. To realize a royalty management for songs and/or music, it is necessary to have awareness on the part of the Author, Copyright Holder, and Related Rights owners to carry out the Recording of songs and/or music and there needs to be awareness from parties who use songs and/or music in a form of public service that is commercial in nature to fulfill obligations in the form of royalty payments to Authors, Copyright Holders and/or Related Rights owners through National Collective Management Institutions. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk menganalisis, mengidenfitikasi, dan mengelaborasi perlindungan hukum atas lagu berdasarkan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait hak cipta, dan mekanisme pemungutan dan pengelolaan royalti setelah diberlakukannya Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 56/2021. Artikel ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konsep serta pendekatan analisis. Studi menunjukkan bahwa lagu merupakan objek perlindungan hak cipta sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 40 huruf d Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Dengan diberlakukannya Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 56 Tahun 2021 mempertegas bahwa mekanisme pengelolaan royalti atas lagu dan/atau musik dilakukan melalui Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif Nasional. Untuk mewujudkan suatu pengelolaan royalti atas lagu dan/atau musik, diperlukan adanya kesadaran dari pihak Pencipta, Pemegang Hak Cipta, dan pemilik Hak Terkait untuk melakukan Pencatatan atas lagu dan/atau musik dan perlu adanya kesadaran dari pihak yang memanfaatkan lagu dan/atau musik dalam bentuk layanan public yang bersifat komersial untuk melakukan pemenuhan kewajiban berupa pembayaran royalti kepada Pencipta, Pemegang Hak Cipta dan/atau pemilik Hak Terkait melalui LMKN.]]>
<![CDATA[Pemidanaan Wajib Pajak Atas Pelanggaran Kewajiban Perpajakan (Perspektif Undang-Undang Ketentuan Umum Tata Cara Perpajakan) ]]>
<![CDATA[I Made Walesa Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[Marcus Priyo Gunarto]]>;
<![CDATA[Dahliana Hasan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p14
<![CDATA[Article aimed to examine the restriction between tax administration violations with tax crimes in order to prevent or minimize disparities in tax law enforcement, for more objective and have legal certainty in distinguishing or determining to what extent a violation of tax administration provisions classified as a tax crime. The type of research is normative research with a statutory and consept approach. The results of study indicated that the restriction of a tax administration violation committed by a taxpayer therefore, it can become a tax crime is based on whether it has fulfilled the formulation of offense element in Article 38, Article 39, and Article 39A of the Tax Law (UU KUP). Beside the fulfillment of the article formulation, there is a policy of the tax authorities or law enforcement officers in accordance with the Tax Law, which is very decisive to become a criminal act by prioritizing the principles of taxation, administrative penal law by the ultimum remedium character. The policy concerns the authority to stop cases in the process of examining preliminary evidence and stopping investigations, to be resolved administratively by paying the repayment added with fine. Even if criminal law is enforced, fines are prioritized over imprisonment or confinement, as the benefit principle is prioritized in tax law enforcement. Penulisan artikel bertujuan mengkaji batasan pelanggaran administrasi perpajakan dengan tindak pidana pajak, sehingga dapat mencegah ataupun meminimalisir disparitas penegakan hukum perpajakan agar lebih objektif dan berkepastian hukum dalam membedakan ataupun menentukan sejauh mana suatu pelanggaran ketentuan administrasi perpajakan dapat menjadi tindak pidana perpajakan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa batasan suatu pelanggaran administrasi perpajakan yang dilakukan oleh wajib pajak sehingga dapat menjadi suatu tindak pidana perpajakan adalah berdasarkan apakah telah memenuhi rumusan unsur tindak pidana dalam Pasal 38, Pasal 39, dan Pasal 39A UU KUP. Disamping pemenuhan rumusan pasal tersebut, ada kebijakan fiskus ataupun aparat penegak hukum sesuai UU KUP yang sangat menentukan untuk menjadi tindak pidana dengan mengedepankan prinsip perpajakan, administrative penal law yang karakternya ultimum remedium. Kebijakan tersebut, menyangkut kewenangan untuk menghentikan perkara pada proses pemeriksaan bukti permulaan dan penghentian penyidikan, untuk dapat diselesaikan secara administratif dengan membayar pelunasan ditambah denda. Bahkan jika dilakukan penegakan hukum pidana maka sanksi pidana denda diprioritaskan daripada penjara maupun kurungan, sebagaimana asas kemanfaatan yang lebih diutamakan dalam penegakan hukum perpajakan.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Inconsistency over the Blood Donor Unit and Blood Transfusion Unit Existence in Realizing Indonesia Blood Transfusion Services Authority ]]>
