cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
ISSN : 25409050     EISSN : 25409069     DOI : -
Core Subject : Religion,
Religion
Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis dengan nomor E-ISSN 2540-9069 dan P-ISSN 2540-9050 adalah jurnal ilmiah yang memuat kajian, hasil penelitian dan publikasi akademik di bidang hadis dan ilmu hadis. Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Jurusan Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung bekerjasama dengan Asosiasi Ilmu Hadis (ASILHA) 2 kali dalam setahun yakni bulan Maret dan September.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 168 Documents
 13   14   15   16   17 
Quantifying Sectarian Bias: A Methodological Analysis of Jarh wa Ta'dil on Abdurrazzaq al-San'ani Alkadri, Alkadri; Hadari, Hadari
Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/diroyah.v10i2.51660

Abstract

The conflict of Abdurrazzaq's undeniable scientific authority and claims of his theological deviation by hadith critics. As a result, some criticized (jarh) and others praised him (ta'dil). Therefore, research on Abdurrazzaq is needed. The aim is to create a map to identify sectarian bias in jarh wa ta'dil and its causal factors. The research method uses library research with a sanad criticism approach. Data analysis is in the form of content analysis by classifying the percentage of jarh wa ta'dil levels and providing their meaning. The data source is the book Rijal al-Hadith. Results: jarh wa ta'dil quantification map: (1) there are 36.8% who accept and do not report Shia, (2) there are 36.8% who accept but report Shia, (3) there are 10.6% who reject and do not report Shia, (4) there are 10.6% who reject but report Shia, (5) there are 5.2% who reject due to old age. Conclusion: The majority of hadith critics accept Abdurrazaq's narration due to Abdurrazaq's intellectual integrity, the influence of his Sunni teachers, and the distance from the tahkim event. Sectarian bias occurs in the form of Shia claims. Most hadith critics are moderate, accepting Abdurrazaq's narration, and some are radical, rejecting Abdurrazaq due to their skeptical views of Shia. Moderation, open-mindedness, and objectivity in hadith studies have transcended sectarian boundaries. This study has broad methodological implications for refining the concept of 'adl in relation to other sectarian narrators in contemporary hadith discourse.
Methodology for Compiling Hadith in the 4th Century Hijri: Integrating Transmission and Practical Orientation in Ibn Sunnī’s Work Nasution, Ismail; Zuhri, Ahmad; Ardiansyah, Ardiansyah; Manik, Zulfirman
Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/diroyah.v10i1.54358

Abstract

The development of hadith codification in the 3rd to 4th centuries of the Hijri marked an increasingly complex process of systematising the transmission of religious knowledge through various hadith compilations. However, modern hadith studies tend to focus on the criticism of the sanad (chain of transmission) and the evaluation of narrators’ authority. In contrast, the methodological dimensions of compilation methods, thematic organisation, and the practical orientation of hadith compilations are less thoroughly analysed. This gap is particularly evident in studies of the works of 4th-century Hijri scholars who integrated the legitimacy of sanad transmission with the practical needs of the community. This study aims to analyse the methodology of hadith compilation in the works of Ibn Sunnī and to explain how the integration of the legitimacy of sanad transmission and a practical orientation shaped the structure of hadith compilations during that period. The study uses a qualitative approach, with textual analysis and the historiography of hadith, through an examination of the thematic structure of the books, the configuration of the sanad transmission network, and variations in hadith redaction in Ibn Sunnī’s works. The results show that Ibn Sunnī’s compilation methodology exhibits three main characteristics. First, the pattern of hadith transmission relies on a broad and multi-layered network of teachers that strengthens the legitimacy of the sanad and reflects intellectual mobility within the 4th-century AH transmission network. Second, the hadith compilation is structured thematically, with a strong orientation towards worship, prayer, and daily ethics, so that it functions as a practical guide for the religious life of Muslim communities. Third, the text’s editing strategy preserves variations in hadith redactions across different transmission lines, representing the dynamics of transmission in the oral and written traditions. These findings suggest that Ibn Sunnī’s compilation functioned not only as an archive of sanad transmission but also as a pedagogical tool that connects scholarly authority with the religious needs of the community, thus making an important contribution to the understanding of the historiography and methodology of classical hadith compilation
Hadith of Ghadir Khum and the Framing of Shia Teachings: A Comparative Analysis of Panjimas.com and ShiahIndondesia.com from Robert M. Entman’s Perspective Istifarin, Nur Annisa; Muhid, Muhid
Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/diroyah.v10i2.51841

