cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
ISSN : 25409050     EISSN : 25409069     DOI : -
Core Subject : Religion,
Religion
Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis dengan nomor E-ISSN 2540-9069 dan P-ISSN 2540-9050 adalah jurnal ilmiah yang memuat kajian, hasil penelitian dan publikasi akademik di bidang hadis dan ilmu hadis. Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Jurusan Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung bekerjasama dengan Asosiasi Ilmu Hadis (ASILHA) 2 kali dalam setahun yakni bulan Maret dan September.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 164 Documents
 13   14   15   16   17 
Quantifying Sectarian Bias: A Methodological Analysis of Jarh wa Ta'dil on Abdurrazzaq al-San'ani Alkadri, Alkadri; Hadari, Hadari
Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/diroyah.v10i2.51660

Abstract

The conflict of Abdurrazzaq's undeniable scientific authority and claims of his theological deviation by hadith critics. As a result, some criticized (jarh) and others praised him (ta'dil). Therefore, research on Abdurrazzaq is needed. The aim is to create a map to identify sectarian bias in jarh wa ta'dil and its causal factors. The research method uses library research with a sanad criticism approach. Data analysis is in the form of content analysis by classifying the percentage of jarh wa ta'dil levels and providing their meaning. The data source is the book Rijal al-Hadith. Results: jarh wa ta'dil quantification map: (1) there are 36.8% who accept and do not report Shia, (2) there are 36.8% who accept but report Shia, (3) there are 10.6% who reject and do not report Shia, (4) there are 10.6% who reject but report Shia, (5) there are 5.2% who reject due to old age. Conclusion: The majority of hadith critics accept Abdurrazaq's narration due to Abdurrazaq's intellectual integrity, the influence of his Sunni teachers, and the distance from the tahkim event. Sectarian bias occurs in the form of Shia claims. Most hadith critics are moderate, accepting Abdurrazaq's narration, and some are radical, rejecting Abdurrazaq due to their skeptical views of Shia. Moderation, open-mindedness, and objectivity in hadith studies have transcended sectarian boundaries. This study has broad methodological implications for refining the concept of 'adl in relation to other sectarian narrators in contemporary hadith discourse.
Methodology for Compiling Hadith in the 4th Century Hijri: Integrating Transmission and Practical Orientation in Ibn Sunnī’s Work Nasution, Ismail; Zuhri, Ahmad; Ardiansyah, Ardiansyah; Manik, Zulfirman
Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/diroyah.v10i1.54358

Abstract

The development of hadith codification in the 3rd to 4th centuries of the Hijri marked an increasingly complex process of systematising the transmission of religious knowledge through various hadith compilations. However, modern hadith studies tend to focus on the criticism of the sanad (chain of transmission) and the evaluation of narrators’ authority. In contrast, the methodological dimensions of compilation methods, thematic organisation, and the practical orientation of hadith compilations are less thoroughly analysed. This gap is particularly evident in studies of the works of 4th-century Hijri scholars who integrated the legitimacy of sanad transmission with the practical needs of the community. This study aims to analyse the methodology of hadith compilation in the works of Ibn Sunnī and to explain how the integration of the legitimacy of sanad transmission and a practical orientation shaped the structure of hadith compilations during that period. The study uses a qualitative approach, with textual analysis and the historiography of hadith, through an examination of the thematic structure of the books, the configuration of the sanad transmission network, and variations in hadith redaction in Ibn Sunnī’s works. The results show that Ibn Sunnī’s compilation methodology exhibits three main characteristics. First, the pattern of hadith transmission relies on a broad and multi-layered network of teachers that strengthens the legitimacy of the sanad and reflects intellectual mobility within the 4th-century AH transmission network. Second, the hadith compilation is structured thematically, with a strong orientation towards worship, prayer, and daily ethics, so that it functions as a practical guide for the religious life of Muslim communities. Third, the text’s editing strategy preserves variations in hadith redactions across different transmission lines, representing the dynamics of transmission in the oral and written traditions. These findings suggest that Ibn Sunnī’s compilation functioned not only as an archive of sanad transmission but also as a pedagogical tool that connects scholarly authority with the religious needs of the community, thus making an important contribution to the understanding of the historiography and methodology of classical hadith compilation
Hadith of Ghadir Khum and the Framing of Shia Teachings: A Comparative Analysis of Panjimas.com and ShiahIndondesia.com from Robert M. Entman’s Perspective Istifarin, Nur Annisa; Muhid, Muhid
Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/diroyah.v10i2.51841