<![CDATA[I Made Wirya Darma]]>;
<![CDATA[I Gede Agus Kurniawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Gede Eka Rusdi Antara]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p05
<![CDATA[This study specifically focusing on uncertainty and inconsistencies that faced on blood transfusion services caused by the existence of Blood Donor Unit and Blood Transfusion Unit led by existing norms on the statutory laws. The Act on Health, the Blood Service Government Regulation, and the Minister of Health Regulation No. 83/2014 assign blood services to the Blood Transfusion Unit. However, the existence of the Red Cross Law along with the Red Cross Government Regulation normalizes the task of providing blood services to the Blood Donor Unit, without confirming legal certainty for the Blood Transfusion Unit. This has triggered the issue of legal inconsistency towards those who carry out blood services, so a solution is needed through this study. This study is based on normative juridical legal research supported by a statutory approach as well as a legal conceptual approach. The results of this study are there are two options that can be formulated in the future, namely by basing the principle of legal preference lex posteriori derogate legi priori or based on the technique of formulating statutory norms according to the principle of clarity of formulation, certainty of the formulation of explanations, transitional provisions, closing provisions and phrases that selected in determining the executor of blood service duties.]]>
<![CDATA[Meninjau Keabsahan Kepemilikan Akta Perseroan Terbatas Persekutuan Modal dengan Saham Harta Bersama Suami Istri ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Made Lalita Sri Devi]]>;
<![CDATA[I Ketut Westra]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p10
<![CDATA[This study was intended to provide the understanding of the legal validity of the private company of capital partnership established by married couple and the effect resulted by this company. This study used the normative legal research regarding the issues of norms that occured with a norm vacuum. This study contained several legal sources such as primary legal sources that study the limited liability company and secondary legal sources that examined the literature as well as the scientific works. The result of this study indicated that the legals of Limited Liability Corporation does not specifically regulate the holdings prohibition of the married couple without having marriage agreement, however, if the seperation of the asset is unavailable within the ownership of the married couple Limited Liability Corporation shares, it will infringe the Legals of Limited Liability Corporation, this is because of the capital partnership is not included in the Limited Liability Corporation. The consequence of Limited Liability Corporation with only one sharesholder will influence the status of the company because the company as a legal corporation becomes a Limited Liability Corporation that is not taking any responsible as a legal corporation anymore, it will be dismissed by the court because it leads to Chapter 7 number 6 of The Legals of Limited Liability Company. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pemahaman terkait keabsahan hukum akta Perseroan Terbatas yang didirikan suami istri dan akibat hukum dari suatu Perseroan Terbatas persekutuan modal yang didirikan suami istri. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif terkait persoalan norma yang terjadi dengan suatu kekosongan norma. Penelitian ini termuat dengan beberapa sumber hukum yaitu sumber hukum primer yang mengakaji UU PT dan sumber hukum sekunder yang mengkaji literatur maupun karya ilmiah. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa Undang-undang Perseroan Terbatas tidak mengatur mengkhusus larangan dengan saham suami istri tanpa memiliki perjanjian kawin, akan tetapi jika akta kepemilikian Perseroan Terbatas sahamnya suami istri tidak memiliki pemisahan harta akan menyalahi aturan Undang-undang Perseroan Terbatas hal ini timbul dikarenakan tidak adanya persekutuan modal pada Perseroan Terbatas. Akibat dari suatu Perseroan Terbatas yang pemegang sahamnya hanya satu pendiri akan mempengaruhi pada status dari Perseroan Terbatas tersebut karena Perseroan Terbatas sebagai badan hukum menjadi Perseroan Terbatas tidak memiliki tanggung jawab sebagai badan hukum lagi, hal seperti ini dapat dibubarkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri karena telah merujuk pada Pasal 7 angka 6 Undang-ndang Perseroan Terbatas.]]>
