Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Andi Ibrahim Masdar's Strenght Analysis at the Golkar Party of Polewali Mandar Regency Asriani; Taufik Ikhsan; Nizar
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i3.1257

Abstract

The presence of the Golkar party in the areas is intrinsically linked to the authority and resources wielded by its chairman. In the Mandar mayoral race, Golkar, during the New Order period, leveraged Masdar's influence derived from a bureaucratic foundation. Following Masdar's leadership in the Golkar Party, his son Andi Ibrahim Masdar assumed leadership. Internal issues within the Golkar party prompted Andi Ibrahim Masdar to resign, thus leading to his replacement by Samsul Mahmud. Despite Andi Ibrahim Masdar's departure from the Golkar Party, he retains devoted cadres. This study seeks to evaluate the current influence of Andi Ibrahim Masdar within the Golkar Party. The power of Andi Ibrahim Masdar will be examined through the lens of Pierre Bourdieu's capital theory and Suzanna Keller's elite theory. This study employs a qualitative methodology through in-depth interviews with multiple informants knowledgeable about the issue to generate a thorough analysis. The study's findings indicate that Andi Ibrahim Masdar emerged as a pivotal elite inside the Golkar Party due to his possession of social capital, cultural capital, and financial capital, hence affording him distinct advantages over other party cadres.
LOCAL DEMOCRACY IN INDONESIA: A COMPARISON OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT REGIONAL HEAD ELECTION SYSTEMS Muhammad Gaus; Farhanuddin; Muhammad; Asriani; Rahmatullah
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): June
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper begins with the debate over direct and indirect elections in regional head elections in Indonesia. This study aims to compare the two electoral systems that have each been implemented in Indonesia, particularly in selecting leaders at the regional government level. The research method used is a qualitative descriptive approach , with the primary data source coming from a literature review of scientific journals, books, reports, official documents, and other relevant references. The results show that both systems have a legitimate basis to justify their adherence to democratic values. Ultimately, no system is perfect; the most important thing is to pursue the best strategy within whichever system is agreed upon.