Abstract

The theological divergence between Sunni and Shia interpretations of the Hadith of Ghadir Khum remains a persistent issue in Islamic discourse, particularly within the digital sphere. This study aims to analyze how two online Islamic media portals, Panjimas.com and ShiahIndonesia.com, frame the Ghadir Khum event and its implications for leadership in Islam. The research applies Robert M. Entman's framing model, encompassing four elements: define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgment, and treatment recommendation. The findings reveal that Panjimas.com frames the Hadith of Ghadir Khum as a theological misinterpretation by the Shia that requires correction. It emphasizes the term mawla as meaning "helper" rather than "leader," thus taking a delegitimizing stance toward Shia claims of imamate. Conversely, ShiahIndonesia.com employs an affirmative framing, interpreting Ghadir Khum as a spiritual and social declaration of Ali bin Abi Thalib's leadership and as a continuation of prophetic authority within the doctrine of imamate. Consequently, both media represent contrasting ideological orientations: Panjimas.com upholds Sunni orthodoxy through a discourse of rejection, while ShiahIndonesia.com reinforces Shia identity through a discourse of affirmation. These differing frames demonstrate that the Hadith of Ghadir Khum functions not merely as a religious text but as a symbolic arena of meaning and authority contestation within the contemporary Islamic digital public sphere.
The Construction of Ithbat-bila-Kayf Theology: An Analysis of Imam Bukhari’s Theological Methodology in the Book Khalq Af’al al-Ibad Rodliyana, M. Dede; Arken, M. Rachmatullah
Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/diroyah.v10i2.54296

Abstract

This study seeks to examine the theological thought of Imam al-Bukhari in his work, Khalq Af’āl al-’Ibād, amidst the escalation of theological conflicts in the 3rd century AH. The primary focus of this study is to map out the Ithbāt bilā Kayf methodology advocated by al-Bukhārī as a response to the Ta’ṭīl (denial of attributes) doctrine of the Jahmiyyah and the threat of anthropomorphism (tashbīh). This study employs a qualitative method through a descriptive-analytical approach and the technique of content analysis (content analysis). This study found that al-Bukhārī constructs a precise theological argument by distinguishing between the actions of servants (af’āl al-’ibād) as created beings and the Qur’an as Kalamullāh, which is not created. The results of the study indicate that al-Bukhārī systematically organised the traditions of the Salaf to affirm the attributes of Allah, including the attributes of Istiwa’, Knowledge, and Voice (Ṣawt), without engaging in anthropomorphism. This study concludes that al-Bukhārī’s theological framework constitutes a model of “Textual Kalam” which forms the foundation of moderate Sunni orthodoxy (wasaṭiyyah), successfully harmonising submission to the text of revelation with the recognition of the reality of creation

Page 17 of 17 | Total Record : 164

 13   14   15   16   17 

Filter by Year

2016 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol 9, No 1 (2024): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis (In Progress) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol 7, No 2 (2023): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol 7, No 1 (2022) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022) Vol 6, No 2 (2022) Vol 6, No 1 (2021) Vol 5, No 2 (2021) Vol 5, No 1 (2020) Vol 4, No 2 (2020) Vol 4, No 1 (2019) Vol 3, No 2 (2019) Vol 3, No 1 (2018): september Vol 3, No 1 (2018): september Vol 2, No 2 (2018) Vol 2, No 1 (2017) Vol 1, No 2 (2017) Vol 1, No 1 (2016) More Issue