Abstract

The theological divergence between Sunni and Shia interpretations of the Hadith of Ghadir Khum remains a persistent issue in Islamic discourse, particularly within the digital sphere. This study aims to analyze how two online Islamic media portals, Panjimas.com and ShiahIndonesia.com, frame the Ghadir Khum event and its implications for leadership in Islam. The research applies Robert M. Entman's framing model, encompassing four elements: define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgment, and treatment recommendation. The findings reveal that Panjimas.com frames the Hadith of Ghadir Khum as a theological misinterpretation by the Shia that requires correction. It emphasizes the term mawla as meaning "helper" rather than "leader," thus taking a delegitimizing stance toward Shia claims of imamate. Conversely, ShiahIndonesia.com employs an affirmative framing, interpreting Ghadir Khum as a spiritual and social declaration of Ali bin Abi Thalib's leadership and as a continuation of prophetic authority within the doctrine of imamate. Consequently, both media represent contrasting ideological orientations: Panjimas.com upholds Sunni orthodoxy through a discourse of rejection, while ShiahIndonesia.com reinforces Shia identity through a discourse of affirmation. These differing frames demonstrate that the Hadith of Ghadir Khum functions not merely as a religious text but as a symbolic arena of meaning and authority contestation within the contemporary Islamic digital public sphere.
The Construction of Ithbat-bila-Kayf Theology: An Analysis of Imam Bukhari’s Theological Methodology in the Book Khalq Af’al al-Ibad Rodliyana, M. Dede; Arken, M. Rachmatullah
Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/diroyah.v10i2.54296

Abstract

This study seeks to examine the theological thought of Imam al-Bukhari in his work, Khalq Af’āl al-’Ibād, amidst the escalation of theological conflicts in the 3rd century AH. The primary focus of this study is to map out the Ithbāt bilā Kayf methodology advocated by al-Bukhārī as a response to the Ta’ṭīl (denial of attributes) doctrine of the Jahmiyyah and the threat of anthropomorphism (tashbīh). This study employs a qualitative method through a descriptive-analytical approach and the technique of content analysis (content analysis). This study found that al-Bukhārī constructs a precise theological argument by distinguishing between the actions of servants (af’āl al-’ibād) as created beings and the Qur’an as Kalamullāh, which is not created. The results of the study indicate that al-Bukhārī systematically organised the traditions of the Salaf to affirm the attributes of Allah, including the attributes of Istiwa’, Knowledge, and Voice (Ṣawt), without engaging in anthropomorphism. This study concludes that al-Bukhārī’s theological framework constitutes a model of “Textual Kalam” which forms the foundation of moderate Sunni orthodoxy (wasaṭiyyah), successfully harmonising submission to the text of revelation with the recognition of the reality of creation
Contesting Hadith Authority: The Socio-Religious Construction of Tabarruk in Muhammad Alawi al-Māliki’s Thought Rohmansyah Rohmansyah
Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/diroyah.v10i2.54526

Abstract

A controversial issue among scholars is tabarruk. Tabarruk is interpreted as taking blessings from people who are still alive and have died. For example, taking blessings from the Prophet, scholars and people who are considered noble. This research aims to analyze Muhammad Alawi al-Maliki's understanding of tabarruk. The research method used is a qualitative method based on library research data. The findings of this study explicitly show that the understanding of the hadith of Muhammad Alawi al-Maliki is very elastic. He used the hadiths and atsar of the companions as an argument for the evidence about tabarruk. Not only that, the hadiths of the Prophet that are used as evidence are not only valid but also hasan. Interestingly, he reads and understands the hadith not only textual but contextual. This is understood from his understanding of tabarruk. According to him, Tabarruk is not only done to the Prophet, the companions but also to pious people including wali and ulama. This aspect of understanding is influenced by his teachers and the conditions of social interaction, where he was born and lived, so that this ability of tabarruk is a rebuttal to those who consider him bid’ah.
The Epistemological Shift in Hadith Science: : An Analysis of al-Hakim’s Contribution and the Relevance of Nūr al-Dīn ‘Itr’s Classification Nur Kholis bin Kurdian; Ainun Nur Hasanah; Mohamed Zariouh; Abdul Rahman; Ghina Putri Ariani
Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/diroyah.v10i2.54783

Abstract

The science of ḥadīth holds a fundamental role in preserving the authenticity of the teachings of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, and its historical development reflects an ongoing epistemological evolution within Islamic scholarship. Nevertheless, studies addressing the epistemological shifts within the discipline of ḥadīth science remain limited and insufficiently explored. This research aims to examine the contribution of al-Ḥākim al-Naisābūrī (d. 405 AH/1014 CE) to the formation of the epistemology of ḥadīth science. Employing a qualitative methodology with a content analysis approach, the study analyzes Ma’rifat Ulūm al-Ḥadīth as the primary source. Secondary data are drawn from academic literature discussing the development of ḥadīth methodology, including Nūr al-Dīn ‘Itr’s (d. 1442 AH/2020 CE) Manhaj al-Naqd fī Ulūm al-Ḥadīth, which proposes a classificatory framework of six branches of ḥadīth studies. The findings demonstrate that al-Ḥākim systematized fifty-two branches of ḥadīth sciences, expanding the methodological foundations laid by al-Rāmahurmuzī in al-Muḥaddith al-Fāṣil, while simultaneously providing a basis for modern reinterpretation by Nūr al-Dīn ‘Itr. The identified epistemological shift reveals a transition from a descriptive and taqlīd-oriented approach toward a systematic-analytical framework, and subsequently toward a reflective and systemic methodological orientation. al-Ḥākim’s contribution thus occupies a pivotal position in the evolution of the epistemology of ḥadīth science and offers a conceptual foundation for the development of ḥadīth methodology in the contemporary era.
The Dynamics of Hadith Transmission in Basrah: A Critical Analysis of the Tadlis Phenomenon within the Structure of Ashahul Asanid Mukhlis Mukhlis
Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/diroyah.v10i2.55042

