Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.666
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal KISA INSTITUE : Journal of Economics, Accounting, Business, Management, Engineering and Society Jesocin : Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Jesocin : Journal of Economics, Accounting, Business, Management, Engineering and Society Indonesian Journal of Innovation Multidisipliner Research
Adang Haryaman
Universitas Logistik dan Bisnis Internasional
Religion Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 27 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 27 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING INVESTMENT AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Adang Haryaman
Journal of Economics, Accounting, Business, Management, Engineering and Society Vol. 3 No. 8 (2026): Kisa Institute :August 2026
Publisher : PT. Kreatif Indonesia Satu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Infrastructure affects regional development when it changes the cost and reliability of moving people, goods, energy or information. The economic effect therefore depends not only on construction spending but on where the asset connects, how reliably it operates and whether firms can use the new capacity. Aims: This article examines the mechanisms that connect the topic to organizational or policy performance and identifies the conditions that make those mechanisms stronger or weaker. Research Method: A structured narrative review integrates peer-reviewed research with authoritative policy, statistical, and professional sources, including UN-Habitat (2024); World Bank (2026). Sources are coded by outcome, mechanism, boundary condition, and practical implication. Results and Conclusion: The synthesis indicates that outcomes are heterogeneous. Large projects are visible, but visibility is not the same as value. Infrastructure can underperform when demand forecasts are weak, maintenance is unfunded, land and social risks are mishandled or complementary local investments never arrive. Six recurring themes show that implementation quality, information, capability, and institutional context frequently matter as much as the headline policy or technology. Contribution: The article offers an evidence-based framework for regional governments, infrastructure agencies and investors that translates the literature into decision principles without claiming primary data that were not collected.
SMART MANUFACTURING AND PROCESS ENGINEERING: PRODUCTIVITY IN THE INDUSTRY 4.0 ERA Adang Haryaman; Nyoman Dwika Ayu Amrita
Journal of Economics, Accounting, Business, Management, Engineering and Society Vol. 3 No. 6 (2026): Kisa Institute : June 2026
Publisher : PT. Kreatif Indonesia Satu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Smart manufacturing creates value when digital information changes a production decision. Sensors and dashboards are useful only when they reduce downtime, improve yield, shorten changeovers, stabilize quality or make maintenance more predictable. Aims: This article examines the mechanisms that connect the topic to organizational or policy performance and identifies the conditions that make those mechanisms stronger or weaker. Research Method: A structured narrative review integrates peer-reviewed research with authoritative policy, statistical, and professional sources, including IEA (2024b); Sony & Naik (2020). Sources are coded by outcome, mechanism, boundary condition, and practical implication. Results and Conclusion: The synthesis indicates that outcomes are heterogeneous. Industry 4.0 projects can produce impressive demonstrations without improving plant economics. A technically successful pilot may fail at scale because data standards, maintenance skills, cybersecurity and process ownership were never resolved. Six recurring themes show that implementation quality, information, capability, and institutional context frequently matter as much as the headline policy or technology. Contribution: The article offers an evidence-based framework for manufacturing firms and process engineers that translates the literature into decision principles without claiming primary data that were not collected.
CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAM MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATION PERFORMANCE IN BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS Adang Haryaman
Journal of Economics, Accounting, Business, Management, Engineering and Society Vol. 3 No. 9 (2026): Kisa Institute : September 2026
Publisher : PT. Kreatif Indonesia Satu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Cross-functional teams are created because innovation problems do not fit neatly inside one department. Their advantage comes from combining different knowledge, but the same diversity also creates different vocabularies, priorities and definitions of a good solution. Aims: This article examines the mechanisms that connect the topic to organizational or policy performance and identifies the conditions that make those mechanisms stronger or weaker. Research Method: A structured narrative review integrates peer-reviewed research with authoritative policy, statistical, and professional sources, including Grant (1996); Edmondson (1999). Sources are coded by outcome, mechanism, boundary condition, and practical implication. Results and Conclusion: The synthesis indicates that outcomes are heterogeneous. Putting specialists in the same meeting does not integrate knowledge. Without clear goals, decision rights and psychological safety, cross-functional work can become a sequence of handoffs or a negotiation between departmental interests. Six recurring themes show that implementation quality, information, capability, and institutional context frequently matter as much as the headline policy or technology. Contribution: The article offers an evidence-based framework for cross-functional innovation teams that translates the literature into decision principles without claiming primary data that were not collected.
