Mardianis Mardianis
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

INTEGRATION OF EPISTEMOLOGY: MEDIEVAL ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVES ON THE HIERARCHY OF KNOWLEDGE, THE QUR’AN, AND PHILOSOPHY Armalena Armalena; Syahrul Fadli; Mardianis Mardianis; Saifullah Saifullah; Riki Saputra
Journal International Dakwah and Communication Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al-Hikmah Pariangan Batusangkar, West Sumatra, Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55849/jidc.v6i1.1205

Abstract

Mainstream narratives often label the Medieval period as a time of global intellectual stagnation, whereas Islamic civilization actually recorded a golden age through the integration of theology, philosophy, and science, reaching its pinnacle. This study seeks to reconstruct the concept of knowledge (‘ilm) in the medieval Islamic tradition and to map the interrelation between the authority of revelation and rationality. The author applies a library research method with content analysis techniques on the thoughts of key figures such as Al-Farabi, Ibn Rushd (Averroes), and Ibn al-Haytham. The analysis identifies three fundamental points: first, medieval Islamic epistemology was holistic, eliminating the dichotomy between sacred and profane spheres; second, the Qur’an serves as an epistemological constitution that legitimizes empirical observation through the doctrine of the "Two Books" (Tadwini and Takwini); and third, philosophy and science are positioned as collective obligations (fardhu kifayah) consistent with the message of revelation. This study concludes that addressing the crisis of modern knowledge dichotomy requires a renewed adoption of the classical spirit of epistemological integration.
AN ANALYSIS OF LAFZ AL-AMR WA AL-NAHY FROM THE PERSPECTIVES OF LINGUISTICS, QUR’ANIC EXEGESIS, AND USUL AL-FIQH Syahrul Fadli R; Yuliarni Yuliarni; Yuliani Yuliani; Ali Amat; Maigus Maigus; Mardianis Mardianis; Mira Salsabila; Mahyudin Ritonga; Rusydi Rusydi
Referensi Islamika: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): APRIL
Publisher : Academic Bright Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66053/ri.v4i2.1068

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the concepts of amr (command) and nahy (prohibition) by integrating the perspectives of Arabic linguistics, Qur'anic exegesis, and usul fiqh. It explains how linguistic structures, interpretive methods, and legal theories shape the understanding of these normative expressions in Islamic texts. This study employed a qualitative library research approach. Data were collected from the Qur'an, Hadith, classical and contemporary Qur’anic exegesis, Arabic linguistic literature, and usul fiqh references. The data were analyzed using content and conceptual analysis to identify, compare, and synthesize the meanings and legal implications of amr and nahy. The findings reveal that amr and nahy cannot be understood through grammatical analysis alone. Their meanings are constructed through the interaction of semantic, pragmatic, contextual, exegetical, and usul fiqh perspectives, producing a more comprehensive understanding of Islamic normative texts. This study contributes to interdisciplinary Islamic legal studies by providing an integrated analytical framework that connects language, interpretation, and legal reasoning for researchers, educators, and scholars. The originality of this study lies in its integrative conceptual framework, which synthesizes Arabic linguistic theory, Qur'anic interpretation, and usul fiqh methodology into a unified model. Unlike previous studies that examined amr and nahy from a single disciplinary perspective, this research offers a holistic understanding of the dynamic relationship between language, interpretation, and legal formulation in Islamic studies.