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dynamics of hadith transmission in Basrah during the pre-canonical period (ca. 40–150 AH), focusing specifically on the paradox between Basrah's reputation as a center of Ashahul Asanid (the most authentic chains of transmission) and the prevalence of the tadlis phenomenon among its narrators. This temporal delimitation is strategically chosen to capture transmission interactions before the tradition was codified in the canonical compilations of the 3rd century AH, enabling a more accurate reconstruction of the formation of hadith authority. Basrah is known for possessing golden chains of narration highly relied upon by hadith scholars; however, it is also noted by critics as a region with a significant rate of tadlis practice. This research employs a qualitative method with a jarh wa ta'dil approach and historical-critical analysis to dissect how hadith scholars such as Imam Bukhari, Muslim, and Shu'bah ibn Hajjaj navigated the validity of narrations amidst the uncertainty of the mudallis' an'anah. The findings indicate that although tadlis was rampant among central Basrah figures like Qatadah and Hasan al-Basri, the integrity of Ashahul Asanid remained preserved through strict selection mechanisms, shawahid (corroborating evidence), and specific methods of tahammul. This article concludes that the phenomenon of tadlis in Basrah does not necessarily undermine the credibility of the region's chains of transmission but rather demands the application of a more layered and cautious methodology of isnad criticism compared to other narration centers.  
Kontra Narasi Ekstremisme terhadap Hadis Larangan Memberi Salam kepada Yahudi dan Nasrani dan Perintah Mendesak Mereka di Jalan:: Telaah Kontekstual dengan Metode Pemahaman Yusuf al-Qaradhawi Arif Nursihah
Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/diroyah.v10i1.52376

Abstract

Pemahaman teks keagamaan yang cenderung ekstrem memiliki risiko yang cukup besar terhadap praktik keberagamaan. Tidak sedikit tindakan persekusi terhadap sesama penganut agama atau berlainan agama dilakukan atas nama agama. Salah satu teks keagamaan yang berpotensi menimbulkan kesalahpahaman adalah hadis riwayat Muslim tentang larangan memulai salam kepada Yahudi dan Nasrani dan perintah mendesaknya di jalan. Penelitian kualitatif ini merujuk kepada sumber utama al-Kutub al-Tis’ah dan Kayfa Nata’amal ma’a al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyah Ma’alim wa Dhawabith karya Yusuf al-Qaradhawi. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kritik hadis dan metode pemahaman Yusuf al-Qaradhawi. Berdasarkan metode pemahaman hadis al-Qaradhawi dengan delapan langkahnya yang terdiri dari 1) memahami hadis sesuai petunjuk al-Qur’an, 2) menghimpun hadis-hadis yang setema, 3) tarjih terhadap hadis-hadis yang kontradiktif, 4) memahami hadis sesuai dengan latar belakang, situasi dan kondisi serta tujuannya, 5) membedakan antara sarana yang berubah-ubah dan tujuan yang tetap, 6) membedakan antara ungkapan haqiqah dan majaz, 7) membedakan antara yang gaib dan yang nyata, dan 8) memastikan makna kata-kata dalam hadis, penelitian ini berhasil membuahkan pemahaman bahwa hadis tersebut perlu dipahami dalam konteks konflik, sehingga dalam konteks normal tetap dianjurkan untuk berbuat baik terhadap Yahudi maupun Nasrani. Pemahaman ini dirasa cukup moderat dan kontektual yang secara langsung kontra terhadap narasi ekstremis yang cenderung tekstual dan memberikan potensi tindakan kekerasan atas nama agama.

Page 17 of 17 | Total Record : 168

 13   14   15   16   17 

Filter by Year

2016 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol 9, No 1 (2024): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis (In Progress) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol 7, No 2 (2023): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol 7, No 1 (2022) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022) Vol 6, No 2 (2022) Vol 6, No 1 (2021) Vol 5, No 2 (2021) Vol 5, No 1 (2020) Vol 4, No 2 (2020) Vol 4, No 1 (2019) Vol 3, No 2 (2019) Vol 3, No 1 (2018): september Vol 3, No 1 (2018): september Vol 2, No 2 (2018) Vol 2, No 1 (2017) Vol 1, No 2 (2017) Vol 1, No 1 (2016) More Issue