GREEN TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT AND OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY IN REGIONAL MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES Adang Haryaman; Arif Budi Raharja
Journal of Economics, Accounting, Business, Management, Engineering and Society Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Kisa Institute : February 2026
Publisher : PT. Kreatif Indonesia Satu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Green investment can reduce waste and energy intensity, but returns depend on process redesign, utilization, maintenance, workforce skills, and the quality of investment appraisal. Aim: The current analysis explains how the relationship between the focal practices and operational efficiency operates in regional manufacturing firms evaluating energy-efficient equipment, cleaner production, monitoring systems, and circular-resource practices. Method: A structured narrative review integrates peer-reviewed research and authoritative institutional sources. Published findings is coded by mechanism, boundary condition, practice development risk, and practical implication. Results: The synthesis identifies six linked mechanisms: energy and material productivity, life-cycle investment appraisal, process integration, maintenance capability, supplier and worker participation, measurement of environmental and operating outcomes. The synthesis indicates that outcomes depend less on nominal adoption than on practice development quality, governance, learning, and fit with local capacity. Conclusion: Decision makers should define the expected outcome, assign responsibility, establish a small set of auditable indicators, and revise the intervention when published findings contradicts its assumptions. Contribution: The synthesis provides a conditional framework without claiming primary data that were not collected.
STRATEGIC BUDGETING UNDER UNCERTAINTY: AN ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE MODEL FOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND CONTROL Wawan Ichwanudin; Adang Haryaman
Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Jesocin : January
Publisher : Organisasi Kreatif Indonesia Emas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Organizations increasingly depend on strategic budgeting under uncertainty, yet visible activity does not by itself demonstrate reliable capability or sustainable value. Fragmented responsibilities, weak evidence, and locally optimized metrics can cause decisions about control ownership to create unmanaged exposure elsewhere. Aim: This article develops a governance framework that connects strategic budgeting under uncertainty, control ownership, and professional judgment through five mutually reinforcing capabilities: decision-useful information, control ownership, professional judgment, traceable evidence, and assurance and review. Method: The paper uses an integrative conceptual review. Established management research, professional standards, and institutional guidance are synthesized through construct clarification, mechanism mapping, risk-control analysis, and proposition development. It does not report respondents, sample statistics, or causal estimates. Results: The synthesis indicates that performance becomes more resilient when decision rights, data definitions, controls, escalation paths, and learning routines are designed as one management system. The proposed model links each capability to observable evidence and balanced indicators. Contribution: The article offers an auditable implementation sequence and propositions that can be tested in later empirical research.
INTERNAL AUDIT AGILITY IN RAPIDLY CHANGING ORGANIZATIONS: A RISK-BASED CAPABILITY FRAMEWORK Adang Haryaman; Anggun Yolistina
Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Jesocin : April
Publisher : Organisasi Kreatif Indonesia Emas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Organizations increasingly depend on internal audit agility in rapidly changing organizations, yet visible activity does not by itself demonstrate reliable capability or sustainable value. Fragmented responsibilities, weak evidence, and locally optimized metrics can cause decisions about control ownership to create unmanaged exposure elsewhere. Aim: This article develops a governance framework that connects internal audit agility in rapidly changing organizations, control ownership, and professional judgment through five mutually reinforcing capabilities: decision-useful information, control ownership, professional judgment, traceable evidence, and assurance and review. Method: The paper uses an integrative conceptual review. Established management research, professional standards, and institutional guidance are synthesized through construct clarification, mechanism mapping, risk-control analysis, and proposition development. It does not report respondents, sample statistics, or causal estimates. Results: The synthesis indicates that performance becomes more resilient when decision rights, data definitions, controls, escalation paths, and learning routines are designed as one management system. The proposed model links each capability to observable evidence and balanced indicators. Contribution: The article offers an auditable implementation sequence and propositions that can be tested in later empirical research.
INTEGRATED REPORTING IN REGIONAL ENTERPRISES: CONNECTING STRATEGY, CAPITALS, PERFORMANCE, AND ACCOUNTABILITY Vip Paramarta; Adang Haryaman
Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Vol. 3 No. 8 (2026): Jesocin : August
Publisher : Organisasi Kreatif Indonesia Emas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Organizations increasingly depend on integrated reporting in regional enterprises, yet visible activity does not by itself demonstrate reliable capability or sustainable value. Fragmented responsibilities, weak evidence, and locally optimized metrics can cause decisions about control ownership to create unmanaged exposure elsewhere. Aim: This article develops a governance framework that connects integrated reporting in regional enterprises, control ownership, and professional judgment through five mutually reinforcing capabilities: decision-useful information, control ownership, professional judgment, traceable evidence, and assurance and review. Method: The paper uses an integrative conceptual review. Established management research, professional standards, and institutional guidance are synthesized through construct clarification, mechanism mapping, risk-control analysis, and proposition development. It does not report respondents, sample statistics, or causal estimates. Results: The synthesis indicates that performance becomes more resilient when decision rights, data definitions, controls, escalation paths, and learning routines are designed as one management system. The proposed model links each capability to observable evidence and balanced indicators. Contribution: The article offers an auditable implementation sequence and propositions that can be tested in later empirical research.
Co-Authors Anggun Yolistina Anggun Yolistina Anggun Yolistina Arif Budi Raharja Faisal Matriadi Ibnu Habib Maya Ariyant Maya Ariyanti Nia Riana Nyoman Dwika Ayu Amrita Ricky Agusiady Vip Paramarta Wawan Ichwanudin Wawan Ichwanudin Widia Asih Zaenal Aripin