Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Majalah Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Pemikiran Keagamaan Tajdid Jurnal Ekonomi, Akutansi dan Manajemen Nusantara Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan
Afaful Ummah
Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
Religion Humanities Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
A Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah Analysis of the Indonesian Ulema Council's Fatwa on Interfaith Greetings within Contemporary Human Rights Discourse Ahmad Musadad; Achmad Badarus Syamsi; Sibawaihi Sibawaihi; Holis Holis; Tri Pujiati; Anis Wahdati; Afaful Ummah
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 12, No 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v12i2.9610

Abstract

The Indonesian Ulema Council's (MUI) fatwa on interfaith greetings has generated significant debate within Indonesia's religious and socio-legal landscape, particularly regarding its implications for pluralism and interreligious harmony. This study conducts a Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah–based analysis of the fatwa within the broader discourse of contemporary human rights. Using a qualitative textual approach, it examines how the fatwa articulates the objectives of Islamic Law (maqāṣid), especially in balancing the protection of faith (ḥifẓ al-dīn) with the demands of social cohesion in a religiously diverse society. The analysis is positioned in dialogue with contemporary human rights norms, drawing selectively on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam (CDHRI) to contextualise the fatwa's normative orientation. The findings indicate that while Western human rights discourse tends to emphasise individual autonomy, freedom of expression, and the neutrality of religious symbols, Islamic human rights frameworks foreground the primacy of Sharīʿah in regulating religious interactions. Within this normative landscape, the MUI fatwa seeks to preserve core Islamic values while acknowledging the importance of maintaining respectful interfaith relations in a pluralistic society. Academically, this study contributes to current scholarship by demonstrating how Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah can serve as a mediating analytical framework between Islamic legal reasoning and global human rights discourse. It offers a more nuanced understanding of how fatwas function not merely as legal pronouncements but also as instruments of socio-religious negotiation in multicultural contexts. Moreover, the study provides a conceptual bridge for integrating maqāṣid-based reasoning into contemporary discussions of religious freedom, tolerance, and interfaith engagement, highlighting the potential of Islamic legal theory to enrich broader human rights conversations constructively in Muslim-majority societies.
Analyzing Differences and Interrelations between Maqāṣid Al-Qur’ān and Maqāṣid Al-Sharī‘ah Ahmad Anas; Afaful Ummah; Fasjud Syukroni
Majalah Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Pemikiran Keagamaan Tajdid Vol 28, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15548/tajdid.v28i2.12637

Abstract

This research addresses a persistent conceptual gap in the fields of Qur'anic exegesis (tafsīr) and Islamic legal theory, namely the overlap and lack of systematic distinction between maqāṣid al-Qur'ān (the objectives of the Qur'an) and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah (the objectives of Islamic law). Although both concepts are increasingly referenced in contemporary Islamic discourse—alongside the development of tafsīr maqāṣidī (purpose-based exegesis)—the theoretical boundaries, developmental genealogy, and methodological relationship between the two remain under-theorized in existing literature. This study presents a novel analytical comparison by examining both frameworks through six dimensions: definition, source, methodological approach, historical development, axiology, and operational function. Through a comparative-analytical qualitative study of classical and contemporary sources, this paper demonstrates that the relationship between the two is one of absolute generality and specificity (al-‘umūm wa al-khuṣūṣ al-muṭlaq), wherein every maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah is encompassed within the maqāṣid al-Qur’ān, but the reverse is not true. Furthermore, this research clarifies that tafsīr maqāṣidī functions as an interpretive tool (wasīlah) to uncover maqāṣid al-Qur’ān, particularly at the thematic, verse, and surah levels. By proposing this clearer typology and hierarchical model, this research contributes to a more precise and methodologically grounded application in Qur'anic interpretation, Islamic legal theory, and contemporary ijtihād.
Between Caution and Speculation Investor Personality Mapping among Muslim Millennial Crypto Traders Aldi Khusmufa Nur Iman; Umi Indasyah Zahro; Afaful Ummah; Hawa Gazani; Clara Devy Yulvia Ratna Sary; Afuza Medina
Jurnal Ekonomi, Akutansi dan Manajemen Nusantara Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Edisi Mei - Agustus
Publisher : Utiliti Project Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55338/jeama.v5i1.1060

Abstract

Volatility, digital information flows, and ethical debate make cryptocurrency decisions difficult to explain through the rational-investor assumption alone. The Bailard, Biehl, and Kaiser (BB&K) model was selected because its two dimensions, confidence and method of action from careful to impetuous, are directly observable in decision narratives. This study maps the psychographic profiles of Muslim millennial cryptocurrency investors in East Java and explains how market context shapes the visibility of investor types. It adopts an interpretive qualitative design with a phenomenological orientation. Thirteen active investors were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling. Anonymized interview summaries were thematically organized in NVivo and compared across cases before being mapped onto the five BB&K profiles. The results identify 2 Adventurers, 2 Celebrities, 3 Individualists, 6 Guardians, and no Straight Arrow. The distribution reveals polarization among speculative action, social dependence, independent analysis, and capital protection. The missing Straight Arrow suggests that investment personality is not expressed as a fixed trait. Volatility, continuous trading tempo, digital social pressure, and ethical reflection can intensify positions away from the moderate center. The study extends BB&K profiling to digital assets and supports personality-sensitive Islamic financial literacy that addresses the distinct behavioral vulnerability of each investor type.
Co-Authors Afuza Medina Ahmad Anas Ahmad Musadad Aldi Khusmufa Nur Iman Anis Wahdati Clara Devy Yulvia Ratna Sary Fasjud Syukroni Hawa Gazani Holis Holis Sibawaihi Sibawaihi Syamsi, Achmad Badarus Tri Pujiati Umi Indasyah Zahro